The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

She Craved the Taste of Boy Flesh

Posted on | March 1, 2014 | 23 Comments

“Allegedly,” I hasten to add: Utah teacher Brianne Altice pleaded not guilty Thursday to three counts of first-degree felony rape for having sex with a 16-year-old Davis High School student. However, previous reports indicate Altice “acknowledged to investigators that she had engaged in sex with the boy,” so her prospects for acquittal aren’t good. Her case was one I highlighted in January when I observed:

Ever since the Debra LaFave case, some people have marveled at instances of female teachers arrested for molesting teenage boys: “But she’s good-looking — why can’t she get a man?”
The assumption is that sexual desperation is the motive for these crimes, when in fact, it’s a matter of sexual preference: Sure, they can get men, but they don’t want men — they want boys.

Brianne Altice was married at the time of her alleged crime:

Altice’s husband filed for divorce shortly after his wife’s arrest. It was finalized in December.
Altice was originally arrested in October. Altice was believed to have had sex with a 16-year-old on many occasions, including at her South Weber home and at a park in addition to the church parking lot, a Davis County Jail report states.
Police have said there may be other potential victims.

The preferential appetite for boy flesh — allegedly! I said “allegedly”! — is particularly obvious in Altice’s case. She’s a slender 5-foot-7 blonde with high cheekbones, and she showed up for her court hearing Thursday looking like Hot Teacher Barbie:

The blonde former teacher appeared collected in the Utah courtroom and chose to wear a close-fitting top, slim pants and conspicuously high heels.

Is this what a felony sex criminal looks like? Every red-blooded male who remembers his 16-year-old self is perplexed at the thought: How could this woman be accused of a felony for fulfilling your wildest adolescent fantasy? But on second thought — when your responsible adult mind finally wrestles control of the mental dialogue away from your depraved inner teenager — you realize that to allow a legal loophole for blonde Barbie-looking hotness would be to undo the Rule of Law, to permit a special caste of protected perverts. If you let the attractive teachers get away with banging jailbait, the ugly teachers who get caught doing the same thing would claim that their prosecution was unfair.

A 30-year-old middle school teacher was arrested in Pennsylvania [Jan. 21] for allegedly entering into a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old student.
Jessica Saienni, of Landenberg, Pa., surrendered herself to the Berks County Detectives Office in Reading about 10am.
Detectives on [Jan. 20] obtained a warrant for Saienni’s arrest.
Investigators said Saienni was a science teacher at Southwest Middle School in Reading from June 2012 through August 2012, when she allegedly had an ‘inappropriate relationship’ with the male victim, according to The Express Times. . . .
Police say the initial sexual encounter took place in Saienni’s vehicle while she was parked near the Body Zone Sports and Wellness Complex, 3103 Papermill Road in Wyomissing, Berks County.
The victim told police that Saienni sent him sexually explicit photos, court records say.

Once you agree that fairness requires us to grant frumpy brunette teachers as much “right” to adolescent boy flesh as the slender blondes, the demands for equality would then follow in due course: If we’re going to let ugly women have sex with teenage boys, certainly we cannot deny gay male teachers their own “right” to do the same.

Mountain View police arrested Harlan Edelman, a longtime San Francisco teacher . . . after he allegedly agreed to meet a teenage boy in the park for sex.
The only problem is that “teenage boy” was actually undercover cops waiting to bust the former San Francisco teacher.
On [Feb. 4], police descended upon Peaceful Cuesta Park in Mountain View after exchanging social media messages with Edelman in the guise of being a 17-year-old boy. At the park, they found Edelman waiting for the boy with whom he had arranged a sex date.
“He was reaching out for sex,” Mountain View Police Sgt. Saul Jaeger told NBC News. “The initial contacts were explicit material, sexually explicit material and he ended up agreeing to meeting for sex.” . . .
Edelman was a teacher employed by the San Francisco Unified School District from 1995 to 2013; he most recently taught at the Academy of Arts and Sciences. He also held teaching positions at Lowell High School, Lincoln High School and the School of the Arts.
He resigned from the district in September 2013, according to Gentle Blythe, spokeswoman for SFUSD.

Next thing you know, lesbian coaches will demand their “rights,” too.

A teacher at a private all-girls Catholic school in Little Rock, Arkansas, had a sexual relationship with a teenage student. The teacher’s live-in lesbian partner, who was athletic director at the school, failed to report the crime. Kelly O’Rourke, 42, was sentenced to 10 years in prison in October 2013 for having sex with the girl beginning in 2010, when the victim was 16. O’Rourke’s partner Kathy Griffin, 55, was convicted in September 2013 after a trial where O’Rourke testified that Griffin knew about the illegal relationship months before the “distraught” mother of the girl contacted Mt. Saint Mary Academy principal Diane Wolfe. The girl had graduated in 2011. Her mother “said the victim wouldn’t get out of bed, was crying all the time, and wouldn’t go to her college classes.” O’Rourke’s sentence was initially suspended on condition that she have no further contact with the victim, but she violated the no-contact order. O’Rourke contacted the victim more than 50 times, telling her in one recorded phone conversation “that she wanted their relationship to continue.” O’Rourke was sent to prison.

