The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Does Brett Kimberlin Really Need Another Lesson in ‘The Streisand Effect’?

Posted on | March 11, 2013 | 13 Comments

Aaron Walker tells the story of his most recent encounter with the “Speedway Bomber.” It’s like Wile E. Coyote and Acme rocket skates: You might think he’d learn a lesson, but somehow he never does:

Brett Kimberlin – who spent 17 years in federal prison after being convicted as Indiana’s infamous “Speedway Bomber” – showed up at a Maryland court house and began photographing Walker’s wife.
While Walker was attending a March 1 hearing and his wife was in their car in the parking lot outside, Kimberlin “circled the vehicle, looking into its interior and at my wife,” Walker wrote at his “Allergic to Bull” blog. Walker said Kimberlin “drove around and then parked in the space directly facing my wife … and started taking pictures or filming her.”

“Streisand Effect” — you can look it up. Attempts to suppress the truth tend to have the opposite effect in the New Media age.

What is the truth that Brett Kimberlin so desperately wants to suppress? Just read this: “When Jessica Was 10, 11, 12 . . .”

When the pro-Kimberlin trolls get up in my face on Twitter, I just start Tweeting out that link, and pretty soon, they get out of my face. Why? Because calling attention to someone who tells the truth about Kimberlin sort of defeats the purpose of the Kimberlin fanboy trolls.

And so, truth! truth! truth! What happened to Julia Scyphers?

Blog Bash is Thursday night. The place will be packed to fire-code capacity, and Aaron Walker will be there, along with hundreds of bloggers who all have a motive to tell the truth about Brett Kimberlin.

Let me ask you something: Wouldn’t you like to see video of that event — hundreds of bloggers cheering — when Aaron Walker receives a check to help with his legal expenses? Give what you can — $10, $20, $50 — and make sure the truth about Brett Kimberlin gets told.

UPDATE: Patterico writes:

This news comes on the heels of reports that Kimberlin and his associate Neal Rauhauser have made calls to the establishment hosting the BlogBash party, which Aaron plans to attend, threatening the establishment with protests by Muslims due to Aaron’s involvement with the “Everyone Draw Mohammed” web site, which Aaron and others created to stand up to Islamic extremists who would kill those who dared to depict Mohammed.

C’mon: $10, $20, $50 for the truth.

 

Category: Aaron Worthing, CPAC, The Kimberlin Files

Is ‘Senator Bruce Carroll, (R-SC)’
The New Hotness?

Posted on | March 11, 2013 | 18 Comments

by Smitty

Props to Bruce Carroll:

I felt it best to resign from GOProud in advance of the CPAC conference this week so that my position in GOProud would not be a distraction from my serious deliberations regarding my potential future plans in South Carolina public service.
I wish only the best to my colleagues and fellow supporters of GOProud moving forward and I’ll always do what I can to be helpful from the crowd.
Over the next few weeks, I will be studying the resources, time and effort it would take to do my part in holding Lindsey Graham accountable for his voting record and his attitude toward the voters in South Carolina.

Feel free to disagree with me on the point, but I’m not holding anything against Carroll, sexual or otherwise. Hopefully we’ve the liberty to support great candidates without that translating into 100% endorsement of all that candidate’s personal choices, fashion or otherwise.
Feel free to request an “Axis of Speedo” photo op with Stacey McCain at CPAC this year for a campaign fundraiser. Stacy would dig that. I think.

Update: Wonkette does a typical Lefty job of focusing on the crotches, and not the issues. Ace of Spades is a supporter.

via Gay Patriot, Sharky, and Red State

Category: South Carolina

British Left’s War on ‘Page Three Girls’

Posted on | March 11, 2013 | 27 Comments

Since 1970, Britain’s largest-selling newspaper, The Sun tabloid, has been famous — or, as some would say, notorious — for publishing photos of topless models on page 3, so that the “Page Three Girls” have become something of a national institution. Yet now, radical feminists have mounted a campaign to ban these buxom beauties:

The campaign to have the infamous ‘Page 3’ of The Sun Newspaper stopped, banned or otherwise censored has reached incredible feats over the past few months. There is no doubt that when it comes to orchestrating a campaign, Lucy-Anne Holmes and her sidekicks are no fools.
From high-profile news stories to political buy-in, from university blanket bans to a petition now signed by 85,000 people, the anti-boob campaigners are allowing their censorious and illiberal tendencies to shine through.

