Sandra Fluke Argued for Mandatory Coverage for Sex-Change Surgery
Posted on | March 5, 2012 | 141 Comments
Rather belatedly, we are becoming aware that this supposedly typical Georgetown coed is not very typical at all:
[B]irth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if “gender reassignment” surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance. She makes these views clear in an article she co-edited with Karen Hu in the Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law.
The title of the article . . . is “Employment Discrimination Against LGBTQ Persons” and was published in the Journal’s 2011 Annual Review.
Remember, as Byron York previously reported, Fluke was rejected as a last-minute substitute witness at a Feb. 16 committee hearing because staffers for Chairman Issa were unable to discover Fluke’s claim to expertise relevant to the subject of the hearing. This law school journal article is the sort of thing that might have been discovered about Fluke’s background, had the Democrats who put Fluke forward as a witness done so with the usual 72-hour advance notice. Here’s one brief quote from the article:
Transgender persons wishing to undergo the gender reassignment process frequently face heterosexist employer health insurance policies that label the surgery as cosmetic or medically unnecessary and therefore uncovered.
Now, imagine Fluke trying to defend this language about “heterosexist” policies in a public hearing, with Republican members of the committee questioning her about whether religious institutions (or private businesses, or taxpayers) should also be required to foot the bill for “gender reassignment.”
Congratulations, America: You’ve been scammed!
UPDATE: Dan Collins at The Conservatory points out that the Obama administration is already providing illegal immigrants with “hormone treatments for transgendered people.”
Of course, this only makes sense. We wouldn’t want these foreign transpeople to go back to wherever they (illegally) came from and say that they’d been the victims of American “heterosexism,” would we? Then President Obama would have to issue another apology to the foreigners we had victimized.
UPDATE II: Welcome, Mark Levin radio listeners! A few words by The Great One certainly did kick the online traffic into high gear.
UPDATE III: Linked by Evil Blogger Lady, and there is now a Memeorandum thread, aggregating further coverage by LifeNews.com, Nice Deb, Protein Wisdom, Hot Air, National Review, Riehl World View and The College Conservative.
Also linked by Bob Belvedere’s Camp of the Saints.
UPDATE IV: Ed Driscoll dubs this “Flukeaquiddick.”
UPDATE V (Smitty): click the Site Meter screen cap for Memeorandum thread.
Stacy wishes to clarify that the hours of 19-2100 on this chart are due to the awesomeness of Mark Levin. Any resemblance to a gesture telling James Wolcott that he is #1 is strictly coincidental.


Pingback: Sandra Fluke Argued for Mandatory Coverage for Sex-Change Surgery | Are We Aware Yet? Political News Blog-Current News Political News Blog
Pingback: The Morning Flap: March 6, 2012 | Flap's Blog - FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
Pingback: Truth Wins Out - War On Sandra Fluke’s Body Is Now War On Transgender Rights, Somehow
Pingback: Sandra Fluke supports mandatory coverage of sex change surgery « Wintery Knight
Pingback: Sandra Fluke, AKA “Condom Girl”, Who and What is She? | Save R Nation
Pingback: Fluke Spin… | askmarion
Pingback: On the North River
Pingback: Whats up sluts - Page 7 - Pelican Parts Technical BBS
Pingback: DPTB Part II: Sex Sex Sex And Stacy McCain « The Camp Of The Saints
Pingback: Fisking Fluke’s Fables | Koch's Tour
Pingback: Anita Dunn Mao Admirer Backs Sandra Fluke: Not Nearly the Whole Story – Connection to Obama White House Deeper Than Dunn | Maggie's Notebook
Pingback: FMJRA 2.0: Spring Forward! : The Other McCain
Pingback: More on the Sandra Fluke Agitprop: Obama adviser Anita Dunn’s PR firm, Fluke Exposed As Fraud, Activist, White House Operative, Fluke’s appearance no fluke, and Fisking Fluke’s Fables « What's Right News Blog