Neal Rauhauser Uses @CatsRImportant to Discuss a Certain Address in Maryland

Having previously explained how Brett Kimberlin associate Neal Rauhauser took over Melissa Brewer’s @catsrimportant Twitter account, now let’s show you what Neal has been doing with that account:


As I have previously explained, I haven’t lived in Maryland for more than a year, for well-known reasons. May 22, 2012:

Convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin on [May 21, 2012] continued his effort to silence those who write about his criminal past by contacting my wife’s employer, claiming that I was “harassing” him. The resulting security concern required immediate relocation if I was to be able to continue writing about the case of Kimberlin, a violent felon, perjurer and admitted tax cheat who is employed as the director of a 501(c)3 non-profit that has collected $1.8 million in contributions since 2005.

Kimberlin’s associate Neal Rauhauser is a relentless liar and has promoted the falsehoods that (a) my former residence is on a “cult compound,” and that alternatively (b) I was “kicked out” because I’m a dangerous extremist or (c) I lied about leaving Maryland.

Last month, the pro-Kimberlin troll mob — including Bill Schmalfeldt (now @LobotomyRadio), R.J. Sterling (@AdversAerial), Matt Osborne (@OsborneInk) and @BreitbartUnmask (whom some suspect to be Kimberlin’s associate, convicted child pornographer Craig Richard Gillette) — were claiming that I had been “served” at the Maryland address. For some reason, however, Brett Kimberlin’s lying admirers cannot provide proof (because none exists)  that I was served (because I wasn’t) in Maryland (where I don’t live). Go figure, huh?

All of this is a devious and dishonest game — a deliberate lie — to provoke me to declare where I actually do live: “Tell the bomber where you and your family are, Stacy. What could go wrong?”

This has been going on for more than a year. Yet it is Kimberlin who claims that I have “conspired” to “stalk” and “harass” him, you see.

Bad causes attract bad people, which is why Brett Kimberlin’s dishonesty and sadistic cruelty is emulated by his twisted admirers. Just take a look at the perverse game played by Neal Rauhauser:

In other words, these wicked creatures are now suggesting that they would SWAT innocent people, and then try to blame me for it.

Go ask Neal Rauhauser (@catsrimportant) why he is so full of monstrous hate, why he loves evil and hates truth.

Whatever he says in reply will be a lie, because he is satanic.

BomberSuesBloggers.com

 

Neal Rauhauser Uses @CatsRImportant to Spread His Evil Lies as ‘Hard Candy’

Neal Rauhauser at Netroots Nation 2010.

“The Mexican Mafia sought and received payments from gangs in Orange County in exchange for freely committing crimes . . . Those who refused were put on lists that often resulted in violent retribution.
“Even those who appeared to have significant roles in the gang found themselves in trouble. One defendant, Raul Gonzalez-Hernandez, was placed on a ‘hard candy‘ list, which meant he was targeted for death.”

— Associated Press, Sept. 25, 2013

“Throughout October [2011], Anonymous waged a war against online child pornography under the name of OpDarkNet. The crusade pinned the hacktivists against the web servers and users of sites such as Lolita City and Hard Candy, where patrons trade graphic images of sexually exploited children.”
— Russia Today, Nov. 3, 2011

Brett Kimberlin’s war against conservative New Media — the federal lawsuit Kimberlin v. the Universe, et al. — would be impossible without the assistance of Neal Rauhauser, the disgraced Democrat campaign consultant whose “Weiner Truther” obsession with the 2011 Anthony Weiner scandal added new stains to his infamous reputation even before Rauhauser became Kimberlin’s self-described “associate.”

During last year’s controversy about Brett Kimberlin, I tried with little success to get people to focus on Rauhauser’s connection to Kimberlin, which was what originally interested me in Kimberlin’s story. Alas, Obama’s history with Bill Ayers had made the “progressive bomber” meme so irresistible to most conservatives that trying to get them to understand Rauhauser’s newsworthy role was difficult.

Another problem: Neal Rauhauser is incredibly weird. If you try to describe him, most people will look at you like you’re crazy.

