Workin’ Hard, Tryin’ To Figure Out Them There Women
Posted on | December 19, 2011 | 1 Comment
by Smitty
Yahoo News reports Men Often Misread Women’s Sexual Cues: Study
You can’t help but go here:
Back to The Fine Article:
The researchers found that:
- Men who wanted a short-term sexual encounter were more likely to overestimate a woman’s desire for them.
- Men who believed they were “hot” also thought the women were hot for them, but men who were actually considered attractive by women did not think this way.
- The more attractive a woman was to a man, the more likely he was to overestimate her interest.
- Women tended to underestimate men’s desire.
Women are just not as unambiguous as Rebecca Larue, who marks out the opposite extreme (nearly NSFW):
Overall, the Smitty advice on women is to worry about them like Senator Harry Reid worries about the federal budget. That is, not at all. I’m not recommending everyone take 35 years like I did to settle down, but the point about not being in a screaming rush cannot be emphasized enough.
When you see a woman as in-your-face as the Rebecca Larue character, you know it’s a RED FLAG:
From that notorious hotbed of social conservativism, Ace of Spades HQ:
Poverty is more a behavioral problem than it is a lack of skills or economic opportunities. There is an almost-guaranteed path to not being poor for most people: graduate high school, get (and stay) married, and don’t have kids until after you’ve gotten married. (Though this advice is a “necessary but not sufficient” recipe, of course.) The degradation of marriage in the post Great Society era is one of the great evils of the age, and it can be laid almost entirely at the feet of Democrats. It’s striking to see how two former linchpins of civilized society — marriage and religious faith — have become rituals observed mainly by the well-off in the modern age.
via Digg
Comments
One Response to “Workin’ Hard, Tryin’ To Figure Out Them There Women”
December 19th, 2011 @ 5:45 pm
With all due respect to Mr. Ace, there are plenty of people right now who have done and remain all of the above and yet aren’t doing so well right now.
It does point to an issue Santorum could run with though: we cannot ever obtain fiscal conservatism if social conservatism is left out of the picture (this is a hard one for many who consider themselves libertarians to contemplate, but there it is).
We have destroyed the fabric of society, made it nearly impossible for the lower classes to hold their families together (all the while indoctrinating them to do the exact opposite), and now, when they have been torn apart and made dependent we want to say that monetary dependency is a sin…but you can continue to do the very things that make you dependent.
…because clearly there is something intrinsically, behaviourly wrong with you and your children…unlike the upright and deserving well-to-do…
I have qualms with this.