The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Is Laci Green (@gogreen18) a Rapist?

Posted on | July 5, 2016 | 32 Comments


Laci Green is a “public sex educator, and feminist activist” who has “hosted online sex education content on behalf of Planned Parenthood and Discovery News.” Therefore, I was shocked to hear the suggestion that she is also “one of the most serious sexual predators on YouTube.” However, this was the subject of a video by Dr. Phil Mason helpfully entitled, “IS LACI GREEN A SERIAL RAPIST?”

More than 250,000 people have watched that video, and as Laci Green herself says, we should always believe anyone who makes an accusation, because “only” between 2% and 8% of rape accusations are false. And far be it from me to say that Dr. Phil Mason, a respected scientist, would be among that single-digit percentage who peddle slanderous falsehood “for attention, for revenge, out of jealousy,” as Laci Green said.

The problem is one of (a) math and (b) definition, as I’ve pointed out in relation to the “campus rape epidemic” hysteria. There are about 12 million college and university students ages 18-24 in the United States, of whom 57 percent (about 7 million) are female. If, as feminists have frequently claimed, 1-in-5 female college students are victims of sexual assault, this would translate to many hundreds of thousands of cases annually. Therefore, even if “only” between 2% (1-in-50) or 8% (1-in-12) of rape accusations are false, this still means that thousands of college boys might be falsely accused every year.

Having addressed the math side of the problem, now let’s examine the issue of definition. One of the problems with the infamous “1-in-5” statistic is that the surveys from which this number is derived ask questions about “unwanted” behavior that is not rape. If a couple are dancing at a party and the guy grabs the girl in a sexual way, or if a couple are making out and the guy makes a move toward third base that the girl rejects, either of these incidents might be listed as “unwanted” behavior in response to a survey question, but this is not rape.

Only the idiots who promulgate “affirmative consent” legislation would expect two teenagers in the midst of a makeout session to interrogate each other — “May I place my hand on your thigh now, Kathy?” — at every stage of their sweaty encounter in the back seat of a parked car. There is a difference between a bad date and a felony, an important difference that is obscured by the bogus “1-in-5” number. (See “Statistical Voodoo and Elastic Definitions,” June 15, 2014.) When adults with common sense expressed doubt about the “1-in-5” claim, feminists smeared these skeptics as “rape apologists,” and reasonable discussion became impossible because feminism is a synonym for shut up.

Context matters, definitions matter, math matters and evidence matters. Adults with common sense understand how sex actually happens — steaming up the windows of a 1973 Volkswagen parked behind a shopping center, for example — and we know what rape is. The idiots behind “affirmative consent” are all much younger than me. Certainly there have been changes in sexual culture over the past 30 years that might require us to examine whether, for example, the greater availability of hard-core pornography (since Al Gore invented the Internet) has created new problems, e.g., boys coercing girls into acts which are painful and unsanitary, although we are no longer permitted to call these acts perverse or abnormal, lest we offend the Sodomy Lobby.

Normal people having normal sex with each other are not the problem. Even horny teenagers routinely negotiate their makeout sessions without committing felonies, and common-sense adults are not deceived by the propaganda tactics behind the “campus rape epidemic” hysteria. However, feminists are not normal people with common sense.


Laci Green is a “pansexual” who advocates “butt sex.” Laci Green is an atheist who is an expert on lesbian sex and, perhaps not coincidentally, she had to seek professional treatment for serious mental illness. To put it as bluntly as possible, Laci Green is an insane pervert who makes her living by encouraging young people to have abnormal sex.

Does any of this mean Laci Green is a serial rapist? No, and I am not aware of any specific accusations that she has ever coerced or forced anyone into unwanted sexual activity. However, this may be because (a) Laci Green is a feminist and (b) sane normal people avoid feminists.


Everybody knows feminism causes herpes, and anyone concerned for their health and safety stays far away from feminists like Laci Green.

