Trump Derangement Syndrome: Some Historical Perspective on Political Manias

When you look at that kind of headline, how can you doubt that the pandemic of Trump Derangement Syndrome has become toxic?

A TikToker has lost her job after posting a video that appeared to pray for former Attorney General Pam Bondi to suffer permanently from cancer, prompting outrage across social media.
In the video, the TikToker says, “Dear MAGA Lord Jesus, please let her end up with a hole in her throat that she has to push every time she speaks. Dear God, if there is a MAGA God, please let Pam Bondi’s throat cancer be the worst case of cancer anybody’s ever seen.”
The TikTok, posted by @glitterandcrossbones, which is currently set to private, appeared to have been posted by Caitlyn Aguiar, who had worked as an assistant vice president for the Inbound Contact Center at Jeanne D’Arc Credit Union since January 2024, according to her LinkedIn page, which appears to have been taken down.
Bondi, 60, who was fired from the Department of Justice in early April, has been diagnosed with thyroid cancer and undergone treatment.
In the TikTok, Aguiar continued, “Please let her have to take on the suffering that she’s unleashed upon the thousands, millions, dare I say, of Americans in this country. . . . Please, dear MAGA Lord Jesus…”
She added, “Please let this be the karma that she so justly deserves, MAGA Lord Jesus. Amen.”

How can it be that someone working as the assistant vice president of a financial institution could think this way? And believe she could post something like that online without consequences?

The problem is not just that a lot of Democrats are insane — although, of course they are — but that so many people, including Republicans, are incapable of thinking outside of the here-and-now of politics, the 24/7 news cycle reinforced by constant immersion in social media noise.

For me, as a journalist, the tyranny of the news cycle is a danger that I must struggle to resist. It helps that there was no Internet at all when I got started, and that it was only after more than 20 years in the newspaper business that I launched out into the world of blogging and social media. Like, I remember when dial-up modems, Usenet boards and AOL were “the new thing,” and therefore have some perspective on the contemporary madness that spawns TikTok meltdowns.

Lose your job for ranting about Pam Bondi? Of the many Cabinet secretaries I’ve seen come and go in my lifetime, there were certainly quite a few I intensely disliked, but I am certain I never said anything about, e.g., Janet Reno that would even begin to compare with what this woman said about Pam Bondi. And why? What is the “suffering” that Bondi allegedly “unleashed”? Pretty doggone sure she never ordered an attack that incinerated 86 Americans, as was the case at Waco.

Political passions come and go. Today’s headline news will disappear when some new controversy comes along tomorrow, and within 10 or 20 years, almost everything we are currently arguing about will be entirely forgotten. How often do I find myself having to explain to people exactly what happened during the Lewinsky scandal, or how the invasion of Iraq went sideways? These are events that dominated the headlines for months at a time, in recent memory, and yet are just vaguely remembered by most Americans. The people burning down their own lives with toxic TikTok rants are trapped in short-term thinking.

When I was packing for our trip to Alaska, knowing I’d be without an Internet connection for many hours, I brought along the third volume of Winston Churchill’s A History of the English-Speaking Peoples, which I’ve read at least twice before, but enjoy re-reading every so often because it’s fascinating. Here you have world-historical events, involving some of the most eminent figures in British history, and most people nowadays know absolutely nothing about it. Here is the Duke of Marlborough smashing the French at Blenheim — arguably the greatest victory ever won by an English army — and it means nothing to the average American. Blenheim? Never heard of it. Marlborough? Isn’t that a cigarette brand? Even among college-educated Americans, how many of them can even tell you one fact about the War of the Spanish Succession?

Marlborough at Blenheim, 1704

If the entire War of the Spanish Succession can vanish from popular memory, what are the chances that any of our grandchildren will ever hear the name Pam Bondi? How crazy do you have to be to think you’re going to “make a difference” in the world by whipping out your phone to record a TikTok diatribe about the former Attorney General?

One of the most interesting characters of the 1700s was Robert Walpole, the first to be called Prime Minister of England. During the reign of King George I and continuing into the reign of King George II, Walpole did something both commendable and remarkable — he made politics boring. The unchallenged ascendancy of the Whigs, and a policy aimed at peace and prosperity, had the effect of causing the English people to forget all the controversies that had previously divided them. It was only after Walpole left the ministry (he died in 1745) that the course of events began that led ultimately to the American Revolution.