“Facts don’t matter, that’s the perception of the situation, and the world is going to act on that basis.”
— Neal Rauhhauser, (“Gaped Crusader”), Nov. 26, 2011

What does it say about Rauhauser that, when he created a fake “persona” to cyberstalk Patrick “Patterico” Frey, he chose the “Gaped Crusader,” which is also the title of a porn movie about anal sex?

And while you’re letting that little clue sink in, take just a minute to ask yourself this: Where, how and why did Rauhauser develop his bizarre penchant for online secrecy, deception and impersonation?

There is no need to suggest any specific answer to such a question, when Rauhauser himself has offered us quite an obvious clue.

A week ago, Melissa Brewer abandoned her @catsrimportant Twitter account after victims of her harassment exposed Brewer’s 2006 prostitution conviction, which involved a 19-year-old sex offender who was arrested and charged with being her pimp. This was newsworthy because Brewer had been involved in the “Stop Rush” boycott against Rush Limbaugh, had put out a “hit list” against conservative bloggers including Sister Toldjah and Darleen Click and, in June 2012, had encouraged deranged cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt’s harassment of Kimberlin target Aaron Walker.

Brewer quit her Twitter account, and Neal Rauhauser evidently took it over, using it to smear, harass and threaten various of his enemies, including the defendants in Kimberlin’s lawsuits. Not only was the name of the account changed, but also the avatar and the profile art:

“Hard candy”? Isn’t that interesting? It’s prison slang for murder, especially used by Mexican gangs to describe an inmate targeted for death by stabbing with a shank, i.e., an improvised knife. Isn’t it interesting, as I say, that Neal Rauhauser chose the name “hard candy,” a term that would be very familiar to his own targeted enemy, Patrick “Patterico” Frey, whose day job involves prosecuting gangsters.

We could interpret “hard candy” as Rauhauser’s implied threat toward Frey, but the phrase also has other perverse connotations:

Oh, my, Neal. Oh, my, my.

Remember: Melissa Brewer says she is a sexual abuse survivor, yet Neal Rauhauser has taken over her Twitter account and renamed it “Hard Candy,” with associations of gang murder and child pornography. And why? To attack and threaten his personal enemies.

Rauhauser is Brett Kimberlin’s associate, and another Kimberlin associate, Craig Richard Gillette, was convicted of child pornography.

Probably just a coincidence, huh?

Maybe you should ask @catsrimportant about “hard candy.”

 



 

 

The #JoinMiTeam Campaign

Today I was working on a long and tedious rant about the federal RICO lawsuit Kimberlin v. Everybody when my cell phone rang and the caller was identified as “John X Operative.” For about 40 minutes, we talked about Andrew Breitbart and stuff, and then I said, “Sounds like you’re in your car.” Yeah, John X said, he was on his way to teach a social media seminar for Michigan Republicans. We talked a few minutes more, and before we hung up, John X asked me to promote a couple of Twitter hashtags: #ComebackState and #JoinMiTeam.

What John X wants, John X gets.

Please, everybody who cares about American freedom, give these guys some Twitter love today: #ComebackState and #JoinMiTeam.

Some day, when the world is safe from lying felon Brett Kimberlin, I may tell the fascinating story of John X. But until that day . . .

UPDATE: I changed the headline and perhaps I can explain why, on some hoped-for day in the future, when it is no longer considered a crime to be a Republican, not even in Michigan.

 

BomberSuesBloggers.com

 

You’re Not Angry Enough

Today, I woke up and read the 47-page compendium of lies in the federal lawsuit I call Kimberlin v. Everybody, and I was angry.

To have a vicious creep like Brett Kimberlin accuse me of dishonesty? Even while he attributes to me words I never wrote?

While this monster lies about my friends?

When I know full well that Kimberlin’s motive for telling these dreadful falsehoods is to misdirect attention from his own wrongdoing?

There is a cold case murder in Indiana. A 65-year-old grandmother was shot to death. And you are not angry?

Is there no sense of honor left in the world?

Have we become a nation of worthless cowards?

Two days after I learned about the perverse and dishonest “Free Kate” movement  on behalf of Kaitlyn Hunt, I wrote: “I’m so angry I’m starting to get angry at other people for not being angry about it.”

And that’s how I’m feeling now.

