The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Tumblrina Hot Take

Posted on | December 14, 2017 | 1 Comment

 

Political commentary from a 27-year-old feminist:

also progressive white men can go ahead and worry about the 72% of white men who voted for roy moore before they start in on the 63% of white women who did so, thanks

She wants everybody to know she’s a Scorpio.

Party of Science™ . . . And oh, she’s been on Tumblr a lloonnngg time, so here’s one of her rants from 2011:

Within our lovely little feminist community bubble, and with people I don’t know, I tend to just take a “live and let live”, “they may well have their reasons,” “I would never but it’s none of my business if you do” stance.
But my god if I haven’t had this conversation in real life so many times and been treated like an angry pariah for daring to suggest that the tradition of taking your husband’s last name is patriarchal and silly. Been told I’m “Thinking about it too much,” etc etc.
It’s all very well to encourage choosing your choice; and my feelings on the matter are that you should think about what you want to do and wherever your thoughts lead you is fine by me. But a lot of the time it isn’t a choice. Isn’t that the point we’re all trying to make here as feminists? That just because no one is saying to some women, “We will ostracize you or call off the wedding if you don’t take my last name,” just because they go along with it with no second thoughts, that doesn’t mean they are making a real choice. And most of the people I know who have changed their last names, it wasn’t necessarily a choice made with agency.
And considering we’ve all seen the statistics where ridiculous numbers of men say their future wives will have to change their last names… I don’t know. If a man said that to me, I’d bail on the wedding and never look back. For a lot of you it might be the same. But for some people that kind of entitlement to their wive’s identity is just so expected and it wouldn’t even make them flinch, but does that mean they’re really making a choice?
These thoughts are pretty scattered so I don’t know if what I’m saying is really coming across. But it’s kind of like the shaving-body-hair thing. We aren’t here to judge and hate on women, especially when it comes to women doing the sort of behaviors the whole enormity of the patriarchy is set up to make them do. But the best way to force someone to do something is to not force them at all, but to make them not even realize they’re making a choice, or to make them think it was their idea all along. So I think there is a lot to be said for speaking out to encourage women to think about whether or not to replace their name with their husband’s last name and urging them to strongly consider not doing it, since we still live in a society where it is so ingrained that women should be absorbed into their husbands’ identities and standing up against that is important.

Such arguments are, and always have been, utter nonsense. A woman’s maiden name is . . . what? Her father’s surname. There was no implied disparagement of my wife’s father when she took my name, nor was it any insult to me when my married daughter took her husband’s name. What this tradition represents is not “that women should be absorbed into their husbands’ identities,” but rather that marriage represents a perpetual unity of man and wife (“one flesh,” Genesis 2:24, Mark 10:8, Ephesians 5:31) and the family therefore shares a single identity.

Considered in historic context, as a custom arising among tribal herdsmen from Mesopotamia, the reasons for uniting husband and wife under the husband’s name, and passing that unitary identity along through their sons, are so obvious that I won’t bother with an explanation, as any educated person with a modicum of common sense already understands it perfectly. Why should anyone resent it? My mother’s family was certainly no less honorable than my father’s family, and my family is not less deserving of honor than my son-in-law’s family. In fact, two of our sons — James and Emerson — are named for ancestors on their mother’s side of the family, and Emerson’s middle name is Kirby in homage to my mother’s family. It is only a narrow-minded selfishness, disdainful of the value of inherited tradition and without regard for larger social interests, that inspires idiotic feminists to claim a married woman is being “oppressed” when she takes her husband’s name.

If a Tumblr feminist is really serious about eschewing “patriarchal” tradition, of course, she would never marry at all, and might emulate certain radical lesbians of the 1970s, e.g., “Elana Dykewomon” (née Nachman). This would not only spare the Tumblrina the dreadful experience of direct male oppression (because “PIV is always rape, OK?”), but it would also decrease the likelihood of her reproducing and thereby afflicting the rest of us with her offspring. Insanity is hereditary, as seen in the Tumblrina’s conversation with her mother:

last night I drank a bunch of whiskey with my mom, we talked about amazing women of color authors and my call to catholicism, and she showed me she has an intuitive understanding of intersectionality, anti-blackness, and the paradoxical position of white women in our society that makes us in so many ways “better off” than black men despite the existence of sexism bc of how we are protected and put on a pedestal
it was pretty interesting (she has no formal relationship to any of these kinds of politics, just personal relationships with loads of different people) and reminds me that people CAN overcome socialization and see on an intuitive and empathetic level that these complex forces of oppression exist, without the help of the “intellectual”/academic elite, so basically racist white feminists do not have ignorance as an excuse and are just parroting white supremacy because deep down they don’t want to lose their special status

Do you see what sort of schizophrenic word-salad young people are being fed by the education system? If your daughter ever started spewing this kind of gibberish, would you just play along with her? Or would you tell her that “these complex forces of oppression” are a politically inspired delusion, and ask her where she got these crazy ideas? It is mentally unhealthy to worry about problems beyond your control. Whatever you might say about “the paradoxical position of white women in our society,” you’re not going to solve that problem with your Tumblr blog. Her save-the-world sense of herself as a secular missionary for “social justice” is therefore symptomatic of psychiatric problems.

No surprise, really, that this Tumblrina has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and is prone to anxiety attacks. Why is she worrying about what percent of white people voted Republican in Alabama? Because other people on Tumblr are talking about it? Because her professors taught her that being concerned about racism is synonymous with moral virtue?

