# No CBO Score For ObamaCare, But Here’s A Cunning Plan

**Posted on** | March 17, 2010 | 28 Comments

by *Smitty*

Via Drudge (the only site faster than Insty), The Hill reports that the CBO couldn’t muster the pixie dust to polish the numbers into something that could pass muster, as if integrity, the Constitution, or common sense mattered fig #1 to this atrocious Congress.

My best suggestion is to make enough rounding errors with them big digits that they still appear to be in base 10 when converted to base 16, i.e., no A-F appearing. Dead giveaway, for that fraction of the population that takes any of this crap seriously.

Converting everything to hexadecimal affects an apparent shrinkage, perfectly appropriate for this game of rectal-pluck limbo.

We all know it’s pure hooey, anyway. Like the 72 hour bit (which could be made into 48 hours by a base 16 conversion, see?) I mean, really: what legitimate analysis can occur in that amount of time, should a flaw be discovered?

Anyway, don’t say I’m not trying to be a Helpy Helper-person in these complex, trying times. If hex doesn’t work, all that’s left is unicorn math. Go, go BHO!

### Comments

28 Responses to “No CBO Score For ObamaCare, But Here’s A Cunning Plan”

## THE FULL METAL JACKET REACH-AROUND AWARD

**AMERICAN POWER**

This spot rotates to honor those who link us in shameless obedience to Rule 2 of "How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog."

## HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!

## Search

## Recent Posts

- Rule 5 Sunday: Julie Strain, RIP
- Modern Motherhood, Florida-Style
- The Other Podcast Rides Again
- FMJRA 2.0: Too Much Too Young
- Democrats and the Media (But I Repeat Myself) Are Trying to Destroy America
- John Weaver: ‘The Truth Is I’m Gay’
- In The Mailbox: 01.15.21
- The Media’s Gaslighting Intensifies: Trump Voters Are ‘Terrorists’?
- In The Mailbox: 01.14.21
- In The Mailbox: 01.13.21

## Click here to manage your email subscription options.

## RSS reader subscription

## MEMEORANDUM

## Recent Comments

- Animal’s Hump Day News | Animal Magnetism on Night Of The Digital Long Knives
- Wednesday Linkage « Bacon Time !!!!!! on Can I Get a ‘Roll Tide,’ Please?
- Web Links And More Yummy Hotties Than Pelosi Could Ever Impeach! (32 Pics) | HarshBrutus on Rule 5 Sunday: Rep. Lauren Boebert
- I was off, a little – Da Boom on Night Of The Digital Long Knives
- FMJRA 2.0: Broken Whiskey Glass : The Other McCain on Real Life Is Not Twitter or a Video Game

## THE AMAZING GONZO FEED

## Blog-Fu Ninja Masters

## ADVERTISEMENT

## Axis of Fedorables

- All-American Girl for the Restoration of Values
- Allergic to Bull
- Cat House Chat
- Chris Cassone
- Conservative Daily News
- DaTechguy
- Fishersville Mike
- Girl on the Right
- Haemet
- Just A Conservative Girl
- Little Miss Attila
- Marooned in Marin
- Paco Enterprises
- So It Goes In Shreveport
- SWAC Girl
- The (Perhaps Slightly Less) Lonely Conservative
- The Camp of the Saints
- The World's Youngest Blogger
- Uncoverage
- VA Right

