Ouch! New Poll Shows Perry at 7% in Iowa

Posted on | October 30, 2011 | 22 Comments

The headline on the Des Moines Register story is “Herman Cain, Mitt Romney lead new Iowa Poll,” but when you break down the numbers, the really shocking result is farther down:

Herman Cain …………………. 23%
Mitt Romney ………………….. 22%
Ron Paul ……………………….. 13%
Michele Bachmann ………….. 8%
Rick Perry ………………… 7%
Newt Gingrich …………………. 7%
Rick Santorum …………………. 5%
Jon Huntsman …………………. 1%

Perry tied for fifth place? This poll was taken Oct. 23-26 (Sunday through Wednesday), entirely after the Oct. 18 Vegas debate, during a period when the media were heavily reporting Perry’s new tax plan and …

Fifth place? Single digits? Wedged between Bachmann and Santorum?

Perry put $174,000 into a TV ad campaign that started Tuesday in Iowa. As far as I know, Perry is the only candidate now running TV ads in Iowa, so he’s likely to see his numbers rise between now and mid-November. We’re still 65 days from the Iowa caucuses, but Perry’s got a lot of ground to make up if he’s going to avoid an embarrassment.

And the really scary thing: Romney wasn’t supposed to be a player in Iowa, and yet he’s neck-and-neck for the lead. Romney is almost certain to win New Hampshire. If he also wins Iowa . . . dude, game over.

Category: Election 2012, Herman Cain, Iowa, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, Polls, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul

Comments

22 Responses to “Ouch! New Poll Shows Perry at 7% in Iowa”

Anonymous
October 30th, 2011 @ 8:22 am

Cain, can. Cain, can. Cain, can.
smitty
October 30th, 2011 @ 8:30 am

Romney will give the concession speech. It has been decided by The Powers That Be. We the peeps have our work cut out for us to alter this predestination.
Anonymous
October 30th, 2011 @ 8:57 am

Are Iowa polls that accurate? How do pollsters filter for likely caucus voters or do they even try? Santorum and Bachman are both following conventional path to winning the Iowa caucus. Are they both living in a fools paradise? Romney could be benefiting from supporters he gained in the 08 cycle even though he’s put little effort in Iowa until recently.
I view the polls in Iowa with a great deal of suspicion.
Sissy Willis
October 30th, 2011 @ 8:59 am

#WeThePeeps, Twitter hashtag of the election season! 🙂
Anonymous
October 30th, 2011 @ 9:11 am

I view the polls in Iowa with a great deal of suspicion.

Indeed, the trudge-through-the-snow factor is a hard thing to calculate. Well-organized high-intensity campaigns over-perform. And you always have to put an asterisk in front of early polls. Two months is a political lifetime under present circumstances.

But for Perry to be at 7% … dude.
ThePaganTemple
October 30th, 2011 @ 9:14 am

Still got two months to go, a lot can change in that time. I won’t say Romney’s got it sewed up until he wins South Carolina and/or Florida. He’s probably got Nevada in the bag. And then there’s Michigan. If it gets down to a two person race after Florida, then whoever that second person is has a damn good chance, depending on who that second person is. But it will have to start thinning out pretty quick, and the sooner it gets down to two people the better. Maybe Cain will pull an upset in New Hampshire. Like I said, he’s got two months.
McGehee
October 30th, 2011 @ 10:04 am

The way they’re front-loading primaries again this cycle Ron Paul actually stands a chance of getting my vote in March.

