A Psychosis Called ‘Equality’

Posted on Comments

The fanatical conceptions of ideologues inspire madness. Last night, a certain devotee of the “Free Kate” crusade went on a Twitter spree, a few samples of which I share for your amusement:

I’d like to embed “Jessica Naomi’s” Tweets directly, but after getting up in my timeline to attack me, “Jessica Naomi” blocked me.

And imagine the chagrin of “Jessica Naomi’s” LGBT friends when they discover that, in fact, “Jessica Naomi” is a 48-year-old straight guy who’s just really into watching teenage lesbians on video.

UPDATE: The creature’s tweets:

 

38 comments

  2. Of course, having said that I was a proud heterosupremacist tyrannical theocRAT, I’ll probably be blocked soon enough. 🙂

  5. These liberals still cant make up their minds over whether the world should be ‘fair’, or ‘equal’.

    Why shouldn’t everyone pay an ‘equal’ share of taxes? Why wouldn’t that be fair?

  11. How’s this [always have it at the ready]:

    Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha – to infinity!

  13. And imagine the chagrin of “Jessica Naomi’s” LGBT friends when they discover that, in fact, “Jessica Naomi” is a 48-year-old straight guy who’s just really into watching teenage lesbians on video.

    You forgot to mention the amazing one handed typing skills she (he) has…

  15. These #FreakHate people are completely losing it.

    Only heterosupremacist tyrannical theocRATs think #LGBT human rights require their acceptance, approval, respect & tolerance

    Well, them and the LGBQWERTYBBQ crowd, who are demanding exactly that.

  16. I got profane comments from that nutjob — and one of her friends hurled false accusations of child abuse at me in an attempt to get my employment as a teacher called into question — all because i think adults should not be having sex with kids.

  17. Dude. Why’d you associate BBQ with that crowd? I’m sure it’s “racist, heteronormative, and oppressive” or something.

    I think the proper acronym is “LGBQWERTYBBW”.

  18. Does that mean that her friends not only believe it’s OK for adults to have sex with children, but it’s mandatory for teachers to do so? Holy NAMBLA, Batman!

  20. Bob has good cardio-vascular endurance for such things. Alas, conservatives get a good work out in such things if yoy watch the left too much.

  23. Something like this: “Bwahahahahahahahaha*gasp* *deep breaths* *snort* *helpless muffled giggles* Hahahahahahahahahahhahaha” and so on and so forth.

    I think, anyway.

  25. The left has delusions where there in no difference between people and everyone thinks and acts alike… unvaryingly by acting and thinking the way the left wants them to.

    Of course, there will always be those “more equal than others” to be the vanguard of “equality.”

  27. Once again, what we have HEAH is a failure to communicate.

    The Left and their wholly-owned LGBQWERTYBBW subsidiary never offered “tolerance” as some sort of mutual, two-way arrangement. I defy anyone to find any evidence they ever did.

    The sole and entire meaning of “tolerance” in the minds of the Left and their factions like LGBQWERTYBBW is, “You STFU and let us do whatever the hell we want to. Any murmur or squeak of disapproval is forbidden, be happy we allow you to express a lack of enthusiasm (as long as you do it passively and quietly).”

    I see nothing in that definition – only slightly paraphrased from the OED – that implies any reciprocation.

  28. and another great example that you can take the LGBT out of the DSM, but you can’t take the profound psychological problems out of the LGBT!

    On a related note, and another public dent in liberal homosexuality propaganda that claims that homosexuality is in-born and unchangeable, another testimony in the news of a woman who claims to have psychologically changed regarding her sexuality- even though she only tried telling her tale to push for homosexual marriage- but that point was sort of lost, since most of the comments focused on her change claims

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/11/lesbian-neutral-gay-marriage-man?commentpage=4

  31. The reality is that if all of us acted on our impulses of sexual attraction, then we’d all probably be in prison by now. You don’t have direct control over ‘what turns you on’ and sometimes these urges act in ways that are contrary to morals and the law. Fortunately, most of us do not define ourselves by our urges and choose to channel our urges in ways that are productive to society, moral and legal.

    It seems that a certain minority in our society have lost control of their animal urges and now choose to be defined by their inability to control their behavior.

  32. A quick google search shows Jessica Naomi connects to occupy as well. This is from Nov 2011 –

    “A lesbian activist in New York is trying to unite LGBT members of Occupy Wall Street protests across the country to highlight the economic issues gay and transgender people face for simply being who they are.

    Jessica Naomi, 60, from Catskills, N.Y., started the Occupy Equality movement, an Internet gathering of LGBT activists involved in the nationwide OWS protests, a month ago and has held several working group meetings online.

    “We’re trying to connect the street to the net,” Naomi said in a phone interview. “We’re using it as a way to do direct action.”

    http://www.thegavoice.com/index.php/news/national-news/3730-occupy-equality-aims-to-unite-lgbt-economic-protesters

  33. I only partially agree with you. The problem with our culture today is that it tells people that they are at the whim of their desires since desires cannot be “chosen.” Thus, spearheaded by liberals (and other irresponsible groups), people lie to themselves that they 1) cannot change, and 2) as a consequence of 1, they should act upon their desires – since this would be what “nature” intended.

    All of this is false. First, while we don’t choose to feel a particular desire, any kind of desire is a product of your psychological condition and history. The more perverted a person’s psychology is, the more perverted their desires will be. And everyone is responsible for investigating and resolving their own psychological dysfunctions and problems, which underlie the production of perverted desires. You change your psychology, you change your desires. It’s as simple as that. (Not that dealing with psychological problems is simple!)

    Americans (and other modern idiots), however, have been telling themselves that they are not responsible for dealing with their perverted psychologies, desires, attitudes, and behaviors regarding sexuality. Not could be further from the truth. This is merely classic liberal propaganda regarding sexuality and relationships.

    Lastly, it is a great mistake to assume that everyone has the same psychological make-up, consequently, the same kind of “landing you in prison” types of desires.

  34. A far more coherently worded version of my intent, thank you.

    I think specific desires/predilections can also be nurtured both by self and by others (esp. through normalisation). For example, I’d suggest a lot of us at one point in a our lives have probably had a spontaneous urge to shoplift or steal something. By not recognising this as potentially problematic behaviour, it could be nurtured in your pysche to the point where it becomes an innate disorder (Winona who?)

    Bottom line is an acceptance that your personal behaviour is a choice. Certain ingrained predilections can be harder to control, esp. if they’ve been allowed to fester.

    IMHO SSA is a predilection that is developed and nurtured with possible genetic factors. If not changeable, it’s manifestation as behaviour is 100% choice. Homosexual behaviour is a choice. When society normalises it, it will spread. Delightful.

Comments are closed.