## AMAZING SAVINGS NOW!

## Archives

- January 2021 (43)
- December 2020 (77)
- November 2020 (81)
- October 2020 (84)
- September 2020 (94)
- August 2020 (75)
- July 2020 (68)
- June 2020 (83)
- May 2020 (77)
- April 2020 (65)
- March 2020 (85)
- February 2020 (94)
- January 2020 (95)
- December 2019 (88)
- November 2019 (60)
- October 2019 (113)
- September 2019 (92)
- August 2019 (91)
- July 2019 (88)
- June 2019 (80)
- May 2019 (74)
- April 2019 (97)
- March 2019 (100)
- February 2019 (85)
- January 2019 (93)
- December 2018 (90)
- November 2018 (83)
- October 2018 (96)
- September 2018 (79)
- August 2018 (107)
- July 2018 (98)
- June 2018 (86)
- May 2018 (78)
- April 2018 (78)
- March 2018 (97)
- February 2018 (61)
- January 2018 (70)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (68)
- October 2017 (67)
- September 2017 (70)
- August 2017 (68)
- July 2017 (52)
- June 2017 (60)
- May 2017 (56)
- April 2017 (80)
- March 2017 (80)
- February 2017 (102)
- January 2017 (104)
- December 2016 (65)
- November 2016 (86)
- October 2016 (77)
- September 2016 (81)
- August 2016 (66)
- July 2016 (83)
- June 2016 (81)
- May 2016 (65)
- April 2016 (64)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (74)
- January 2016 (66)
- December 2015 (64)
- November 2015 (85)
- October 2015 (71)
- September 2015 (80)
- August 2015 (67)
- July 2015 (79)
- June 2015 (69)
- May 2015 (72)
- April 2015 (94)
- March 2015 (122)
- February 2015 (71)
- January 2015 (93)
- December 2014 (99)
- November 2014 (67)
- October 2014 (109)
- September 2014 (87)
- August 2014 (106)
- July 2014 (132)
- June 2014 (154)
- May 2014 (126)
- April 2014 (145)
- March 2014 (144)
- February 2014 (142)
- January 2014 (185)
- December 2013 (192)
- November 2013 (174)
- October 2013 (175)
- September 2013 (181)
- August 2013 (172)
- July 2013 (147)
- June 2013 (135)
- May 2013 (128)
- April 2013 (105)
- March 2013 (162)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (206)
- December 2012 (190)
- November 2012 (176)
- October 2012 (240)
- September 2012 (206)
- August 2012 (235)
- July 2012 (223)
- June 2012 (161)
- May 2012 (230)
- April 2012 (269)
- March 2012 (282)
- February 2012 (247)
- January 2012 (267)
- December 2011 (285)
- November 2011 (300)
- October 2011 (302)
- September 2011 (297)
- August 2011 (288)
- July 2011 (297)
- June 2011 (245)
- May 2011 (260)
- April 2011 (344)
- March 2011 (293)
- February 2011 (201)
- January 2011 (263)
- December 2010 (265)
- November 2010 (266)
- October 2010 (305)
- September 2010 (280)
- August 2010 (272)
- July 2010 (230)
- June 2010 (244)
- May 2010 (256)
- April 2010 (222)
- March 2010 (271)
- February 2010 (286)
- January 2010 (229)
- December 2009 (21)
- October 2009 (1)

## Wombat's Wizards of Blog

## SHAMELESS CAPITALISM

The Other McCain is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for this blog to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

## Can't Get Enough of That Hot Bloggy Stuff

- All-American Blogger
- American Glob
- American Power
- Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Athens & Jerusalem
- Barney Quick
- Bartholomew's Notes On Religion
- BatesLine
- Bear Creek Ledger
- Bearsears Patriots
- Blog de KingShamus
- Blueshelled
- Bride of Rove
- Cold Fury
- Dr. Helen
- Dustbury
- Five Feet of Fury
- I Own The World
- Legal Insurrection
- Little Miss Attila
- No Runny Eggs
- Obi`s Sister
- Piece of Work in Progress
- Pirates Cove
- Rhetorican
- The Conservatory
- The Sundries Shack
- VodkaPundit
- Zilla of the Resistance

