The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Muslim Fanatic Defends Savage Murders by Fanatical Murderous Muslim Savages

Posted on | January 8, 2015 | 150 Comments

Muhammad was a bloodthirsty polygamous warlord and also the prophet of a religion that commands the murder of non-believers:

USA Today caused a stir [Wednesday] night when they published a column from Anjem Choudary, whom they describe as “a radical Muslim cleric” from London specializing in shari’a law. . . . Choudary blames France for not protecting “the sanctity of a Prophet,” and says we should not expect anything else other than murder from Muslims when that doesn’t happen . . .

Most people don’t know what Islam actually teaches, and those who tell the truth about Islam are often denounced as warmongers, bigots and even “racists.” Islam is a religion not a race, of course, and Muslims of every race murder non-believers of every race. Some of the most dreadful savagery committed in the name of Islam has been perpetrated against Africans. The claim that critics of Islam are “warmongers” is even more absurd: Islam is at war with us, whether we fight back or not.

The most influential Muslim leaders are determined to annihilate every Jew in Israel and, because the United States is Israel’s strongest ally, America has been branded “The Great Satan.”

Nothing we say or do as Americans — no policy of our government — can ever appease our Islamic enemies. Even if we were to abandon our alliance with Israel, the resulting slaughter of every Jew in Israel would only be the prelude to our own slaughter. Islam commands this, it requires this, and we should be grateful to the editors of USA Today for allowing Anjem Choudary to tell us the truth:

Contrary to popular misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine revelation and not based on people’s desires.
Although Muslims may not agree about the idea of freedom of expression, even non-Muslims who espouse it say it comes with responsibilities. In an increasingly unstable and insecure world, the potential consequences of insulting the Messenger Muhammad are known to Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
Muslims consider the honor of the Prophet Muhammad to be dearer to them than that of their parents or even themselves. To defend it is considered to be an obligation upon them. The strict punishment if found guilty of this crime under sharia (Islamic law) is capital punishment implementable by an Islamic State. This is because the Messenger Muhammad said, “Whoever insults a Prophet kill him.”
However, because the honor of the Prophet is something which all Muslims want to defend, many will take the law into their own hands, as we often see.
Within liberal democracies, freedom of expression has curtailments, such as laws against incitement and hatred.
The truth is that Western governments are content to sacrifice liberties and freedoms when being complicit to torture and rendition — or when restricting the freedom of movement of Muslims, under the guise of protecting national security.
So why in this case did the French government allow the magazine Charlie Hebdo to continue to provoke Muslims, thereby placing the sanctity of its citizens at risk?
It is time that the sanctity of a Prophet revered by up to one-quarter of the world’s population was protected.

Damn your honor and damn your Prophet, you murderous savages.

“Truth is great and will prevail if left to herself . . . she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.”
— Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, 1786





 

Category: Islam, Terrorism

Comments

150 Responses to “Muslim Fanatic Defends Savage Murders by Fanatical Murderous Muslim Savages”

  1. texlovera
    January 8th, 2015 @ 5:22 pm

    Damn them to hell, indeed, Satcy.

  2. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 8th, 2015 @ 5:33 pm

    https://twitter.com/MsEBL/status/553295222197592064

    For a “Religion of Peace” they sure are cranky to each other.

  3. Steve Kroft Caught ‘Up on the My-O-My’ | Regular Right Guy
    January 8th, 2015 @ 5:37 pm

    […] Muslim Fanatic Defends Savage Murders by Fanatical Murderous Muslim Savages […]

  4. Jim R
    January 8th, 2015 @ 5:41 pm

    says we should not expect anything else other than murder from Muslims when that doesn’t happen . . .

    Then they should expect nothing from us but hanging or Predator drones.

  5. Jim R
    January 8th, 2015 @ 5:45 pm

    Just so.

    We are at a point where we have to decide whether we mean it when we say, “I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

    I say without hesitation, “Yes. I mean it.”

  6. Jim R
    January 8th, 2015 @ 5:46 pm

    He gives the millions of peaceful Muslims a bad name.

  7. Jim R
    January 8th, 2015 @ 5:47 pm

    God, I hate these choads almost as much as the terrorists. Tossers.

  8. Jim R
    January 8th, 2015 @ 5:50 pm

    Yes. Time to very publicly tell the world that anybody who wants our help – ANY help we can give – in the fight against these monsters will have it. In plain terms, the United States are at war with these villains, and we will not stop until they are in prison or in hell (their choice, but my preference is the latter).