She took my daughter’s innocence away,” said the mother of a 17-year-old Catholic school girl who was molested by the lesbian who coached her swim team. Sarah Blessing, 28, taught fifth grade at a public school in Scotch Plains, N.J. and was also the swim team coach at Bishop George Ahr High School in Edison. When she was sentenced to a year in jail and five years of probation in 2010, Blessing defended her consensual relationship with the girl, telling the judge: “It wasn’t manipulative. It wasn’t predatory. I had feelings for this person.”

If women teachers and gay teachers have a “right” to sex with teenagers — consenting teenagers, of course — then it will be no crime for the football coach to bang the homecoming queen, and we will have arrived at what Matt Barber calls “sexual anarchy.”

Moral decadence encroaches steadily on our society in the age of the “Emerging Awareness” Doctrine, and we do not have to imagine the arguments for de-criminalizing sex with minors, because they are already being made. This was what the “Free Kate” movement was all about: The claim that it was an expression of homophobia to prosecute an 18-year-old lesbian for having sex with a 14-year-old.

Many in the media (notably, ABC’s 20/20) seemed strangely sympathetic to this attack on Florida’s age-of-consent laws. Yet if one extrapolates the known number of cases where adults have been charged with crimes for “consensual” sex with teenagers — male or female, gay or straight — into a trend, the risk involved in treating these cases with leniency becomes apparent. Even with the possibility of felony prosecution to discourage them, many adults seem unable to restrain their deviant desires, and how much more common would such crimes be, if the perpetrators believed they would likely face only probation if apprehended?

This was what I warned about in January: “Perversion is rampant and we may be in the midst of a complete societal breakdown.”

We cannot permit our sympathies — for the Barbie-doll teacher like Brianne Altice or the “cute” cheerleader like Kaitlyn Hunt — to influence our judgment in such cases. If society starts showing leniency on such a basis, we’ll be traveling the Highway to Hell at top speed.

 

Comments

23 Responses to “She Craved the Taste of Boy Flesh”

  1. ariyadesai01
    March 1st, 2014 @ 1:43 pm

    RT @smitty_one_each: TOM She Craved the Taste of Boy Flesh http://t.co/1optauQBIN #TCOT

  2. rsmccain
    March 1st, 2014 @ 1:45 pm

    She Craved the Taste of Boy Flesh http://t.co/5YyIFor93A Is “Hot Teacher Barbie” a felony sex criminal? #tcot

  3. vermontaigne
    March 1st, 2014 @ 1:47 pm

    RT @rsmccain: She Craved the Taste of Boy Flesh http://t.co/5YyIFor93A Is “Hot Teacher Barbie” a felony sex criminal? #tcot

  4. Darth Odie
    March 1st, 2014 @ 2:02 pm

    Son, this is Brianne, Brianne this is my 18 going on 19 couch bound college freshman, what he needs is some vagina because he’s driving me nutz.

    Have a good time son….

  5. Jeanette Victoria
    March 1st, 2014 @ 2:50 pm

    Well maybe these folks will tell their stories as victims of the system along with Kaitlyn Hunt

  6. DaveO
    March 1st, 2014 @ 3:32 pm

    Goes back to the sexualization of Brooke Shields and models getting younger and younger. If western culture expects the perfect woman to be a hyper-sexual, shaved 18 year old who looks younger, it follows that women are going to look for young males in exchange. Teachers raping students is a symptom of a cultural economy that holds up unsullied pubescents as the epitome of beauty and encourages pedophilia and pederasty.

  7. Art Deco
    March 1st, 2014 @ 4:26 pm

    The people who contend that a phrase in a constitutional provision adopted in 1868 requires that county clerks issue marriage licenses to pairs of dudes and that welfare departments turn over young children to sexual deviants for ‘adoption’ will figure out a way to annul the age of consent for their preferred clients while having the full force of the law fall on the benighted.

    http://www.nj.com/camden/index.ssf/2012/10/police_triton_regional_teacher.html

    They prefer the magisterially pompous judicial opinion (you can hear it on NPR “today a landmark ruling”), but will settle for the same way that traffick in pornography was legalized: prosecutor/shysters simply stop bringing cases.

  8. Art Deco
    March 1st, 2014 @ 4:29 pm

    By the way, the blonde at the top is not attractive.

  9. Kirby McCain
    March 1st, 2014 @ 5:17 pm

    When you hear some of the criticisms of our age of consent laws from radical left-wing pro-pedophile groups like the NEA you’d think that the U.S. is out of line with other modern countries. One only has to look at the ‘age of consent’ wiki to learn that we are, in fact, mainstream in our AoC laws. You might also notice that many other countries have situational statues which govern people in a position of trust. In almost all of those cases the AoC is 18. We can’t give women a free pass on pedophilia and we can’t lower the AoC. A lower AoC is an invitation to sex tourism and we don’t need that. Though Dems might be tempted by the possible tax revenue…

  10. Bob Belvedere
    March 1st, 2014 @ 5:40 pm

    When I was a teenager would I have refused the advances of a female teacher? No, of course not.

