The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

‘You Convicted Him on Twitter’

Posted on | January 29, 2010 | 21 Comments

Andrew Breitbart gets into a fascinating argument with MSNBC’s David Shuster here.

Via Nice Deb. Much more blog reaction at Memeorandum.

UPDATE: Jill Stanek notes that the Washington Post has already been forced to correct and clarify its first report on James O’Keefe’s arrest.

Category: Andrew Breitbart, Media Bias, MSNBC, Video

Comments

21 Responses to “‘You Convicted Him on Twitter’”

  1. Charles Johnson
    January 29th, 2010 @ 3:49 pm

    We convict criminals and enemies where ever we can. I convicted you and Pam Geller at LGF. We do not care about process, the ends justify the means. Our ends are promoting ourselves at the expense of others.

  2. Charles Johnson
    January 29th, 2010 @ 10:49 am

    We convict criminals and enemies where ever we can. I convicted you and Pam Geller at LGF. We do not care about process, the ends justify the means. Our ends are promoting ourselves at the expense of others.

  3. Dave C
    January 29th, 2010 @ 5:28 pm

    If you watch the clip closely.. You can see Keith Olbermann slip into the frame a time or two while manipulating his favorite sock puppet, David Shuster.

  4. Dave C
    January 29th, 2010 @ 5:28 pm

    If you watch the clip closely.. You can see Keith Olbermann slip into the frame a time or two while manipulating his favorite sock puppet, David Shuster.

  5. Dave C
    January 29th, 2010 @ 12:28 pm

    If you watch the clip closely.. You can see Keith Olbermann slip into the frame a time or two while manipulating his favorite sock puppet, David Shuster.

  6. Red
    January 29th, 2010 @ 7:15 pm

    Updated link at this post. Thanks for the follow up. I hope O’Keefe emerges relatively unscathed if all this boils down to trespassing.

  7. Red
    January 29th, 2010 @ 2:15 pm

    Updated link at this post. Thanks for the follow up. I hope O’Keefe emerges relatively unscathed if all this boils down to trespassing.

  8. kansas
    January 29th, 2010 @ 9:32 pm

    Is it just me or are more conservatives simply not accepting MSNBC bullshit? If that is the case, just plan on MSNBC not having any on.

  9. kansas
    January 29th, 2010 @ 4:32 pm

    Is it just me or are more conservatives simply not accepting MSNBC bullshit? If that is the case, just plan on MSNBC not having any on.

  10. Miss Sharon
    January 29th, 2010 @ 11:58 pm

    Shuster’s partisan glee is nauseating. I followed his tweets immediately following the first burst of fallacious news/smear.

    The funniest one was Schuster telling James that @JamesKeefeeIII was not a journalist… I kid you not! Of course, now in order to provide documentation of Schuster’s tweets, I cannot.The account is gone…hmm problem with the boss, David?

    Oh, and the taxpayer funded, nonpartisan @ACORN_Nat was just as egregious as the tax exempt @mmfa. The smearing continues as they try to pressure the http://tickets.commonwealthclub.org/ to drop O’Keefe’s 2/1 gig.

  11. Miss Sharon
    January 29th, 2010 @ 11:58 pm

    Shuster’s partisan glee is nauseating. I followed his tweets immediately following the first burst of fallacious news/smear.

    The funniest one was Schuster telling James that @JamesKeefeeIII was not a journalist… I kid you not! Of course, now in order to provide documentation of Schuster’s tweets, I cannot.The account is gone…hmm problem with the boss, David?

    Oh, and the taxpayer funded, nonpartisan @ACORN_Nat was just as egregious as the tax exempt @mmfa. The smearing continues as they try to pressure the http://tickets.commonwealthclub.org/ to drop O’Keefe’s 2/1 gig.

  12. Miss Sharon
    January 29th, 2010 @ 6:58 pm

    Shuster’s partisan glee is nauseating. I followed his tweets immediately following the first burst of fallacious news/smear.

    The funniest one was Schuster telling James that @JamesKeefeeIII was not a journalist… I kid you not! Of course, now in order to provide documentation of Schuster’s tweets, I cannot.The account is gone…hmm problem with the boss, David?

    Oh, and the taxpayer funded, nonpartisan @ACORN_Nat was just as egregious as the tax exempt @mmfa. The smearing continues as they try to pressure the http://tickets.commonwealthclub.org/ to drop O’Keefe’s 2/1 gig.

  13. Miss Sharon
    January 30th, 2010 @ 3:00 am

    I apologize.@DavidShuster has not been suspended. here is the one of many on the “convictions by twitter”

    http://twitter.com/DavidShuster/status/8265042783

  14. Miss Sharon
    January 30th, 2010 @ 3:00 am

    I apologize.@DavidShuster has not been suspended. here is the one of many on the “convictions by twitter”

    http://twitter.com/DavidShuster/status/8265042783

  15. Miss Sharon
    January 29th, 2010 @ 10:00 pm

    I apologize.@DavidShuster has not been suspended. here is the one of many on the “convictions by twitter”

    http://twitter.com/DavidShuster/status/8265042783

  16. ccoffer
    January 30th, 2010 @ 3:17 am

    Schuster is a robot. He’s never had an original thought. He’s never done anything of worth. His only job skill is his blind devotion to the leftist political machine.

    He’s a Ken doll.

    What a waste of an otherwise perfectly good life.

  17. ccoffer
    January 29th, 2010 @ 10:17 pm

    Schuster is a robot. He’s never had an original thought. He’s never done anything of worth. His only job skill is his blind devotion to the leftist political machine.

    He’s a Ken doll.

    What a waste of an otherwise perfectly good life.

  18. ccoffer
    January 30th, 2010 @ 3:28 am

    Am I the only one who can only see the “Church Lady” whenever David speaks? He’s got the little head bobble, the “smile up your nose” face, the effeminate voice. It’s uncanny.

  19. ccoffer
    January 29th, 2010 @ 10:28 pm

    Am I the only one who can only see the “Church Lady” whenever David speaks? He’s got the little head bobble, the “smile up your nose” face, the effeminate voice. It’s uncanny.

  20. Red
    January 30th, 2010 @ 6:13 am

    Well isn’t that special?

  21. Red
    January 30th, 2010 @ 1:13 am

    Well isn’t that special?