Out on the farm, young Miss Bachmann might have seen how they castrate young bull calves. They put a rubber band around their nooksacks and eventually they shrivel up and fall off.

Which is what happend to Chris Matthews and gg.

How much longer before Matthews get’s the axe?

Comcast wants a profitable division here, and they sure as hell won’t get one with a network that is exclusively frothing Leftard.

They just need to try harder to get a fraction of that “exclusively frothing ‘tard” thing going given the success of Fox News in that regard. But i doubt there is an audiecne pool large enough in the lefty base that is as retard and nutty as that on the right for this work.

But nice try Chris Matthews. Lets just hope your employers won’t make you miss Keith Olbermann too much.

Quote marks might be applicable around the word “think” when applied to you, little gg, but the rest of us actually engage in the practice.

Just because Fox News is actually Fair and Balanced, exactly as advertised, is no reason for you to go hating on them, you hate filled hater you.

It should also be noted that you used quotes properly, using ” rather than the single quote mark ‘ which gg used improperly. Generally it invalidates a person when they mock someone’s intelligence and fails grammatically

@ Bill Hedrick

“To avoid the potential for confusion between ironic quotes and direct quotations, some style guides specify single quotation marks for this usage, and double quotation marks for verbatim speech” [from wikipedia]

Apparently not everyone has to follow ‘your’ rules of “grammar” strictly for it to be deemed grammatically correct.

Btw my use of single quote was more to highlight the philosphical nature of the world “think”, in which case it is perfectly justified whatever the styleguide is.

Moreover, the fact that Randy has the ability to use better grammar than me is immaterial to the insult, ‘he can’t think…’, which is way broader in implication.

Lets see…he allowed the opposition 5 times unlimited rebuttal and then sputterred into that rebuttal.
When, oh why does an conservative go on these shows?
Why of why is gg allowed anything but dull crayons!

OK RSM knuckleheads (or numbnuts, in the case of ‘Joe’ and Ragin’ Randy), since you’re raging against Matthews for calling Bachman a “balloonhead,” go ahead and ‘splain how this isn’t a statement who is unhinged from reality (or at least any reasonable sense of history):

“the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States.”

I’ve got the popcorn on and am waiting for the show.

FAIR AND BALANCED….

Here’s an example:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0111/Dept_of_water_carrying.html?showall

The accompanying photographs were heavily altered, although the audience was probably none the wiser. Mr. Reddicliffe looked like the wicked witch after a hard night of drinking, but it was the photo of Mr. Steinberg that stopped traffic when it appeared on the Web at Media Matters side by side with his actual photo. In a technique familiar to students of vintage German propaganda, his ears were pulled out, his teeth splayed apart, his forehead lowered and his nose was widened and enlarged in a way that made him look more like Fagin than the guy I work with.

FAIR AND BALANCED indeed.

It can’t be any other way.

I pity their audience who REALLY REALLY think it is so.

I can understand why Matthews would go off on that, that was a pretty dumb thing to say. I don’t think she actually meant it the way it came out, but there it is. She said it, she owns it.

And that life might come crumbling down, no worries if she’s hit by a scandal or has a meltdown, we still have Crazy Bachmann as a fine substitute to kick around.

That’s voices in your head you are hearing. Take your medicine.

I suppose Tingles wanted to say “poopyhead”, but was constrained by network policies for civility.

Heheheh. Half the fight is knowing which weapon to pick, and pointing out that study after study after study shows Fox to be far more fair and balanced than any other news network is the one sure way to give a Leftard apoplexy.

It really hurts that she’s so much better looking, successful and smarter than you’ll ever be, doesn’t it?

Puzzle me this, Ragin’ R: Exactly which of the “founders” made it to 1865? Your suggestion that “most of them died” before ’65 implies that some lived that long.

Much more to the point: Bachmann discusses the “founders” as a group. Well, as a group they agreed to a document that incorporated slavery as an accepted institution. Certainly, some of the founders not only opposed slavery but also worked against it after the Constitution was adopted. However, most did nothing of the sort. They either stuck their heads in the sand or actively supported slavery.

So tell me, then, exactly which “essentials of the matter” are you thinking of?

Ok, point to you for noting (correctly, something I never thought I’d see from you, color me surprised) that none of the Founding Fathers lived until 1865.

That said.

Don’t you dare lecture anyone on “reasonable sense of history” when that is your take on the groundwork laid by the Founding Fathers to abolish the practice of slavery.

You ignorant slut.