## Blogroll

- 90 Miles From Tyranny
- A Conservative Shemale
- AmSpec Blog
- Bad Blue
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- Calvin Freiburger Online
- Carol's Closet
- Cassy Fiano
- Catholic Bandita
- Catholic Tide
- Caught Him With A Corndog
- Cecil Calvert
- Charles G. Hill
- Clever S. Logan
- Common Cents
- Common Cents
- Conservative Girl With a Voice
- Conservative Hideout
- Conservative Watch News
- Conservatives for America
- Conservatives For Palin
- Crazy For Liberty
- Creative Minority Report
- Crush Liberalism
- Cubachi
- Cynthia Yockey
- Dad 29
- Daria DiGiovanni
- Dateline Zero
- DC Damsel
- Dr. Flap
- Dyspepsia Generation
- Effing Conservatives
- Election Dissection
- Ennui Pundit
- Eric Reasons, IT Genius
- Evil Blogger Lady
- Eye of Polyphemus
- Fausta's Blog
- Finding Ponies. . .
- Fire Andrea Mitchell
- For What It's Worth
- Founding Bloggers
- Free Will
- Funny and Jewish
- Gay Patriot
- Get Along Home
- GM's Place
- Grandpa John's
- Granite Grok
- Granny Rant
- GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
- Hit & Run
- Hoosier Access
- Hot Air Green Room
- Hugh Hewitt
- Ignorant Me
- Inside Charm City
- Is This Blog On?
- Jackie Wellfonder
- John William Perry
- Judicial Watch
- Jumping in Pools
- Katy's Conservative Corner
- KillTruck
- KURU Lounge
- Laughing Conservative
- Laura Elizabeth Morales
- Lead and Gold
- Lee Hernly
- Libertarian Republican
- Liberty Pundits
- Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
- Live Action
- Maj. Steven Givler
- Makes My Brain Itch
- Marathon Pundit
- Martin Eisenstadt's Blog
- Media Fade
- Michael Leahy
- Mind Numbed Robot
- Mister Pterodactyl
- Monique Stuart
- Morally Right
- My Blog
- My Thoughts on Freedom
- Naked Villainy
- Nathan Martin
- Never Yet Melted
- Newsreal Blog
- Nice Deb
- noot's observatory
- Not One Red Cent
- NOVA Townhall
- Ollieander
- Ordered Liberty
- Outside the Beltway
- Pierre Legrand's Pink Flamingo Bar
- Pileus
- Pinup Girl
- PJ Tatler
- Point of a Gun
- Political Clown Parade
- Political Pit Bull
- Politicaljunkie Mom
- Primordial Slack
- Public Secrets
- Pundit and Pundette
- Reaganite Republican Resistance
- Red Alexandria
- Red Dog Report
- Red State Eclectic
- Red, White & Conservative
- Republican Redefined
- ResCon1
- Rhymes With Right
- Ric's Rulez
- Ricochet
- Right of Course
- Right Pundits
- Right Turns Only
- Right View From the Left Coast
- Right Wing News
- Right Wing Nut House
- Robipedia
- Robomonkey
- Ruby Slippers Blog
- Saberpoint
- Scared Monkeys
- Sentry Journal
- Serr8d's Cutting Edge
- SI VIS PACEM
- Sissy 'put moi in your blogroll' Willis
- Skepticrats
- Smash Mouth Politics
- Sooper Mexican
- Southern Maryland Online
- Soylent Green
- St. Blogustine
- Stacy on the Right
- Story Balloon
- Suzy Rice
- Taking Hayek Seriously
- Tel-Chai Nation
- Tequila & Javalinas
- That Mr. Guy
- The Aged P
- The American Catholic
- The Anchoress
- The Blogmocracy
- The Busted Nut
- The Classic Liberal
- The Daily Conservative
- The Daily Ramble
- The Daley Gator
- The Essex Blog
- The Frugal Cafe
- The Hay Ride
- The Indentured Servant Girl
- The Izzy Report
- The Jawa Report
- The Last Tradition
- The Looking Spoon
- The Minority Leader
- The Minority Report
- The NeoSexist
- The Nose on Your Face
- The Political Commentator
- The Prudence Paine Papers
- The Real Mike
- The Republican Mother
- The Right Sphere
- The Saint Angilbert Press
- The Snark Factor
- The Snooper Report
- The Tiger on Politics
- The Underground Conservative
- The View From LL2
- The Washington Rebel
- Three Beers Later
- Threedonia
- Thunder Tales
- Tigerhawk
- Tom McLaughlin
- Tory Anarchist
- TrogloPundit
- Ui2 — Informed Dissent
- Urban Grounds
- Valley of the Shadow
- Vets On The Watch
- Vox Day
- Watcher of Weasels
- Western Experience
- Wintery Knight
- Word Around the Net
- World's Only Rational Man
- WyBlog
- Yankee Phil
- Zingstrom's Blog

March 18th, 2010 @ 2:31 am

I’m probably the only guy who reads this blog who understands what you just said.

One theory: They could have been talking in Octal the whole time. That would come out to 58 hours, and no pesky letters to eliminate.

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, and those who don’t

March 17th, 2010 @ 9:31 pm

I’m probably the only guy who reads this blog who understands what you just said.

One theory: They could have been talking in Octal the whole time. That would come out to 58 hours, and no pesky letters to eliminate.

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, and those who don’t

March 18th, 2010 @ 2:38 am

@ Jeff or Smitty;

As one who doesn’t speak binary (I took French 1 three time and I don’t speak French either)could someone translate to English please.

March 17th, 2010 @ 9:38 pm

@ Jeff or Smitty;

As one who doesn’t speak binary (I took French 1 three time and I don’t speak French either)could someone translate to English please.