This probably explains why no one has ever publicly admitted having sex with Laci Green. Check her Wikipedia page, and you find that this 26-year-old woman has never been married, nor does her biography name any of her alleged boyfriends or girlfriends. Don’t you suppose that a celebrity who has made numerous TV appearances — named by Time magazine as one of the 30 most influential people on the Internet — would have occasionally been the subject of a mention in a gossip column? Wouldn’t you expect to see paparazzi photos of Laci Green with a date at an awards ceremony or something? However, while Laci Green has claimed to have a boyfriend (they “prevent pregnancy together”), this alleged boyfriend never stepped forward to admit that he was having sex with her. Doesn’t this seem rather suspicious, ladies and gentlemen?

Do we have evidence of her known proclivities? Perhaps.

Mentally ill women with make-believe boyfriends? Ring a bell? Right — Jackie Coakley and the alleged UVA rapist “Haven Monahan.” But we should always believe survivors, and if any of Laci Green’s victims ever musters the courage to admit having sex with her, I’ll believe them.



32 Responses to “Is Laci Green (@gogreen18) a Rapist?”

  1. Joe Joe
    July 5th, 2016 @ 4:32 pm

    It’s like sewage dumped on your doorstep. One wonders who her parents were and if they sexually abused her.

  2. robertstacymccain
    July 5th, 2016 @ 4:44 pm

    I blame Mormonism, quite frankly.

    Anyone who cares to examine the history of the Mormon cult can see that Joseph Smith was a blasphemous fraud, a plagiarist and forger, a sexual pervert and false prophet.

    What often happens is that young people (especially girls) who grow up in the Mormon cult discover the truth and become disillusioned. They then not only reject Mormonism and become alienated from their family, but most of them then become vehement atheists. Laci Green certainly is not the first former Mormon woman to follow this path. Sonia Johnson was an ex-Mormon who divorced her husband and became a radical lesbian feminist. False prophets and their cults tend to produce very wicked followers and apostate rebels.

  3. Slidellman4life
    July 5th, 2016 @ 4:51 pm

    Laci…has issues.

    I saw a video she posted about marriage that she has since either made private or deleted which demonstrated her own personal hatred of marriage, as well as some daddy issues and her belief white wedding gowns were racist (I am NOT making that up!).

    She has also repeatedly lied about things sexual, even though she casts herself as an expert (Loved the video about there being no hymen or pain for female first timers.).

    The fact anyone is considering her an authority on anything is an abomination and an indication of the current status of society.

  4. Grandson Of TheGrumpus
    July 5th, 2016 @ 4:55 pm

    Reading this article was compelling— in the same manner as watching a train crash.

    It was a waste of time and effort… in addition to making me quite nauseous.

    I feel pity for this young woman and all those who’s lives she’s touch, and those who are in regular association w/her. Her mental/spiritual illness is as communicable as any pathogen on the physical plain. She’ll infect a huge number of innocent souls before she wises-up. That’s very sad.

    That I read about these things, that they’vr become so common that they no longer shock the bulk of our citizens makes me feel old and almost as if— b/c I believe in wholesomeness, fidelity to a spouse, and the sacredness of marital relations— I’m painted in old, washed-out shades of gray.

    Heaven help us.

  5. Grandson Of TheGrumpus
    July 5th, 2016 @ 5:06 pm


  6. robertstacymccain
    July 5th, 2016 @ 5:14 pm

    Going back at least to Wilhelm Reich and Alfred Kinsey, the more depraved a “sex expert” is — in their personal lives as well as their teaching — the more influential they tend to become.

    The ideals of chastity and fidelity have no influential advocates, because the media gets to decide who is “influential,” and the people in charge of the modern media are all anti-Christian perverts.

  7. concern00
    July 5th, 2016 @ 5:26 pm

    She’s taken all of the fun out of lesbian porn.

  8. M. Thompson
    July 5th, 2016 @ 5:42 pm

    I’ll just say that I don’t understand the need to talk about sex all the time to people who do this sort of thing. Call it just sanity.

    Also, BDSM costumes make me giggle. They all look faintly ridiculous. Can anyone else point that out?

