The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

John Cornyn and the Eunuch Anacephalic ‘Leadership’ of the Republican Party

Posted on | April 1, 2010 | 61 Comments

Drew M. at Ace of Spades says John Cornyn is “starting to go wobbly,” which involves the wholly unwarranted assumption that Cornyn was ever steady to begin with.

It was Cornyn who, by giving the National Republican Senatorial Committee’s endorsement to Charlie Crist — 15 months before the Florida GOP primary — sparked the Not One Red Cent rebellion.

Over and over, we have seen recently that Republican “leadership” in Washington is a joke, their cowardice exceeded only by their incompetence. Pete Sessions and the National Republican Congressional Committee squandered hundreds of thousands of dollars on the Dede Scozzafava campaign, and the NRCC’s candidate-recruitment efforts consist mainly of trying to find “self-funders” — e.g., Ben Quayle types with lots of Daddy’s money to throw around — rather than identifying real leaders with solid values, like Vernon Parker

The recent foibles of the Republican National Committee are too numerous to mention, but the bondage-nightclub fund-raiser is the tip of a very large iceberg of RNC staff blunders. The RNC also backed Scozzafava and there was that moronic Powerpoint presentation. Now Michelle Malkin calls our attention to the latest outrage:

Mr. Steele agreed to meet with the immigration groups after they staged a brief but noisy sit-in at the R.N.C. offices on March 22.
Several advocates emerged from the closed-door session to say Mr. Steele had pledged to help find at least one more Republican sponsor for a bill being crafted by Senator Lindsey O. Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, a Democrat.
The advocates “walked away with a commitment from Steele to work with Sen. Lindsey Graham and the party’s leadership to enlist another Republican senator’s support for comprehensive and bipartisan immigration reform,” the leaders of the Fair Immigration Reform Movement said in a statement. The movement is a coalition of groups that support a path to legal status for illegal immigrants.

This kind of sellout — the GOP elite betraying the party’s conservative grassroots — occurs routinely. While I was in Arizona, I heard rumors that if John McCain’s big money isn’t enough to buy re-election, the NRSC will spend money to help McCain destroy J.D. Hayworth. It’s typical of the kind of clueless Republican “leadership” that spent $320,000 to help Arlen Specter defeat Pat Toomey in 2004 — and was prepared to do the same this year, until Specter decided he was a Democrat:

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, [wrote an April 2009 letter] to fellow Republicans asking them to support Specter.

And Cornyn certainly wasn’t alone:

In a sign of party support, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell’s Bluegrass PAC contributed $10,000 to Specter [in March 2009].

“Does the GOP have enough balls?” Neither balls, nor brains.

(Cross-posted at the Hot Air Greenroom.)

Comments

61 Responses to “John Cornyn and the Eunuch Anacephalic ‘Leadership’ of the Republican Party”

  1. Art Mueller
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:13 pm

    Yep, had enough of the two toned blue-red Republicans. Not voting for one of them; not giving them a red cent.

  2. Art Mueller
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:13 pm

    Yep, had enough of the two toned blue-red Republicans. Not voting for one of them; not giving them a red cent.

  3. Art Mueller
    April 1st, 2010 @ 2:13 pm

    Yep, had enough of the two toned blue-red Republicans. Not voting for one of them; not giving them a red cent.

  4. The Greenroom » Forum Archive » No Balls, No Brains: John Cornyn and the GOP’s Eunuch Anacephalic ‘Leadership’
    April 1st, 2010 @ 2:16 pm

    […] (Cross-posted at The Other McCain.) […]

  5. DYSPEPSIA GENERATION » Blog Archive » John Cornyn and the Eunuch Anacephalic ‘Leadership’ of the Republican Party
    April 1st, 2010 @ 2:29 pm

    […] The Other McCain overturns a rock. Drew M. at Ace of Spades says John Cornyn is “starting to go wobbly,” which involves the wholly unwarranted assumption that Cornyn was ever steady to begin with. Over and over, we have seen recently that Republican “leadership” in Washington is a joke, their cowardice exceeded only by their incompetence. […]

  6. The Javelineer
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:36 pm

    Thanks for exposing RINO Cornyn. That department store cowboy is my Senator. He has sponsored bills giving amnesty for illegal aliens. He wants to give unlimited H-1B visas to foreign high-tech workers even in the current 17% real unemployment. Now he’s waffling on repealing health care. What a surprise. Fool. Fool!