I’d rather that didn’t happen…
Anonymous
October 30th, 2011 @ 10:15 am

Admittedly 7% percent is remarkably low particularly with Romney coming in basically tied with Cain. Romney’s number is one of the reasons I’m more than usually suspicious of this poll. Santorum’s low rating is another. The conventional wisdom may well be incorrect as to how one must campaign to win in Iowa but unless they’re sending one of the kids to go fetch the shotgun every time Santorum knocks on some one’s door and he just can’t take a hint, I’m eyeing his low number with extreme skepticism. This poll looks suspiciously similar to the national polls.
Daily Pundit » “Conservative” No-Hopers Principally Greedy and Power-Crazed
October 30th, 2011 @ 11:47 am

[…] Ouch! New Poll Shows Perry at 7% in Iowa : The Other McCain And the really scary thing: Romney wasn’t supposed to be a player in Iowa, and yet he’s neck-and-neck for the lead. Romney is almost certain to win New Hampshire. If he also wins Iowa . . . dude, game over. […]
Joe
October 30th, 2011 @ 12:03 pm

Wow I thought everything was Bush’s fault…but now it is Cain’s fault!
SOYLENT GREEN
October 30th, 2011 @ 12:23 pm

Perry’s the only one who said Ethanol is a disastrous boondoggle.
Of course he’s going to fail in Iowa.
Everyone else is saying what they need to to get by…kind of like liberals.
Anonymous
October 30th, 2011 @ 12:32 pm

But ORomney is better than Obama! Anything with an R! especially since we know the voters won’t fall for “bi-partisan” just because it’s a position most Republicans don’t support and Democrats do!
Herman Cain Leads Mitt Romney in Republican Presidential Nomination Des Moines Register’s Iowa Poll, 23% to 22% | Scared Monkeys
October 30th, 2011 @ 1:06 pm

[…] Cain surges, Texas Gov. Rick Perry continues in GOP nomination campaign free-fall as he is now in 5th place in the Iowa poll with only 7%. It is safe to say Perry has fallen and he can’t get up. […]
Finrod Felagund
October 30th, 2011 @ 1:55 pm

Caucuses are notoriously difficult to poll; if Cain is the second choice of as many people as I’ve been hearing he is, he’ll outperform his polling numbers in the actual caucus, since from my understanding of how the caucus works, if your candidate doesn’t have enough other supporters at your location, you have to choose again from the candidates that do have enough supporters.
Finrod Felagund
October 30th, 2011 @ 2:09 pm

And “writing” like that is why I’m more of a commenter than a blogger.
ThePaganTemple
October 30th, 2011 @ 2:16 pm

The question is will Cain be one of the ones with a lot of supporters who make it to the caucuses, or will he be one of the ones with very few. That’s the question these polls can’t even begin to answer.
Adjoran
October 30th, 2011 @ 3:15 pm

Perry’s 7% isn’t so shocking considering the history. They built him up, Buttercup, just to let him down. He was hyped and advertised as something he is not and is paying the price for that deception – which may not have been his, personally, but his campaign, supporters, and desperate conservatives wanting to believe that Zombie Reagan might walk among us and eat the living brains of Obama and Biden sure pumped up the expectations.

If not for that, his tough-but-compassionate-evangelical campaign might have attracted the bulk of the Huck Club from ’08. But the Church Lady doesn’t like little boys who tell fibs.

Somebody does need to step up and take some of Romney’s support in Iowa, though, if it is to be a real contest.
Anonymous
October 30th, 2011 @ 4:48 pm

So we’re at the point where just two early(iest) primary wins determines the representative for the GOP in a field pretty much as wide open as we’ve ever had?

Houston, we have a problem. If this isn’t the sign that the primary system needs an overhaul or the sign of apocalypse, then I’ve gone blind.
Info
October 30th, 2011 @ 10:38 pm

Iowa: A state with caucauses (cauci?) where organization really helps (someone who has been running for prez for twelve years has organization if nothing else)

New Hampshire: Romney’s backyard, filled with Mass. evacuees who hate the taxes but still haven’t figure out that the liberal policies necessarily result in the high taxes.

How does Romney winning these two states sew up the nomination for him???
(Are you being sarcastic again, and I missed it … ?)
Anonymous
October 31st, 2011 @ 1:05 am

Yeah, but he has all seven of them. Solid. Prime. And listed as ahead of Newt.

In Omabanomics “recovery” math, he’s practically leading the pack!
Anonymous
October 31st, 2011 @ 1:06 am

Blame it on the butterfly ballot.
Anonymous
October 31st, 2011 @ 1:09 am

Well, as I recall from C-Pac, Romney does give a great concession speech.