The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Florida Man Kills Family After Stealing Money to Contact a Bulgarian Whore

Posted on | January 30, 2019 | Comments Off on Florida Man Kills Family After Stealing Money to Contact a Bulgarian Whore

 

Internet porn addiction turns deadly:

A Florida man is accused of fatally shooting his parents and brother after stealing $200,000 from them to pay a Bulgarian webcam model he met as a result of his addiction to online porn, police say. Grant Amato, a 29-year-old nurse, killed his family members at their home in Chuluota on January 25, according to the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office.
Amato was charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of his mother, Margaret Amato, 61; father, Chad Amato, 59; and brother, Cody Amato, 31, the sheriff’s office said. Amato’s surviving brother and Cody’s girlfriend told detectives Grant Amato had stolen the money so he could keep talking to the Bulgarian woman online and that resulted in a deteriorating relationship with his family. Cody’s girlfriend told police Cody told her he feared “Grant Amato would kill everyone,” according to court documents. . . .
The Seminole County Sheriff’s Office began investigating the triple homicide in rural Chuluota, Florida, on January 25, after a co-worker called police to express concern that Cody Amato hadn’t come to work. When deputies entered the Amatos home on Sultan Circle about 9 a.m., they found three people dead inside. They were later identified as Margaret Amato, Chad Amato and Cody Amato, according to the sheriff’s office. . . .
Cody Amato’s girlfriend told investigators that over the past few months there had been “problems” with Grant Amato. She said Grant stole $60,000 from Cody and also stole his guns and sold them without his permission. She told police that Grant Amato had been placed in a facility because he was unstable and her boyfriend told her he was afraid that “Grant Amato would kill everyone,” according to court documents. Police said the admission to the facility in South Florida was voluntary.
Cody’s girlfriend also told police that Grant [Amato] was unemployed and had been “going downhill” after he was “kicked out of nurse anesthetist school.” She also told police that Amato was “having a relationship” with a woman from Bulgaria “and that he was stealing money from the family so he could contact the female.”
Investigators said, “It was later learned that Grant Amato had stolen approximately $200,000 from the family to purchase time to interact with the female on a pornographic website.” . . .
Grant Amato had been talking to an “online call girl” in Bulgaria and had been wiring “an excessive amount of money to her and wasn’t sure if he owed money to her,” according to court documents. Jason Amato said the woman had sent mail to Grant and given her his parents’ address.
Jason Amato told police that his brother had sent the Bulgarian woman more than $200,000 in a three-month period. But he said he had spoken to his mother on January 16 and she said everything was OK and Grant was applying for work. Jason Amato also told detectives he was aware that his brother had stolen $150,000 from his parents, including a $65,000 loan on the house, and had taken $50,000 from Chad Amato. . . .
Jason Amato told police that his brother spent about two weeks at a facility for depression. Police said Grant Amato was actually enrolled in a 60-day program to treat internet- and sex-addiction. But he only completed about two weeks before returning home, according to court documents. He returned home on January 5.
Grant Amato told investigators that on January 24 he was in a heated argument with his father and was kicked out of his home because he was continuing to communicate with the Bulgarian webcam model over the internet. Amato told police he met the girl on Cam Girls, an adult web camera website, and had been communicating with her since June 2018, while sending her $200,000. . . .
According to court documents, Amato told police his father gave him an “ultimatum” because of his addiction. His father told him if he wanted to stay at his family’s house he would have to complete the sex addiction program at Cornerstone in Fort Lauderdale. He went into the program on December 22, but left early on January 4. He returned to the Orlando area and his family held a meeting where he was given a two-page list of rules he had to follow to stay in the house, according to court documents.
“During the meeting, Chad told Grant that if he broke any of the rules he would have to leave the house immediately. One of the rules was that he wasn’t allowed to have communications with the female in Bulgaria,” police wrote in the affidavit. “Grant Amato initially agreed to the rules his father had set, but he didn’t think they were fair because he felt that the Bulgarian female was his girlfriend and they had a relationship.”

Wow. Where to begin? Let’s start with this: If you were going to steal $200,000 for a whore, why wouldn’t you find a local whore, instead of some whore in Bulgaria you met via the Internet? Like, I don’t know the going rate for whores in Seminole County, Florida, but I’m pretty sure $200,000 would buy a lot of time with whores. Just sayin’ . . .

This shows how easily people can get lost in Internet-generated illusions. Grant Amato “felt that the Bulgarian female was his girlfriend and they had a relationship” — and, in a similar way, teenagers afflicted with “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria” become convinced they’re transgender after binge-watching YouTube “transition” videos. There have always been people with weird fantasies, but the Internet makes it possible for such people to spend endless hours playing make-believe until the fantasy takes on a life of its own. So this guy in Florida thinks he’s in a “relationship” with a Bulgarian camwhore and kills his parents and his brother to facilitate that fantasy. Crazy People Are Dangerous.

 

In The Mailbox: 01.29.19

Posted on | January 30, 2019 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho

OVER THE TRANSOM
357 Magnum: The Justice Department – Winning At All Costs, Even if It Means Breaking The Law
EBL: Learn To Code
Twitchy: Dems Flee Kamala Harris’ Targeting Of Private Health Plans
Louder With Crowder: VA House Democrats Pass NY-Style Abortion Law. Watch The Horror For Yourself

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Look Out Toyboys, The Cougars Are On the Prowl, also, The Right To Self-Defense
American Power: “Vacation”
American Thinker: Who’s In Charge Of The Executive Branch?
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily Election Spoiler News
BattleSwarm: Why Ask Huawei?
CDR Salamander: Pirates Of The Caribbean – The 200 Horses Indicator
Da Tech Guy: Why Stacey Abrams Will give The Democrats’ Response To The SOTU, also, The Left’s Failures On Crime, Drugs, & The Environment
Don Surber: 56% Say Do More On Illegal Immigration
Dustbury: Japan Has Incels
The Geller Report: American Imam Praises Hitler-Lover Farrakhan & His Position On Jews, also, Top Saudi Official Says Obama Lied, Set Back Middle East 20 Years
Hogewash: Kamala Harris & Willie Brown, also, Team Kimberlin Post Of The Day
Joe For America: Kamala Harris’ Staffers Threatened To Call Police When Angel Moms Visited Her Office
JustOneMinute: Fauxcahontas’ Wealth Tax Contains The Germ Of A Decent Idea
Legal Insurrection: Sore Loser Stacey Abrams To Give Dems’ SOTU Response, also, Obligatory “Bernie Sanders On Honeymoon – Drunk, Shirtless, & Singing In 1988 Soviet Union” Video
Michelle Malkin: The MAGA-Phobic Manure Spreaders Of Media Sensationalism
The PanAm Post: Venezuelan Diplomats In The US Rebel Against Maduro, Recognize Guaido, also, The End Of Maduro’s Dictatorship In Sight?
Power Line: Brennan Brays Again, also, A Different Take On Howard Schultz’ Candidacy
Shark Tank: Broward GOP Committee To Censor Media, Again
Shot In The Dark: Comforting The Comfortable
STUMP: Taxing Tuesday – Save Us Rich People From Senator Candidates
The Political Hat: Cancer Doesn’t Care About Your Gender Identity
This Ain’t Hell: Four Years To Field, Four Days To Damage, also, Some Dems Float Idea Of Primary Challenge For Occasional Cortex
Victory Girls: Five Issues Trump Should Discuss At The SOTU
Volokh Conspiracy: The Ongoing Gratuitous Cruelty Of Trump’s Travel Ban
Weasel Zippers: It’s Not Just NY – VA Dems Propose Bill Allowing Abortion Up To Moment Of Birth, also, Two Mexicans & Ten Chinese Illegals Arrested When Boat Lands At Naval Weapons Station
Megan McArdle: Elizabeth Warren’s Wealth Tax Is No Way To Run A Country, But A Good Way To Run A Campaign
Mark Steyn: Accessories & Crimes, also, Everyone’s Running As Bernie


Madness Take Its Toll

Posted on | January 29, 2019 | Comments Off on Madness Take Its Toll

 
Frankenfurter, it’s all over.
Your mission is a failure.
Your lifestyle’s too extreme . . .

The woman spoke with a Russian accent, and she wanted someone to listen. We were in the lobby of the Heritage Foundation after Monday’s event “The Inequality of the Equality Act: Concerns from the Left,” where the ideology of “gender identity” had been critically examined by a panel that included two board members of the radical Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF). The woman’s daughter, now 29, had begun identifying as transgender in 2013, after working on President Obama’s re-election campaign. “She cut us all off!” the woman said, explaining that her daughter — her only child — had blocked any communication with her family via Facebook, telephone or email. “It’s a cult!”

I already had all I needed for my article, but the woman — her name is Tatiana and she immigrated with her family from Russia in 1993 — wanted to talk, so I took notes. “The whole involvement started with politics,” she said, recalling how proud she had been when her daughter started working on the presidential campaign. Then the daughter had broken up with her longtime boyfriend, and the descent into transgenderism began. “I experienced the death of my own child,” she said, speaking metaphorically, as the daughter she raised has in effect ceased to exist and is completely alienated from her family. “It’s mourning . . . People can’t understand.”

Monday was a weird day all around. I’d driven down to D.C. for this panel, my first road-trip expedition in months, 150 miles round-trip, and in the elevator up to the Heritage Foundation’s 7th floor Douglas and Sarah Allison Auditorium, I remarked to a couple of young staffers how weird it was that radical feminists were speaking there. “We’re through the looking-glass, down the rabbit hole, sailing uncharted waters in the part of the map where it says ‘Here Be Dragons’.” I’d arrived with about 10 minutes to spare, and sat in the second row, getting ready for the event. Then I looked up from my notebook and saw a group of women about to sit right in front of me. One of them looked familiar.

“Excuse me, ma’am — are you Lierre Keith?” I asked.

Indeed, it was her. It boggled my mind that this radical environmentalist from Deep Green Resistance was at the Heritage Foundation, but we’re living in strange times, in which lesbians are being driven out of gay organizations because they won’t toe the “inclusive” party line:

Julia Beck’s voice quavered with emotion and she seemed on the brink of tears as she neared the end of her presentation Monday. “We are losing an entire generation of sisters to this madness,” she said. “That’s why it’s personal. It’s infuriating. It’s devastating. And I have had enough.”
A radical lesbian feminist, Ms. Beck spoke these words at a place she once never imagined she’d be — a seventh-floor auditorium at the conservative Heritage Foundation — as part of a panel discussing “this madness” of transgender ideology. But as Heritage scholar Ryan T. Anderson said in introducing Monday’s event, no liberal institution in Washington was willing to host such a discussion because the influential and well-funded transgender lobby has effectively silenced criticism on the Left. Ms. Beck began her presentation by telling how she was removed from the Baltimore mayor’s LGBTQ commission because she refused to kowtow to transgender ideologues.
“You might be thinking to yourself, ‘Why is a lesbian speaking at the Heritage Foundation?’ And I ask myself the same thing,” she said. “But my answer is pretty simple: There is no place for me. I am politically homeless.” Ms. Beck was the target of what she called a “month-long witch-hunt” after she committed the “crime” of referring to a rapist as male. This involved the notorious British case of Stephen Wood (a/k/a “Karen White”), a sex offender who assaulted two women in a women’s prison to which he had been assigned after he decided to “identify” as female. As crazy as that sounds, it actually reflects the current state of law in England, and the fact that a lesbian feminist got kicked off a municipal commission in Baltimore for stating an indisputable fact — i.e., the rapist is a man, no matter how he may “identify” — shows how transgender ideology is a threat to basic First Amendment freedoms. . . .

Read the rest of my column at The American Spectator.

You can also watch the video of Monday’s Heritage panel:



 

Rule 5 Monday: Elizabeth Pipko

Posted on | January 29, 2019 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Regardless of her politics, I don’t think Miss Pipko is going to have much problem finding modeling work. Abbreviated Rule 5 post this week for a number of reasons; back to the usual next Sunday.

Pretty in pink.

Ninety Miles From Tyranny: Hot Pick of the Late Night, The 90 Miles Mystery Box Episode #510, Morning Mistress, and Girls With Guns.

Animal Magnetism: Rule Five Dinobirds Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon.

EBL: The Upside, Cheese Lovers Day, Elle McPherson, Sarah Beattie, Bikini Hiker Dies Of Hypothermia, Amber Rose Revah, Deborah Ann Woll, and Alexa Davalos & Giorgia Whigham.

A View From The Beach: Brande Nicole RoderickScience Says Tattooed People SluttierTaiwan’s Bikini Hiker Dies of ExposureSNL Second Strigner Offers BJs for BeatingsCommuters Celebrate Ride by Removing PantsA Cold Serving of RussiagateWell, I Suppose That’s One Way to Keep the Weight OffSunday Morning Russiagate Coming Down and “Delusions Made of Wax”

Proof Positive: Jenny Scordamaglia, Marie Osmond, and Jenifer Aniston.

Dustbury: Piper Laurie and Emily Mortimer.

Thanks to everyone for all the luscious linkagery!


Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women

In The Mailbox: 01.28.19

Posted on | January 29, 2019 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho

It was a bad weekend. Rule 5 Monday will follow this post, and the FMJRA if I have the energy;
if not, then I’ll post it Tuesday.

OVER THE TRANSOM
357 Magnum: Lack Of Care & Overcrowding – The Joys Of Socialized Medicine
EBL: Daisy Appreciation Day
Twitchy: Adam Schiff NOT Buying The AG’s Mueller Investigation Update – Includes Bonus Reality Check Buzzkill
Louder With Crowder: Model Elizabeth Pipko Just Outed Herself As A Trump Supporter

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Friday Hawt Chicks & Links – The Learn To Code Edition, also, Greasy Pole Podcast #10 – The English Humor Episode
American Power: Fixing Facebook, also, A Stinging Defeat For President Trump
American Thinker: The FBI Drops In
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye, Blue Monday
BattleSwarm: Westboro Baptist Church For Thee, But Not For Me, also, Democratic Presidential Clown Car Update
CDR Salamander: The Fort Report On The Fitzgerald
Da Tech Guy: More On Nathan Phillips, also, Do We Owe Our Bishops Anything?
Don Surber: No, Trump Did Not Cave, also, Trump Wins Because He Isn’t Screwing Anyone Over
Dustbury: Strange Search Engine Queries, also, Orange You Glad
First Street Journal: Bishop Who Doesn’t Follow Catholic Teachings Condemns Covington Kids For Not Folllowing Catholic Teaching
The Geller Report: Israeli Scientists Find Cure For Cancer, also, Lawyers Say Google May Face RICO & Defamation Lawsuits Due To SPLC Partnership
Hogewash: Team Kimberlin Post Of The Day, also, An Improved Marxist Model
Hollywood In Toto: Audiences Cheer Racial Harmony, Reject Vice
Joe For America: Midwest To Be Blasted By Polar Vortex, Life-Threatening Wind Chills
JustOneMinute: Still Stuck In Covington
Legal Insurrection: Kamala Harris Officially Launches White House Run Before Adoring Media, also, Thousands show Up To Give Deceased Air Force Vet Proper Sendoff
The PanAm Post: Russian Mercenaries In Venezuela? Nothing We Can’t Handle
Power Line: “They Need To Start With Themselves”, also, What Has Happened To The Left?
Shark Tank: Gillum’s Political Future Takes Big Hit
Shot In The Dark: Not To Indulge In Schadenfreude…
STUMP: Saying Goodbye To Pickwick
The Political Hat: Banning Unwoke Pronouns In California
This Ain’t Hell: Why Are Some People Afraid Of The Red Hat? also, Attitudes On The Left And The Politics Of Inclusion
Victory Girls: Ilhan Omar – Evil In The House
Volokh Conspiracy: “The Myth Of Substantive Due Process”
Weasel Zippers: Court Hides Reason For FBI Raid On Clinton Whistleblower, also, NY State Legislation Permits College Financial Aid For Illegal Aliens
Megan McArdle: Is Journalism’s “Pivot To Dust” Arriving?
Mark Steyn: Muriel’s Wedding, also, Waltzing Matilda


Prejudice and Error

Posted on | January 28, 2019 | 2 Comments

If the basis of your investigation is a belief that witchcraft is the source of social problems, you’ll probably find some witches soon:

Mistaken identity is always a risk when a witch-hunt hysteria takes hold, and the hunt for “hate” in the Trump era has produced a mob mentality that rivals 17th-century Salem. Just ask Michelle Grissom, a Colorado middle-school teacher who may lose her job because she mistakenly identified the wrong Covington Catholic School student in a viral video — and called him a “Hitler Youth”!
Ms. Grissom has been placed on leave from her position as a social studies teacher at Mountain Ridge Middle School in the Denver suburb of Highlands Ranch after deleting her Twitter account and apologizing for her error. The Kentucky student she meant to defame as a Nazi — Nick Sandmann — is now arguably the most famous Catholic in America, thanks to video of his Jan. 18 confrontation with activist Nathan Phillips in D.C., but Ms. Grissom instead “doxed” Covington Catholic junior Jay Jackson. Unfortunately for her, Jackson did not accompany his classmates on the trip to Washington for the annual March for Life. Instead, he was 500 miles from the nation’s capital, playing basketball in a tournament in Middletown, Ohio. Adding to Ms. Grissom’s misfortunes was the fact that Jay’s father is a successful obstetrician who, to say the least, did not take kindly to having his son labeled a Hitler Youth. After the gravity of her error became apparent, Ms. Grissom issued an abject apology and also resigned her post as local teachers union official.
To paraphrase Britney Spears: Oops, they did it again. . . .

Read the rest of my column at The American Spectator.



 

How Anti-Christian Bias in #FakeNews Media Is Encouraging Anti-Semitism

Posted on | January 27, 2019 | 1 Comment

 

This is a topic I am reluctant to write about, but in the wake of the Covington Catholic school story, the elephant in the room is now so large that it is more dangerous to ignore it than to mention it:

It’s rare to see a major media outlet be so honest about its ideological bias. But yet there was New York Times reporter Dan Levin on Twitter the other day, openly soliciting negative stories about Christian schools. “I’m a New York Times reporter writing about #exposechristianschools,” Levin tweeted, “Are you in your 20s or younger who went to a Christian school? I’d like to hear about your experience and its impact on your life. Please DM me.” . . .
You probably won’t be surprised to learn . . . that the #exposechristianschools hashtag Levin used did not initially go viral because Twitter users were anxious to share their enriching experiences in Christian-based educational institutions. The tag was predominately used to dox and smear the Covington Catholic School kids. . . .
The New York Times’ long history of prejudicial coverage of religious Christians should cement your skepticism about its intentions. Even while the newspaper was rifling through Twitter looking for people who had been damaged by a traditional Christian education, it was running a fawning profile on the overtly racist and anti-Semitic “Black Hebrew Israelites.” The piece opens with the line: “They are sidewalk ministers who use confrontation as their gospel.”
Christian schools, of course, irritate the sensibilities of contemporary Democrats for a number of reasons. It’s not only that students who attend them are often saved from the leftist cultural and political indoctrination, but also that the very existence of parochial schools, private schools and home schooling undermines their institutional political monopoly.

(Hat-tip: Instapundit via Hogewash.)

Wow. That’s what they call a “bad look,” Dan Levin.

Or perhaps as some would say, it’s a shanda fur die goyim.

As David Harsanyi says, the anti-Christian bias of the New York Times has long been notorious, and this bias is transparently partisan: The Times has always been a propaganda organ of the Democrat Party and, ever since the 1980s, when the so-called “religious Right” was identified as a core constituency of the Reagan coalition, attacking Christianity has become a more or less regular “beat” in Times coverage.

Understanding this as a partisan bias is important. Whenever religion can be used as an issue in favor of Democrats, we find the liberal media singing from the same hymnal, so to speak. When John F. Kennedy’s Catholic faith became an issue in the 1960 campaign, the New York Times became more ardently Catholic than the Pope. When the Southern Baptist Jimmy Carter was the Democrat presidential candidate, the New York Times coverage was almost evangelical in its endorsement. Over and over, we can see it is the partisan political value of religion that dictates how the topic is covered in the New York Times — anything that helps Democrats is good, anything that helps Republicans is bad.

This partisan explanation of why the New York Times hates Christians is important to understand, because otherwise people might notice a name like Dan Levin and then point at the paper’s mastheadnudge, nudge, wink, wink — and you had better believe that this has been happening since the Covington Catholic fiasco. How is it, as David Harsanyi points out, that a New York Times reporter is seeking to “expose” Christian schools while at the same time his newspaper is giving softball coverage to a bizarre racialist cult like the Black Hebrew Israelites? Doesn’t such obvious bias lend credence to hateful stereotypes and conspiracy theories about Jewish influence? As a conservative Christian who is the exact opposite of an anti-Semite, I get tired of dealing with the anti-Semitic comments that crop up online whenever one of (((those names))) features prominently in a story about media bias.

Why Are Jews Liberals? the late Norman Podhoretz asked in a 2010 book that ought to be required reading in political science classes. Anyone can look at the exit poll numbers. In 2004, for example, Democrat John Kerry got 74% of the Jewish vote, which was more than his percentage of union members (61%) or Latino voters (53%).

That Jews voted 3-to-1 against Bush, who had invaded Iraq to crush the Jew-hating dictator Saddam Hussein, should have aroused critical scrutiny from the media, but for (((some reason))) it didn’t. Instead, the media were so blatant in their partisan loyalty to the Democrats that their negative coverage of the Bush administration lent credence to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about “Zionist” neoconservatives.

Am I the only one who sees the feedback loop at work here?

  1. A majority of Jews are Democrats;
  2. Many Jews have prominent positions in the news media;
  3. The allegedly “objective” media are in fact dishonest partisans, consistently promoting pro-Democrat messages;
  4. Republican voters express resentment of the media’s dishonest propaganda;
    and
  5. The media then cite these complaints about bias as proof of Republican anti-Semitism.

Isn’t it obvious, in such a situation, that assigning (((Dan Levin))) to “expose” Christian schools was a very bad idea? And what I fear most is that this feedback-loop effect could create a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy. The media uses accusations of anti-Semitism to justify their blind fanatical hatred of Trump, and this might actually (a) increase the partisan skew toward Democrats among Jewish voters while at the same time (b) encouraging avowed anti-Semites to support Trump, and then (c) lather, rinse, repeat with potentially dangerous consequences.

Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) seem to believe that there is no downside to their divisive identity-politics game, so that even if there is some kind of backlash, they’ll be able to exploit this to their advantage, and never mind if innocent people actually get hurt. The media have recently tried to play victim — “Orange Man Bad!” — with CNN’s Jim Acosta actually getting a contract to write a book about how that evil bully Donald Trump is mean to famous millionaire TV reporters. So it can be expected that this media victimhood narrative will be merged with the “Republicans hate Jews” theme to create a new message: Criticism of liberal media bias is an anti-Semitic “dog whistle.”

Meanwhile, of course, Dan Levin will “expose” Christian schools and if you dare mention the hateful bias involved, you’re literally Hitler.

UPDATE: Welcome, Instapundit readers!



 

‘An Important Discussion’

Posted on | January 27, 2019 | Comments Off on ‘An Important Discussion’

 

Three weeks ago, the shooting death of 7-year-old Jazmine Barnes in Houston was all over CNN, but the story disappeared once police arrested two black suspects in the drive-by shooting (see “Media’s Anti-White Bias Makes Houston Drive-By Shooting National News,” Jan. 7).

However, Ashe Schow offers this thoughtful update on the case:

The family of 7-year-old Jazmine Barnes regrets calling her tragic murder a hate crime, a claim which led to a white male being falsely accused of the attack.
Young Barnes was killed in a drive-by shooting on the morning of December 30, 2018. Her mother was driving her and her four sisters in Houston, Texas, when a man opened fire on their vehicle. In the confusion, Laporsha Washington, Barnes’ mother, saw a white man in a red truck speeding away, and believed he was the shooter.
The shooting became a viral news story, and suddenly Washington’s description of a white male suspect became a “hate crime,” according to KPRC2 in Houston.
“Buffin said once word about the shooting became news, it went viral. From there, activists swarmed her family — listening to Washington and her daughters’ description of a white gunman. They told them the shooting likely was a hate crime,” KPRC2 reported.
Activist Shaun King amplified the sketch of the man and emphasized that it was a “hate crime.” King then started asking about a man who had been arrested for purse snatching after Barnes’ murder, strongly implying this man may be connected to the case. This led to the identified man and his family receiving death threats.
A week after Barnes’ murder, two black men were arrested for the crime.
Now Barnes’ family regrets the role they played in misidentifying an innocent man.
“We apologize. We apologize,” Mary Buffin, Barnes’ great aunt, told KPRC2. “The thing that’s bothering me is that someone was falsely accused.” . . .
Eric Black, 20, and Larry Woodruffe, 24, were arrested for Barnes’ murder. Both are African American men. Police believe the white man in the red truck sped off just after the shooting to protect himself.
Law enforcement officers also believe the two men mistook the car Barnes and her family was in for another vehicle belonging to rival gang members when they opened fire.
Even though a man was falsely accused of a horrific and racist crime, Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez didn’t seem concerned, suggesting it had launched an “important discussion” on racism.
“This death has sparked a lot of discussion on many different levels,” the sheriff said at a press conference earlier this month. “We know that there is an important discussion that does need to take place about race, about the real fear and concerns that hate crimes are in an uptick across this county. We also need to talk about gun violence.”
This is a common defense when a claim of racism or sexism turns out to be bogus. Activists have been using some iteration of the “important discussion” line for years. It is especially prevalent on college campuses after a hate-crime hoax has been perpetrated.

You know what we need to have an “important discussion” about? The irresponsible way that CNN and other national news organization jump on any claim of racism as an excuse to portray America as a country defined by hatred — for which, they suggest, Republicans are to blame. It’s not just racism, either. As I recently pointed out (“The Media’s ‘Climate of Hate’ Myth,” American Spectator, Jan. 18), transgender activists and the media have falsely claimed that Donald Trump’s election is to blame for an alleged “epidemic” of anti-transgender violence. In 2016, Ashe Schow described how the media excuses these hoaxes:

Falsely accusing someone of a crime is never okay and society should never excuse it. Sadly, today’s culture allows anyone to accuse someone of rape or racism and seek forgiveness by claiming the false accuser just wanted to “start a dialogue.”
In the recent race hoax at State University of New York at Albany, where three black women started a fight on a bus and accused a dozen white people of attacking them for being black, a professor at the school claimed they were justified because they started a conversation on race.
“My white students have said this has opened up conversations,” said Sami Schalk, an assistant professor in SUNY Albany’s English department. “Things that are inadvertent, small, but that these white students have no experience with, not being a person of color on this campus.”
The three women who claimed to be the victims of a racial attack are currently being charged with assault (as videos show one of them threw the first punch) and filing a false report.
Another recent hoax, this one involving a lesbian professor at Central Michigan University who claimed she was attacked for her sexuality by a man at a Tony Keith concert, also included the “starting a dialogue” excuse. Professor Mari Poindexter said she made up the story (and punched herself in the eye to fake evidence) “because she wanted to raise awareness about the social hardships of people in the LGBTQ+ community.”
After Rolling Stone’s article about an alleged gang-rape at the University of Virginia was proven to be a hoax, media outlets — including MTV — rushed to suggest that the article “may have unintentionally started a conversation that’s bigger than the controversy itself.”

Here’s a suggestion: Let’s “raise awareness” that the reason activists are always willing to perpetrate hoaxes to “start a conversation” is because they know the media are willing to act as their accomplices.

It’s almost as if fake news is the enemy of the people, or something.




 

 

« go backkeep looking »