    We are steadily winning independent voters, by our opposition to Obamacare. This buffoonish hick, Cornyn, threatens our increasing advantage by signaling weakness. What the – ? Moron. Moron!

    I’m sick of the Republican Party leadership. Sick. Sick. Sick. The first business of the Tea Party should be to to topple the RNC. And I mean expulsion, expulsion!, not a temporary desk job.

    Arrrghjghghghhgl;shgjlsgjh;lskgj;lasdkgja;lsdkgjs;lgkjsa!

    I’m angry. And I haven’t even started thinking about Lindsey Graham-cracker.

    This is the same pattern we’ve seen over and over. Talk conservative to the base, then vote moderate.

    Maybe I’ve been wrong. Maybe we should turn the Tea Party into a third party. The Republican leadership has been doing this two-faced two-step for thirty years. I’m not up for it even one more time. Not again. Never again.

    I’m taking a long run to regain my calm. This is b.s.

  7. The Javelineer
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:36 pm

    Thanks for exposing RINO Cornyn. That department store cowboy is my Senator. He has sponsored bills giving amnesty for illegal aliens. He wants to give unlimited H-1B visas to foreign high-tech workers even in the current 17% real unemployment. Now he’s waffling on repealing health care. What a surprise. Fool. Fool!

    We are steadily winning independent voters, by our opposition to Obamacare. This buffoonish hick, Cornyn, threatens our increasing advantage by signaling weakness. What the – ? Moron. Moron!

    I’m sick of the Republican Party leadership. Sick. Sick. Sick. The first business of the Tea Party should be to to topple the RNC. And I mean expulsion, expulsion!, not a temporary desk job.

    Arrrghjghghghhgl;shgjlsgjh;lskgj;lasdkgja;lsdkgjs;lgkjsa!

    I’m angry. And I haven’t even started thinking about Lindsey Graham-cracker.

    This is the same pattern we’ve seen over and over. Talk conservative to the base, then vote moderate.

    Maybe I’ve been wrong. Maybe we should turn the Tea Party into a third party. The Republican leadership has been doing this two-faced two-step for thirty years. I’m not up for it even one more time. Not again. Never again.

    I’m taking a long run to regain my calm. This is b.s.

  8. The Javelineer
    April 1st, 2010 @ 2:36 pm

    Thanks for exposing RINO Cornyn. That department store cowboy is my Senator. He has sponsored bills giving amnesty for illegal aliens. He wants to give unlimited H-1B visas to foreign high-tech workers even in the current 17% real unemployment. Now he’s waffling on repealing health care. What a surprise. Fool. Fool!

    We are steadily winning independent voters, by our opposition to Obamacare. This buffoonish hick, Cornyn, threatens our increasing advantage by signaling weakness. What the – ? Moron. Moron!

    I’m sick of the Republican Party leadership. Sick. Sick. Sick. The first business of the Tea Party should be to to topple the RNC. And I mean expulsion, expulsion!, not a temporary desk job.

    Arrrghjghghghhgl;shgjlsgjh;lskgj;lasdkgja;lsdkgjs;lgkjsa!

    I’m angry. And I haven’t even started thinking about Lindsey Graham-cracker.

    This is the same pattern we’ve seen over and over. Talk conservative to the base, then vote moderate.

    Maybe I’ve been wrong. Maybe we should turn the Tea Party into a third party. The Republican leadership has been doing this two-faced two-step for thirty years. I’m not up for it even one more time. Not again. Never again.

    I’m taking a long run to regain my calm. This is b.s.

  9. RickS
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:37 pm

    It’s just absolutely infuriating. Here we are coming off the health care debate, WHICH WE WON if the polls are any indication. No bounce for Barry, GOP ahead in generic polls and now we have these f***ing idiots just pissing it away with their incompetence. Fricking IMMIGRATION?! Are you kidding me?! STEELE.CORNYN.SESSIONS.MUST.GO.

  10. RickS
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:37 pm

    It’s just absolutely infuriating. Here we are coming off the health care debate, WHICH WE WON if the polls are any indication. No bounce for Barry, GOP ahead in generic polls and now we have these f***ing idiots just pissing it away with their incompetence. Fricking IMMIGRATION?! Are you kidding me?! STEELE.CORNYN.SESSIONS.MUST.GO.

