The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Women’s Studies Major Gets Spanked

Posted on | October 30, 2014 | 81 Comments

Literally. @LoriAdorable is the Twitter handle of a feminist who calls her Tumblr feed “woman-centered anti-oppression analysis”:

Lori Adorable started out by taking a different (though hardly avant-garde) approach to being naked on the Internet. She wanted to de-objectify herself as an exhibitionist submissive woman by placing her public displays of sexuality within the context of her whole messy self. She uses the same name to do nude, erotic, fetish, and porn modeling as she does to write and speak about her experiences with sex work, mental illness, abuse, and chronic disability, as well as her feminist politics. . . .
Lori currently works as a ‘fetish professional’ while finishing up her undergraduate degree in women’s studies on a part-time basis. She hopes to transition to sex and sexuality education and freelance writing upon graduation . . .

Uh, yeah. Keep telling yourself that, sweetheart.

A couple days ago, I wanted to link to one of my most popular blog posts ever, “Hard Times for Gender Studies Major”:

“I have a honors BA and I’m defending my MA thesis in two weeks. I am also apply [sic] for jobs and I can only find stuff in the service industry. I applied for a Hotel Front Desk Clerk job today. My degrees mean NOTHING. I am at the end of my rope.”

That August 2013 post went so viral, it had its own Memeorandum thread and, while I was linking it, I noticed that in the quoted Twitter exchange, the Gender Studies major was conversing with @LoriAdorable.

Out of idle curiosity — “Gee, Stacy, how do you find these freaks?” — and knowing nothing at all about @LoriAdorable‘s self-described interests until I checked her Twitter stream, I saw where she had Tweeted a link to one of her, uh, fetish submissive gigs.

Two words: Spanking porn.

Now, on the one hand, I strongly disapprove of pornography. On the other hand, anybody who majors in Women’s Studies probably needs to be spanked, and often, and by someone who knows how.

So this discovery — remember, I am a professional journalist who has been researching radical feminism for the past four months — really put me into a quandary as to how it should be, uh, reported.

You have to ask yourself: Do you want to see really this? And by “this,” I mean a Women’s Studies major naked, getting spanked with a belt and then getting some patriarchal oppression in her mouth. The description is bad enough, but YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

Did you click the link? You can invoke your Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refuse to answer that question. As for myself, I am a professional journalist, which means I get paid to research these crazy feminists — paid by my readers, I hasten to add, and remind you the Five Most Important Words in the English Language are:


C’mon, people: You just saw a naked Women’s Studies major get spanked. If that’s not worth $5 or $10 in the tip jar, what is?



81 Responses to “Women’s Studies Major Gets Spanked”

  1. Dana
    October 31st, 2014 @ 3:26 pm

    Oh, it’s been too late for a long time now.

  2. Dana
    October 31st, 2014 @ 3:26 pm

    So, are you going? You really should, you know.

    Maybe you can get a grant from the Obama Administration . . . .

  3. Dana
    October 31st, 2014 @ 3:29 pm

    [control][shift][n] and you are on incognito on Chrome, so your wife won’t be able to find your history.

  4. Dana
    October 31st, 2014 @ 3:29 pm

    Alternate answer: Sideboob.

  5. Dana
    October 31st, 2014 @ 3:32 pm

    Tag teaming with Miriam Weeks, perhaps?

    Maybe we could get an Andria, Miriam Weeks and #FreeKate film together.

  6. Nurse Kaci Hickox Can Ride Her Bike | Regular Right Guy
    October 31st, 2014 @ 3:35 pm

    […] Women’s Studies Major Gets Spanked […]

  7. marew
    October 31st, 2014 @ 4:47 pm

    This woman has daddy issues. No, really, she mentions it within the first screen cap of her daddy issues porn.

    What an incredibly boring “woman”.

  8. marew
    October 31st, 2014 @ 4:51 pm

    The depressing part? Read her twitter feed (be prepared to shower with lye…several times) she writes, “I GOT THE GRANT, I GOT THE GRANT….”


  9. Messenger
    October 31st, 2014 @ 5:08 pm

    I’m not coming to her defense but Miriam Weeks makes actual money, and does mainstream porn flicks. This girl is trafficking in the underbelly of porn.

