The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Woman Sold Her Kids for Sex

Posted on | January 27, 2014 | 47 Comments

Natisha Hillard, 25, got paid by Christopher Bour, 39, to have sex with her kids.

Scraping the bottom of the barrel of human depravity:

A Gary, Ind. woman admitted this week that she sold a baby eight times to a Gary man for sex . . .
Natisha Hillard, 25, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Hammond to one count of selling a child for sex and two counts of allowing a child to take part in child pornography . . .
Hillard admitted . . . that she met Christopher M. Bour through a dating service in 2011 and that they agreed to meet at her place. That was when Bour started asking her about two children she had access to, both girls, who were 4 months and 3 years old at the time.
The crimes lasted from September 2011 until February 2013 . . .
She . . . can be seen on images found on Bour’s computer showing him sexually touching the child with Hillard in the background.
She also let Bour take sexual pictures of the older child at least once, Koster said.
Koster said that Hillard told law enforcement after she was arrested that she agreed to sell the children to Bour because she needed money and that Bour paid her extra for the last encounter to be alone with child.

Just a woman selling her babies for sex. Nothing to see here. Move along.

 

Category: Crime, Sex

Comments

47 Responses to “Woman Sold Her Kids for Sex”

  1. R. K. Delka
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:40 am

    It sounds like, technically, she just rented them.

  2. Jeanette Victoria
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:52 am

    It hard to imagine such depravity, but never fear, real people who have never been been exposed to a society where Christian morals are the default will invent more ways to pander to the baser elements of mankind

  3. Dana
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:53 am

    Having seen her picture, I’m trying to figure out how she ever had kids in the first place.

  4. Indiana woman confesses to ‘selling’ her young children for sex | Conservative Firing LineConservative Firing Line
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:54 am

    […] Hillard was charged in a U.S. District Court with one count of selling a child for sex and two counts of allowing a child to take part in child pornography, according to Fox 32 News in Chicago (h/t The Other McCain). […]

  5. Kirby McCain
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:57 am

    Dana!

  6. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:59 am

    Sex slaves for sale or rent I suppose. Maybe the President can address this in the SOTU.

  7. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:00 am

    There are five “a”s in raaaaacist! but,

    There are two “n”s in funny!

  8. Kirby McCain
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:03 am

    And now from the birthplace of Michael Jackson we give you…

  9. richard mcenroe
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:06 am

    Nothing tugs at the heart strings like a wretched, skinny, hungry poor woman… oh, wait…
    She sold the kid because she WANTED money. She clearly isn’t starving.

  10. julie
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:19 am

    Actually, from the article it doesn’t sound as though the children were hers. It describes them as children “she had access to,” which would be very strange language if she was their mother. It sounds like somebody trusted this woman with the children, and she returned the favor by pimping them out.

  11. Dana
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:23 am

    I have to like a comment that has nothing in it but my name. 🙂

  12. Dana
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:28 am

    The good news is from the original:

    Hillard, who is being held without bond, faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years to life in prison on the count of selling a child.

    Here’s hoping that the judge imposes not the mandatory minimum, but the maximum in each charge, and orders the sentences to run consecutively. This woman should never know a single day of freedom again.

    As for Mr Bour, life without parole, in general population, in the meanest prison in the state, with widespread publicity among the other prisoners about why he’s in the pen.

  13. Kirby McCain
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:31 am

    Actually having seen the woman’s picture reminded me of a 6’2″ 450 lb killer from my hometown. An absolute loon who raved about the mothership, referred to the courthouse as the masonic courthouse etc.

    http://youtu.be/hPGPC4Bdmh0

  14. Bozikek
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:45 am

    Ya know, I can’t think of a GOOD motive for pimping your children.

  15. Kirby McCain
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:54 am

    And yet if you look at CEDAW they talk about women, even children prostituting because their families need money.

  16. Kirby McCain
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:54 am

    And yet if you look at CEDAW they talk about women, even children prostituting because their families need money.

  17. Bozikek
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:57 am

    Naw son that aint whoring. Thats sex work, sounds much less dirty that way. Its ok it will all be alright when the stigma is removed.

