The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Lawsuit Says Feminist @jenniferbedbaum Fired Employee in Purge of Lesbians

Posted on | May 2, 2016 | 67 Comments

Jennifer Baumgardner (left) is being sued by Elizabeth Koke (right)

How did I miss this story last fall?

A former staffer at CUNY’s Feminist Press claims she was illegally fired [in December 2014] because her new boss thought the imprint was “too lesbian.”
Elizabeth Koke filed a $3.5 million lawsuit against The Feminist Press, its executive director Jennifer Baumgardner and the City University of New York [in November 2015] claiming retaliation, wrongful termination and discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Koke, 30, says she was three years into her gig as publicity and marketing manager when Baumgardner took over in July 2013 and decided along with the board of directors that the independent publisher was “too lesbian” and needed a “change of direction.”
Baumgardner, 45, allegedly pushed for titles with more “mainstream appeal,” instead of books such as “Therese and Isabelle,” a love story involving two boarding school girls, according to the suit.
Koke claims employees who openly identified as gay were subjected to an environment of “alienation and isolation” and then “systematically terminated or forced out,” including Cary Webb in February 2014 and Amy Scholder in July 2014.
When Koke was let go without explanation on Dec. 22, 2014, she was the last employee who self-identified as lesbian, according to her claim.

Of course, as a conservative, I’m cheering for the plaintiff. If Elizabeth Koke’s suit gets to the discovery phase, her lawyer should email me all the documents and deposition transcripts. It’s not just my wicked anticipation of the possibility Feminist Press and CUNY could be forced to fork over millions to a disgruntled lesbian separatist witch. Beyond that sweet taste of ironic “social justice,” there’s also the potential to personally humiliate the perpetrator of this alleged purge of lesbians, Jennifer Baumgardner, who certainly deserves personal humiliation.

Baumgardner is bisexual and her biography confirms basically every negative stereotype of bisexual women — selfish, opportunistic and immature, playing around with lesbians in her 20s, before eventually settling down with a man. For such women, being with lesbians is really just cheap contraception, a way to avoid growing up. Instead of the whole husband-and-babies adult responsibility thing, the bisexual devotes her youth to bohemian adventure, skipping the high-risk game of heterosexuality for a lesbian roommate. No babies, no mortgage, no really permanent commitment, and none of the predictable difficulties associated with dating the kind of arrogant young bachelors that a young professional woman is likely to meet in the big city.

Look, feminists: I get this part, OK?

The imperious arrogance of young single men in hookup culture is not a new phenomenon. In an age of shameless promiscuity — an era of immoral hedonism that feminists have applauded as “empowerment” — no attractive young man ever has a shortage of female companionship.

“Where are all the good guys?” young women in the city are wont to complain. Alternatively: “Why is my boyfriend afraid of commitment?”

Well, ma’am, he’s not so much afraid of commitment, as he is simply lacking incentives. He’s making pretty good money. He’s a nice-looking guy with a pleasant personality and a bright future ahead of him.

He’s also got you, the girlfriend who’s glad to have a boyfriend who qualifies as a Potential Future Husband. The problem, from the girlfriend’s perspective, is that such a guy is always negotiating from an advantageous position. No need to hurry. A guy like that — 25, 26, 27, just a few years out of college — knows that if this girlfriend doesn’t work out, plenty more candidates are available. This girlfriend is not his first girlfriend, after all, and their “relationship” (as the girlfriend calls it, a word that makes her boyfriend noticeably uncomfortable) is always more serious to her than to him. He’s an ambitious young man on his way to success. He’s got a full head of hair, he hits the gym regularly, he’s driving a nice car and his 401(k) keeps growing. There are lots of young women who would like to be with him, and that’s not likely to change in the near future. No hurry, no pressure, no commitment.

Immoral hedonism is not a game that women usually win, which is why sane parents urge their daughters to avoid immoral hedonism.