  11. RickS
    April 1st, 2010 @ 2:37 pm

    It’s just absolutely infuriating. Here we are coming off the health care debate, WHICH WE WON if the polls are any indication. No bounce for Barry, GOP ahead in generic polls and now we have these f***ing idiots just pissing it away with their incompetence. Fricking IMMIGRATION?! Are you kidding me?! STEELE.CORNYN.SESSIONS.MUST.GO.

  12. Lisa Graas
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:44 pm

    I mostly agree with what you say here, Stacy, and I will leave it at that. Good job.

  13. Lisa Graas
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:44 pm

    I mostly agree with what you say here, Stacy, and I will leave it at that. Good job.

  14. Lisa Graas
    April 1st, 2010 @ 2:44 pm

    I mostly agree with what you say here, Stacy, and I will leave it at that. Good job.

  15. bellez
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:55 pm

    Well they are still picking democrats in disguise. Don’t fall for the Tim Pawlenty bid either. He isn’t a fan of T-Party patriots.If he suddenly enthusiastic it is because he wants to run for Prez. No Mitt Romney who is for soemthing till T-Party says no. No Ron Paul who is 75yrs old. Pick your own candidate, donate to them then work your butt off. Worry & work for 2010 then we can focus on 2012. We can’t get rid of them all but we can try and minimize some damage. God Bless America, God Bless Patriots.

  16. bellez
    April 1st, 2010 @ 2:55 pm

    Well they are still picking democrats in disguise. Don’t fall for the Tim Pawlenty bid either. He isn’t a fan of T-Party patriots.If he suddenly enthusiastic it is because he wants to run for Prez. No Mitt Romney who is for soemthing till T-Party says no. No Ron Paul who is 75yrs old. Pick your own candidate, donate to them then work your butt off. Worry & work for 2010 then we can focus on 2012. We can’t get rid of them all but we can try and minimize some damage. God Bless America, God Bless Patriots.

  17. RightKlik
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:20 pm

    typo: Anencephalic

  18. RightKlik
    April 1st, 2010 @ 3:20 pm

    typo: Anencephalic

  19. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:21 pm

    My kids will end up paying for your refusal to tell the difference between ‘bad’ and ‘worse.’ Hint: this situation that we’re in right now is ‘worse.’

  20. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:21 pm

    My kids will end up paying for your refusal to tell the difference between ‘bad’ and ‘worse.’ Hint: this situation that we’re in right now is ‘worse.’

  21. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 3:21 pm

    My kids will end up paying for your refusal to tell the difference between ‘bad’ and ‘worse.’ Hint: this situation that we’re in right now is ‘worse.’

  22. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:30 pm

    …Sorry. It’s just that we get hella people over at RS who want to tell us about how horrible the national committees are, how they’ll never support anybody but an individual candidate ever again – only they *don’t* support individual candidates, they *don’t* try to fix the parties on the local level, they *don’t* accept anything but a mythical 120% conservative opinion on anything, and in fact *don’t* do anything except complain on RS comment boards about ‘RiNOs,’ which is the point where I want to start practicing my Sith powers through the computer screen.

    So I’m a bit prickly on the topic.

  23. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:30 pm

    …Sorry. It’s just that we get hella people over at RS who want to tell us about how horrible the national committees are, how they’ll never support anybody but an individual candidate ever again – only they *don’t* support individual candidates, they *don’t* try to fix the parties on the local level, they *don’t* accept anything but a mythical 120% conservative opinion on anything, and in fact *don’t* do anything except complain on RS comment boards about ‘RiNOs,’ which is the point where I want to start practicing my Sith powers through the computer screen.

    So I’m a bit prickly on the topic.

  24. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 3:30 pm

    …Sorry. It’s just that we get hella people over at RS who want to tell us about how horrible the national committees are, how they’ll never support anybody but an individual candidate ever again – only they *don’t* support individual candidates, they *don’t* try to fix the parties on the local level, they *don’t* accept anything but a mythical 120% conservative opinion on anything, and in fact *don’t* do anything except complain on RS comment boards about ‘RiNOs,’ which is the point where I want to start practicing my Sith powers through the computer screen.

    So I’m a bit prickly on the topic.