America today could use a Walpole, a president who could usher in an era of quiet competence, resting upon a decisive and durable political majority. If you look back over the past 40 years, you see why our politics have become so toxic. Despite the 12-year White House tenure of Reagan-Bush (1981-93), Republicans never had a majority at the congressional level during those years. After Clinton was elected in 1992, however, the reaction to his first two years in office produced the “Republican Revolution” that led to 12 years of GOP control of the House. Since then, we’ve gone through the Lewinsky scandal (1998), the Bush-vs.-Gore Florida recount 2000), the 9/11 attacks in 2001, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and repeated changes of the congressional majority (2006, 2010, 2018, 2022). The balance between the two major parties is so close that it seems impossible for either of them to maintain control for very long, and the result of this fragile balance is a relentless intensification of political conflict, as each side appeals more desperately to the prejudices of its partisan base. Consequently, emotionally vulnerable people are quite literally driven mad by the nonstop bombardment of political messages intended to incite “grassroots energy,” as the consultants call it.

If we are to have an American Walpole, I think, he will have to be Republican, and he will need a majority so strong as to push the Democratic Party into a very long period of political eclipse. The opportunity is there for Marco Rubio (or J.D. Vance, or Ron DeSantis) to do this if (a) Republicans can manage to hold onto both houses of Congress in this November’s midterms, (b) any Republican can win the White House in 2028, and (c) the Trump agenda of strong border enforcement can be continued until (d) the 2030 Census peels enough House seats away from “blue” states to make a Democratic majority a forlorn hope for the next decade. This is a series of hypothetical contingencies, each dependent on the most favorable developments for Republicans, but it is nevertheless possible. All we need is a few breaks, and the next decade could finally bring us a prolonged relief from the tremendous strain we’ve endured since the 1990s.

Pray for it. Pray hard, and then pray harder.



 

‘Pretending Not to Know’

In 2011, explaining his abandonment of “brain-dead” liberalism, the Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright David Mamet published The Secret Knowledge: On the Dismantling of American Culture. It was there that he expressed what has become known as The Mamet Principle: “In order to continue advancing their illogical arguments, modern liberals have to pretend not to know things.” We see this all the time in the make-believe play-acting of TV personalities like Jake Tapper, who did a perfect imitation of Claude Rains in Casablanca in describing how he was shocked — shocked! — by the revelation that Joe Biden was senile.

As a journalist, one of my biggest gripes is that TV news has given people a mistaken idea about what journalism actually is. Writing a 700-word news article is a full day’s work for the reporter who has to rely on his own notes of conversations with sources. To be an actual reporter — as opposed to a TV talking head — means spending a lot of time on the phone, trying to get people to tell the truth when it would better suit them to keep the truth out of the newspaper. By contrast, if you understand what TV news actually is, you realize that the anchorman is paid for his ability to convey the proper emotion about what he’s telling you.

As Mamet remarked, newscasters are hired “not for their probity or for their intelligence, but for their ‘believability,'” and that is how Barack Obama became president — he had that same kind of superficial “believability” that characterizes a successful TV news anchor.

This brings us to Obama’s disingenuous (unsolicited and unnecessary) comment about Cole Allen’s botched assassination attempt Saturday night at the annual White House Correspondents dinner. By the time he pushed the “publish” button on that tweet, we did indeed “have the details about the motives” of the gunman. Allen’s social-media archives and his written “manifesto” made clear that Allen was a Democrat, inspired by the same vicious lies about Trump that Democrats and their media allies have been promoting for the past decade.

“His beliefs mirrored mainstream Democrat talking points” — in other words, he was radicalized not by some obscure fringe website, but by what every Democrat with access to a microphone or a camera has been saying publicly ever since Trump beat Hillary nearly 10 years ago.

Barack Obama’s intent was to conceal and obscure this truth, to assert that Democrats are against political violence, no matter how often we have seen them incite, defend, justify and participate in such violence (e.g., the “fiery but mostly peaceful” riots of 2020). As David Mamet said, Obama must “pretend not to know things” (and encourage others to join him in that pretense) or else the very existence of the Democratic Party might be jeopardized, because everybody would realize what a colossal scam it is (as all honest and intelligent people already do).