No, ma’am, this is not a new game. The Peter Pan Syndrome — a book published in 1983, the year I graduated college — was a shrewd analysis of the narcissistic immaturity of Baby Boomer guys whose refusal to grow up typically took the form of being “afraid of commitment.” The problem wasn’t actually fear, as I say, but was rather a matter of incentives. If there were plenty of single women willing to have sex without marriage (and take my word for it, there were), why should an immoral hedonist bother with “commitment”? Even if a guy wasn’t just out for cheap thrills, if a woman saw him as a Potential Future Husband, and she had no moral scruples about fornication, the guy could easily string her along for six months or a year without even so much as saying “I love you.”

Feminists are always publishing sexual memoirs, whereas the old rule that a gentleman does not kiss and tell is still basically in effect, so we almost never hear the guy’s side of these stories. Jennifer Baumgardner is author of a 2007 book called Look Both Ways: Bisexual Politics, which garnered predictably enthusiastic reviews like this:

Baumgardner, coauthor of the “third wave feminist” Manifesta, discovered her own bisexuality shortly after graduating from college, when she unexpectedly fell in love with a “girlie girl” co-worker at Ms. magazine, which was, significantly, the first place she “truly saw women without men as being successes, not failures.” Her story of how she explored her “urge toward bisexuality as a means to figuring out how to have a satisfying, truly equal and truly intimate relationship” weaves a personal thread through the book.

The “girlie-girl” was actually an intern, and whatever happened to her? We don’t know, nor to my knowledge have there been any memoirs by any of Baumgardner’s other ex-girlfriends or ex-boyfriends. From 1997 to 2002, she dated singer Amy Ray of the Indigo Girls and then . . .

I was feeling curious about men and increasingly returned the flirtation of a sexy and misanthropic musician/public-school teacher named Gordon. I threw myself into this new relationship. Within weeks, I was making excuses to my friends about his rudeness and saying things like “You just don’t get his sense of humor. He’s actually hilarious.” I swung between hating him and hating myself. In a moment of self-respect, I broke up with him. In an ensuing moment of denial, we got pregnant. I had a baby, Skuli, but ended the relationship with Gordon. . . .
The first three years of my son’s life were full with writing, book tours, friends, family, and the seemingly endless dramedies of the little boy with whom I lived. . . .
This time around, I dated only men. It’s hard to know why, but my sexuality isn’t some equal-opportunity employer; it has its own logic and serendipity. Just as I was starting to feel like I had my mojo back, I ran into Michael, an old friend of my sister’s, on a subway platform. He was broad shouldered, big eyed, and tall, his hair a thatch of floppy blondness.

My guess? It wasn’t just his looks. This guy also had money, unlike Gordon the musician/teacher, which is why she married Michael, but Jennifer Baumgardner is not going to say this in so many words. Hers is the kind of “happily-ever-after” bisexual fairy-tale ending Third Wave feminists want to believe in, and such stories do happen, but how often? And is this actually the end of  the story? Or will we come back in five or 10 years to read Jennifer Baumgardner’s next memoir, perhaps entitled I Divorced That Abusive Creep: Why I Never Should Have Stopped Dating Lesbians (and You Should Be a Lesbian, Too)? Maybe she’ll use the royalties from that to pay for her children’s therapy, then write another book, My Son, My Daughter: How I Coped With My Child’s Transgender Adolescent Crisis (and You Can, Too). This will eventually be followed by Finally Alone With My Cats: A Third-Wave Feminist Looks Back on Her Courageous Struggle Against Heteropatriarchy.

Of course, Jennifer Baumgardner supports the “campus rape epidemic” hysteria, and brags about her “activism” in college:

In 1988, my freshman year at college, one of my friends was raped at a party and became pregnant; she dropped out, had the baby and changed schools, keeping mum about the whole experience for many years. Two women in my dorm were raped by the same international student. At another party, a woman I knew was trapped in a bathroom by her “friend” and not allowed out until she gave him a blow job. . . .
I scheduled meetings with deans where I angrily accused them of not caring about student safety and covering up the “real” rape statistics at my college, Lawrence University, in Appleton, Wisconsin. The Clery Act of 1990 mandated that schools publish their crime statistics, but sexual assaults reported by Lawrence amounted to just two or three; meanwhile, I alone had heard of dozens. Inspired by students at Brown University, my friends and I anonymously published a “castration list” — the names of male students who had raped women we knew — and hung it in the bathroom in the student union. In the end, we didn’t change much, but protesting the injustice and expressing rage felt good, felt important.

