Rule 5 Monday

Posted on 20 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Well, maybe I should have been less certain that we had enough leftovers to make this week’s Rule 5 compendium as double-stuffed as last week’s. My bad. Still, we have what we have, and I must say what we have is pretty nice.

We begin with Randy’s Roundtable and Olivia Garson, followed by Fishersville Mike with Kaley Cuoco, Laughing Conservative with Eva Longoria, and Blackmailers Don’t Shoot with Emma K. Animal Magnetism chipped in with Rule 5 Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon, while Ninety Miles From Tyranny contributed Girls With Guns, Morning Mistress, and Hot Pick of the Late Night. First Street Journal, of course, focuses this week on the women of Ukraine’s military.

EBL’s herd of heifers this week includes a rug beater, photo editing magic, Miriam Weeks/Bella Knox, and more Duke pr0n.

Wine Women and Politics has black & white blondes, school girls, bath time and other hotness, the Babe of the Day, Saturday Sweeties, Friday Honey, and someone delicious.

A View From the Beach offers Gemma Atkinson, We Really Need Some Summer, “The Principal Of The Silver Lining”, Topping Off the Japanese Weirdness Content, Bad Food Becomes Good Again, Olympic Final, and A Refreshing Pause.

Soylent Siberia says this one could raise the dead. Also, morning coffee, Still No Football, Overnighty Oliveira, Monday Motivationer Mariana, In This Best Of All Possible Worlds, Tuesday Titillation, Humpday Hawt Underboob Awesome, One Million Exiles Flock To Soylent, Fursday Reader Submission Milena, Evening Awesome Further Fursday, Corset Considerations, T-GIF Friday Got Snooch? and a WeekEnder.

Proof Positive’s Babe of the Week is Giada di Laurentiis, his Vintage Babe is Anny Duperey, and Sex in Advertising this week is supplied by Kate Moss. Meanwhile, at Dustbury, it’s Kate Mara and Jessica Alba.

Thanks to everyone for their linkagery!


Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop

20 comments

  1. Hey Wombat Dude – I had a couple of good Rule 5 posts this week

    Katheryn Winnick (Lagertha, the Viking chick) is hosting this metablog issue. Plus udder assets that you won’t find in your local library – http://goodstuffsworld.blogspot.com/2014/02/goodstuffs-blogging-magazine-128th-issue.html

    The Human Barbie, Valeria Lukyanova, lives in Ukraine and with the recent conflict in the Crimea area, some people with enquiring minds want to know if the Human Barbie is in danger. – http://goodstuffsworld.blogspot.com/2014/03/valeria-lukyanova-doing-crimea.html

  2. Honestly confused. You profess your disdain for porn and pornographers, however, you have your ‘Rule 5 Monday.’ which, in some instances, links to porn. So are you being hypocrtical or is this special for some reason?

  3. You must be new here, and also, confused about the definition of pornography. Naked women are not necessarily pornographic.

  4. Neither, actually. Your use of the word, ‘necessarily’ in your reply, negates your definition of porn. Help me understand. BTW, I am referring to the author, Mr. McCain and his views.

  7. [I can’t define what is pornography.] “But I know it when I see it.”

    popular paraphrase of Potter Stewart, opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964)

    some kind of Animal Magnetism?

  8. Stacy doesn’t do these posts, I do. They’ve been a regular feature of this blog for several years, and only now you’re confused? Our official blog policy on Rule 5 is expressed here.

  9. Mine have had the attitude that they didn’t care where I got my appetite so long as I came home to eat, IYKWIMAITYD.

  11. No, now I only got around to mentioning it. So you are a distributor of porn. If we agree that scantly clad, half naked, young women (some are porn stars) posted by men old enough to be their fathers is porn. So, you distribute porn on a site where the purveyor often rails about the depravity of those who produce it and those who view it. I read your ‘rule 5 Monday.’ Meh. All I see is hypocrisy.

  12. We obviously don’t agree on the definition of pr0n. If you find what we do here objectionable on the grounds of hypocrisy, well, nobody’s holding a gun to your head. Feel free not to drop by.

  13. No, I enjoy McCain’s stories. Your non-definiton of porn and your non-response tells me that you must feel some shame. If not, you should

  14. On the contrary, I don’t see what I’m doing as distributing pr0n, or even as something shameful. By the way, thanks for volunteering for duty as my conscience, but that job’s already taken. Go peddle your shame somewhere else.

  15. Mr Miller can always check out The First Street Journal’s version of Rule 5, which is definitely not porn . . . unless, of course, he sees firearms as pornographic.

  16. Really. That is you educated reply? How old are you? I am surprised you do this. But to each his own. Your non-reply’s and attempted attacks tell me everything I need to know about you. Best of luck to you.

Comments are closed.