 

Yet Another Democrat Has Failed to Assassinate President Donald Trump

Democrats are crazy and evil, but also utterly incompetent:

A man armed with guns and knives stormed the lobby outside the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner attended by President Donald Trump on Saturday night, charging toward the ballroom in a chaotic encounter with Secret Service agents as guests dived under tables at the sound of shots being fired.
The president was uninjured and was rushed off the stage. The armed man, who officials said was a guest at the Washington Hilton where the dinner was being held, was taken into custody and was expected in court Monday. Police believe he opened fire and acted alone but did not say who was his intended target or describe a motive.
“When you’re impactful, they go after you. When you’re not impactful, they leave you alone,” Trump, safe and uninjured and still in his tuxedo, said at the White House two hours later. “They seem to think he was a lone wolf.”
The shooting unfolded just outside the vast subterranean ballroom holding thousands of dinner guests, disrupting minutes after it began an annual event meant to honor journalism and the First Amendment that was being especially scrutinized this year because it was the first time since Trump became president that he had attended. . . .
Video posted by Trump showed the suspect running past security barricades as Secret Service agents ran toward him. One officer was shot in a bullet-resistant vest but was recovering, officials said. The gunman was tackled to the ground and was not injured, but was being evaluated at a hospital, police said.
The shooting suspect was identified as Cole Tomas Allen, 31, of Torrance, California, according to two law enforcement officials who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation. He is facing two firearm-related charges, including a count of assaulting an officer with a deadly weapon.

Notice something missing in that Associated Press story? “Assassination.” You could say, “an apparent assassination attempt,” or use the phrase “would-be assassin,” but the AP goes out of its way to avoid saying the obvious: THIS GUY WANTED TO KILL TRUMP.

Furthermore, despite cramming the story full of all kinds of irrelevancies — quotes from this or that politician in attendance — the AP doesn’t include important details about the suspect’s background: First, that Cole Allen donated to Kamala Harris’s campaign, and second, that there was a campaign sign for a Democratic candidate for a state judge position in the front lawn of Allen’s home in California. In other words, evidence clearly suggests the shooter is a Democrat with a political motive, but the Associated Press didn’t think that merited inclusion in the story.

Why is it that everything turns into a story about media bias?

This is what irritates me, after 40 years in the news business. There would be no need for conservative journalism, as such, if it were not for the pervasive bias of the industry. If journalists at the Associated Press, the New York Times, the major networks, etc., would just do their jobs without turning every story into some kind of Democratic Party propaganda message, guys like me would be out of work.

It is rather symbolic that a deranged Democrat decided that the best place to kill the president was at the most prestigious annual gathering of journalists in America. And I’m sure members of the White House Correspondents Association are disappointed that their fellow Democrat failed to murder the president they’ve demonized for years.



 

Trump Declares Ceasefire in Iran

During Tuesday’s liberal freakout, Democrats were denouncing President Trump as a genocidal maniac because of his threats to destroy Iran. Then, about an hour before the 8 p.m. deadline he’d given the Iranian regime, Trump announced that a deal had been reached for a ceasefire:

President Donald Trump and the Islamic Republic of Iran both announced on Tuesday evening just before the U.S. president’s deadline for a deal that they have agreed to a two-week ceasefire while negotiators finalize a deal between the warring nations.
Trump took to his Truth Social platform to announce that he has agreed to the ceasefire urged by the Pakistani Prime Minister . . .
Israel has also agreed to the ceasefire, per CNN, which quoted a White House official. “Israel is part of the two-week ceasefire President Donald Trump announced just an hour and a half before his deadline for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face escalated military attacks on civilian infrastructure, a senior White House official tells CNN,” CNN reported. “Israel has agreed to also suspend its bombing campaign while negotiations continue, the official said.”

More background from Beege Wellborn at Hot Air:

I have a feeling there were several things moving the Iranians along in this direction if they wanted to have any hope of saving their miserable, murderous skins. The US and Israelis started smacking industrial installations this evening, for one thing. . . .
B-52s were also noted leaving RAF Fairford within the flight window to arrive over Iran at Trump’s ultimatum zero hour. . . .
Jesse Watters reporting that China begged Iran to take the deal because it [i.e., the shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz] was cratering their already shaky economy.

Hat-tip: Instapundit, who adds: “Word is that one of the targets struck today was a collection of airplanes the mullahs had set up for fleeing the country. That may have had something to do with this.” We now have two weeks of a conditional ceasefire, while negotiations continue for a permanent peace agreement. What will happen during those two weeks?

Recall that Trump had already begun sending combat troops toward the region (“Guess What Time It Is, ‘Iranian Leaders’?”), including a Marine battalion and elements of the Army’s 82nd Airborne and 10th Mountain divisions. We can assume that those troops will continue to deploy, while we wait to see whether the Tehran regime is serious about ending the war. If Iran doesn’t negotiate in good faith, then we can go back to fighting, having used the two-week pause to resupply the Navy and Air Force with bombs, etc., and with ground troops ready to go.



 

It Would Be Wrong to Say Democrats Are Going Completely Crazy Today …

. . . because obviously they’ve been crazy for many years. Trump said that tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern is some kind of deadline for Iran, and this morning he turned the volume all the way to 11: “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will.” Do you know what that means? Neither do I.

Maybe it’s thermonuclear Armageddon, or maybe not, but the Democrats are running around with their hair on fire, screaming like lunatics, even more than their usual hair-on-fire lunacy. Krystal Ball, the Democrat whose failed 2010 congressional campaign resulted in a 29-point GOP landslide, has become frighteningly unhinged over this.

She’s basically repeating Iranian propaganda here, demanding a military coup d’etat against the President of the United States. To repeat what I previously said, nobody knows exactly what Trump’s rhetoric signifies, and while we could speculate about what Trump intends to do, my hunch is that it’s nothing that would justify the “military revolt” that Krystal Ball is calling for. Unlike her, I am completely sane, and not locked into an obsessive fear/rage cycle, so my plans for this evening are to attend my grandson’s Little League game. Maybe the world will blow up tonight, but let’s hope it doesn’t happen before the seventh inning.



 

Thinking About Mogadishu

Last night, I was inspired to watch Black Hawk Down again, although I’ve seen it many times before, including during its original 2001 release. Perhaps you’ve forgotten this from 2022:

Staff Sgt. Robert McCain wanted to be in the Army for as long as his mother can remember. But McCain remembers exactly when he knew he’d be a soldier someday: The first time he watched “Black Hawk Down.”
“I was like nine and I saw that movie — which you should not show a nine-year-old that movie — and I wanted to join the Army from then on,” he told Task & Purpose on Sunday.
Not only did McCain go on to be an infantryman in the Army like he’d dreamed, but over the weekend he competed in the 2022 Best Ranger Competition, a brutal battle of grit and skill among elite Airborne Ranger-qualified service members. . . .

That story still makes me smile. The intensity of that movie, which I took Bob and his twin brother Jim to see when it first came out, sort of caught me by surprise at the time. I grew up watching war movies like The Longest Day, and the TV series Combat, and playing with G.I. Joes, and so the thought of taking my kids to see a war movie seemed like a great idea. The graphic realism of Black Hawk Down was, as Bob later told that reporter, maybe too much for a 9-year-old, even if it did inspire his future career ambitions. In case you haven’t subscribed to my Substack newsletter yet, you may not understand why I bring that up now, given that I start today by talking about the war in Ukraine:

How closely have you followed the war in Ukraine lately? There was as a time, in 2022 and 2023, when I regularly kept track of developments in that war, but then it settled down into a de facto stalemate — trench warfare, with little change in the front lines — and I lost interest. Most Americans were even less interested in the war than I was, except perhaps as a partisan talking point for the kind of people with Ukrainian flags in their social-media profiles. After the dramatic events of early 2022, when Ukraine defeated the initial Russian effort to capture Kyiv, there just wasn’t enough battlefield news to maintain public interest. Incidentally, nobody has any idea how many casualties there have been in the Russia-Ukraine war. Propaganda by both sides has made it impossible to ascertain how many troops have been killed and wounded, although it seems certain that the death toll is in the tens of thousands.
Just this past week, however, I happened to see a report that Ukraine has driven the Russians out of Kupyansk, a city straddling the Oskil River, nearly 400 miles east of Kyiv. . . .

You can read the whole thing at Substack, and if you haven’t subscribed yet, please do so now. Also, please pray for peace.



 

‘Major Combat Operations’ in Iran UPDATE: Is the Ayatollah Dead, or Not? UPDATE: He’s ‘Pining for the Fjords’

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

UPDATE 5:10 p.m. ET: The Associated Press:

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in a major attack on Iran launched by Israel and the United States, Israeli officials told The Associated Press on Saturday. There was no immediate comment from the U.S. or Iran on his status.

The old Monty Python parrot sketch reference via Aaron Walker at Twitchy. It is elsewhere reported that pretty much the entire military leadership of the Tehran regime has been eliminated and, if indeed the Ayatollah himself has now shuffled off this mortal coil, the Islamic Republic is done, finished, kaput. War is over, we win.

We do not know what comes next, of course, but the Left’s predictable noise about a long war in Iran appears to be immediately void. In a one-day lightning strike, the U.S. and Israel have destroyed the Shiite theocracy, and whatever happens now, the future in Iran will be different.

But the protesters already had their signs printed!

 

* * * PREVIOUSLY (8:36 a.m. ET) * * *

A couple of weeks ago, it was noticed that roughly one-third of the U.S. Navy was within striking range of Iran, at a time when Iran was “negotiating” over their nuclear program with the Trump administration. One must put “negotiating” in quotation marks, because Donald Trump clearly had in mind a specific outcome — the elimination of Iran’s nuclear threat — and the Iranians did not seem to understand the consequences of not giving Trump what he wanted. That was the fuck around stage of the process, and we have now reached the find out stage:

The US and Israel launched airstrikes against Iran Saturday morning in response to the regime’s refusal to dismantle its nuclear program after weeks of negotiations — targeting military infrastructure and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s compound in Tehran.
The attacks — which the Department of War called “Operation Epic Fury” — follow a massive US military buildup in the Middle East and come after President Trump repeatedly warned Tehran that it would face consequences if it didn’t make a deal with the US.
Iran then launched missiles towards Israel in a retaliatory attack as officials claimed the response would be “crushing.”
“Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime,” Trump said in an eight-minute video address on Saturday.

In addition to the expected outcries from Democrats, who are not just anti-Trump but objectively pro-Iran, this event will trouble many of Trump’s most loyal supporters, whose ideas of an “America First” foreign policy certainly do no include a joint U.S.-Israeli strike against Tehran. What Trump is doing now is very much the kind of thing neoconservatives have advocated for many years, and yet the most prominent neocons have been anti-Trump since 2015. In other words, Trump is disappointing many of his friends by doing what should please many of his enemies. My own concern is for the U.S. troops involved, wishing them success, decisive victory being the shortest route to peace.

UPDATE 12:55 p.m. ET: So you were promised updates and updates ye shall have, but confirmed facts are unfortunately scarce:

Initial indications from intel sources are that Ali Khamenei has at least been hit in the attack, and that the IRGC’s top commander has been killed. The Times of Israel followed up on a report from KAN:

Israel “assesses” that Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was likely killed in an Israeli strike earlier today, Channel 12 says, citing unnamed Israeli sources. It says there are “growing indications” to this effect.
There is no official confirmation of the report.
The TV station had minutes earlier said the Israeli assessment was that Khamenei was “hurt at the very least, ” and that this was not an assessment based on satellite imagery showing Khamenei’s presidential compound being flattened, but rather on information from unnamed sources.

The Jerusalem Post corroborates that report, albeit with a bit more caution:

Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has been cut off from contact, and there is no certainty about his fate, Israeli officials told Walla on Saturday afternoon. Iranian officials promised to release a recording from Khamenei soon after Israeli strikes targeted his Tehran compound.
The preliminary assessment among Israeli officials was that Khamenei was hurt in the strike. No official confirmation has been received by Israeli, American, or Iranian sources. …
Iran’s Defense Minister Amir Nasirzadeh and Revolutionary Guards commander Mohammed Pakpour are believed to have been killed in Israeli attacks, two sources familiar with Israel’s military operations and one regional source said.
Israeli and Iranian sources said earlier on Saturday strikes on Iran killed several senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders and Islamic Regime political officials.

Unless and until we see a mob of enraged Iranian civilians dragging the Ayatollah’s corpse through the streets of Tehran, we’re unlikely to have actual confirmation. What we can confirm, however, is that a lot of Democrats are busy making jackasses of themselves.

.



 

Are You Tired of All This #Winning Yet?

The Gaza War began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas fired more than 4,000 rockets at Israel, then sent 6,000 terrorists across the border, where they murdered nearly 1,200 innocent Israelis and kidnapped another 250. Joe Biden was president at the time, and respect for the United States was at an all-time low. For the next 17 months, while Democrats pandered to the pro-Hamas protesters, nothing was done to end the war. In January 2025, Donald Trump took office for his second term as president and now, less than nine months later, there is a peace deal with the remaining hostages returned to Israel.

Hamas has been defeated and thoroughly humiliated. At Instapundit, Ed Driscoll cites this pithy summary by Ed Morrissey:

“Trump won this war in June, when he made an unapologetic decision to intervene with military strikes in Iran. Those strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities completely shook up the order in the region, which had settled into an Iranian track toward dominance. Israel had already done most of the damage by wiping out Hezbollah’s upper echelons and their banking system, which led directly to the fall of Bashar al-Assad and the rise of a new Syrian regime that detests the mullahs in Iran. However, the strikes by Trump on Iran forced everyone to reconsider their assumptions and recalculate for a president who had no problem ordering military force to defend and protect American interests.”

Also from Ed at Instapundit, here’s an important point made by retired Col. Kurt Schlicter: “If you start a war, you need to be prepared to lose it.”

Gen. John Bell Hood (left), Gen. William T. Sherman (right)

Knowing me to be a native of Atlanta, perhaps some readers will be surprised to discover that I’m willing to admit that General Sherman was right about certain things. In September 1864, after the Yankees had captured Atlanta and Gen. John Bell Hood’s Confederates had retreated south of Lovejoy Station, Sherman wrote to Hood, explaining his plan to evacuate the civilian population of Atlanta (a plan detailed in Special Field Orders No. 67). Hood replied harshly, declaring to Sherman that “the unprecedented measure you propose transcends, in studied and ingenious cruelty, all acts ever before brought to my attention in the dark history of war.” Sherman replied vehemently and at some length, defending the necessity of the evacuation, and laying the blame for war on Southerners who, “in the midst of peace and prosperity, have plunged a nation into war, dark and cruel war; who dared and badgered us to battle, insulted our flag, seized our arsenals and forts,” et cetera.

The point that Sherman sought to make was that those who choose war must accept the consequences of that choice. At the time the Confederates opened their bombardment of Fort Sumter in April 1861, and for quite some time thereafter, neither North nor South expected the war to become what it did — a four-year ordeal that took the lives of more than half a million soldiers, to say nothing of the other destruction and hardship involved. My ancestors fought for the Confederacy, and I’ll brook no insults of their honor, yet an important lesson is to be learned from the Sherman-Hood correspondence, which the inhabitants of Gaza and their sympathizers ought to study. How many times have you seen the pro-Hamas crowd on X posting before-and-after pictures of Gaza and trying to blame Israel for the destruction? Well, boo hoo hoo.

Atlanta in 1864

To quote General Sherman: “Talk thus to the Marines, but not to me.”

Oh, they want to complain about the occupation, do they? They send us an invitation to their pity party, and pout when we don’t R.S.V.P.

They slaughter the innocent, then try to say they’re victims.

Can’t speak for anyone else, but I resent the insult implied by people who tell me such things as if I am fool enough to believe them. Of course, Southerners are very sensitive to insults, but I’ve learned to resist such provocations. History teaches some hard lessons. Anyway . . .

If Democrats had their way, Trump would now be in prison. Instead, he’s a hero, and I’m not yet tired of all this winning. Are you?



 

Shop Electronics at Amazon

Save on Groceries and Everyday Essentials

Shop Amazon Basics

Office & School Supplies