Don’t go to college parties and avoid international students — this is probably sound advice for young women, but “expressing rage” is more important for Third Wave feminists than giving young women sound advice. If young men need advice, I will repeat: AVOID FEMINISTS!

As soon as a woman indicates that she is a feminist, this should be a cue to any man to avoid her as much as possible. No male should ever speak to a feminist. . . .
Guys: Learn to take a hint. Learn to walk away.
If a woman tells you she is a feminist, say nothing and walk away.
No feminist wants to hear what a man has to say, and life is too short to waste your time taking to feminists. Just walk away.
Leave feminists alone, and then they can complain about that.

Think about poor Gordon, the musician/teacher who sired Jennifer Baumgardner’s first child. He’s probably still paying child support, while his son is being raised by his bisexual Third Wave feminist ex-girlfriend and her rich husband. Is anyone offering to publish a memoir by Gordon? No, and neither could any of Jennifer Baumgardner’s ex-girlfriends get a contract for tell-all stories of their relationships with her. The feminist is always the protagonist of the story, and everyone else is a supporting character in the ensemble cast, their existence only important insofar as they play a role in her story. Feminism is ultimately nihilism, an expression of godless selfishness akin to Nietzsche’s The Will to Power, masquerading in 21st-century costumes of “social justice.”

Feminism is about psychological rationalization and scapegoating. Whatever she is unhappy about, whatever goes wrong in her life, the feminist blames on men — “patriarchy,” the male conspiracy that forces girls to get drunk at college parties with foreign guys named Abdul. She is never responsible for anything. She can do as she pleases and the negative consequences are not her fault. She breaks up with her lesbian girlfriend and, because she is now “curious about men,” she hooks up with a “sexy” rude guy, gets pregnant, then dumps him and finds another guy, “broad shouldered, big eyed, and tall,” and now it’s happily-ever-after, because she says so. And if it doesn’t end that way? Blame the patriarchy.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

It’s always beautiful to see feminists publicly going to war against each other. Jennifer Baumgardner allegedly purges lesbian staffers at the Feminist Press? Good! Lesbian witch sues for discrimination? Better!

No matter who wins this case, a feminist loses, and no one will believe either of them when they take turns blaming it on the patriarchy.

“All is proceeding as I have foreseen . . .”

 


Category: Sex Trouble

Comments

67 Responses to “Lawsuit Says Feminist @jenniferbedbaum Fired Employee in Purge of Lesbians”

  1. CrustyB
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 5:51 pm

    “Just welcomed new roomie w/ email that says I’m a witch/lesbian separatist & organizing a ritual where cis/str8 men won’t be welcome in apt”

    What ever happened to fruit baskets?

  2. robertstacymccain
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 6:06 pm

    I know, right?

    You can imagine the new roommate on the phone to her mother: “She’s completely psycho. Not even gonna unpack my stuff here. I’ve already got an ad on Craigslist specifying ‘no witches.’ … Yeah, I know, Mom, but it’s New York …”.

  3. NeoWayland
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 6:19 pm

    The “Witch Winter Solstice Ritual” in Nylon is populist pap. It’s a lot like having Easter using only Cadbury eggs and never once mentioning a resurrection or what it might mean.

  4. Steve Skubinna
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 6:27 pm

    Yeah yeah yeah… shock the bourgeoisie, offend the squares, piss off Mom and Dad…

    (yawn)

    It must get tiresome being a perpetual adolescent. More so to those in the immediate area. Which means life is a constant struggle to remain within the infantile bubble.

  5. Steve Skubinna
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 6:28 pm

    You think that’s a problem? Now I’ve got the theme from “Bewitched” running through my head. I might have to sing “Gilligan’s Island” to get it out.

    Which will bring another problem. Grrrr…

  6. Steve Skubinna
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 6:30 pm

    I was wondering what she meant by “apt.” Just her own apartment, or the entire damn building? Imagine the poor guy on the third floor, minding his own business when – suddenly! – he finds himself sitting on the street, exorcised.