When I think back to the morning of May 17, 2012, when I was planning to go cover the G-8 Summit but changed my mind after I learned what Brett Kimberlin and Neal Rauhauser had done to Aaron Walker, sometimes I wonder why I even bothered. What’s the point of all this, if no one even cares enough to be angry about it?

Today Lee Stranahan called and caught 10 minutes of Celtic fury.

Hint to friends: Don’t expect me to calm down when I get in this mood.

The problem is, you’re not angry enough.

The problem is, we have lost the sense of decency that should be outraged when the innocent are made to suffer, when selfish cruelty is tolerated, when evil flourishes, when liars have no shame.

Thus does a once-great nation become corrupt and decadent.

It’s hard to write when my fingers are trembling with rage.

 

BomberSuesBloggers.com

 





 


Bill Schmalfeldt Lies Again

After I replied to his “offer” of an “interview,” the sadistic sociopath who has cyberstalked, harassed and threatened me for months — and well do regular readers know this — had the unspeakable effrontery to e-mail me again, from which I quote two sentences:

“You make untrue statements that you sprinkle with your hate spittle and anoint as ‘true.’ I have not lied, and you have never once proven a lie other than to call me a liar.”

How many time in the past year has Bill Schmalfeldt accused me of lying when I said I no longer live in Maryland? How many times in the past five weeks has Bill Schmalfeldt falsely claimed I was “served” at a Maryland address in the Kimberlin v. Walker et al. lawsuit?

How many times have I named witnesses who can confirm for a fact that I do not live in Maryland, that I have not lived in Maryland since mid-2012? How many times have I stated that I have not been “served” in Maryland, because the Maryland address listed for me in Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., is not my address and, in point of fact, that particular address has never been my address?

I have not been served. I do not live in Maryland. Yet Schmalfeldt has never once acknowledged his dishonesty in accusing me falsely.

What authority, after all, did Bill Schmalfeldt ever have to make this false accusation against me? If Bill Schmalfeldt can prove that I am in Maryland — as he knows damned well that I am not — where is his proof? Where is the signed receipt for legal service that Bill Schmalfeldt says his perjuring friend Brett Kimberlin should have?

Bill Schmalfeldt has repeatedly claimed to be “ethical,” even as he has endlessly repeated this lie, demanding that I tell a convicted bomber where I and my family live, in order to disprove his lie.

You are a sick and pathetic freak, Bill Schmalfeldt. And your deliberate dishonesty is nearly as disgusting as your shameless cruelty.

 Bon voyage!

 





 


Reply to Bill Schmalfeldt

From: Bill Schmalfeldt <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:31 PM
Subject: Interview offer

Despite your opinion of me, I want to write a balanced story about Kimberlin’s RICO suit. If you are interested in telling your side of the story, i could submit a list of questions and will print your answers verbatim. This is a one time, take-it-or-leave-it offer. If you want your side told in my writing, let me know. If you do not want your side of the story, feel free to ignore me. Don’t bother writing back telling me not to contact you. That doesn’t work. Either agree or disagree to be interviewed, and leave it at that.
Thank you.

– – – –
From: Robert Stacy McCain
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Interview offer

