40 comments

  1. Loving the shirt! Everyone should wear one at Glenn Beck’s re-purposing of MLK’s speech in DC.
    Smitty- kudos on the commandments.Either that was truly inspired or it took many many hours to put together.
    However, you make a rookie mistake in taking the pulse of the opponent: progressives have as much disdain for government as you do– depending of course on who and how the government is being run. And this is the crux of the matter and why the Tea Party won’t be taken seriously by moderates and progressives; During massive government expansion under Bush, you and your buddies where nowhere to be found. And I’m pretty sure it’s because you were quite happy with the people at the helm. You see, you had no problems with government then, right?
    So the whole basis of your commandment, aside from the fact that we generally don’t cater to biblical rhetoric in any form, is flawed.
    Personally, I’m a big fan of capitalism. i just wish that our system would get back to some semblance of what capitalism could and should be as opposed to this sham perpetuated by Conservatives. If your idea of Capitalism is a reversal to late 19th century economic philosophy then you can keep capitalism. In fact, you’ve owned it for the last 30 or so years and what has it brought us?
    I realize the nuance of such positions, and foresee the difficulty that the mental midgets like Adobe Walls, Kojo, Rager and clan will have dealing with my opinions.
    But you asked what I thought and there you go.
    “Focus on constructing narratives, a much more nuanced approach to prevarication.”
    GS, I marvel that you can’t see how this is a game played by both sides. Willful ignorance is the worst kind of bliss.
    Next!

  2. Loving the shirt! Everyone should wear one at Glenn Beck’s re-purposing of MLK’s speech in DC.
    Smitty- kudos on the commandments.Either that was truly inspired or it took many many hours to put together.
    However, you make a rookie mistake in taking the pulse of the opponent: progressives have as much disdain for government as you do– depending of course on who and how the government is being run. And this is the crux of the matter and why the Tea Party won’t be taken seriously by moderates and progressives; During massive government expansion under Bush, you and your buddies where nowhere to be found. And I’m pretty sure it’s because you were quite happy with the people at the helm. You see, you had no problems with government then, right?
    So the whole basis of your commandment, aside from the fact that we generally don’t cater to biblical rhetoric in any form, is flawed.
    Personally, I’m a big fan of capitalism. i just wish that our system would get back to some semblance of what capitalism could and should be as opposed to this sham perpetuated by Conservatives. If your idea of Capitalism is a reversal to late 19th century economic philosophy then you can keep capitalism. In fact, you’ve owned it for the last 30 or so years and what has it brought us?
    I realize the nuance of such positions, and foresee the difficulty that the mental midgets like Adobe Walls, Kojo, Rager and clan will have dealing with my opinions.
    But you asked what I thought and there you go.
    “Focus on constructing narratives, a much more nuanced approach to prevarication.”
    GS, I marvel that you can’t see how this is a game played by both sides. Willful ignorance is the worst kind of bliss.
    Next!

  3. “progressives have as much disdain for government as you do”

    Lost all credibility right there. That is demonstrably untrue.

    ” During massive government expansion under Bush, you and your buddies where nowhere to be found. And I’m pretty sure it’s because you were quite happy with the people at the helm. You see, you had no problems with government then, right?”

    Lots of us complained about spending. You guys weren’t trolling our websites back then. You were busy circle-jerking re: BushCheneyMcChimpHitlerNazi. Additionally, the Bush administration spent more than many of us were comfortable with, but it didn’t massively expand the government. They didn’t, for example, buy out thousands of mortgages, or take controlling interest in GM, and the Department of Homeland Security is not very big. Besides, Obama and a Democratic Congress have succeeded in tripling Bush’s deficit. I think you’re barking up the wrong tree(s) here.

    “So the whole basis of your commandment, aside from the fact that we generally don’t cater to biblical rhetoric in any form, is flawed.”

    Except for Nancy Pelosi, que no?

    “If your idea of Capitalism is a reversal to late 19th century economic philosophy then you can keep capitalism. In fact, you’ve owned it for the last 30 or so years and what has it brought us?”

    An assemblage of straw-man arguments. Make a coherent point here, and I’ll respond to it, though you realize you’ve just credited Republicans with the 90’s boom. You are correct there, a Republican Congress did pave the way for most of that economic growth.

    “GS, I marvel that you can’t see how this is a game played by both sides. Willful ignorance is the worst kind of bliss.”

    That would make sense, if Fox News wasn’t one channel (whose news coverage really is balance) and if most of the problems you libs have with it is based on commentary shows.

    AP, CNN, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, NBC, Time, Newsweek, any major metropolitan newspaper… I think that outweighs Fox in terms of media influence, don’t you? We’re not taking about HuffPo vs. The Other McCain here, we’re talking about “mainstream” “unbiased” journalists, from whom the majority of the public take their knowledge of current events, creating the narrative instead of reporting the news.