  7. NeoWayland
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 6:30 pm

    ?You want your religion taken seriously? Stop treating it like fandom.?

    Not mine, but it applies.

  8. kilo6
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 7:13 pm

    As our host said in a previous post “… [he] probably doesn’t realize he’s gambling in the Crazy Bitch Casino. Any man who keeps playing that game will eventually meet with disaster.” (BTW, “Crazy Bitch Casino” is now my phrase of the month when discussing modern feminists)

    Quite possibly Gordon unwittingly took a trip to the Crazy Bitch Casino, had a couple of strong drinks and would up at the No Limit Blackjack table. Sure, we’ve all played the nickel slots and maybe even roulette at that horrid place, but somehow by the Grace of God didn’t wind up at the No Limit tables. In a normal casino you can loose a bunch of money or even wind up getting a wooden shampoo from hotel security but your misery will be relatively short compared to loosing at the Crazy Bitch Casino.

    A friend of mine married a feminist who was less looney and far prettier than the various feminists RSM has described (but IMHO still qualified as coo coo for Cocoa Puffs). Let’s just say that “less bad” is definitely not good when it comes to feminists. He would up asking his lawyer “OK, how much will it cost to get her to leave me alone … forever”

    No one ever wins at the Crazy Bitch Casino, don’t ever date a feminist.

  9. Fail Burton
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 7:27 pm

    Feminists are the most brain-dead people in the world. Why do they have a press only about women? It would never even occur to me to have a press or any interest in a press about men. It’s not like the world is fly fishing. Do I have an interest in a man’s view of Mayan architecture? I can’t imagine being that moronic and narcissistic. And these are the daffy dames who claim men are self-absorbed. If I create a press it’ll be for everyone, but then I don’t need an institutional crutch to explain why lunar orbit rejects my sex.

  10. M. Thompson
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 7:48 pm

    Man, watching these lunatics eat each other is kind of funny, but sad.

    Sad they didn’t see it coming first. Like, oh, Red Terror, the Iranian National Front, and the Girondins. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

  11. Fail Burton
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 7:51 pm

    What’s she gonna do, hang garlic around the apt? Will straight men feel a sudden buzzing in their ears and an urgent desire to leave the apt.? I feel such an urge even now. Are there any lesbians who aren’t mentally ill neo-Nazi wannabees?

  12. DeadMessenger
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 7:54 pm

    Um…she IS a fruit basket.

  13. Linda
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 7:54 pm

    This post could be titled: Sex in the City: The Red Pill Perspective

  14. DeadMessenger
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 7:56 pm

    Thanks heaps, Skubinna. Once you got me going with Bewitched, I switched to I Dream of Jeannie to get rid of that, and now I’m stuck with Jeannie.

  15. robertstacymccain
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 8:01 pm

    I hate to quote Judy Collins songs, but I’ve looked at immoral hedonism from Both Sides Now. I keep reminding you people I used to be a Democrat, but then I got married, started having kids, accumulating responsibilities, etc., and the world began to look very different.

    You want to try raising daughters in this culture, when you know exactly what kind of fate may await them if they step off the strait and narrow way? As bad as things were 30 or 40 years ago (and they were very bad indeed), the situation is much more dangerous now. Even in just the past 10 years, it’s gotten noticeably worse. Circa 2004, you didn’t have social media full of crazy noise. You didn’t have kids uploading sex videos from their cellphones. Things are very, very bad out there, and I fear most parents have no idea how bad it actually is.

  16. RS
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 8:08 pm

    Baumgardner, 45, allegedly pushed for titles with more “mainstream appeal. . .”

    Query how mainstream something denominated “Feminist Press” could get?

  17. Adobe_Walls
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 8:40 pm

    Are there visuals with that?

  18. Wombat_socho
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 8:41 pm

    Yeah, but they’re only in it for the money. 😉

  19. Cynthia Yockey
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 8:42 pm

    OK, I laughed out loud at the book sequence culminating in, “Finally Alone with My Cats”! The women’s movement has always viciously exploited lesbians for money and free labor, while excluding them from positions of power. Re-read Sonia Johnson, who comments on how she was treated at NOW back in the day.

