The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Hateful Bigoted Incestophobes!

Posted on | October 31, 2014 | 32 Comments

Earlier today I was reading The [Un]Documented Mark Steyn, which has many things to say about the West’s heedless descent into degeneracy — wealthy gay men employing surrogate mothers as womb-for-hire baby-makers and so forth — and then I returned to the computer to find that New York State’s highest court has ruled that an uncle has the constitutional right to have sex with his niece.

The Creepy Uncle Clause is probably right there in the Constitution next to the Emerging Awareness Doctrine that Justice Kennedy used to legalize sodomy in the Lawrence v. Texas case.

However, sophisticated ideals of social progress haven’t made much headway in Louisiana where, believe it or not, it is still considered illegal to have sex with dogs or 3-year-olds on video.

 

Category: Constitution, Crime, Sex

Comments

32 Responses to “Hateful Bigoted Incestophobes!”

  1. Mike G.
    October 31st, 2014 @ 10:53 pm

    Just another day in the life of our nation’s perverts. By the way, tweeted this to you this morning.

  2. Zohydro
    October 31st, 2014 @ 10:55 pm

    The gay-marriage genie is out of the bottle… Every thing we feared about this degeneracy is coming to pass now in spite of all the reassurances!

    I give up!

  3. Adjoran
    October 31st, 2014 @ 10:59 pm

    She claims she was drugged?

    Odd – that was the dog’s excuse, too.

  4. BreitbartLovesEwe
    October 31st, 2014 @ 11:03 pm

    Here’s the real story:

    Marszalkowski determined that as a matter of consanguinity, or blood
    relations, half-uncles and nieces share the same level of genetic ties
    as first cousins — or only one-eighth the same DNA.

    “It really was the equivalent of cousins marrying, which has been
    allowed in New York state for well over 100 years,” Marszalkowski said."

  5. Nigel Rae
    November 1st, 2014 @ 12:16 am

    I’m an Aussie, but I know what a Purple Heart is awarded for.
    The psychological damage McCain is taking by delving into the abyss of this shit deserves something like a Purple Heart. FFS he’s been taking ideological bullets while most of us won’t even think of looking over the parapet.
    You, McCain either have an intelectual SM fetish or you’re downright crazy.
    Thanks for sharing – I think.

  6. Nigel Rae
    November 1st, 2014 @ 12:30 am

    PS Steyn is a legend.

  7. Nigel Rae
    November 1st, 2014 @ 12:40 am

    “The Constitution doesn’t so much guarantee us things; it guarantees us an absence of government intrusion.”
    Yep, you wish. It may imply small Gov. but it surely aint GUARANTEED it.
    Lawyers – can’t live with em, can’t shoot em.
    Well not without a really top-notch lawyer in your pocket anyway.
    is that double-think?

  8. darleenclick
    November 1st, 2014 @ 1:02 am

    “Hey, mom & dad! I’m marrying your granddaughter!”

    Yeah, that’s a winner around the Thanksgiving table.

  9. Adobe_Walls
    November 1st, 2014 @ 1:34 am

    The bad intended and unintended consequences will be oozing out of this for the next century.

  10. DeadMessenger
    November 1st, 2014 @ 2:24 am

    BWAHAHAHAHA!

  11. Käthe
    November 1st, 2014 @ 2:53 am

    Disgusting. Anyone who doesn’t understand that the biggest danger with the creepy uncle clause has nothing to do with DNA should not be left unattended around children. Apparently now little girls in NY can be groomed by their creepy relatives with impunity, as long as he waits until her 18th birthday to make his first obvious move.

  12. Phil_McG
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:06 am

    He got the 1,000 yard stare after wading into the heart of Dworkin. He’s seen some shit, man.

    http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cats-whove-seen-some-shit.jpg

  13. Fail Burton
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:21 am

    Note to world: Yorkers like Lena Dunham laugh at Louisiana as depraved. I think water is still wet in LA but I’d have to check. I know it’s rock-hard in NY. Libs never understand why we make jokes about marrying our pick-up trucks. There is not only no negative slippery slope in liberalism, they can’t wait to turn it into a cliff. Project America 1960-14 to 2015-70 and yes folks, we will most certainly be marrying toaster ovens and have a Cousin It with tits and both sex organs as President. We will also be digging through our own ruins looking for magic ancient laptop parts during the Tower of Babel Civil War.

  14. Fail Burton
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:23 am

    And our part of the pact (the only part really since the Constitution isn’t a ruling robot) is not to act nuts.

    Or you can see it as not angering the robot.