    And that’s why when I was that age I was not considered an adult.

  11. trangbang68
    March 1st, 2014 @ 6:19 pm

    Agreed, as a matter of fact she has a strong resemblance to a young Hillary Clinton. So after she does her time in the Big Yard, she can look forward to being a crazy old drunken hag that falls down a lot.

  12. Art Deco
    March 1st, 2014 @ 6:25 pm

    When I was a teenager would I have refused the advances of a female teacher? No, of course not.

    I would have. I think the youngest lady teacher I had between the ages of 11 and 18 was 18 years my senior and nearly all were married. There were several coaches and a driver ed instructor who were younger, but only two of these women were at all handsome. I can locate one of them with Google. She’s taken up lesbianism in the intervening years.

  13. RKae
    March 1st, 2014 @ 6:32 pm

    “But she’s good-looking — why can’t she get a man?”

    That would mean sexual intercourse with an equal. They’re after the thrill of being “the boss.” They need a lopsided relationship. An equal is a scary idea.

  14. Bob Belvedere
    March 1st, 2014 @ 6:47 pm

    You were not lucky enough to have Miss DeFeo then, eh?

  15. Art Deco
    March 1st, 2014 @ 7:13 pm

    No. There was a science teacher who was quite attractive, and only seven years my senior; I was never enrolled in any of her classes, however, and she did not last long there. She was a newlywed and her husband came to pick her up each day. Great big guy and seemed to dote on her; quite formal in a way some Italians are when they’re not around family (at least in our part of the country). Noodling around, I see there is some indication they both still live in my home town. Regrettably, it appears he is married to someone else.

  16. Zohydro
    March 1st, 2014 @ 8:44 pm

    She looks better in this pic…

  17. Mm
    March 1st, 2014 @ 9:25 pm
  18. RS
    March 1st, 2014 @ 9:47 pm

    When demolition engineers implode a building, they set a few small, but strategic charges. When those are ignited, there is a pause for up to several minutes. Then physics does its thing and poof, a building implodes. What we are seeing is the implosion. The charges were set and ignited some time ago in the form of various SCOTUS rulings. The society that we knew is falling around us and it was destroyed deliberately.

    I hate to be gloomy, but I find it difficult to see it any other way the longer I live and observe what’s happening in our country.

  19. Common Core Recommended Materials Contain Child Porn - Conservative Hideout 2.0
    March 2nd, 2014 @ 12:00 am

    […] She Craved the Taste of Boy Flesh […]

  20. LN_Smithee
    March 2nd, 2014 @ 1:14 am

    Every red-blooded male who remembers his 16-year-old self is perplexed at the thought: How could this woman be accused of a felony for fulfilling your wildest adolescent fantasy? But on second thought — when your responsible adult mind finally wrestles control of the mental dialogue away from your depraved inner teenager — you realize that to allow a legal loophole for blonde Barbie-looking hotness would be to undo the Rule of Law, to permit a special caste of protected perverts.

    Amen, Brother Stacy. One of the reasons I tired of Free Republic at the end of the last decade is the way too many male Freepers would regularly chime in on posts about the slutty teacherettes and laugh off the fact they are every bit the predator as their crucified male counterparts. When they would comment with such stuff as “I’d hit it,” my response would be this:

    “I used to fantasize about being with my better looking teachers. Then I grew up.”

  21. Lee Reynolds
    March 2nd, 2014 @ 8:37 pm

    Why does this seem to be happening so often as of late?

    Because we live in a world where adulthood doesn’t really exist anymore. Once upon a time the difference between a 16 year old and someone 6, or 10 years older was deep and profound. The older person was typically married, with children of their own, and had been working in a career of some sort for several years.

    Nowadays we get pajama-boys and pajama-girls for whom being a 20-something is not appreciably different from being in high school.

    So it isn’t surprising that a woman in her 20’s would find a boy of 16 appealing. A kid that age is not very different from the men of her own age group. He’s not that different from the way she is either.

    This is what happens when people grow older without ever actually growing up.

    This trend can be attributed directly to lack of accountability in childhood and adolescence. Infantilization creates infants. Holding young people accountable to adult standards of maturity and responsibility is the only way to actually raise someone to be an adult.

  22. British Group Claimed ‘Research’ Showed ‘No Identifiable Damage’ of Child Sex : The Other McCain
    March 3rd, 2014 @ 2:13 pm

    […] March 1: She Craved the Taste of Boy Flesh […]

  23. Da Tech Guy On DaRadio Blog » Blog Archive » Roses are Red, Violets are Blue
    March 3rd, 2014 @ 3:01 pm

    […] Very inter­est­ing. The fact that dif­fer­ent peo­ple engage in dif­fer­ent types of sex­ual activ­ity appar­ently means that basic bio­log­i­cal dif­fer­ences should be thrown straight out the window. There is no male and female anatomy; there is only a com­plex tapes­try of desires and Thou Shalt Not Judge Any Of Them. […]