March 17th, 2010 @ 10:06 pm

[…] and the CBO still hasn’t found a way to massage the numbers into anything that would be palatable to the American people. Not that anything the CBO says will […]

March 18th, 2010 @ 3:22 am

Hexadecimal (base 16) and Octal (base 8) are both related through binary – they are simple notations for long strings of binary numbers. Each number in Hexadecimal has 4 binary digits (0000), and Octal has 3 (000).

Just like we count from 0-9 and move place to the tens, octal counts 0-7 and moves to 10. Hexadecimal counts 0-15, with the numbers after 9 replaced with the first 6 letters of the alphabet A-F before moving place to 10. So a decimal 10 is 12 in octal and A in hexadecimal. And it would all be 1010 in binary. 20 decimal would be 24 octal, 14 hexadecimal and 10100 binary.

Converting to and from decimal is odd. Each binary digit you see is expressed as a power of 2. The far right digit is 2 to the first power, and each digit to the left is at a power double the previous, so to the 2nd, then 4th, then 8th, then 16th, then 32nd, and so on. To figure the Decimal notation, add the power number for every 1 in it’s binary place. So, binary 0001110100010001 in decimal is 1+16+256+1024+2048+4096=7441.

Converting from octal to hex is easy, just use binary notation and change the digit breaks – octal only goes to power of 8 (3 binary digits) and starts over with the next 3, and hex only goes to power of 16 (4 binary digits)

So the same decimal 7441 (binary 0001110100010001) is expressed in octal as (001)=1(110)=6[2+4](100)=4(010)=2(001)=1 or 16421, and in hexadecimal as (0001)=1(1101)=D[8+4+1](0001)=1(0001)=1 or 1D11

Confused more, yet?

March 17th, 2010 @ 10:22 pm

Hexadecimal (base 16) and Octal (base 8) are both related through binary – they are simple notations for long strings of binary numbers. Each number in Hexadecimal has 4 binary digits (0000), and Octal has 3 (000).

Just like we count from 0-9 and move place to the tens, octal counts 0-7 and moves to 10. Hexadecimal counts 0-15, with the numbers after 9 replaced with the first 6 letters of the alphabet A-F before moving place to 10. So a decimal 10 is 12 in octal and A in hexadecimal. And it would all be 1010 in binary. 20 decimal would be 24 octal, 14 hexadecimal and 10100 binary.

Converting to and from decimal is odd. Each binary digit you see is expressed as a power of 2. The far right digit is 2 to the first power, and each digit to the left is at a power double the previous, so to the 2nd, then 4th, then 8th, then 16th, then 32nd, and so on. To figure the Decimal notation, add the power number for every 1 in it’s binary place. So, binary 0001110100010001 in decimal is 1+16+256+1024+2048+4096=7441.

Converting from octal to hex is easy, just use binary notation and change the digit breaks – octal only goes to power of 8 (3 binary digits) and starts over with the next 3, and hex only goes to power of 16 (4 binary digits)

So the same decimal 7441 (binary 0001110100010001) is expressed in octal as (001)=1(110)=6[2+4](100)=4(010)=2(001)=1 or 16421, and in hexadecimal as (0001)=1(1101)=D[8+4+1](0001)=1(0001)=1 or 1D11

Confused more, yet?

March 18th, 2010 @ 3:25 am

Oh, and if you understand all that, you’ll get my joke.

March 17th, 2010 @ 10:25 pm

Oh, and if you understand all that, you’ll get my joke.

March 18th, 2010 @ 3:28 am

That your valiant effort was doomed says more about me than about you. Thank you for the effort.

March 17th, 2010 @ 10:28 pm

That your valiant effort was doomed says more about me than about you. Thank you for the effort.

March 18th, 2010 @ 3:40 am

The hard part is going from decimal to binary. That takes math.

March 17th, 2010 @ 10:40 pm

The hard part is going from decimal to binary. That takes math.

March 18th, 2010 @ 3:45 am

“My best suggestion is to make enough rounding errors with them big digits that they still appear to be in base 10 when converted to base 16, i.e., no A-F appearing.”

Uh

huh. Let me study on that a minute…“In mathematics and computer science, hexadecimal (also base 16, or hex) is a positional numeral system with a radix, or base, of 16. It uses sixteen distinct symbols, most often the symbols 0–9 to represent values zero to nine, and A, B, C, D, E, F (or alternatively a through f) to represent values ten to fifteen.”