  18. Bozikek
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:57 am

    Naw son that aint whoring. Thats sex work, sounds much less dirty that way. Its ok it will all be alright when the stigma is removed.

  19. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:08 pm

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IuDYdIkwiLc/UqMqIGPa9QI/AAAAAAAAdko/KpcrG9Idg14/s1600/EatsBabies2_4006.JPG It is all consistent with the worship of Moloch.

  20. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:08 pm

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IuDYdIkwiLc/UqMqIGPa9QI/AAAAAAAAdko/KpcrG9Idg14/s1600/EatsBabies2_4006.JPG It is all consistent with the worship of Moloch.

  21. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:09 pm

    Money? Not a good reason, but that is how some roll.

  22. Quartermaster
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:13 pm

    That’s Bovinist!

  23. Quartermaster
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:13 pm

    That’s Bovinist!

  24. texlovera
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:20 pm

    Punishment needs to include sterilization for both of them.

    No euthenasia…

  25. Kirby McCain
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:28 pm

    The caption on the photo says her kids. But with the state of journalism today …

  26. K-Bob
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:47 pm

    barack had her back.

    twice.

  27. Animal
    January 27th, 2014 @ 12:51 pm

    How? Well, the “how” is pretty much a foregone conclusion. The real question is the “why.”

  28. Dana
    January 27th, 2014 @ 1:03 pm

    The “how” raises the question of how the male in question was able to achieve sufficient blood flow to the instrument for depositing semen in a location in which conception could have occurred. I mean, even Stevie Wonder could see that she was ugly!

  29. Animal
    January 27th, 2014 @ 1:24 pm

    I’m guessing the male in question was probably equally undesirable – “any port in a storm,” and all that. In fact, I’m guessing he probably, at some point, had a conversation with one of his bros that ran along these lines:

    Impregnator: “Man, good-looking women just aren’t interested in me. What can I do about that?”

    Bro: “Well, if you want to appeal to good-looking women, we have to fix the things about you that are not attractive.”

    I: “Like what?”

    B: “Well, you’re not attractive.”

    I: “That isn’t encouraging. What should I do?”

    B: “Lower your standards.”

    I: “How far?”

    B: ***Looks at I critically*** “All the way, man. All the way.”

  30. TheFall
    January 27th, 2014 @ 1:37 pm

    Jesus Christ lady, you’re completely deluded. Human beings have been committing acts of depravity, including selling one another into bondage, sexual and otherwise, since the beginning, and all through the Christian epoch. We didn’t suddenly fall off a moral cliff when Obama became President. face facts, we’re nothing more than intelligent apes and our nature has not changed much in millions of years regardless of how much technology we pile on top of ourselves. If anything that just gives some people more efficient means to kill and enslave one another.

  31. MNHawk
    January 27th, 2014 @ 1:50 pm

    $20 says she doesn’t know the cursives.

  32. freedomisnotfree
    January 27th, 2014 @ 2:32 pm

    Could be that she has other children that were taken away and therefore had no access to them. That is the way I read what was said.

  33. julie
    January 27th, 2014 @ 2:52 pm

    The photo at the article only shows her name. At no point in the Fox article is she identified as their mother. That said, freedomisnotfree could well be correct; also, McCain had to have gotten the photo of the guy from somewhere else, so maybe there is more information elsewhere.

    Whatever the case – their mother, or a friend or relative, this is a horrifying story.

  34. Shawny1
    January 27th, 2014 @ 4:06 pm

    Get a grip. The vast majority of humans (including hardened vicious criminals) still find this particular kind of depravity abhorrent and despicable. Preying on the innocent or helpless. No one suggested Obama invented the problem but his policies have resulted in some gaping wounds in our culture and created an atmosphere of depraved indifference.

