The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Movie Star Robert Pattinson Is a Horrible Hatemongering Vaginaphobe

Posted on | February 16, 2010 | 27 Comments

OK, so Details magazine arranges a photo shoot (NSFW) of the Twilight star surrounded by naked fashion models. His reaction?

“I really hate vaginas. I’m allergic to vagina. But I can’t say I had no idea, because it was a 12-hour shoot, so you kind of get the picture that these women are going to stay naked after, like, five or six hours. But I wasn’t exactly prepared.”

Five or six hours surrounded by beautiful naked women. And he “wasn’t exactly prepared”?

Dude.

Comments

27 Responses to “Movie Star Robert Pattinson Is a Horrible Hatemongering Vaginaphobe”

  1. Fresh Air
    February 16th, 2010 @ 11:10 pm

    Why is youth wasted on the wrong people?

  2. Fresh Air
    February 16th, 2010 @ 6:10 pm

    Why is youth wasted on the wrong people?

  3. Another damned Hatemongering Vaginaphobe! « The Daley Gator
    February 16th, 2010 @ 6:56 pm

    […] Stacy McCain exposes Robert Pattinson, of Twilight fame as a man who just hates having naked women around him OK, so Details magazine arranges a photo shoot (NSFW) of the Twilight star surrounded by naked fashion models. His reaction? “I really hate vaginas. I’m allergic to vagina. But I can’t say I had no idea, because it was a 12-hour shoot, so you kind of get the picture that these women are going to stay naked after, like, five or six hours. But I wasn’t exactly prepared.” […]

  4. Dave C
    February 16th, 2010 @ 11:57 pm

    Not to be such a downer but why is it considered art to have a two nearly naked chicks side by side a dude in Vanity Fair/Details/Vogue/whatever magazine title you want to throw out there but when it’s in Penthouse, it’s porn?

    Both have naked chicks, both are designed to be looked at and for guys to want to be the guy in the picture surrounded by naked chicks.

    But in general, most people have to be over 18 to buy Penthouse but the other magazines can be bought by anyone.

  5. Dave C
    February 16th, 2010 @ 6:57 pm

    Not to be such a downer but why is it considered art to have a two nearly naked chicks side by side a dude in Vanity Fair/Details/Vogue/whatever magazine title you want to throw out there but when it’s in Penthouse, it’s porn?

    Both have naked chicks, both are designed to be looked at and for guys to want to be the guy in the picture surrounded by naked chicks.

    But in general, most people have to be over 18 to buy Penthouse but the other magazines can be bought by anyone.

  6. Dave C
    February 16th, 2010 @ 11:59 pm

    I meant to add: Both are designed for the viewer to desire to be in the picture.. even if the guy in the picture doesn’t want to be there.

  7. Dave C
    February 16th, 2010 @ 6:59 pm

    I meant to add: Both are designed for the viewer to desire to be in the picture.. even if the guy in the picture doesn’t want to be there.

  8. Bob Belvedere
    February 17th, 2010 @ 1:31 am

    All METROSEXUALS Must Die!

  9. Bob Belvedere
    February 17th, 2010 @ 1:31 am

    All METROSEXUALS Must Die!

  10. Bob Belvedere
    February 16th, 2010 @ 8:31 pm

    All METROSEXUALS Must Die!

  11. Cynthia Yockey, A Conservative Lesbian
    February 16th, 2010 @ 8:49 pm

    Hitler finds out Phil Jones has admitted ‘climate change’ science isn’t settled…

    H/T Bookworm Room This video actually is an amazingly good summary of the melting of the anthropogenic global warming hoax now re-branded as “climate change,” which seems like a safe enough position to hold since change is what the climate …

  12. The Watcher
    February 17th, 2010 @ 2:40 am

    He’s ALLERGIC? What’s that mean, he experienced some swelling?

  13. The Watcher
    February 17th, 2010 @ 2:40 am

    He’s ALLERGIC? What’s that mean, he experienced some swelling?