  9. Adjoran
    January 8th, 2015 @ 6:18 pm

    In honor of the Founders, I recall having to correct some quotes from Jefferson and Adams on a news site which had them referring to “Muslims,” because neither of them ever used that word. Their term was “the mussel-men,” which some modern editors seem determined to update for political purposes.

    There is only one way to deal with barbarians, and it isn’t by expanding trade and cultural exchange.

  10. Adjoran
    January 8th, 2015 @ 6:21 pm

    Especially if they are thrown at Patrick!

  11. Fail Burton
    January 8th, 2015 @ 6:43 pm

    #NotAllProphetsArePeds

  12. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 8th, 2015 @ 6:44 pm

    https://twitter.com/MsEBL/status/553316762192588800

  13. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 8th, 2015 @ 6:47 pm

    Now now, don’t be an Islamist, a feminist, or a Ferguson demonstrator throwing rocks at Chris Hayes…okay throwing rocks at Chris Hayes is fine.

  14. Wombat_socho
    January 8th, 2015 @ 7:00 pm

    Impalement.

  15. Wombat_socho
    January 8th, 2015 @ 7:01 pm

    “Millions for defense, not one cent for tribute!”

  16. joethefatman
    January 8th, 2015 @ 7:51 pm

    How very Vlad of you. lol

    I find it appropriate though that impalement was used by Vlad to repulse a muslim invasion after he learned about it… from the muslims.

  17. joethefatman
    January 8th, 2015 @ 7:53 pm

    He belongs in hell. Odds are 7.62 to 59 that he’ll get there.

  18. joethefatman
    January 8th, 2015 @ 7:57 pm

    Don’t say it
    don’t say it
    don’t say it

    http://youtu.be/eUDcTLaWJuo

  19. M. Thompson
    January 8th, 2015 @ 7:59 pm

    Get him on a ship for two weeks across the Pond, bread, water, and pork products only. Work as a deck ape the whole trip.

    Hang him on the way in.

  20. joethefatman
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:00 pm

    Agreed. Paying Dane-geld is no way to live. Jizya demands should be met with gunfire.

  21. Zohydro
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:08 pm

    Well… I’m hoping he’s not the voice of millions of silent and complicit Muslims, though I suspect he actually is!

  22. Zohydro
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:13 pm

    Maybe 5.56 to 45 is a safer bet…

  23. joethefatman
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:19 pm

    Either way it’s a safe bet

  24. HughdePayens
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:20 pm

    Wow you read my mind. Maybe that Lena bitch can make those murdering bastards think again?

  25. FROM STACY MCCAIN, YOUR NUANCED HEADLINE OF THE DAY: Muslim Fanatic Defends Savage Murders by Fanat… | CRAGIN MEDIA
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:20 pm

    […] STACY MCCAIN, YOUR NUANCED HEADLINE OF THE DAY: Muslim Fanatic Defends Savage Murders by Fanatical Murderous Muslim Savages. “We should be grateful to the editors of USA Today for allowing Anjem Choudary to tell us the […]

  26. Sort-of-Mad Max
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:21 pm

    Good grief, his profile sez he’s a child abuse investigator in the Quad Cities. Bet he’s a real charmer to work with.

  27. HughdePayens
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:22 pm

    Oh fuck it lets just drop a couple of nukes on Mecca and Medina to be fur sure fur sure.

  28. Sort-of-Mad Max
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:25 pm

    Oh, and it appears he’s an AFSCME steward. Your tax dollars appearing to be at work!

  29. HughdePayens
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:28 pm

    It is well past time to play Cowboys and Muslims…

  30. M. Thompson
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:31 pm

    That if once you have paid him the Danegeld,
    ???You never get rid of the Dane.

  31. Bob Belvedere
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:40 pm

    I think that a grand idea!

  32. Bob Belvedere
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:44 pm

    As I wrote earlier today over at my site:

    They may not all currently be terrorists, but they all have the potential to be terrorists because their ‘Bible’, their commanding book, demands that all Muslims take-up Jihad — it’s just a matter of when and if they will be called to choose between Islam and the rest of the
    World.

    http://thecampofthesaints.org/2015/01/08/not-all-muslims/

  33. Bob Belvedere
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:45 pm

    Two crows, one stone-dead Mohammedin.

  34. Bob Belvedere
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:47 pm

    Ah, but there’s Guantanamo Bay Naval Base there and I think, considering the Navy’s history, they should have the honor.

