Alabama Teacher, 39, Gets Five-Year Sentence for Sex With Boy, 14
Posted on | August 9, 2014 | 27 Comments
Summer is the slow season for teacher sex scandals. For obvious reasons, there are fewer teachers arrested for having sex with students during vacation months when kids aren’t in school. Yet the courts are still in session, and the trials and hearings continue:
A former Alabama high school teacher and cheerleading coach accused of having an affair with a teenage boy was sentenced Thursday to five years in prison.
In May, Jennifer McNeill, 39, pleaded guilty to three counts of second-degree rape and one count of second-degree sodomy.
McNeill said in court that she was sorry for what she had done, adding, ’I’ve lost so much… I’ve learned my lesson.’ . . .
Judge John Bush, who handed down the sentence this morning, called the defendant’s actions ‘absolutely abhorrent,’ adding that as a figure of authority she had betrayed the trust of the community, Al.com reported.
The victim’s mother also spoke in court, saying that not a day goes by that her son does not pay for what happened between him and McNeill — a long-time family friend and a Sunday school teacher. . . .
McNeill, a married sixth-grade teacher from Thorsby, was arrested last year and originally charged with six counts of rape and two counts of sodomy of a juvenile male — some of the alleged encounters took place on school grounds.
McNeill’s illicit romance with her friend’s son lasted from April 2012 to June 2013, during which time the lovers had sexual intercourse at least six times and on two occasions engaged in oral sex.
Let’s ask a few questions. In recent years, we have read case after case like this, in which female teachers are accused of illegal sex with underage students. At the same time, however, feminists have spent decades promoting theories in which male sexuality is condemned as inherently oppressive to women, where even heterosexual relationships between consenting adults are impugned as oppressive because of “male domination” and “male supremacy” within a partiarchal society. But where are the feminists addressing these sex crimes involving female predators like Jennifer McNeill?
How is it that popular feminist columnists like Jessica Valenti and Amanda Marcotte, who have been often willing to claim that there is “rape culture” which implicates all men in sexual violence against women, have nothing to say about predatory sex crimes when the perpetrators are women? Why aren’t the Women’s Studies professors and academic proponents of “gender theory” publishing journal articles and books that explain female sexual predators from the perspective of feminist ideology?
Isn’t it a reasonable suspicion that the reason feminists have noting to say about deviant sex crimes committed by women is that these crimes contradict everything feminism teaches about men, women and sex? Isn’t this collective silence from feminists really a guilty expression of shameful embarrassment, a tacit admission that feminism’s ideology of sex — i.e., anti-male theories that theorize women as victims whose oppression is rooted in collective inequalities of power — does not comport with reality?
There are facts which cannot be explained by feminist theory. When forced to choose between facts and theory, feminists will ignore the facts. They aren’t merely anti-male. They’re anti-truth.
Comments
27 Responses to “Alabama Teacher, 39, Gets Five-Year Sentence for Sex With Boy, 14”
August 9th, 2014 @ 5:22 pm
[…] Alabama Teacher, 39, Gets Five-Year Sentence for Sex With Boy, 14. […]
August 9th, 2014 @ 6:03 pm
I’ll ask a simpler question – why do stories like this call what happened a “romance”?
August 9th, 2014 @ 6:06 pm
This is simply the evil fruit of feminism. I bet that these women thought of themselves a feminist and liberated.
August 9th, 2014 @ 6:10 pm
Will she actually see any prison time?
August 9th, 2014 @ 6:35 pm
A five year sentence is a start.
August 9th, 2014 @ 6:54 pm
You presuppose that the Marcottes and Valentis of the world actually acknowledge the existence of certain facts. I would suggest that they do not. Feminism is nothing if not a collective, mass solipsim, wherein their reality is all that truly exists. Everything else is illusion. They see no contradiction because the cannot, as opposed to seeing it and ignoring it. It’s another instance of the Left’s penchant for magical thinking.
Further, if they were to think about it, they would view the fact as more evidence of the evil Patriarchy at work–Victimized by Heterosexual Oppression and Trauma Bonding PIV, Teacher Lashes Out In Rebellion Against System–or some such B.S. Much like those suffering from paranoid delusions, the rabid Feminist will force all evidence into the Reality of her Delusion.
August 9th, 2014 @ 7:19 pm
Excellent commentary. Thank you for ointing out the corruptive, man-hating and hypocritical nature of modern day feminists.