That’s from Raheem Kassam of The Commentator, who points out that the argument made by feminists is that — wait for it — celebrating beautiful women hurts the feelings of less-beautiful women:

Holmes declared her selfish and self-hating motivations in an interview with The Guardian in September 2012.
She said, “It took me until I was 35 to go, ‘why have I hated my boobs?’… Oh, because I’ve been comparing them to this image in the paper that is purely for the gratification of men. I have never really owned this part of my body.”
Does Holmes’s insecurity seem like a good reason to stop other, secure women from using their bodies in a way they choose to, and in a way that drives the sales of the most popular newspaper in Britain?

Hmmm. This war against “Page Three” confirms Rush Limbaugh’s Undeniable Truth of Life #24: “Feminism was established so as to permit unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.” It also looks as if it might be part of a larger strategy to hurt the business of The Sun’s publisher — Rupert Murdoch — by depriving his most successful newspaper of one of its most popular features.

But the question should be asked: Other than hurting the feelings of ugly feminists like Lucy-Anne Holmes, is “Page Three” bad for women? The models themselves aren’t complaining. The very first “Page Three Girl,” Stephanie Rahn was 62 when she described the impact on her career on the 40th anniversary of her Sun debut:

“I’d done the pictures for a modelling agency and I got a  call one day to tell  me my picture was appearing in The Sun. . . .
She says: “I would never have got other modelling jobs if it wasn’t for The Sun. Being on Page 3 until 1978 opened doors.
“I loved the people, the newspaper and I loved what they did for me and my career. I’m very grateful for my time on Page 3.”
Stefanie, from north London, notched up a few minor roles on TV series such as Some Mothers Do ’Ave ’Em, The Benny Hill Show and The Cut Price Comedy Show.
Her most famous role was playing Lady Marie in The French Revolution section  of Mel Brooks’ comic masterpiece, History Of The World: Part I in 1981.

Read more about the war on “Page Three” at The Commentator, and you should follow Raheem Kassam on Twitter. I met this young conservative British journalist Sunday in D.C. and he reminds me much of the late Christopher Hitchens, of whom he is a great admirer.

UPDATE: “For Leftists, anything that is not illegal shall be mandatory. Anything that is not mandatory shall be illegal.” If the Left ever decided that every chick with a nice rack must appear on Page Three, I might consider becoming a leftist.

UPDATE II: The ever-diligent Donald Douglas is prepared to do extensive research on Page Three girls. Oh, the sacrifices required of a citizen-journalist . . .

 


Category: Feminism, Great Britain, Rule 5

GOP: Don’t Defend ObamaCare. Defund.

Posted on | March 11, 2013 | 18 Comments

by Smitty

Lo and behold, there is some chance of getting the Democrats to do their job:

Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Budget Committee say they hope to keep the focus during this week’s expected marathon markup on setting a sound course for the country’s fiscal future.
Though such issues have dominated the national political conversation since 2008, this week marks the first time in four years that members will actually debate a budget resolution, with proceedings expected to kick off Wednesday.
“Senate Budget Chair Patty Murray, and her colleagues, will introduce the long-delayed Democrat plan on Wednesday,” Senate Budget ranking member Jeff Sessions of Alabama said Saturday in the GOP weekly address, previewing the Republican rebuttal to the proposal to be unveiled by the Democratic senator from Washington.

Senator Jeff Sessions laid down the GOP response in the Weekly Address on Saturday:
Around 5:18, Sessions gets around to going over a laundry list of swell ideas that would indeed be improvements. However, it’s almost as though Sessions accepts the basic premise that Americans work for the government, not the government for Americans.

In fairness to Sessions, the Weekly GOP Address is not the place for spitball throwing and rabble-rousing. He’s just relating the party line.

However, should the GOP want voters to take it seriously, it’s got to do more than re-arrange the railcar loads of deck chairs at the titanic train wreck. SWIDT? The GOP itself is a Progressive cliché. Rehabilitating it is going to take more courage that killing efforts to defund ObamaCare in the House. Again, in defense of Boehner, the election failed to deliver enough Republican political heft to go calling any shots. However, acceding to ObamaCare  will be selling the Democrats the rope with which they tied the propaganda noose.