    So it’s not surprising the first thing a bisexual woman does is to purge all the lesbians from a feminist niche publishing company. By the way, financially, that was a terrible blunder because people who read niche books, especially gays and lesbians, have to BUY their books because they know they’ll never find them at the public library.

    I support pretty much all of this post, Stacy. My only quibble is that bisexuals are MUCH, MUCH worse than you can imagine. Bisexuality is not a sexual orientation because what really attracts the bisexual are qualities like power: to exploit a more powerful partner, or to dominate one who is less powerful. Bisexuals are sexual predators. They get away with it because the straight community is their home base for their predatory forays into the gay community. If they did it the other way around, there would be hell to pay.

    P.S. For your other commenters, Stacy and I are friends and my blog is “A Conservative Lesbian.”

  20. Adobe_Walls
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 8:44 pm

    I remember the good old days when ”scaring the straights” was just a newer version of offend the squares.

  21. Windy Wilson
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 9:16 pm

    “No feminist wants to hear what a man has to say, and life is too short to waste your time taking to feminists.”
    It would be safer talking to the walls when no one’s home, if that alignment of the planets ever occurs.

  22. NeoWayland
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 10:17 pm

    Chances are in this case it’s called freaking the mundanes.

    Blame the SCA.

  23. Steve Skubinna
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 10:56 pm

    BwahahahaHAHAHA!!!!!

    I knew I’d get somebody. My own personal earworm remover is Jethro Tull’s Aqualung. Knocks whatever it is right out and then goes away on its own.

  24. Steve Skubinna
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 10:58 pm

    Only a sucker bets against the house.

  25. Steve Skubinna
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 10:59 pm

    Always plenty of Useful Idiots.

  26. Steve Skubinna
    May 2nd, 2016 @ 11:01 pm

    I suppose bisexuality is like those people who claim to be “very spiritual, but not religious.”

  27. Joe Joe
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 1:06 am

    “Baumgardner, 45, allegedly pushed for titles with more “mainstream appeal…”

    Is it possible that Baumgardner’s was really a business decision? Clearly, books about 2 boarding school girls in love may not be terribly appealing to the mainstream. If there’s enough sex in it, some men might buy it; but considering its authorship, “Therese and Isabelle” might be more about female emotional drama, which is not terribly appealing.

    If the press was losing money or in financial difficulties, Baumgardner might be able to fight against the discrimination suit successfully. After all, publishers terminate lines of books all the time when they don’t sell. They also terminate editors and authors who are not producing money-making products.

  28. Joe Joe
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 3:05 am

    Re: The Ghomeshi case

  29. Dana
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 4:09 am

    Our esteemed host wrote:

    Feminists are always publishing sexual memoirs, whereas the old rule that a gentleman does not kiss and tell is still basically in effect, so we almost never hear the guy’s side of these stories.

    I’d point out your own article, the name of which escapes me, about the guy who did kiss and tell, complete with ratings.

  30. Dana
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 4:13 am

    Our host wrote:

    Of course, as a conservative, I’m cheering for the plaintiff.

    I’m not sure that you should. The plaintiff is alleging that she was not an “employed at will” person, who can be fired for any reason, but someone who was protected by virtue of her homosexuality. A victory by the plaintiff weakens employment at will.

  31. Dana
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 5:25 am

    Then again, her worst sin was naming a son “Skuli.”

  32. Dana
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 5:28 am

    I wrote something noting that even cats and rats and elephants can recognize the difference between males and females of their species, but liberals cannot, and now I’m stuck with the Unicorn Song running through my head.

  33. RS
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 5:40 am

    Snot is running down his nose!

  34. gunga
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 6:39 am

    More like, “Horny, but not particular.” – – OK, I’m denounced already.

  35. gunga
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 7:02 am

    “…I’m a witch/lesbian separatist & organizing a ritual where cis/str8 men won’t be welcome in apt” – – but it’s not about hating men. Funny, but I just keep thinking of the poor pizza delivery guy standing outside the building, filled with a sense of dread…not because of the ritual…but because the last time he went up there, the crazy chick in 18-C spent 20-minutes explaining body-hair-positive politics and then shouted her “status” before she paid him…and stiffed him on the tip…because of his white privilege (even though his parents are from Deli and he emigrated last year from Durban).