  35. Sulaco
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:47 pm

    Recent pols in England show that approx., 78% (of Muslims) approve and support global Jihad against the west. Higher in the Mideast.

  36. Bob Belvedere
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:49 pm

    Old Vlad took all the Musselmen in his country – about 20K – and impaled them along his front with the Muslim Army. Scared the living crap out of them, even though they numbered about 60K.

  37. joethefatman
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:50 pm

    Yup.

  38. Zohydro
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:50 pm

    “Where’s King Ethelred?
    Ethelred is still in bed!
    One shoe off and one shoe on…
    Much adored by everyone!”

    …or something like that!

  39. Bob Belvedere
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:50 pm

    Nice gams.

  40. Bob Belvedere
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:51 pm

    Im. Pale. Ing.

  41. EndOfPatience
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:53 pm

    Well, she could take off her clothes and get them to swear off sex. But I don’t think that’s what you had in mind.

  42. jdkchem
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:54 pm

    Choudary is a boil on civilization that needs to be lanced.

  43. el_polacko
    January 8th, 2015 @ 8:57 pm

    that doesn’t quite jibe with calling america ‘the great satan’ though, does it ?

  44. Jim R
    January 8th, 2015 @ 9:09 pm

    I like the way you think

  45. Oldav8r
    January 8th, 2015 @ 9:11 pm

    I’d forgotten how much I enjoyed that book until I read those quotes.

  46. qawsed
    January 8th, 2015 @ 9:15 pm

    Personally, I’d like to see a mosque, preferably while full, bombed into oblivion every time some vile raghead commits an atrocity of this sort.

  47. Hank Seiter
    January 8th, 2015 @ 9:18 pm

    The only real criticism that I have about this commentary is that the first sentence should be more faithful to actual history by reading: “Muhammad was a bloodthirsty polygamous warlord pedophile and also the prophet of a religion that commands the murder of non-believers … ”

    Just Google “Mohammed and Aisha.” Of course there are those liberal apologists who will vigorously defend Islam’s Mohammed by lamely noting “he lived in a different time with different cultural norms … blah, blah, blah.” Pahlease, he’s still a pedophile even if the left doesn’t want to criminalize that practice in his case.

    Also, clever Muslims too-smart-by-half will claim that Mohammed never really “consummated” his sexual liaison with Aisha blah, blah, blah … which is an outright lie (it’s called “taqiyya” or holy lying for the cause of Islam) because there are other Islamic holy writ and histories which clearly state that Mohammed indeed deflowered a little 9 or 10 year old girl.

    So given these documented bona fides and standing within the Islamic community itself, how in the world does such an unrepentant murdering, lying, thieving, deceitful miscreant become the author of a legitimate religion? In short, Islam is merely a fascist, authoritarian mid-eastern cultural philosophy reflecting the very character of Mohammed himself. Islam is not a legitimate religion the way the western world understands religion and faith, and it certainly is no “religion of peace.”

    BTW, one more nit to pick. Having read the Koran myself I can say with a wee bit of authority that the Koran doesn’t command its adherents to “kill all infidels”, it does teach them to kill infidels who won’t convert or pay the jizrah tax and to never be the “friend” of either Christians or Jews (and probably liberal atheists, too).

    In view of the authoritarian dogmatism of Islam and its jealousy in keeping its practitioners within its fold for a lifetime by threat and by force, there really isn’t such a thing as a “moderate Muslim” because for a Muslim to be truly westernized and moderate they must become thoroughly apostates. And the Koran teaches its most faithful fundamentalist adherents (which comprises the sheer bulk of global Islam, don’t kid yourselves) to similarly kill the apostate (kafir) while seeking to turn all infidels into converts or at minimum into dhimmies to pay the jizrah tax to Islam.

    Don’t be stupid, don’t be a dhimmie and don’t believe the lying trash western liberals want you to believe about one of the most aggressive and fascist faiths on the face of the Earth.

  48. SDN
    January 8th, 2015 @ 9:20 pm

    Like other forms of Leftism, projection is a specialty.

  49. David Gillies
    January 8th, 2015 @ 9:20 pm

    I had a particularly spectacular bowel movement one day that spelt out “Mohammed” in Arabic. At least that’s what it looked like.

  50. rangerider
    January 8th, 2015 @ 9:27 pm

    That is why they were known as true believers by other Muslims 🙂 If so why would any Muslim go against them 🙂