Damn your “offer,” and damn your “interview.”
My opinion of you is of no consequence. What finally matters is the self-evident fact of your hateful dishonesty and cowardice, which is apparent to every intelligent person who has ever bothered to examine your words and actions.
Your assistance in “telling [my] side of the story” is neither welcome nor necessary. Of course, your offer is not made in good faith, as you have never acted on good faith in the entirety of the months that I have been forced to observe your constant lying and harassment. Further research has determined that this sort of disgraceful conduct has been your habit ever since you began your inept online attempts at impersonating a “progressive pundit” or whatever else you may choose to call that pathetic charade of yours.
What is astounding is that, after days of threatening the Impending Doom of myself and others — because of your advance notice of Kimberlin’s RICO suit — you have the unmitigated gall now to insult me by suggesting that you “want to write a balanced story” about the baseless and legally defective federal lawsuit your patron has filed against innocent people who have committed no wrong. You well know that the only “sin” of which the defendants are guilty is their failure to join you in your reverent worship at the Holy Shrine of Saint Brett of the Blessed Pipe Bomb.
Despite your knowledge of this truth, you pretend that Kimberlin’s litigation has some purpose beyond harassment. This pretense of yours fools no one. Your actions are entirely for the selfish and sadistic purpose of inflicting harm on people who are successful and happy, and your hate toward them is motivated by your envy, the ultimate cause of which is your inability to take responsibility for your incompetence and self-inflicted misfortunes.
Failure has attended your every step so far, and you have forfeited any claim you might ever have had on the courtesy of decent, honest and respectable people. Every person who knows you must regard you with thorough contempt, even such of your colleagues as may find you temporarily useful. Bad causes attract bad people, and the very fact that you are acceptable to Brett Kimberlin as an accomplice is conclusive proof of how desperate he has become.
You obviously have no shame, but you cannot be unconscious of the wrongs you have done, and I pity anyone so unfortunate as to have any reason to care what a laughingstock you have made of yourself. Cast your eye backward, look at the road you have traveled to reach your present humiliated position, and consider what destination you shall reach if you continue your current self-destructive trajectory.
I don’t have to tell you to go to Hell, because you are already in a frantic hurry to get there. All I can say now is, “Bon voyage.”
— RSM

 

– | – | – | –

ADDENDUM: A reader suggests the addition of this link:

BomberSuesBloggers.com

What is it worth to you, to read the truth about these jackals?

 

DOCUMENT: Kimberlin Federal Lawsuit

John Hoge was able to get the entire 48-page thing uploaded:

Kimberlin v NBC, Et Al by himself2462

 

Bear in mind that Brett Kimberlin is a sociopathic liar and convicted perjurer, so everything he alleges is to be presumed false.

 

BomberSuesBloggers.com

 

UPDATE: In a conversation with a source who (a) has extensive legal training and (b) has quickly skimmed over the complaint in the case of Kimberlin v. Everybody, I remarked rather vehemently that the case would be thrown out of court because the plaintiff is a “lying sociopathic menace,” or words to that effect.

My source replied, “The problem is, he’s told the wrong lies.”

However, the source cautioned me against specifying the multiple clumsy errors committed by the World’s Worst Pro Se Litigant™ because we do not want the perjuring bomber to benefit from any advance disclosure of our legal strategy. However, I can say that it will require lots of money, and also laughter at the plaintiff’s expense.

In all seriousness, however, please keep praying. It’s a comfort to the defendants to know that good people are praying for us.

 

BomberSuesBloggers.com

 


Yes, the World’s Worst Pro Se Litigant™ Brett Kimberlin Now Suing EVERYBODY

When I first heard the news this morning, my initial reaction was, “You’re kidding me. This has got to be a hoax.” But today at a Maryland courthouse — where Bill Schmalfeldt completely beclowned himself, BTW — the vicious creep actually delivered the news by hand:

Convicted bomber Brett Kimberlin filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday that names as defendants syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin, Red State editor Erick Erickson, talk radio host Glenn Beck, investigative journalist James O’Keefe and others, claiming they are part of a “criminal racketeering enterprise” under federal R.I.C.O. statutes. . . .
In addition to Malkin, Erickson, Beck, O’Keefe and others, Kimberlin’s federal complaint also names as defendants the late Andrew Breitbart‘s news site, two former Breitbart contributors, Lee Stranahan and Mandy Nagy, the non-profit watchdog group Franklin Center, O’Keefe’s publisher Simon & Schuster, Beck’s Web site TheBlaze.com and the award-winning conservative blogger known as “Ace of Spades.”
Also named as a defendant in Kimberlin’s federal complaint is Patrick Frey, the popular blogger known as “Patterico.” Kimberlin first threatened to sue Patterico in 2011 in an e-mail that included this warning: “I have filed over a hundred lawsuits and another one will be no sweat for me. On the other hand, it will cost you a lot of time and money …”

Please read the whole thing at Viral Read, and expect updates.

UPDATE: Kimberlin’s entire complaint will be posted online here soon. Meanwhile, I am issuing this Official Press Statement:

“Fuck you, Brett Kimberlin, you dishonest sociopathic creep.”

Please quote me on that.