  15. concern00
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:24 am

    When you embrace birth control (pre and post coitus) and unfettered sex with anything and everything, then the incest taboo holds about as much weight as age of consent.

    There is no f–king slippery slope. It’s a cliff and we’re pretty close to hitting bottom.

  16. RKae
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:35 am

    And the awareness just keeps right on emerging!

    It never stops!

  17. Adobe_Walls
    November 1st, 2014 @ 4:01 am

    I seriously doubt we’ll last long enough to have a cousin It as president, not as sure about the toaster oven. Once again, there are no slippery slopes there are only the cliffs we step off of. It’s the outcroppings that smack us on the way down creating the illusion of sliding.

  18. Fail Burton
    November 1st, 2014 @ 5:49 am

    I disagree. In Soylent Green Edward G. Robinson looks at a rarely seen steak and vegetables and starts crying and says “How did we come to this?”

    Hate speech and madness that were unacceptable in 1970 are not only acceptable today but institutionalized. Who gets arrested for singing “Kung-Fu Fighting”?

    No belly button for I Dream of Jeannie. Now naked cutters are not only easily available to children but have legitimacy as gender theorists. That doesn’t happen in one week.

  19. CrustyB
    November 1st, 2014 @ 7:10 am

    If we seize marriage and change it to include ONE kind of sick couple…

  20. Adobe_Walls
    November 1st, 2014 @ 7:14 am

    Cousin It must wait his turn. First we must have woman president and then a Hispanic. We’ll not last long enough to complete that ritual.

  21. Matthew T. Mason
    November 1st, 2014 @ 9:10 am

    Fascinating, isn’t it? The sodomites keep telling us there’s no slippery slope. And then what we said was going to happen, happens.

    Although we haven’t heard anything from the sodomite camp yet, I expect them to try to escape responsibility for this.

    It’s up to us to make absolutely sure they own it.

  22. RS
    November 1st, 2014 @ 12:03 pm

    Screaming “slippery slope” fallacy is beloved of the Left, but what it refuses to acknowledge is that it is only a fallacy where there is a definitive, philosophical line which will never be crossed and which is acknowledged by those wishing to change the status quo. Given that the Left stated endgame is the absolute destruction of the institutions of traditional Marriage and traditional family, any Leftist who defends himself by invoking that alleged fallacy is demonstrating his bad faith.

  23. Saltyron1977
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:12 pm

    Absolutely. You hit the nail on the head. The gays either get real pissed or simply change the subject when you point out this cause and effect. They need thier faces rubbed in it like the dog shiat it is because its all their doing.

  24. Kirby McCain
    November 1st, 2014 @ 3:19 pm

    I have mentioned on my blog that 40% of the women incarcerated in this country admit they were on drugs at the time of their crimes. If 40% admit it then the actual number is probably much higher.

  25. JadedByPolitics
    November 1st, 2014 @ 5:52 pm

    She and Lena Dunham should just hook up and leave the kids and dogs alone1

  26. Anon Y. Mous
    November 1st, 2014 @ 6:29 pm

    and then I returned to the computer to find that New York State’s highest court has ruled that an uncle has the constitutional right to have sex with his niece.

    Wow, you mischaracterized that one pretty badly. The court ruled that the existing law banning an uncle from marrying his niece did not apply to a half-uncle / half-niece union. Why? Because of what the law said. If the legislature were to change the law to read the same way it does regarding brother / sister unions (half-brothers and half-sisters are explicitly covered), then it could be fixed. The only way the constitution would come into it would be that the state doesn’t get to pretend laws say things when they don’t. If there is a problem with the law, the solution is to change it, not to just wave your hands and say it should have said something else, so let’s just act like it does.

  27. Bob Belvedere
    November 1st, 2014 @ 6:49 pm

    I can’t wait to be aware of Justice Kennedy’s death [yeah, I said it].

  28. Nan
    November 1st, 2014 @ 7:54 pm

    Except that the IRS says things say what they want them to say. And so does the supreme court.

  29. Wibbins
    November 1st, 2014 @ 8:56 pm

    More like “Hey, Bro, me and your daughter is getting married!”

  30. Quartermaster
    November 2nd, 2014 @ 9:45 am

    You misspelled Injustice.

  31. LN_Smithee
    November 2nd, 2014 @ 12:30 pm

    I try to make them own it every chance I get, and they ALWAYS punt.

    https://twitter.com/LNSmithee/status/527564277289213952

  32. What’s the Difference B/T a Clinton and Obama Democrat? | Regular Right Guy
    November 2nd, 2014 @ 4:34 pm

    […] Hateful Bigoted Incestophobes! […]