August 9th, 2014 @ 7:53 pm
There’s a female teacher in Utah that was recently charged with having sex with a student who had made it his goal to get in her pants (he admitted that was his aim). She has now been brought up on more charges of sex with another student.
I personally don’t understand why in the hell any woman who is in her late 20s/early 30s would want to have any sort of relationship with a teenage boy. I didn’t want anything to do with teen boys when I was a teen girl and I sure as hell don’t want anything to do with them now. I can’t even grasp how much less I’d want anything to do with them if I had to be around their whiny, self-obsessed asses all the time.
August 9th, 2014 @ 8:47 pm
Here’s a hint: it’s not their personalities the women are interested in.
August 9th, 2014 @ 9:12 pm
I wonder whether it’s some perverse, metastatic desire to relive their own high school days/adolescence, either because they stopped mentally maturing then, or because they are trying to recapture their youth which they’ve seen slip away.
August 9th, 2014 @ 9:25 pm
Disgraceful behavior and despicable writing.
August 9th, 2014 @ 9:25 pm
“They’re anti-truth.”
That puts them on a par with lefties. Which should come as no surprise.
August 9th, 2014 @ 9:38 pm
[…] TOM: Why? Can feminists explain this to us? […]
August 9th, 2014 @ 9:56 pm
No… I think Wombat nailed it… So to speak!
I denounce myself…
August 9th, 2014 @ 10:05 pm
She’s sorry she lost so much? She should be killed just for saying that.
August 9th, 2014 @ 11:13 pm
So they can then use words like ‘torrid’ and ‘tawdy’ and ‘lurid’.
August 9th, 2014 @ 11:13 pm
Well, that goes without saying.
August 9th, 2014 @ 11:15 pm
Not killed, but certainly slapped upside the head repeatedly.
August 9th, 2014 @ 11:25 pm
Instead of “embarrassed silence,” maybe the reason there is no outcry from RadFems is that they approve of this behavior.
Victimizing the victimizers, and such.
August 9th, 2014 @ 11:31 pm
I’m with msr. Why, oh WHY is the sexual assault of a boy called a “romance”?
August 10th, 2014 @ 12:37 am
This is an area I admittedly know nothing about, but what could possibly be desirable about a teen boy who hasn’t had the experience and practice (for lack of a better word) in comparison to a grown man who actually knows what you want and how you like it (assuming you haven’t been lying and pretending the whole time you’ve been married)? I think of all my hobbies and things I like to do and just the thought of doing them with somebody who doesn’t know how to do them (or does them badly) makes me want to pull out my hair. And those are just hobbies.
August 10th, 2014 @ 12:46 am
I could certainly understand wanting to recapture youth. When I turned 30 I looked back and wondered where the hell my 20s went, but it seems like the adult thing to do would be to realize you may have wasted the time, but the only thing you can do about it is to not waste your time going forward.
Of course, I’m sure many of these women did, for whatever reason, stop mentally maturing in high school. I’m going to go out on a limb and guess one reason could be the princess syndrome (daddy treated her like a princess her whole life and was wrapped around her finger so tight he could never see her doing anything wrong). Or the father was absent. Either way, there must have been a dysfunctional relationship there. Or she’s just a whackjob. Which would certainly apply to my sister.
August 10th, 2014 @ 1:44 am
The teaching moment for pedophiles is this: Look at a picture of a naked boy, get mandatory 10 years, plus lifetime registration as a sexual predator. Molest the same boy, get 5 years. So the takeaway is, if you feel the urge, act on it. You get in less trouble. I think the feds need to revamp their sentencing guidelines before NAMBLA “wises” up.
August 10th, 2014 @ 1:50 am
You’re being obtuse…
August 10th, 2014 @ 2:13 am
Because this is what rape culture looks like: rape a boy, and it’s a romance. Rape a girl, and you’re an evil monster. Rape culture exists, but its victims are primarily boys. This is the end result of feminism. Raping boys and men is not a big deal in America, and whether it’s Sandusky or prison rape, absolutely no one cares.
Unless it’s priests, then they never shut the f**k up about it.
August 10th, 2014 @ 2:31 am
No, killed. She has no remorse for being an child molester. How many has she molested and didn’t get caught for?
August 10th, 2014 @ 8:48 am
Just trying to work out in a way i can understand what the hell is wrong with these women.