Doggy Style: Delaware Couple Arrested, Now Facing Felony Bestiality Charges
Posted on | January 11, 2013 | 95 Comments
Police say Samantha L. Golt had sex with a dog.
A 24-year-old Delaware mother had sex with a dog while her boyfriend took pictures, according to officials who arrested the couple this week.
Samanth L. Golt and 25-year-old boyfriend James P. Crow were arrested Tuesday and charged with felony bestiality and felony second-degree conspiracy for the alleged sex act that police say occurred at the couple’s Milford home, Delaware State News reports:
The investigation began when a Delaware State Police trooper was contacted by a concerned citizen in reference to abuse of a canine on Dec. 28, papers said.
During the investigation, photographs taken by Mr. Crow were collected as evidence, court documents said.
Police said they compared a Delaware Justice Information System Web Portal photograph to the evidence photo and positively identified Ms. Golt as the female having sex with the dog. . . .
Bestiality is a class D felony under state law. . . . A person convicted of bestiality would be placed on the state’s sex offender registry, the Delaware Attorney General’s Office said.
Samantha Golt is the mother of a 4-year-old girl. Golt had mentioned on Facebook that she owned three dogs, pit bulls and mixed breeds, the Digital Journal reported.
PREVIOUSLY:
- Dec. 20: A Constitutional Right to Donkey Sex?
- Dec. 10: Ohio Democrat Makes Bestiality Jokes; Humane Society Official Not Amused
Comments
95 Responses to “Doggy Style: Delaware Couple Arrested, Now Facing Felony Bestiality Charges”
January 11th, 2013 @ 7:43 pm
@smitty_one_each must resist joking about a certain onion-skinned columnist. MUST.
January 11th, 2013 @ 7:53 pm
I fail to see why you found it necessary to post this…
January 11th, 2013 @ 7:53 pm
Delaware, the new Florida…
January 11th, 2013 @ 7:54 pm
It does illustrate the depravity of “civilization” today. This story makes a bookend with the English tabloid article advocating pedophilia.
January 11th, 2013 @ 7:56 pm
I wonder, if they voted, who they voted for???
January 11th, 2013 @ 8:03 pm
I understand Michael Vick is dedicating his next completed pass to her. Symbolic.
January 11th, 2013 @ 8:09 pm
Just ain’t dogs..the question is, if the donkey is male, does this make the Jihadist gay?
January 11th, 2013 @ 8:20 pm
It wasn’t a tabloid, it was a left-wing broadsheet, the Guardian.
January 11th, 2013 @ 8:22 pm
Too bad she isn’t married to David Gregory.
It would be a resume enhancer.
January 11th, 2013 @ 8:30 pm
Man’s Best Friend, not Man’s Best Sex Toy.
And, to top it off, I don’t even care for dogs.
January 11th, 2013 @ 8:37 pm
You’re right. I was thinking that it was another.
January 11th, 2013 @ 8:39 pm
It used to be if it bleeds, it leads. Now it is if it barks, it starts!
January 11th, 2013 @ 9:13 pm
“Arf” means “arf”. IYKWIMAITYD.
January 11th, 2013 @ 9:15 pm
“Mixed breeds,” indeed.
January 11th, 2013 @ 9:46 pm
Abuse of a canine? What the fucking fuck? We can call this what it is, but holy shit, are we supposed to feel sorry for the damn animal? That’s even more depraved than what these pervs did.
January 11th, 2013 @ 10:47 pm
She can’t help who she loves.
January 11th, 2013 @ 10:56 pm
That’s messed up.
January 11th, 2013 @ 11:00 pm
I know who they didn’t vote for.
January 11th, 2013 @ 11:01 pm
She loves getting it long and hard…from a dog.
January 11th, 2013 @ 11:02 pm
The dog does not care. This is not about abuse of an animal (sorry to be sexist, but a male dog climbing on a bitch is not abuse to the dog). it is about abuse of standards of decency. But the latter raises all sort of issues that the left does not want to explore.
January 11th, 2013 @ 11:03 pm
She would get prosecutorial immunity.
January 11th, 2013 @ 11:04 pm
Well, good thing he is not in the playoffs.
January 11th, 2013 @ 11:04 pm
Biden is from Delaware. I am not surprised.
January 11th, 2013 @ 11:12 pm
First of all, it is not at all certain it was a male dog. The article doesn’t state that. Also, you have no idea what sort of subtle psychological pressures may have been applied to coerce the dog.
Finally, the dog was probably underage.
“Woof!” means “NO!” dammit!
January 11th, 2013 @ 11:29 pm
given the lefty insistence that all morality is personal choice, what basis is there for making this a crime? first, queers getting married is normalized. now, lefty “scholars” are claiming pedophilia is just another sexual preference. there is no logical basis in outlawing bestiality, other than harming the animal. and a male dog humping a woman is not getting hurt.