  4. “progressives have as much disdain for government as you do”

    Lost all credibility right there. That is demonstrably untrue.

    ” During massive government expansion under Bush, you and your buddies where nowhere to be found. And I’m pretty sure it’s because you were quite happy with the people at the helm. You see, you had no problems with government then, right?”

    Lots of us complained about spending. You guys weren’t trolling our websites back then. You were busy circle-jerking re: BushCheneyMcChimpHitlerNazi. Additionally, the Bush administration spent more than many of us were comfortable with, but it didn’t massively expand the government. They didn’t, for example, buy out thousands of mortgages, or take controlling interest in GM, and the Department of Homeland Security is not very big. Besides, Obama and a Democratic Congress have succeeded in tripling Bush’s deficit. I think you’re barking up the wrong tree(s) here.

    “So the whole basis of your commandment, aside from the fact that we generally don’t cater to biblical rhetoric in any form, is flawed.”

    Except for Nancy Pelosi, que no?

    “If your idea of Capitalism is a reversal to late 19th century economic philosophy then you can keep capitalism. In fact, you’ve owned it for the last 30 or so years and what has it brought us?”

    An assemblage of straw-man arguments. Make a coherent point here, and I’ll respond to it, though you realize you’ve just credited Republicans with the 90’s boom. You are correct there, a Republican Congress did pave the way for most of that economic growth.

    “GS, I marvel that you can’t see how this is a game played by both sides. Willful ignorance is the worst kind of bliss.”

    That would make sense, if Fox News wasn’t one channel (whose news coverage really is balance) and if most of the problems you libs have with it is based on commentary shows.

    AP, CNN, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, NBC, Time, Newsweek, any major metropolitan newspaper… I think that outweighs Fox in terms of media influence, don’t you? We’re not taking about HuffPo vs. The Other McCain here, we’re talking about “mainstream” “unbiased” journalists, from whom the majority of the public take their knowledge of current events, creating the narrative instead of reporting the news.

  5. The spasms that come from youngforeskins computer keyboard is subpar honestly you should sue your doctor for the lobotomy going awry

  6. The spasms that come from youngforeskins computer keyboard is subpar honestly you should sue your doctor for the lobotomy going awry

  7. During massive government expansion under Bush, you and your buddies where nowhere to be found. And I’m pretty sure it’s because you were quite happy with the people at the helm. You see, you had no problems with government then, right?

    I’ll admit to having been insufficiently critical, but the problem’s roots trace back a century, not a decade.

  8. During massive government expansion under Bush, you and your buddies where nowhere to be found. And I’m pretty sure it’s because you were quite happy with the people at the helm. You see, you had no problems with government then, right?

    I’ll admit to having been insufficiently critical, but the problem’s roots trace back a century, not a decade.

  9. Oh GS, way to take a swing there!
    “That would make sense, if Fox News wasn’t one channel (whose news coverage really is balance) and if most of the problems you libs have with it is based on commentary shows.”
    um, perhaps you’re too far gone to realize the blatant imbalance of their “news” segments,not to mention the commentary.Hey! ALERT! IS BO A SECRET BLACK PANTHER?!
    Yeah, balanced “news”…
    And dimwit that you are, you don’t realize that in giving Republicans “credit’ for the 90’s boom I am also crediting them for the bust.Because that is all you get with voodoo economics-:a series of bubbles exacerbated by the trickle-down ponzy scheme that your leaders devised. It is unsustainable, and history has shown it time and again. Way to go, economic “growth”!
    “Lots of us complained about spending. ”
    Oh I know, it was all over the news with all you guys protesting and marching in on DC. Uh huh. Like I said, the Tea Party will only attract simpletons who sat by the sidelines when the problem began and only complained when it was politically expedient.The rest of your paragraph is just a sad case of someone taking Conservative sophistry and making a bad joke of it. Nice try…
    GS, it’s nice too see that you will spare nothing to defend your ideological flaws, even if it makes you look like a disingenuous tool.

  10. Oh GS, way to take a swing there!
    “That would make sense, if Fox News wasn’t one channel (whose news coverage really is balance) and if most of the problems you libs have with it is based on commentary shows.”
    um, perhaps you’re too far gone to realize the blatant imbalance of their “news” segments,not to mention the commentary.Hey! ALERT! IS BO A SECRET BLACK PANTHER?!
    Yeah, balanced “news”…
    And dimwit that you are, you don’t realize that in giving Republicans “credit’ for the 90’s boom I am also crediting them for the bust.Because that is all you get with voodoo economics-:a series of bubbles exacerbated by the trickle-down ponzy scheme that your leaders devised. It is unsustainable, and history has shown it time and again. Way to go, economic “growth”!
    “Lots of us complained about spending. ”
    Oh I know, it was all over the news with all you guys protesting and marching in on DC. Uh huh. Like I said, the Tea Party will only attract simpletons who sat by the sidelines when the problem began and only complained when it was politically expedient.The rest of your paragraph is just a sad case of someone taking Conservative sophistry and making a bad joke of it. Nice try…
    GS, it’s nice too see that you will spare nothing to defend your ideological flaws, even if it makes you look like a disingenuous tool.