  35. Shawny1
    January 27th, 2014 @ 4:19 pm

    Adept analogy. ; )

  36. TheFall
    January 27th, 2014 @ 4:38 pm

    Regardless of whether or not hardened criminals find this behavior repulsive, my point was that this kind of depravity is in no way a modern problem, has been going on since the beginning of human civilization, and is a hallmark of the human condition. The only difference between then and now is technological and people can capture a memento of their sickness with a smart phone. A few thousand years ago some people actually sacrificed children to appease angry Gods. ya know, if you really want to get into, Christianity is based on child sacrifice. Sorry, but it’s true. As a people we’ve been murdering, raping, enslaving, and oppressing one another forever. It’s what we do. We’re a violent breed; apes with guns.

  37. Australia Has Shark Troubles | Regular Right Guy
    January 27th, 2014 @ 5:17 pm

    […] Woman Sold Her Kids for Sex […]

  38. trangbang68
    January 27th, 2014 @ 6:30 pm

    You’re wrong Homie, You are an ape but you’re not intelligent. You’re a moral imbecile wrapping debased perversity in Darwin’s dirty drawers.

  39. trangbang68
    January 27th, 2014 @ 6:32 pm

    Christianity is based on child sacrifice? You’re out of your mind.

  40. trangbang68
    January 27th, 2014 @ 6:35 pm

    I think they ought to take the fat ghetto rat and the short eyed monster and grind them into hamburger and feed them to the pigs. Where are Saddam’s sons when we need them?

  41. TheFall
    January 27th, 2014 @ 7:32 pm

    Awww….someone is getting defense.

    Yeah, we got here by the touch of “God”! Creationism is the real story! LOL! You poor deluded fool. Even worse when you’re called “trangbang68”. What did you think you were doing in Vietnam? Helping people? No, you were a big mokney with a gun slaughtering peasants for the big apes back in DC, and the expansion of their power. The history of humanity is one of slavery, oppression, depravity, and murder and a couple of lowlife’s messing around with kid’s is not some new moral low. It’s just as it’s always been because human beings are savages. We were selling kids into sexual bondage thousands of years ago, or have you never read a history of the ancient world? And of course Christianity is based on child sacrifice. God sacrificed his own son, dummy.

  42. Quartermaster
    January 27th, 2014 @ 8:32 pm

    This guy is far below zeta. We don’t have enough letters or numbers to go that low.

  43. trangbang68
    January 27th, 2014 @ 8:37 pm

    Christianity is based on child sacrifice because God gave his son…you really are a deluded fool.
    As far as the war went, you’re clueless. You don’t know what went on, what the will of the Vietnamese people was. I know this, far better men than you on both sides died nobly and heroically.
    Communism is and was the kind of monstrous ideology spawned by amoral midgets who think its all just a materialistic world with better apes running it. Ideas have consequences.

  44. ChrisDavis2011
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:15 pm

    Doesn’t she kind of look like that actress in Precious?

  45. TheFall
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:22 pm

    Bullsh*t. The Vietnamese were fighting for national liberation, and self determination, after having been colonized by the French(with our help) who they threw out, and from us who later showed up to colonize them too. It’s ironic that the American government talks about freedom and then intervenes when a foreign country attempts to plot it;s own course. And how did we fight communism in South East Asia? By turning the country into a slaughterhouse, both through the use of indiscriminate and disproportional bombing which mostly effected the civilian population who despised us far more than the VC, and mass murder programs like Phoenix. And what happened? We still lost.

  46. trangbang68
    January 27th, 2014 @ 10:39 pm

    Thanks for the gospel according to Howard Zinn and Herbert Marcuse, lefty

    When the French war ended in 1954, the predominately Catholic sector of the population settled in the south because they didn’t want to live under communism. To say they hated the Americans in mass is a lie perpetrated by western useful idiots for the North.

    Obviously there were atrocities and civilian casualties, but there was a large percentage of southerners who wanted to be free. The North Vietnamese routinely committed atrocities.

    I was there a couple years ago and the government is largely despised by the people in Saigon. I thought it was ironic seeing western tools walking around wearing hammer and sickle tee shirts while the average Vietnamese person hates the communists.

  47. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 27th, 2014 @ 11:22 pm

    The Fall may very well be S:OE too. I have noticed a few “new” voices that want to stir up trouble.