  14. The Watcher
    February 16th, 2010 @ 9:40 pm

    He’s ALLERGIC? What’s that mean, he experienced some swelling?

  15. Bob Belvedere
    February 17th, 2010 @ 3:53 am

    I’ve been thinking about this…

    Now, you know Stacy that I agree with you that we can’t get into a purgefest on the Right as we seek to advance the cause of the VRWC by taking over the GOP at every level. But I really really really believe that its essential that we purge all the metrosexuals from our ranks. You know, like Conor, Lowry, et. al. Besides, being weaklings, they give all red-blooded American men a bad name. Down with the panty-waists! Up with Red Meat People!

  16. Bob Belvedere
    February 16th, 2010 @ 10:53 pm

    I’ve been thinking about this…

    Now, you know Stacy that I agree with you that we can’t get into a purgefest on the Right as we seek to advance the cause of the VRWC by taking over the GOP at every level. But I really really really believe that its essential that we purge all the metrosexuals from our ranks. You know, like Conor, Lowry, et. al. Besides, being weaklings, they give all red-blooded American men a bad name. Down with the panty-waists! Up with Red Meat People!

  17. Bob Belvedere
    February 17th, 2010 @ 3:54 am

    Oops…forgot to include The Trog along with Conor and Twinkle Toes Lowry.

  18. Bob Belvedere
    February 16th, 2010 @ 10:54 pm

    Oops…forgot to include The Trog along with Conor and Twinkle Toes Lowry.

  19. Live Free Or Die
    February 17th, 2010 @ 4:12 pm

    Just skimming the link made me alergic to
    clicking on to anymore links.
    Robert Pattinson goes to West Hollywood, lives gayly ever after.

  20. Live Free Or Die
    February 17th, 2010 @ 11:12 am

    Just skimming the link made me alergic to
    clicking on to anymore links.
    Robert Pattinson goes to West Hollywood, lives gayly ever after.

  21. DC Handgun Info
    February 17th, 2010 @ 5:12 pm

    Geez, Robert.

    Why do you have to open your mouth and ruin it for the ladies (and guys) that swoon at your looks? In the old days (Rock Hudson era), he would glibly lie: “I had a great time.” But no, in our “honest” age, he has to say he “hate[s] vaginas”?? What a jerk.

  22. DC Handgun Info
    February 17th, 2010 @ 5:12 pm

    Geez, Robert.

    Why do you have to open your mouth and ruin it for the ladies (and guys) that swoon at your looks? In the old days (Rock Hudson era), he would glibly lie: “I had a great time.” But no, in our “honest” age, he has to say he “hate[s] vaginas”?? What a jerk.

  23. DC Handgun Info
    February 17th, 2010 @ 12:12 pm

    Geez, Robert.

    Why do you have to open your mouth and ruin it for the ladies (and guys) that swoon at your looks? In the old days (Rock Hudson era), he would glibly lie: “I had a great time.” But no, in our “honest” age, he has to say he “hate[s] vaginas”?? What a jerk.

  24. Rich Fader
    February 19th, 2010 @ 6:27 pm

    Wouldn’t “ungrateful prat” cover it just as well?

    Personally, I would have loved to be in that shot…or the more clothed cover shot on the new Vanity Fair…or best of all, next to Christina Hendricks on that New York cover. Wowsers.

  25. Rich Fader
    February 19th, 2010 @ 1:27 pm

    Wouldn’t “ungrateful prat” cover it just as well?

    Personally, I would have loved to be in that shot…or the more clothed cover shot on the new Vanity Fair…or best of all, next to Christina Hendricks on that New York cover. Wowsers.

  26. Rich Fader
    February 19th, 2010 @ 6:55 pm

    As an aside…Christina on that cover and Baby Troll on Mark Alger’s blog: Separated at birth?

  27. Rich Fader
    February 19th, 2010 @ 1:55 pm

    As an aside…Christina on that cover and Baby Troll on Mark Alger’s blog: Separated at birth?