  11. “um, perhaps you’re too far gone to realize the blatant imbalance of their “news” segments,not to mention the commentary.Hey! ALERT! IS BO A SECRET BLACK PANTHER?!”

    Hahahahaha… Panthergate? Really? That’s your comeback?

    “And dimwit that you are, you don’t realize that in giving Republicans “credit’ for the 90’s boom I am also crediting them for the bust.”

    Your logic is impeccable. If you’ve ever taken Macroeconomics 101, you’ll understand that the economy is cyclical. Any boom will be followed by a period of downturn. However, the massive economic recession did not begin until 2006, when a Democratic Senate took their seats, reaching overdrive when a Democratic House sat in 2008.

    “It is unsustainable, and history has shown it time and again. Way to go, economic “growth”!”

    Really? 2-3% productivity growth is “unsustainable”? That’s a new one. In reality, it’s only unsustainable when Democrats work overtime to kill private enterprise and then complain about a lack of jobs and productivity.

    “Oh I know, it was all over the news with all you guys protesting and marching in on DC. Uh huh. Like I said, the Tea Party will only attract simpletons who sat by the sidelines when the problem began and only complained when it was politically expedient.”

    Like I said, Bush spent too much. He didn’t triple the deficit in one year. So no, I didn’t really feel the need to march on DC.

    If you want to see a tool, young4eyes, I suggest you walk out into the communal bathroom of whatever free clinic you reside in, and take a look in the mirror. Your arguments, while full of energy and invective, lack any sort of basis in reality. I’m done feeding you, troll.

  12. “um, perhaps you’re too far gone to realize the blatant imbalance of their “news” segments,not to mention the commentary.Hey! ALERT! IS BO A SECRET BLACK PANTHER?!”

    Hahahahaha… Panthergate? Really? That’s your comeback?

    “And dimwit that you are, you don’t realize that in giving Republicans “credit’ for the 90’s boom I am also crediting them for the bust.”

    Your logic is impeccable. If you’ve ever taken Macroeconomics 101, you’ll understand that the economy is cyclical. Any boom will be followed by a period of downturn. However, the massive economic recession did not begin until 2006, when a Democratic Senate took their seats, reaching overdrive when a Democratic House sat in 2008.

    “It is unsustainable, and history has shown it time and again. Way to go, economic “growth”!”

    Really? 2-3% productivity growth is “unsustainable”? That’s a new one. In reality, it’s only unsustainable when Democrats work overtime to kill private enterprise and then complain about a lack of jobs and productivity.

    “Oh I know, it was all over the news with all you guys protesting and marching in on DC. Uh huh. Like I said, the Tea Party will only attract simpletons who sat by the sidelines when the problem began and only complained when it was politically expedient.”

    Like I said, Bush spent too much. He didn’t triple the deficit in one year. So no, I didn’t really feel the need to march on DC.

    If you want to see a tool, young4eyes, I suggest you walk out into the communal bathroom of whatever free clinic you reside in, and take a look in the mirror. Your arguments, while full of energy and invective, lack any sort of basis in reality. I’m done feeding you, troll.

  13. Smitty: Thank you for reprinting the Slashdot piece. You, sir, are a wit of the first order.

    My favorite:
    17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring an exaflood of data upon the earth, to destroy all data, wherein is the breath of binary life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall crash like Internet Explorer.

  14. Smitty: Thank you for reprinting the Slashdot piece. You, sir, are a wit of the first order.

    My favorite:
    17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring an exaflood of data upon the earth, to destroy all data, wherein is the breath of binary life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall crash like Internet Explorer.

  15. Smitty [and Stacy]: Perhaps you should look into making GiGi and Young4Douche pay for the server storage space they’re taking up with their driveling diatribes of droning dreck?

  16. Smitty [and Stacy]: Perhaps you should look into making GiGi and Young4Douche pay for the server storage space they’re taking up with their driveling diatribes of droning dreck?

  17. GG the only mass madness is being exhibited by you pal no one except the kiddies at LGF take you seriously

  18. GG the only mass madness is being exhibited by you pal no one except the kiddies at LGF take you seriously

Comments are closed.