Romney Debates Crowley And Obama On Benghazi, Wins
Posted on | October 17, 2012 | 30 Comments
by Smitty
Benghazi was the pivotal moment in the town hall debate, in my opinion, and that of some others:
“act of terror” is to Obama what “is” was to Clinton
— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) October 17, 2012
Via BlueGrass pundit:
What a sad, pathetic joke that Obama has to have a woman attempt to stand up for him. Romney’s five sons were no doubt writhing at the raised eyebrows at 0:20 in the clip, recalling their own sad attempts at sliding one by dad, and getting thoroughly crushed by the Brows Of Doom.
The Administration’s pathetic attempt to walk back the 12 September Rose Garden speech is thoroughly debunked here. If Obama’s claim is true, that he properly labeled Benghazi terrorism initially, then shifted ‘narratives’ to call it a spontaneous riot due to Nakoula’s handiwork, then Obama’s sordid performance would be an example of postvarication, where the truth shifts to a lie upon the retelling, instead of the truth remaining in the forefront.
However, what we have here is a creep show Administration that owes Americans straight answers, but can’t even tell itself a straight story. Maybe Petraeus could offer such. Where is that guy? Stuffed under the bus behind Clapper?
Kudos to Mitt. You could see that hours of preparation that went into this debate on display. That the topic would come up was fairly obvious. But the delivery was polished, and Obama’s body language and shout to Crowley for a lifeline were sweet, sweet tells. Romney should have ended his exchange with Crowley by saying “Thank you, Madame President.” As graphically put: 
And Crowley then walked back her shilling. Fortunately, these Lefty creeps no longer retain an iron grip on matters. While viewers at the time called it a draw or gave the edge to #OccupyResoluteDesk, further analysis is going to show that, as in the previous debates this season, the Republicans are holding their own despite having two opponents.
Say whatever else you want about the debate: seeing Romney have the sack to call out Obama for lying, to his face, was pure chewing satisfaction. As with the previous debate, I may have to trundle over to the Romney campaign site for a wee donation, I’m so pleased by this. And as for Candid Candy, I hope she doesn’t spend all 30 pieces of silver in one place.
Further linkage at Instapundit, but don’t miss Michelle, violating the rules, clapping in support of falsehood. I’m not ashamed of my country, in general, but the 2008 election sure was a hiccup. And, for those wondering what the debate would have looked like if you dropped some acid before viewing:
In the second presidential debate, President Obama stood up proudly for his record, offered a positive vision, called out Romney’s lies in a calm and cool way, and, most importantly, showed some real fire in the belly.
Update: Memeorandum thread, also linked at Protein Wisdom, Daily Pundit, WyBlog, and Obi’s Sister.

Pingback: Post-Debate Soup « Obi's Sister
Pingback: Back to the Meme Mill | Daily Pundit
Pingback: WyBlog - Hofstra debate post-game report, The Empire Strikes Back
Pingback: Well at least we know Candy Crowley is… « The Rhetorican
Pingback: Lying, prevaricating weasel dragged over finish line by treacherous “moderator,” thereby meeting liberals’ criteria for “victory” » Cold Fury
Pingback: @CandyCNN Targeted by Fat Jokes, Legitimate Criticism, But Mainly … : The Other McCain
Pingback: Mitt Romney and the Fact Checkers | hogewash
Pingback: Presidential Debate II Hangover [Updated Below] « The Camp Of The Saints
Pingback: Candy Obama Hides Behind a Candy Woman | ZION'S TRUMPET
Pingback: Those Wanting Obama Impeached Should Understand. . . : The Other McCain