  10. Steve Skubinna
    October 31st, 2014 @ 7:21 pm

    It always comes down to the hoo-hahs for them. Any guy who obsessed constantly about his penis and who would not shut up about it would find himself shunned by other men. But feminists are endlessly fascinated about their vaginas.

    Sane women are probably too polite and nonconfrontational to tell these people to STFU, take it outside, or get a room.

  11. Steve Skubinna
    October 31st, 2014 @ 7:22 pm

    You probably have to be something of a Special Snowflake to even consider getting a (Fill in the Blank) Studies degree in the first place. People with a more reasonable and realistic self image get useful, or at least non stupid degrees.

  12. Steve Skubinna
    October 31st, 2014 @ 7:27 pm

    She does appear to display many of the trite stereotypes, doesn’t she?

    On the other hand, stereotypes form and take root for good reasons – there’s usually some truth to them.

  13. Messenger
    October 31st, 2014 @ 8:01 pm

    And like I said above, and to hear Lori, and her friend Pepper say it, if you take any interest in them, even from a purely intellectual angle in order to critique their pretensions, you’re really only obsessed with their bodies, and sexuality, and your interests are as base as theirs. the amount of projection shot at McCain by those two skanks is epic, shows what they’re really all about, and the level of reality they exist on.

  14. Fail Burton
    October 31st, 2014 @ 8:25 pm

    Have you noticed that women who used to simply be called perverts and folks with mental health issues now use feminism as their go-to running back? There are no longer sick-minded whores, just Balkan refugees practicing “survival sex” in a world of patriarchal cruelty. Like Jews in Nazi Germany, men are the cause of all evil in the world. Triple that if you’re white, halve it if you’re not, ignore it if you’re Muslim.

    It’s a perfect example of the false-flag of oppression nutty gender feminists fly under. They’re not nuts – it’s civilization with its colonization and marriage as a tactic of oppression that’s the problem. It’s like that army guy in Dr. Strangelove: he wasn’t nuts, it was water that was the problem. No surprise that in feminist ideology, water is never wet. If water says it’s now a rock and you don’t buy into it you’re a bigot and will be fired or sent to counseling. The people who need counseling become teachers and professors. Water is declared hard and racists declared anti-racists.

    We have a new way of determining whether one is speeding or not: a race and gender gun instead of a radar gun.

  15. robertstacymccain
    October 31st, 2014 @ 9:10 pm

    It’s amazing to see the extreme rationalization involved. She’s got more defense mechanisms than an Abrams tank. Anyone who criticizes what Lori does must be somehow — somehow — morally inferior to Lori. It’s as if, having chosen to pursue a way of life that is objectively shameful, Lori first abandons all objectivity and then irrationally externalizes the shame. It’s not her that is doing wrong, see: Accepting responsibility for her own actions is impossible for the millennial Special Snowflake. Instead, it’s everybody else (i.e., those of us who aren’t getting paid to do dirty things on video) whose morality must be deprecated. Sucking cock in front of a camera actually makes Lori better than us, from her warped perspective, and if we dare directly criticize her, well — HATE CRIME!

    That’s right: Using the Internet to promote your spanking porn is perfectly acceptable, whereas using the Internet to call attention to the implications of this vis-a-vis Lori’s “feminism” is misogynistic harassment. Once you drink the postmodern Kool-Aid, I suppose, these kind of moral reversals and psychiatric distortions make perfect sense.

  16. Southern Air Pirate
    October 31st, 2014 @ 9:20 pm

    The hard part was that after reading through this, I couldn’t tell if she was a hooker who was getting a college education and found the money too good to leave street walking. If not that then she was an upper class liberally raised young lady like the genetic cis-female who answers to the name Lena Dunham that likes to play at being a call girl and feels empowered and in control of her sexuality, rather than the truth by most honest men; a low down dirty hooker who doesn’t deserve real “love” (or her idea and over educated version of love) and only pity.

  17. ThomasD
    October 31st, 2014 @ 9:32 pm

    “On the other hand, anybody who majors in Women’s Studies probably needs to be spanked, and often, and by someone who knows how.”

    No fair Stacy, given the material lines like that practically write themselves.

    Like Having Bud Abbott tossing out straight lines.