  25. Live Free Or Die
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:36 pm

    Eunuch Anacephalic, heh, no balls, no brain.
    I salute your loquacious verity.

  26. Live Free Or Die
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:36 pm

    Eunuch Anacephalic, heh, no balls, no brain.
    I salute your loquacious verity.

  27. Live Free Or Die
    April 1st, 2010 @ 3:36 pm

    Eunuch Anacephalic, heh, no balls, no brain.
    I salute your loquacious verity.

  28. Robert Stacy McCain
    April 1st, 2010 @ 3:45 pm

    My kids will end up paying for your refusal to tell the difference between ‘bad’ and ‘worse.’

    Moe: Giving money to incompetents is not going to change “bad” to “better.” The reason that we are where we are now is because of this kind of cluelessness at GOP HQ. After 2002-04, the Republican Party had a solid majority, which has been squandered by the blunders of “leadership.”

    This is about incentives. Unless and until the national committees show meaningful recognition of their fundamental errors — not spin, not the firing of lower-level staffers, but serious consequences for senior personnel — anyone who gives them money is merely rewarding incompetence, and there is no incentive for the clueless clowns at GOP HQ to get their acts together.

  29. Robert Stacy McCain
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:45 pm

    My kids will end up paying for your refusal to tell the difference between ‘bad’ and ‘worse.’

    Moe: Giving money to incompetents is not going to change “bad” to “better.” The reason that we are where we are now is because of this kind of cluelessness at GOP HQ. After 2002-04, the Republican Party had a solid majority, which has been squandered by the blunders of “leadership.”

    This is about incentives. Unless and until the national committees show meaningful recognition of their fundamental errors — not spin, not the firing of lower-level staffers, but serious consequences for senior personnel — anyone who gives them money is merely rewarding incompetence, and there is no incentive for the clueless clowns at GOP HQ to get their acts together.

  30. Robert Stacy McCain
    April 1st, 2010 @ 8:45 pm

    My kids will end up paying for your refusal to tell the difference between ‘bad’ and ‘worse.’

    Moe: Giving money to incompetents is not going to change “bad” to “better.” The reason that we are where we are now is because of this kind of cluelessness at GOP HQ. After 2002-04, the Republican Party had a solid majority, which has been squandered by the blunders of “leadership.”

    This is about incentives. Unless and until the national committees show meaningful recognition of their fundamental errors — not spin, not the firing of lower-level staffers, but serious consequences for senior personnel — anyone who gives them money is merely rewarding incompetence, and there is no incentive for the clueless clowns at GOP HQ to get their acts together.

  31. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 9:00 pm

    Stacy: I would disagree. We’re in the state that we’re in right now – tripled deficits, free-fall on foreign policy, and 1/6th of the economy being nationalized – because we don’t have the votes to stop any of it.

    Correction: the *GOP* doesn’t have the votes to stop any of it. Because since 200*7* a segment of conservatives have abandoned support of the Republican party committees while, by and large, not increasing their support of anything else. As I said in my follow-up vent. 🙂

  32. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 4:00 pm

    Stacy: I would disagree. We’re in the state that we’re in right now – tripled deficits, free-fall on foreign policy, and 1/6th of the economy being nationalized – because we don’t have the votes to stop any of it.

    Correction: the *GOP* doesn’t have the votes to stop any of it. Because since 200*7* a segment of conservatives have abandoned support of the Republican party committees while, by and large, not increasing their support of anything else. As I said in my follow-up vent. 🙂

  33. Joe
    April 1st, 2010 @ 9:12 pm

    Moe is right and so are you Stacy. We live with the GOP because that is the only game in town for us right now. We give our money and support directly to those conservative candidates we can legitimately support. We fight wobbly GOP politicans when we reasonably believe we can replace them with a more conservative candidate who can win general elections (such as Rubio over Crist; anyone over Lindsay Graham in SC; I am less sanquine over JD Hayworth vs. McCain because Hayworth lost his congressional seat which makes me doubt his state wide legs in the general election–but I trust Arizona republicans to do what is best). The RNC gets nothing but scorn.

    The grass roots tea parties need to start taking over the GOP. Just like Reagan did. It will take some time, but it is doable.