Sometimes you have good options. Sometimes you’re Dennis Hopper in True Romance, to the Democrat’s Christopher Walken.

via Memeorandum

Category: Republicans

‘Green on Blue’: Two U.S. Special Forces Troops Killed in Afghanistan Attack

Posted on | March 11, 2013 | 6 Comments

NBC News reports from Kabul:

Two U.S. service members were killed and at least eight others were injured Monday in a possible insider attack at a special forces site in Afghanistan, U.S. and Afghan officials said.
The shooting occurred at a U.S. special operations outpost in Wardak province in eastern Afghanistan, U.S. officials said. The shooter, who was dressed in an Afghan military or police uniform, was shot and killed.
“We have two confirmed dead, but the toll could rise,” one U.S. official said.
A senior official in the Afghan Defense Ministry said that at least three Afghans were also killed.
The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack in a text message sent by Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid. . . .
The shooting occurred during a group meeting or briefing, a spokesman for NATO’s International Security Assistance Force said.

The so-called “green on blue” attack came in the wake of Afghan president Hamid Karzai’s harsh criticism of U.S. policy, and after U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s visit to Afghanistan.

UPDATE: Bill Rogio of Long War Journal reports:

An Afghan policeman killed two US soldiers in an attack at a US Special Forces base in Wardak province today. The attack is the second green-on-blue, or insider attack, that has been reported in the past four days.
The International Security Assistance Force confirmed that two US soldiers from the US Forces-Afghanistan (USFOR-A), the command which many US special  operations forces fall under, were killed by Afghan personnel.
“Two US Forces-Afghanistan service members died in eastern Afghanistan today when an individual wearing an Afghan National Security Forces uniform turned a  weapon on U.S. and Afghan forces,” the  ISAF statement said.
ISAF told The Long War Journal that the attack took place in the Jalrayz district in Wardak, and that two US soldiers were killed and several more were wounded.
The policeman opened fire on US soldiers with a machine gun that was mounted  to the back of a pickup, killing two US soldiers and wounding eight more, according to Pajhwok Afghan News. US soldiers returned fire, killing three Afghan Local Policemen, including the policeman who initiated the attack.

UPDATE: Related news by Philip Bump at Atlantic Wire:

The Department of Defense describes a private conversation between Hagel and Karzai, in which Hagel made similar assurances.

“We did discuss those comments,” the secretary said, responding to a reporter’s question about his meeting with Karzai. “I told the president it was not true that the United States was unilaterally working with the Taliban in trying to negotiate anything.”
Any negotiation with the Taliban to build peace and political consensus in Afghanistan must come from the Afghan government, Hagel said.

This morning, early reports of another source of tension between the two countries: U.S. troops opened fire on two Afghan civilians as they approached a military convoy. Both men, later identified by the AP as employees of a company that repairs police vehicles, were killed.
The official Defense statement quoted above summarizes the secretary’s trip: “Hagel’s first visit to Afghanistan as secretary has been eventful.” Indeed.


Category: Aghanistan, Military

Obama Administration’s Top Legal ‘Experts’ Pwned by Blogger in Australia

Posted on | March 11, 2013 | 18 Comments

Guest Post by “Badger Pundit.”

Illustrating Glenn Reynolds’s “Army of Davids” observation about how the internet enables ordinary but competent people to beat Big Media, Big Government, and other goliaths which formerly enjoyed a near-monopoly over public policy debate even if lacking in competence, back in 2008 an American blogger, Dwight Sullivan, pwned all the attorneys and Justices involved in a U.S. Supreme Court case about the constitutionality of a state executing a criminal defendant for raping a child. After the Court ruled unconstitutional the death penalty for child rape, in part because the federal government (supposedly) does not authorize it, Sullivan pointed out in a blog entry that both the Congress and the President had recently authorized the execution of members of the military who commit child rape. The Court ended up modifying its opinion to correct the error Sullivan pointed out.

Meet Harvard law professor David Barron and Georgetown law professor Martin S. Lederman, the most recent legal “goliaths” to be felled by a blogger:

David Barron

Martin S. Lederman

Barron is graduate of Harvard Law School. Even more impressive, Lederman is a graduate of Yale Law School. Both have impressive professional accomplishments, which together with their contacts within the progressive legal community in 2009 won them high legal posts in the Obama Administration. But even these highly credentialed law professors — Obama’s best and brightest in the field of constitutional law — have now been pwned by law professor blogging from Australia.