  18. Dianna Deeley
    October 31st, 2014 @ 9:55 pm

    I retain a serene confidence. Should it prove misplaced, I have even more confidence in your wife, whose only apparent insanity is marrying you.

  19. Dianna Deeley
    October 31st, 2014 @ 9:58 pm

    Done, and done, Stacy.

  20. Messenger
    October 31st, 2014 @ 10:02 pm

    This is the exact point I was making earlier. If you look at some of Lori’s photos you’ll see that she’s full of scars from self mutilation, which is a sign of mental illness,in her case(and like it is with so many radical feminists)I’m guessing Borderline Personality Disorder due to physical/sexual/psychological abuse at the hands of a caregiver. It would also account for the repetition compulsion playing out in her bdsm lifestyle. what they seem to do though, either because personal responsibility is too hard, or because the rage is so intense, and the shame so deep, is split off and project it all outward, while continuing, and in her case celebrating(narcissism)her destructive behavior, and claiming its rebellion against men, patriarchy, etc.

    In short, you’re dealing with one screwed up character with multiple, dense layers of neurosis. I’m guessing her personal relationships are intense, but short, unstable, and violent because she would be impossible to ever reach, or truly know. She’s really the kind of girl who would lure you in with hot, kinky sex, and then you would be trapped in her web, and possibly never get out.

  21. Bob Belvedere
    October 31st, 2014 @ 10:53 pm

    ‘Mainstream’ – she has a body that looks like an underage girl and does Barely Legal videos.

  22. Zohydro
    October 31st, 2014 @ 11:17 pm

    Firefox – private browsing mode…

  23. Messenger
    October 31st, 2014 @ 11:52 pm

    I don’t want to split hairs here, but I wouldn’t go so far as to say she looks like an underaged girl. She’s definitely petite though, but still has some hip on her. In any case, she works with all the major producers of porn, with well known performers, and in all likelihood gets paid pretty well. If I had to guess, porn will be her life, even with a degree from Duke, although a degree in women studies isnt good for much more than acting in porn, or being a nude model. I’m a photographer, and shot a model about six months who was a recent graduate of a really prestigious(and expensive) northeastern liberal arts college(I wont say which one) with a women’s studies degree, and about all it qualified her to do is work in the “male gaze”. When I pointed out this irony that she was a women’s studies major but earning a living as a model, and in the male gaze, she simply responded, “I like it”, and left it at that. “Now, can you please remove your top?” was my next question.

  24. Messenger
    November 1st, 2014 @ 12:16 am

    I couldn’t get over how she, and all her friends, immediately jumped to the conclusion that if you were giving an objective, intellectual analysis of what she says, and does, it really meant you were obsessed with “Lori” and her third rate pornography! They are completely blind to to the empty twaddle they pass off as insight, and social commentary. It’s pathetic, and, not to mention narcissistic. Pepper the stripper was in many ways just as loathsome, and insufferable, and afflicted with the same mental illness as little “Lori”. I can just imagine what being in an intimate relationship with such a creature must be like? Pity any man that has walked that path because in all reality it would be a hell trying work through all that neurosis and would undoubtedly scar him for life.

  25. Adobe_Walls
    November 1st, 2014 @ 1:39 am

    Where’s the challenge in that?

  26. Daniel Freeman
    November 1st, 2014 @ 2:27 am

    Rule 32.

  27. Fail Burton
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:29 am

    I’ve always been obsessed with first-rate pornography. It’s called a door-knob that leads to the outside world and real women.

  28. Fail Burton
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:33 am

    I’m not taking any moral direction from nutty women who spend as much money on razor-blades to cut themselves as men do to shave. The Dem Party will though and so will Ivy League schools. “Lori For President: Hope, Change and Survival Sex in every pot.”

  29. Messenger
    November 1st, 2014 @ 10:33 am

    It’s really beyond frightening that she’s a good representation of the kind of mentality educating children, and creating public policy.

    Express elevator to Hell! Going down!

  30. Napa
    November 1st, 2014 @ 12:40 pm

    Ironic that the same girls who show their tits in public, and get choked on cocks as a form of mass entertainment claim saying hello to them on the street constitutes harassment.

    Feminism is evil.

  31. Some Rabbit
    November 2nd, 2014 @ 4:29 pm

    Rule #5 served up stealth style.