  9. Joe Joe
    July 5th, 2016 @ 5:45 pm

    I did not expect that. I’ll have to think about it. There have to be women who leave Mormonism and don’t intimate lesbian relationships with every woman in a selfie. And certainly the sewage-laden Kathy Griffin is from a Catholic household, where she was also sexually abused by her brother.

    Also, have you seen this:

    Obama admin refuses to visit colleges that ‘mishandle’ sexual assault

  10. Daniel Freeman
    July 5th, 2016 @ 5:52 pm

    Funny thing, I think she’s done hundreds of videos — and as far as I can recall, every single one is about abnormality.

  11. Jeanette Victoria ?????????
    July 5th, 2016 @ 6:13 pm

    I just image these women at 60, and it isn’t pretty. I suspect she would not be spending time like I did with the neighborhood women all of which were Christians who gushed about their husbands. I’ve never seen a happy atheist, LGBT degenerate or feminists.

  12. Jeanette Victoria ?????????
    July 5th, 2016 @ 6:14 pm

    I’ve known two Mormon who left that cult, one is born again Evangelical Christian and a awesome voice coach. The other went Eastern Orthodox and became a sub-deacon.

  13. FenelonSpoke
    July 5th, 2016 @ 6:25 pm

    So, she’s talking at the White House?. What a surprise//sarc.
    The WH wouldn’t have some morally straight young person who wasn’t an exhibitionist speaking. I just feel sadness for this woman. She’s left her mora/l religious moorings behind her and has no center and she’s trying to feel the void. with this, Sad.

    Pray for her. She needs it.

  14. FenelonSpoke
    July 5th, 2016 @ 6:29 pm

    P.S.. “Magical Unicorn Lesbian sex?”


    How old is this kid anyway?

  15. FenelonSpoke
    July 5th, 2016 @ 6:38 pm

    P.P.S She needs to do something about her voice timbre and her overwrought facial expressions if she wants to be taken seriously, because she sounds rather like a hyper sexed Valley Girl. “Like OMG!”

  16. Matthew W
    July 5th, 2016 @ 6:44 pm

    Mom and dad must really be proud

  17. Matthew W
    July 5th, 2016 @ 6:47 pm

    Great Marx Brothers movie !!

  18. FenelonSpoke
    July 5th, 2016 @ 6:52 pm

    I am slightly suspicious of people who smile all the time anyway. It’s as if she’s trying to convince herself she’s happy doing all this, and so smiles broadly into the camera..

  19. Wombat_socho
    July 5th, 2016 @ 7:23 pm

    Clearly, she’s talking about what she knows.

  20. Blessed Bee
    July 5th, 2016 @ 7:52 pm

    What happened to your latest Twitter Account?

  21. Sort-Of-Mad Max
    July 6th, 2016 @ 1:33 am


    -in case the videos don’t load, that’s basically it.

  22. DeadMessenger
    July 6th, 2016 @ 2:14 am

    And there’s lots of young people who think she’s great. Their own parents = idiot old farts, Laci Green = super cool, and a great teacher.

  23. DeadMessenger
    July 6th, 2016 @ 2:17 am

    That would be more accurate if you interspersed random feminist or SJW buzzwords.

  24. robertstacymccain
    July 6th, 2016 @ 6:37 am

    What do YOU think happened?

  25. Jim Christian
    July 6th, 2016 @ 9:04 am

    Future cat lady. Slutty, well-defined member of the Alphabet Soup of Sexual Depravity wasting her youth only, like the rest of them, to bemoan the lack of children and family when her merely ok looks fade. It will be men’s fault too. Her dissipated, diseased and toxic-of-womb will be infertile from twenty years on hormonal birth control, untold abortions, the booze, drugs legal and illegal. All of it wearing down her soul to a sharp piece of flint, good to nor for no one. Her influence will evaporate the minute her looks fade, or if she adds another ten pounds to her already chunky frame.

    I’ve seen a million of them, they think the party never ends and then: Poof. All of a sudden, the calls and whatever income stop, your “sisters” disappear (They are a mess by then too) and bingo, it’s party and life over. These broads are mentally ill to a psychotic state in any case and it’s good that they don’t breed. Better they hadn’t had their 15 years on earth after high school, but you can’t stop every evil.