As proof, consider this long article published yesterday in the New York Times addressing the legal work that went into the Administration’s decision that it had the constitutional authority to assassinate via a drone strike, rather than capture, a non-combatant U.S. citizen located in a foreign country (i.e., someone who though perhaps plotting harm against U.S. interests, is not presently engaged in an attack). As the article recounts, once the Administration developed an active interest in killing Anwar al-Awlaki (a U.S. citizen hiding in Yemen) in the aftermath of the attempted Christmas Day bombing in 2009, in early 2010 Barron and Lederman put together a memo concluding that there was no legal obstacle to using a drone strike to kill al-Awlaki (at least if he proved difficult to capture).

The main commentary so far on this article, for example, by Ann Althouse and Glenn Reynolds, has focused on the hypocrisy angle. Barron and Lederman found themselves in the uncomfortable position of arguing that the war power of the President is broad enough to justify killing rather than capturing a U.S. citizen who had not even been charged with a crime.This position was uncomfortable because just two years earlier they had published more than 250 pages in the Harvard Law Review (see here and here) attacking as unduly broad the Bush Administration’s view of the war power used to justify mere enhanced interrogation (leaving no permanent harm) of captured terrorists who were citizens of foreign countries. As Althouse puts it: “Karma’s a bitch!” She adds: “isn’t it amusing to picture them — somewhere in the secret passageways of power — flop-sweating and frantic over the realization Oh, my God, we’re John Yoo!?”

But beyond the hypocrisy, it should not escape notice how these two towering figures of the progressive legal community were, in their actual analysis of the relevant law, pwned by a blogger. The New York Times article reveals that after completing a legal memorandum which concluded that “Mr. Awlaki was a lawful target” for assassination, Barron and Lederman “grew uneasy . . ., particularly after reading a legal blog that focused on a statute that bars Americans from killing other Americans overseas.” As Marcy Wheeler and others have pointed out, although the New York Times did not credit him by name (or, apparently, even interview him), the person who wrote the blog which made Barron and Lederman uneasy is Kevin Jon Heller, a law professor in Australia.

Kevin Jon Heller

Even though one would think lawyers in America would be somewhat more familiar with American law than a law professor in Australia, it was left to Heller to point out that there’s a statute protecting U.S. citizens from being killed in foreign countries by other U.S. citizens. Just a day after reading in the Washington Post that al-Awlaki had been added to the CIA “hit list” despite being a U.S. citizen, on April 8, 2010, Heller published a blog post, “Let’s Call Killing al-Awlaki What It Is — Murder,” which pointed to the legal problem presented by 18 U.S.C. 1119(b), which reads:

A person who, being a national of the United States, kills or attempts to kill a national of the United States while such national is outside the United States but within the jurisdiction of another country shall be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113.

In reaction to Heller’s blog post (and other concerns), the New York Times article reports, Barron and Lederman devoted months of additional work to the matter of whether al-Awlaki could lawfully be killed, adding dozens of pages to their analysis in an attempt to get around the problem raised by Heller (and other concerns). But based on Professor Heller’s recent analysis of the leaked “White Paper” which summarized the analysis of Barron and Lederman, it does not appear that they ever focused on the key issue — the problem under 18 USC 1119(b) presented by the CIA, which is not part of the military, killing a U.S. citizen in a foreign country.

It appears that Professor Heller is continuing to pwn Barron and Lederman. Just this morning he published a blog post which is highly critical of this key omission in their analysis: “Why the ‘Public Authority’ Defense Does Not Work for the CIA.” The blog post seems quite thorough, and one looks forward to hearing what current Administration officials, and Barron and Lederman (who have returned to teaching), have to say about it. A snippet:

al-Awlaki was killed by the CIA, not by the US military. The White Paper does not discuss whether a CIA drone operator would be entitled to a public-authority defense in a prosecution under the foreign-murder statute; indeed, all of the sources cited in III.C regarding the defense (p. 14) — three classic criminal-law treatises and an old state case — claim that the laws of war entitle a soldier to kill the enemy. They say nothing about the right of anyone else to kill.