  36. Durasim
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 8:15 am

    True, but there is always the minor satisfaction of watching a feminist or progressive get hoisted by her own petard.

  37. Fail Burton
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 9:20 am

    “Castration list” cuz due process. Feminists can’t do anything right without the angelic guidance of civilized men to guide their wild monkey-like ways.

    I have an idea for a series of feminist press books: start with “The Constitution Explained by a Man.”

    “The Magna Carta Women Can’t See.”

    “Li’l Tommy Jefferson Declares Independence from his Cat.”

  38. Fail Burton
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 9:21 am

    The Emperor just wants blood. We’ll worry about the thumbs down later.

  39. kilo6
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 12:08 pm

    Whatever happened to good old fashioned traditional names like Dweezil or Moon Unit?

  40. Libby_CO
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 12:47 pm

    Tucker Max?
    He wrote “I Hope they Sell Beer in Hell.”

  41. Adobe_Walls
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 12:58 pm

    Knee deep.

  42. robertstacymccain
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 1:00 pm

    Force the enemy to live up to his own standards — I believe Alinksy said as much.

  43. Sort-Of-Mad Max
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 1:06 pm

    And then she’ll wonder why the cable doesn’t work and the toilet doesn’t flush.

    Honestly, you can’t get THAT dumb with just four years of college; post-grad study is a MUST!

  44. What a bummer
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 1:14 pm

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Baumgardner

    Wow, serious MILF material right there. Too bad she’s a psycho.

  45. robertstacymccain
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 1:21 pm

    “My only quibble is that bisexuals are MUCH, MUCH worse than you can imagine.”

    Well, this is a case for you to make, based on your own observation and experience. All I know about this subject — at least, everything I could tell without violating the Gentleman’s Code — is what you have told me, and what I’ve gathered through the past couple of years in my research. The discourse on Feminist Tumblr makes apparent the distrust with which radical lesbians regard bisexual women, who tend toward liberal feminism or postmodern “Third Wave” feminism. The hardline radical anti-male/anti-heterosexual position — e.g., Jill Johnston, Charlotte Bunch, Adrienne Rich, Andrea Dworkin, Marilyn Frye, Catharine MacKinnon, Dee Graham, Celia Kitzinger, Denise Thompson, Sheila Jeffreys, et al. — is at least ideologically coherent. The real problem is that there are some women who believe they can have their feminism and keep their heterosexuality, too. Such a position is simply untenable, once you understand feminist theory as regards sexuality and “gender.” Normal sexual behaviors cannot be reconciled with the rigid ideas of “equality” that feminism advocates, and until this problem is recognized, heterosexual feminists will continue spinning in endless circles of helpless rage, like Meghan Murphy.

    All that would be necessary for Meghan Murphy to be happy is for her to buy a plane ticket to Alabama and join the lesbian separatist community there. Ah, but this would not make Meghan Murphy happy, because she is only happy when she’s lashing out at heterosexual men, including her creepy boyfriends. Although she claims to be heterosexual, never in her life has Meghan Murphy said anything good about a heterosexual man — or anything about sex for that matter — and her feminism is profoundly contradictory, whereas at least Sheila Jeffreys has lived in accordance with her own avowed principles.

  46. Finrod Felagund
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 2:46 pm

    I use Puff the Magic Dragon, personally.

  47. Finrod Felagund
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 2:48 pm

    My experience is that gays and lesbians hate bisexuals more than straight people do. Bisexuals are no more sexual predators than any other sexual orientation.

  48. Finrod Felagund
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 2:55 pm

    Walls don’t follow you around hating you.

  49. Finrod Felagund
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 2:56 pm

    Or like Norman Lear, naming his daughter Crystal Shanda.

  50. Fail Burton
    May 3rd, 2016 @ 3:26 pm

    So her husband took her name? My, he is a blond Viking, probably a Berserker.