  34. Joe
    April 1st, 2010 @ 4:12 pm

    Moe is right and so are you Stacy. We live with the GOP because that is the only game in town for us right now. We give our money and support directly to those conservative candidates we can legitimately support. We fight wobbly GOP politicans when we reasonably believe we can replace them with a more conservative candidate who can win general elections (such as Rubio over Crist; anyone over Lindsay Graham in SC; I am less sanquine over JD Hayworth vs. McCain because Hayworth lost his congressional seat which makes me doubt his state wide legs in the general election–but I trust Arizona republicans to do what is best). The RNC gets nothing but scorn.

    The grass roots tea parties need to start taking over the GOP. Just like Reagan did. It will take some time, but it is doable.

  35. Robert Stacy McCain
    April 1st, 2010 @ 9:17 pm

    . . . they *don’t* support individual candidates, they *don’t* try to fix the parties on the local level, they *don’t* accept anything but a mythical 120% conservative opinion on anything, and in fact *don’t* do anything except complain on RS comment boards about ‘RiNOs’ . . .

    Which is why it’s so important, when an actual opportunity arises to direct grassroots support to a conservative candidate, I do.

    John McCain vs. J.D. Hayworth? That’s an easy choice.

    Parker Griffith vs. Les Phillip? Another easy choice.

    Ben Quayle vs. Vernon Parker? That’s an easy choice, too.

    So I think I cannot be fairly accused of having failed to offer people constructive alternatives to squandering their money, Moe. If people fail to act on my suggestions, that is their own responsibility. But I’m certainly not going to tell them to give money to the national GOP committees, which are demonstrably incompetent.

  36. Robert Stacy McCain
    April 1st, 2010 @ 4:17 pm

    . . . they *don’t* support individual candidates, they *don’t* try to fix the parties on the local level, they *don’t* accept anything but a mythical 120% conservative opinion on anything, and in fact *don’t* do anything except complain on RS comment boards about ‘RiNOs’ . . .

    Which is why it’s so important, when an actual opportunity arises to direct grassroots support to a conservative candidate, I do.

    John McCain vs. J.D. Hayworth? That’s an easy choice.

    Parker Griffith vs. Les Phillip? Another easy choice.

    Ben Quayle vs. Vernon Parker? That’s an easy choice, too.

    So I think I cannot be fairly accused of having failed to offer people constructive alternatives to squandering their money, Moe. If people fail to act on my suggestions, that is their own responsibility. But I’m certainly not going to tell them to give money to the national GOP committees, which are demonstrably incompetent.

  37. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 9:57 pm

    Great. Now tell me about what the heck people are doing about getting rid of John Adler in NJ-03. Or Kathy Dahlkemper in PA-03. Or Charlie Wilson in OH-06? Wins in all three of these races would represent a net improvement for conservatives, in that their GOP replacements would not be voting in a Democrat as Speaker of the House. Worth it right there: but I’m not expecting anybody besides the NRCC to actually do the non-sexy leg work of getting what would be gettable districts.

    I don’t mean to yell at you: you’re an activist and you show up. But, incompetent or no, the national committees can at least be counted to show up all the time. If the VRWC wants to defeat the Democrats, it either has to start ensuring that they themselves show up, or they can start funding and taking over the groups that do.

  38. Moe Lane
    April 1st, 2010 @ 4:57 pm

    Great. Now tell me about what the heck people are doing about getting rid of John Adler in NJ-03. Or Kathy Dahlkemper in PA-03. Or Charlie Wilson in OH-06? Wins in all three of these races would represent a net improvement for conservatives, in that their GOP replacements would not be voting in a Democrat as Speaker of the House. Worth it right there: but I’m not expecting anybody besides the NRCC to actually do the non-sexy leg work of getting what would be gettable districts.

    I don’t mean to yell at you: you’re an activist and you show up. But, incompetent or no, the national committees can at least be counted to show up all the time. If the VRWC wants to defeat the Democrats, it either has to start ensuring that they themselves show up, or they can start funding and taking over the groups that do.

  39. theCL
    April 1st, 2010 @ 10:36 pm

    If the VRWC wants to defeat the Democrats …

    Defeating Democrats doesn’t necessarily change anything. We have to beat Statists, progressives, or whatever you want to call them. In both parties.

    Hey, prior to Obama, GWB and a Republican Congress increased the size and scope of government greater than LBJ! If being conservative doesn’t mean standing for limited government, it means nothing.