So would a CIA drone operator be entitled to a public-authority defense? I don’t see how. . . . I simply fail to understand how the US could argue that a CIA drone operator has the right to kill an American citizen abroad, even one who otherwise qualifies as a legitimate target.

* * *

Because CIA drone operators do not possess the combatant’s privilege, a drone operator does indeed violate federal law when he kills an American citizen abroad — namely, the foreign-murder statute. That is true even though the exact same attack would not be criminal if it was carried out by a drone operator working for the US military. The difference is precisely one of public authority: the military drone operator has it (the combatant’s privilege); the CIA drone operator does not.

One wonders whether the country is in the best of hands if we have to rely on a law professor in Australia to point out to top lawyers in a progressive Administration statutes put in place to limit the ability of Americans to kill each other outside America.

Then again, Professor Heller is no slouch. From a review of his biography, perhaps one should not be surprised that Heller can run circles around Barron and Lederman — for example, he has twice as many advanced degrees (four) as Barron and Lederman have combined, two of them from American universities (an M.A. from Duke and a J.D. from Stanford). Perhaps the Obama Administration needs to cast a wider net in its staffing decisions.

Category: Constitution

LIVE AT FIVE: 03.11.13

Posted on | March 11, 2013 | 3 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
SecDef Hagel Gets Explosive Welcome To Afghanistan

"So we're the problem here? I agree!"

Hagel and Karzai in SEKRIT MEETING

Two bombs kill nineteen on day of Hagel’s arrival
Karzai: “The bombs that were detonated in Kabul and Khost were not a show of force; they were serving America.”


Delhi Gang Rape Suspect Ram Singh Suicides In Solitary Confinement Cell
Prime suspect in brutal rape used own clothes to hang himself

Harvard Administrators Secretly Searched Profs’ E-Mail
Admins were hunting leak to media during cheating scandal



POLITICS
Ass’t AG Perez To Be Named Secretary Of Labor?

Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez

Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez

Well-known race hustler to be nominated as replacement for Hilda Solis

Navy Clips Blue Angels’ Wings

Drink Sellers Angered By Nanny Bloomberg’s “Suggestion”

Ryan: We’ll See If Obama Outreach Is Serious

Obama Slams New Media, Sucks Up To Lamestream Media At Gridiron Club Dinner

Democrats Eager For Ashley Judd To Enter Kentucky Senate Race…And So Are Republicans

Florida Bill Would Require Anger Management Classes For Ammunition Buyers



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Crude Drops On PRC Industrial Data, Stronger Dollar: NYMEX $91.69, Brent $110.42
PRC On Alert As Inflation Creeps Higher
Kuroda Says Bank Of Japan Will Consider Buying Derivatives
Intrade Shuts Down, Citing Fiscal Irregularities
Dollar Slips Broadly But Gains Against Yen
Japan Machinery Orders Fall 13%
PRC Stock Trading Opens To Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan Residents
Maine Lobster Fishery Certified As Sustainable
Publishers Oppose Amazon’s Bid To Gain Control Of TLDs
Ultima Creator Launches Kickstarter For New RPG
Dad Hacks “Donkey Kong” For Daughter, Creates “Pauline Edition”
Iran Blocks VPNs To Prevent Circumventing Web Censorship
Samsung Dominated PRC Smartphone Market In 2012
Alleged EA Employee Writes Missive, Joins SimCity’s Public Flogging
Seattle Dive Bar Bans Google Glasses



SPORTS
Matt Kenseth Celebrates Birthday With Win At Kobalt Tools 400

The winner!

The winner!

His first win with Joe Gibbs Racing

U.S. Rallies Late To Beat Canada 9-4, Advance In WBC

Hoosiers Rally For Big Ten Title

Penguins Crush Islanders 6-1, Extend Win Streak To Five

Pacers Can’t Beat The Heat, Fall 105-91


Duchene Lifts Avs Over Sharks In OT

Depleted Bucks Hold Off Late Charge By Kings

Repertoire In Mind, Dan Haren Works Inside



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Kelly Osbourne “Doing Fine” After Seizure, Still Hospitalized

Doesn't sound good...

Doesn’t sound good…

Could it be epilepsy?

Rihanna Cancels Boston Concert Due To Laryngitis

Kidney Stones Force Rocker Vince Neil Off Stage

Elle Macpherson’s Engaged!

