If You Don’t Like Avatar and Anderson Cooper, You’re a Kook
Posted on | February 10, 2010 | 13 Comments
That’s the basic message of Jonathan Kay’s Newsweek column:
Like all populists, tea partiers are suspicious of power and influence, and anyone who wields them. Their villain list includes the big banks; bailed-out corporations; James Cameron, whose Avatar is seen as a veiled denunciation of the U.S. military; Republican Party institutional figures they feel ignored by, such as chairman Michael Steele; colleges and universities (the more prestigious, the more evil); TheWashington Post; Anderson Cooper; and even FOX News pundits, such as Bill O’Reilly, who have heaped scorn on the tea-party movement’s more militant oddballs.
One of the most bizarre moments of the recent tea-party convention came when blogger Andrew Breitbart delivered a particularly vicious fulmination against the mainstream media, prompting everyone to get up, turn toward the media section at the back of the conference room, and scream, “USA! USA! USA!” But the tea partiers’ well-documented obsession with President Obama has hardly been diffused by their knack for finding new enemies. . . .
Read the rest. Kay goes on to list his own enemies — Joseph Farah, Roy Moore, Pat Robertson — and seems to proceed on the assumption that all populist resentment of the elite is equally baseless and illegitimate, without regard to either (a) how the elite gain their influence, or (b) what the elite do with their influence.
Grassroots protest movements often attract “militant oddballs.” Opportunistic charlatans will seek to piggyback their narrow agendas on popular movements. This is nothing new.
But have you ever seen Newsweek (or any other major media outlet) make a big deal about the Marxist organizations who turn out at every left-wing protest event? Ten years ago, I covered the “A26″ anti-globalization demonstration in Washington:
Once you got past the Socialist Workers, there were still more entrepreneurial leftists, hawking the Worker’s Vanguard. Then there was the guy selling yellow “Mumia Must Live” buttons for a buck each. . . .
The place was positively brimming with rage against corporate capitalism, from T-shirts (“Mean Corporations Suck”) to handmade signs (“Corporate Press Is Not Free”). At the International Socialist Organization table, you could get a nice blue-and-white sign reading, “Workers of the World Unite and Fight.” Another group distributed red T-shirts lettered in black: “Abolish the World Bank! End the IMF! Dissolve the WTO! Socialist Party USA.” . . .
I’m not up to date on the various Marxist outfits represented at the A16 rally — League for the Revolutionary Party? International Action Center? — so I don’t know which ones are Trotskyists, which ones are Mensheviks and which ones are Maoists, but I know the original Big Red when I see it. The colorful banner proclaims, “People & Nature Before Profit$ … Young Communist League USA,” and the kids at the table are handing out the People’s Weekly World, official organ of the CPUSA. The Bolsheviks — who seized power from a backward czarist regime and actually managed to make things worse, who spent more than seven decades proving the murderous futility of revolutionary socialism — are still at it.
The major media never mentioned the kooks and commies who infested the anti-globalization movement, who also infested the anti-war movement during the Bush years. Yet Newsweek‘s columnist insists that the Tea Party movement is defined by kooks and conspiracy theorists.
And the media elite wonder why we don’t like them . . .

Pingback: uberVU - social comments