  40. theCL
    April 1st, 2010 @ 5:36 pm

    If the VRWC wants to defeat the Democrats …

    Defeating Democrats doesn’t necessarily change anything. We have to beat Statists, progressives, or whatever you want to call them. In both parties.

    Hey, prior to Obama, GWB and a Republican Congress increased the size and scope of government greater than LBJ! If being conservative doesn’t mean standing for limited government, it means nothing.

  41. Adobe Walls
    April 1st, 2010 @ 11:25 pm

    If the Republicans were getting Tea Partied the way the Social Democrats are things might have been different. For far too long many have slept well at night thinking that we’d elected statesmen to look out for our interests. We know better now and must never go back to sleep. As the house can be entirely flipped every two years correcting it is relatively simple. It could take decades to fix the Senate.

  42. Adobe Walls
    April 1st, 2010 @ 11:25 pm

    If the Republicans were getting Tea Partied the way the Social Democrats are things might have been different. For far too long many have slept well at night thinking that we’d elected statesmen to look out for our interests. We know better now and must never go back to sleep. As the house can be entirely flipped every two years correcting it is relatively simple. It could take decades to fix the Senate.

  43. Adobe Walls
    April 1st, 2010 @ 6:25 pm

    If the Republicans were getting Tea Partied the way the Social Democrats are things might have been different. For far too long many have slept well at night thinking that we’d elected statesmen to look out for our interests. We know better now and must never go back to sleep. As the house can be entirely flipped every two years correcting it is relatively simple. It could take decades to fix the Senate.

  44. With leadership like this, who needs enemies? « The Daley Gator
    April 1st, 2010 @ 6:27 pm

    […] Arlen Specter, GOP bandage party, John Cornyn, John McCain, The Other McCain Stacy McCain flays the morons running the Republican Party. Over and over, we have seen recently that Republican […]

  45. Larry Sheldon
    April 1st, 2010 @ 11:42 pm

    All this talk about how destructive a “third party” might be–I’m thinking it would be good for the GOP to take immediate steps to try and secure a position as one of the three.

  46. Larry Sheldon
    April 1st, 2010 @ 6:42 pm

    All this talk about how destructive a “third party” might be–I’m thinking it would be good for the GOP to take immediate steps to try and secure a position as one of the three.

  47. rcocean
    April 2nd, 2010 @ 12:16 am

    Its short-term thinking that’s gotten us where we are today. The “we need to be responsible and settle for half-a-loaf” “we need a big tent”, “we need to nominate someone who can win” is exactly the problem.

    In the long run, electing the lessor of two evils, just gets you evil. Electing a bunch of McCains just gets you Ted Kennedy socialism – only more slowly.

    You need to think long-term. Nominate and vote only for conservatives and we will have a majority soon – and it will be a conservative one – not a useless RINO majority like 2005.

  48. rcocean
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:16 pm

    Its short-term thinking that’s gotten us where we are today. The “we need to be responsible and settle for half-a-loaf” “we need a big tent”, “we need to nominate someone who can win” is exactly the problem.

    In the long run, electing the lessor of two evils, just gets you evil. Electing a bunch of McCains just gets you Ted Kennedy socialism – only more slowly.

    You need to think long-term. Nominate and vote only for conservatives and we will have a majority soon – and it will be a conservative one – not a useless RINO majority like 2005.

  49. Republican Party “Leadership”
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:32 pm

    […] John Cornyn and the Eunuch Anacephalic ‘Leadership’ of the Republican Party Over and over, we have seen recently that Republican “leadership” in Washington is a joke, their cowardice exceeded only by their incompetence. Pete Sessions and the National Republican Congressional Committee squandered hundreds of thousands of dollars on the Dede Scozzafava campaign, and the NRCC’s candidate-recruitment efforts consist mainly of trying to find “self-funders” — e.g., Ben Quayle types with lots of Daddy’s money to throw around — rather than identifying real leaders with solid values, like Vernon Parker. […]

  50. They Just Don’t Get It: Michael Steele, RNC, NRSC, NRCC « The Camp Of The Saints
    April 1st, 2010 @ 7:46 pm

    […] Stacy McCain’s posting of today John Cornyn and the Eunuch Anacephalic ‘Leadership’ of the Republican Party: Over and over, we have seen recently that Republican “leadership” in Washington is a joke, […]