Hmmm…m’yes…Well, let me think on what Jeff Weimer up there has to say…

“Hexadecimal (base 16) and Octal (base 8) are both related through binary – they are simple notations for long strings of binary numbers.[

Yawns, looks at watch] Each number in Hexadecimal has 4 binary digits (0000), and Octal has 3 (000).”Oh. Right, right.

That.March 17th, 2010 @ 10:45 pm

“My best suggestion is to make enough rounding errors with them big digits that they still appear to be in base 10 when converted to base 16, i.e., no A-F appearing.”

Uh

huh. Let me study on that a minute…“In mathematics and computer science, hexadecimal (also base 16, or hex) is a positional numeral system with a radix, or base, of 16. It uses sixteen distinct symbols, most often the symbols 0–9 to represent values zero to nine, and A, B, C, D, E, F (or alternatively a through f) to represent values ten to fifteen.”

Hmmm…m’yes…Well, let me think on what Jeff Weimer up there has to say…

“Hexadecimal (base 16) and Octal (base 8) are both related through binary – they are simple notations for long strings of binary numbers.[

Yawns, looks at watch] Each number in Hexadecimal has 4 binary digits (0000), and Octal has 3 (000).”Oh. Right, right.

That.March 18th, 2010 @ 3:59 am

I see lots of things break lots of places before Drudge or Insty get them.

March 17th, 2010 @ 10:59 pm

I see lots of things break lots of places before Drudge or Insty get them.

March 18th, 2010 @ 4:04 am

Chris hit me right in the geek spot, and Adobe Walls asked a question I could

actually answer.Wanna hear how to convert from decimal to any base using long division? It can do it, I can do it, I really can!

March 17th, 2010 @ 11:04 pm

Chris hit me right in the geek spot, and Adobe Walls asked a question I could

actually answer.Wanna hear how to convert from decimal to any base using long division? It can do it, I can do it, I really can!

March 18th, 2010 @ 4:16 am

Jeff: Yeah, if you wouldn’t mind.

March 17th, 2010 @ 11:16 pm

Jeff: Yeah, if you wouldn’t mind.

March 17th, 2010 @ 11:27 pm

[…] No CBO Score For ObamaCare, But Here's A Cunning Plan : The Other … […]

March 18th, 2010 @ 4:36 am

Paco,

Now you’re just teasing.

Here’s a link to a site that can explain that better without me taking up so much of Smitty’s bandwidth. http://www.wikihow.com/Convert-from-Decimal-to-Binary . They give you two ways – subtraction and division. The great thing is is that you’re using the remainder –

and you start from the bottom.The trick is to not think of hex or octal numbers like one thousand eight hundred thirty-four, but as

one eight three four base 8for example. It really does lessen the confusion.March 17th, 2010 @ 11:36 pm

Paco,

Now you’re just teasing.

Here’s a link to a site that can explain that better without me taking up so much of Smitty’s bandwidth. http://www.wikihow.com/Convert-from-Decimal-to-Binary . They give you two ways – subtraction and division. The great thing is is that you’re using the remainder –

and you start from the bottom.The trick is to not think of hex or octal numbers like one thousand eight hundred thirty-four, but as

one eight three four base 8for example. It really does lessen the confusion.March 18th, 2010 @ 5:10 am

I’ve been using this trick for a long time; I’m only 29 in hexadecimal.

If you still don’t understand, try listening to Tom Lehrer’s New Math, which involves subtraction in base 8. “Base 8 is just like base 10, really, if you’re missing two fingers”

March 18th, 2010 @ 12:10 am

I’ve been using this trick for a long time; I’m only 29 in hexadecimal.

If you still don’t understand, try listening to Tom Lehrer’s New Math, which involves subtraction in base 8. “Base 8 is just like base 10, really, if you’re missing two fingers”

March 18th, 2010 @ 5:23 am

I’m younger than you, Finrod, I’m only 27! or 00100111! or 48! Or…I’ll let you figure out base 10.

You can thank the Navy that I can think in Binary. I lived in base 8 or 16 for about 8 months after boot camp.

And yes, I still managed to get laid.

March 18th, 2010 @ 12:23 am

I’m younger than you, Finrod, I’m only 27! or 00100111! or 48! Or…I’ll let you figure out base 10.

You can thank the Navy that I can think in Binary. I lived in base 8 or 16 for about 8 months after boot camp.

And yes, I still managed to get laid.