“Oz” Opens To $80.3 Billion Box Office In North America, $150.2 Million Global Debut

Holly Madison: My Daughter Rainbow Aurora Won’t Be Traumatized By Her Name

Adele To Sing At Michelle Obama’s 50th Birthday Party

“Star Trek Into Darkness” Debuts New Action-Packed Trailer

Mandy Moore Exits ABC Pilot “Pulling”

Lindsay Lohan’s Options: House Arrest Or Jail



FOREIGNERS
Taiwan Anti-Nuclear Protests May Derail $8.9 Billion Power Plant
PRC Fishes 900 Dead Pigs Out Of Shanghai’s Huangpu River
Norks Making Good On Some Threats
Conclave To Elect New Pope Begins Tomorrow
Capriles Will Challenge Venezuelan VP Maduro In Next Month’s Presidential Election
Nigeria’s Ansaru Jihadis Announce Deaths Of Seven Hostages
Captured City A Test For Syrian Rebels
Her Majesty A Champion Of LGBT Rights? Dubious.



BLOGS & STUFF
American Power: #StandWithSpencer – John Hawkins Attacks Robert Spencer
Jihad Watch: UN Reports That Hamas, Not Israelis, Killed BBC Reporter’s Baby In Gaza
The Truth About Guns: More Guns, Fewer People?
Weasel Zippers: Maryland GOP State Senator Files Bill To Prevent School Suspensions Over Inane Gun Comparisons
PJ Tatler: Yep, Ashley Judd 2014 Is Official
Jazz Shaw: Karzai Now Accusing U.S. Of Collusion With Taliban
Lonely Conservative: SNL’s Goodbye To Hugo Chavez
Protein Wisdom: Outdoor Channel Poised To Leave Colorado

Category: Live at Five

Rule 5 Sunday: This Time It’s For Real

Posted on | March 10, 2013 | 15 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


For the benefit of those reading Rule 5 compilations for the first time, or who have forgotten since last time: some of the links below are most definitely Not Safe For Work and could contribute to the pollution of your precious bodily fluids – or worse.


Laughing Conservative leads off this week with Adriana Karembu, followed by Conservative Counterpoint with hot babes packing heat.* Animal Magnetism has Rule 5 Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon, Fishersville Mike has the Big Bang before hoops, and Randy’s Roundtable comes off the road trip with Kara Wester. Reaganite Republican returns with Miss Kosovo 2012, while Sahib and the Crew debut with a feature on the SHEALS (no typo). Eye of Polyphemus offers Scarlett Johansson, First Street Journal has basic rifle marksmanship with the Delta Dragons, and Ninety Miles From Tyranny pulls a threefer with Late Night Ladies, more Late Night Ladies, and a Hot Pick of the Evening.


EBL starts with Game of Thrones actress Emilia Clarke, and continues with Ashley Judd, Nigella Lawson, and Lisa Dutton.


From his secret lair at Site Y, Soylent Green submits Curse of the Code Monkeys, Four Years Later Motivationer, Tuesday Titillation Erin, BTW You Guys Are Awesome, I’m Thinker Than I Dumb I Am, Humpday Hawt GULAG Edition, Fursday From The GULAG Lexi, and a re-run of a link previously featured at Live at Five: Best AGW Hoax Promotion EVAH. Over at his new digs, it’s Let’s Try This Again Shall We? Corsetus Interruptus, and Now That’s A Wakeup Call!


A View From The Beach offers Candice Swanepoel, Oh No Silvio!, Women And Chimps Act Alike, You Can Take The Woman Out Of The Cave…,Cave Girls Have Stronger Jaws, Recording Fail, and Goats (With Girls).


Proof Positive has Monica Bellucci, Sex In Advertising, and vintage babe Celeste Holm; Dustbury checks in with Becky?# and Little Peggy March; and at the Camp of the Saints, it’s Lisa Dergan and the Rule 5 News.


The DaleyGator’s DaleyBabes this week included Sayaka Ando, Zulay Henao, Suelynn Madeiros, Nicole Alexander, Norika Kamamura, Jewel Santini, Annabella Botalli, Rachelle Leah, Romina Aranzola, Norelys Rodriguez, and Laura Bell Bundy.


Thanks to everyone for their links! Deadline to submit links to the Rule 5 Wombat mailbox is Saturday, March 16.

Category: Rule 5
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin