“Why is this reporter just pushing Democratic Party agitprop?”

The question answers itself.

http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
[For a light hearted take on our present peril]

Why is this reporter just pushing Democratic Party agitprop?

Rhetorical question.

The best stenographers write at The Economist on the DIA Blog — they’re the same types of reporters that still think Andrew Sullivan is an American Conservative.

Why is the democratic party so polarizing? Why does Mitt have a problem with women in power? My friends and I don’t like this one bit and other women are noticing it too.

To the extent that racism charges cause more and more people especially on the right to ignore or better yet scoff at such charges, the consequent divisiveness is good for our national debate. The NAAAAACP is no longer relevant the more they scream raaaaacism the more apparent this becomes to more people.

Hey, Stacy: Methinks many of us [your loyal true VRWC bloggers who live for you insights] are wondering why you have declared the Second Annual Internation Bikini Fest yet? Hits is down, brother.

Man…I shouldn’t be allowed to post after midnight…

Hey, Stacy: Methinks many of us [your loyal and true VRWC bloggers who live for your insights] are wondering why you have not declared the Second Annual International Bikini Fest yet? Hits is down, brother.

You answer your own question, my friend! It is because it is Agence France-Presse!

Debate?
We just get called racists and the media moves on. I wouldn’t call that a debate.

Seriously, as just a conservative girl stated, there is no real exchange of ideas. There is no debate. Remember when Teh One said, “We won.”? That ended the debate. Game over.

There is no debate because they can’t beat us in the arena of ideas.

OT: Did you see where the damn GOP did not endorse our Doug Hoffman in #NY23? The Conservative Party did thus ensuring he will be on the ballot but I was pretty ticked.