  26. Jim Christian
    July 6th, 2016 @ 9:07 am

    Imagine, this is what Obama wants for dear Malia, his daughter? Really?

  27. robertstacymccain
    July 6th, 2016 @ 10:44 am

    “… wasting her youth …”

    This is the key point. Young people are being manipulated by the Population Control movement and do not even recognize the agenda behind it.

    Students of demographics understand that fertility delayed is fertility denied. No matter how a woman avoids having children in young adulthood (ages 18-24), whether through contraception, abortion or abstinence, every cycle represents a lost opportunity for motherhood that she can never regain in the future. Every student of the matter knows that the seven years between a woman’s 18th and 25th birthday are her peak fertility. A healthy young woman is more likely to become pregnant in her late teens and early 20s than at any subsequent point in her life. A healthy human female has approximately 360 reproductive opportunities (12 cycles annually between ages 15 and 45) during her lifetime, and the 84 cycles during ages 18-24 are scientifically ideal in terms of her fertility, the health of her offspring and her chances to live to see her grandchildren. Her fertility slowly declines after age 26, the risk of birth defects increases age 30, and by the time she is in her 40s, a woman experiences the increased risk of cancer, heart attacks and other deadly or crippling diseases. The 21-year-old mother is very likely to live to see her children have children, whereas the woman who delays childbearing until her 30s is increasing the odds against her prospects of being a grandmother.

    What this means in terms of demographics — in terms of the larger society, as a general trend — is something we can study objectively. However, what this may mean for an individual woman is often a tragedy that is overlooked because it is considered impolite to point out the factors involved. Children and parents are being deprived of the support that grandparents have traditionally provided to young families. Gifts from Grandpa, or babysitting by Grandma — these are tangible and valuable benefits to young families when people have their families while they are still young. Furthermore (and this is often overlooked), by marrying and having her first child in her early 20s, a woman provides herself cushion to her “biological clock” in terms of providing her eldest child with younger siblings. I believe that larger families tend to be happier families, and that having three or four children is better than having only one or two. (Of course, my wife and I have six, but that involves a story.) Larger families pay dividends in future generations, because children born to those who come from larger families have more aunts, uncles and cousins, and this kinship network can provide a variety of social and financial resources to children.

    To say that Laci Green is ‘wasting her youth” is directly on target because, in fact, she has already wasted her youth. Go study the available data, and you find that the childless woman who is still unmarried at age 26 is not very likely ever to become a mother. She has already passed the crucial pivot-points (median age at first marriage and media age at first birth) in terms of population demographics.

    Ask yourself who is funding the promotion of the kind of “sex education” Laci Green is known for. Ask yourself why they are funding this, and follow the money — these are the people who endorsed (or at least never objected to) China’s infamous “one-child” policy. Think about it.

    Not a conspiracy. It’s a consensus of the elite.

  28. robertstacymccain
    July 6th, 2016 @ 10:44 am

    She has a lovely smile. She is the smiling face of the Culture of Death.

  29. Warmongerel
    July 6th, 2016 @ 6:21 pm

    “Daddy! Look at me! Look what I can do! Look! Daddy! Look!”

    All Leftists are emotionally damaged children seeking attention.

  30. Blessed Bee
    July 6th, 2016 @ 7:29 pm

    I’m guessing you were engaging in some of that free speech again.
    Do you have a new Twitter?

  31. NRPax
    July 6th, 2016 @ 7:43 pm

    Laci Green is a “pansexual”

    For those unaware, “Pansexual” came about because “will screw anything” sounds too crass and “Bisexual” isn’t edgy enough. This has been your fun lesson for the day.

  32. News of the Week (July 10th, 2016) | The Political Hat
    July 10th, 2016 @ 4:56 pm

    […] Is Laci Green (@gogreen18) a Rapist? Laci Green is a “public sex educator, and feminist activist” who has “hosted online sex education content on behalf of Planned Parenthood and Discovery News.” Therefore, I was shocked to hear the suggestion that she is also “one of the most serious sexual predators on YouTube.” […]