Old and Boring: ‘Safe Sex’
New and Hot: ‘Let’s Make Babies’

Posted on Comments

Young folks have discovered a kinky new sexual phenomenon: If a man places his penis inside a woman’s vagina, she can have a baby.

This shockingly weird activity is being promoted by a Web site called 1Flesh.org, whose founders describe their revolutionary idea:

We want awesome marriages and mind-blowing sex lives. We want women and men to be respected and loved for who they are, to the very depths of their being. We want sex free from fear, love free from use, and a world of people who love and respect their own bodies. In short, we want sexy back. In fact, we demand it.

Wow! What a bizarre concept: Sex that begins with “I do,” and ends with “Till death do us part.” Being fruitful and muliplying!

Exactly how dangerous is this “one flesh” concept? It has already been denounced by Amanda Marcotte, and you know what that means.

It’s 100% pure awesomeness.

1Flesh.org
Let’s Do It Until Amanda Marcotte Screams

 

UPDATE: Jackie Wellfonder explains that 1Flesh.org was the brainchild of “Bad Catholic” blogger Marc Barnes, who announced it in late June and has already been denounced by Amanda Marcotte. Which means you should follow Marc Barnes on Twitter, because he’s awesome.

UPDATE II: For my own thoughts on the Contraceptive Culture, please see, “The Pill at 50: Unhappy Un-Birthday” (May 8, 2010).

UPDATE III (Smitty): Welcome, Instapundit readers!

26 comments

  1. @rsmccain Wait. So this is ‘I want 100% drivers seat; now shut up and chauffeur me!’? What ever happened to the mature notion of ‘we serve each other’?

  3. I have been practing the “one flesh” sex life for quite some time.  With myself.  It involves creative use of bicycle seats and other props, but it only involves me.  Because only myself is worthing of having sex with me. 

  10. Amanda Marcotte will not stop her war against healthy sex until everyone is just as miserable (and used) as she is.

    Snark aside, femisogynists do NOT understand the male mind.  As I’ve pointed out, men will build skyscrapers, fly fighter jets, and run huge corporations for the sole purpose of getting laid.  They will also, if not architects, fighter pilots, or CEOs, put a ring on a woman’s finger before making love to her.

    A woman who has sex with a man before marriage is a woman who is being banged by a  guy who is functionally saying, “The sex is great, but you aren’t great.” Or “I love sex, but I don’t love you.”

  11. As I’ve pointed out, men will build skyscrapers, fly fighter jets, and run huge corporations for the sole purpose of getting laid.  They will also, if not architects, fighter pilots, or CEOs, put a ring on a woman’s finger before making love to her.

    To paraphrase Rick James, testosterone is a helluva hormone.

  17. When the idea of “awesome marriages and mind-blowing sex lives” does not
    immediately make people think you’re talking about 2 different things,
    we’ll be on the right track. Too many women out there still justify keeping their husbands dissatisfied by a litany of threadbare nonsense that mostly boils down to “everybody else isn’t doing it, and I don’t feel like living up to my vows”. Then they wonder why he acts as though she’s just a roommate…

    It’s our fault: the ones who believe in marriage and what it means. I deeply wish we were able to blow the doors off Team Sleeparound, but until all of us (you lads better bring your game, too) are making more orgasms than excuses, they can point and laugh with very little to slow them down. We show better examples, we get better results. Until then, our evidence for the functional superiority of a moral life is anecdotal at best.

  18. I’m not sure what the point of following him on twitter is, seeing as how its mostly a stream of pointers to YouTube and Facebook.  But you’re right: he’s brilliant.

  19. Ending welfare as we know it took out the financial incentive to have a baby (place of your own!). Obama has rolled that back. Babies, babies, babies!

  21. Amanda Marcotte claimed in the latter paragraphs that pregnancy without contraception was 85 percent certain within 1 year. But that was the contraception failure rate, meaning the figure she meant to express was 15 percent.

    So she doesn’t understand failure rates. Which is funny …y ou would think she would be a much greater expert on failure.

Comments are closed.