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:04 am
Woof means “No” until it extends out and he starts humping. She must have gone through all the “dogs” at the local tavern before she decided on the real thing.
January 12th, 2013 @ 6:20 am
This is exactly why morality laws are so dangerous. This couple offended the public taste, and now they must pay dearly. As must their daughter and other family members. There are already laws against animal cruelty, so why a specific law regulating inter-species sexual encounters? Is God offended? Nature? If we believe animals to have feelings of shame and guilt related to sexual activity, we must change the way we treat animals altogether.
January 12th, 2013 @ 8:09 am
Wife to husband: “You know what, I have an interest in boinking our dog”
Husband: “OK, Can I watch?”
How the hell do to “mature” adults agree to do this???
How does a conversation like that even start and doesn’t end 30 seconds later with one of them RUNNING out of the house with the child, never to return???
January 12th, 2013 @ 8:12 am
Are you shitting me? Offended public tastes my ass. It’s people who think like you who are dangerous. These people have trained one or more agressive pitbull type dogs that it’s ok to hump human in the home with their 4 year old daughter……and everyones worried about the safety and wellbeing of the dog. They didn’t give a shit what impact their actions might have on anyone or anything else, and that’s the problem with their mindset and yours. If that animal gets excited and tries to hump anyone else as it has been allowed or encouraged to do it could cause serious injury, with the likelihood of having to actually be destroyed as a result. Totally irresponsible, selfish choices which put others at risk should have consequences. Hopefully, theirs will not include damaging others who had no choice.
January 12th, 2013 @ 8:32 am
Either way, this time they screwed the pooch.
January 12th, 2013 @ 9:17 am
A: If they’re morally relativistic lefties.
B: “Hey, you know what would be cool? I could let the dog do *me* now. Move over.
January 12th, 2013 @ 3:48 pm
When a society allows for it’s people to be promiscuous without social consequence, it devalues the simple and basic acts of sexuality.
One way it does this is regarding the satisfaction one gets out of the sexual act.
If the normal sex act is unlimited in the amount of times it may be enjoyed, then, after a while, it becomes routine and, since sexual satisfaction is primarily a psychological phenomenon, this type starts to no longer satisfy. So, the person has to seek out other means of achieving sexual satisfaction. This leads to such things as bisexuality, S&M, anonymous sex, and anal sex, to name a few – all of which are not normal.
When these practices no longer satisfy, the person has to ramp-up the thrill some more and, thus, the perversion. This leads to pedophilia, bestiality, and other horrors.
Sexual Revolutions are, ultimately, dead ends, contributing to the deadening of the soul and the fall of civilizations.
January 12th, 2013 @ 3:54 pm
[Forgive me for this, but I just can’t resist] Is this what you call ‘Going Golt’???
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:01 pm
Mina, you’re making me suspect we ought to call the humane society over to your house to check on the well being of Fido
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:13 pm
When she said she loved her dog, I thought she meant……….
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:17 pm
[…] Do take the time to click here and read the sickening details. […]
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:28 pm
Don’t they sell dildos in Delaware? Or is that term restricted to politicians.
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:38 pm
According to OpenSecrets.org, a Samantha L. Golt and James P. Crow donated to Obama’s reelection campaign. So they not only screw dogs, they screw the American public as well.
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:38 pm
Wow. Did you see her picture? I wonder if all the dog’s friends are giving him shit.
Can the dog claim he was drunk?
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:40 pm
Rather Dogmatic thing to say isn’t it?
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:41 pm
If not for animals most muslim men would be sex starved.
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:45 pm
I don’t see those donations/
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:46 pm
Wait, the guy was actually named “Jim Crow”?!?
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:47 pm
Why would a dog want/need a dildo?
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:48 pm
Nearly everything that used to be considered perverted is now considered healthy sexual expression, and the number one best seller is a book for women to learn and desire BDSM. So, bestiality is still gross, I suppose, but I would bet that won’t last more than another decade or so, and then it will be all about how those who think it’s sick are just judgmental puritans. Sigh.
January 12th, 2013 @ 4:52 pm
And if she’s wet, it’s not “rape!” or “rape-rape” or whatever, eh?
Wow, Bloggerlady, you really are evil.
January 12th, 2013 @ 5:06 pm
So in other words, this isn’t the first time they’ve screwed the pooch.
January 12th, 2013 @ 5:10 pm
Not a male dog? Are you saying they make such things as strap-ons for dogs?
Somehow I find that more disturbing than the act itself.
January 12th, 2013 @ 5:23 pm
lol.
January 12th, 2013 @ 5:23 pm
Rimshot.