If you want to talk about “complex forces of oppression,” let’s talk about the oppression that compels taxpayers to provide money for an education system that turns kids into emotional cripples. Because that’s the real root of this woman’s problems. As with so many other people who share her “social justice” obsessions, she has been miseducated, taught that progressive activism is the whole purpose of human life, an attitude that is incompatible with success and happiness.

 

Category: Sex Trouble

New Study: Middle Easterners 34 Times More Likely to Fake Hate Incidents

Posted on | December 14, 2017 | Comments Off on New Study: Middle Easterners 34 Times More Likely to Fake Hate Incidents

HATE HOAXERS: (left to right) Darren Beach, Aisha Ismail, Cainin Milton.

Most fake “hate crimes” are committed by members of the group targeted by such hoaxes, according to a new study. The most likely perpetrators are black or of Middle Eastern ancestry, an analysis of more than 100 such incidents from July 2015 to December 2017 found that “by far the largest number (44) fabricated acts of bias against blacks”:

The next most common “victim” categories of fake bias crimes were Middle Easterners/Muslims (17), non-whites in general (13), and LGBT people (10). Sixty-four percent of the hoaxers are male.
In the FBI’s latest hate crimes report, blacks are overrepresented as offenders. They account for 26.1 percent of those cases in which the race of the perpetrator was known, meaning that they were 2.4 times more likely than non-blacks to commit hate crimes. . . .
In the case of hate-crime hoaxes, black overrepresentation is much greater. . . . [O]ver the last two-and­-a-half years, on a per capita basis, blacks were 13.3 times more likely than whites to commit hate-crime hoaxes, and Middle Easterners were 34.7 times more likely.
For the most part, it is correct to assume that bias-crime hoaxes are committed by a member of the group that was falsely targeted: gays commit anti-gay hate hoaxes, and blacks commit anti-black hate hoaxes.
Of cases with whites perpetrators, only 3 of the 18 committed hoaxes in which whites, as a race, were the targets of fake hate; the rest meant to draw sympathy to LGBT people, other non-white groups, or women. A few “progressives,” for example, have drawn swastikas or written racial slurs in the hope of evoking sympathy for non-whites or to justify increased anti-racist activity.

The study from American Renaissance was accompanied by an online database spreadsheet, as well as detailed case-by-case reports, including:

  • Darren William Beach Jr., a 26-year-old gay man who was charged with setting fire to a community center for LGBT youth after he became too old to participate in the program when he turned 25.
  • Aisha Ismail, a 22-year-old Muslim woman who was arrested and charged with starting a fire at the Islamic Center of Des Moines, Iowa.
  • Cainin Hakeem Milton, a 19-year-old black man who was arrested and charged for a spree of anti-black graffiti in South Carolina.

American Renaissance (AR) is a publication founded by Jared Taylor, author of the 1992 book Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. AR has been listed as a “hate group” by the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

 

Category: Crime, Gays, Islam, Racism

Fat, Gay and Stupid

Posted on | December 14, 2017 | 1 Comment

 

Say hello to Albert Maruna, a 22-year-old student at Youngstown State University in Ohio. Albert Maruna is evidently gay, and so stupid he doesn’t know that if you ever encounter a minor on the Internet trying to hook up for sex, it’s actually an undercover cop:

Maruna IV, 22, is charged with attempted unlawful sexual contact with a minor, disseminating matter harmful to juveniles, possessing criminal tools, and importuning.
Austintown police say Maruna started chatting through an online dating app with an undercover officer.
They say Maruna’s conversations were sexually graphic, he sent nude pictures of himself and he set up a meeting with someone whom he believed was an underage boy.
According to police, both agreed to get together on Tuesday, Dec. 12, and Maruna would bring lubricant, chicken alfredo and Sprite.
Police said Maruna traveled to Austintown, where he thought he’d be meeting the teen, when he got there he was arrested.
At the time of his arrest, police say Maruna was carrying an iPhone, a MAC book, three zip drives, a bottle of Astroglide lubrication, Vaseline lotion, two bottles of Sprite, and chicken alfredo in a Tupperware container.
Maruna is currently being held in the Mahoning County jail.

Oh, I’m sure Albert is going to be very popular in jail.

Chicken alfredo, Sprite and, uh, lubricant . . .

 

Category: Crime

Tumblrina ‘Intersectionality’

Posted on | December 14, 2017 | 1 Comment

 

Excuse me for returning to this bottomless well of feminist insanity, but here’s a Tumblr post that went viral last week:

I think one of my least favorite types of responses to people speaking up on sexual harassment and sexual assault is are articles like “in wake of weinstein, men wonder if hugging women still ok”, and comments like “this is why men don’t pursue women anymore”, “i don’t wanna work with women cause i don’t want a lawsuit”, or “i don’t even look at women anymore cause everything is sexual harassment”. this is a particular brand of rape culture, men acting as if women are overreacting, as if men don’t have the basic social skills to know the difference between wanted and unwanted advances, as if women simply setting boundaries is “cramping their style” and “emasculating” them, as if the rules of respecting women are super confusing, so confusing that they’re supposedly forcing men not to interact with us altogether.

this is an act they’ve been putting on for decades: playing stupid, pretending not to know better and then getting upset when we tell them what “better” is. if that doesn’t show you how emotional and emotionally manipulative they are, i don’t know what does.

 

Notice where “they” is used as an all-inclusive reference to males — men have been putting on an act, men are “emotionally manipulative.”

If any man categorically smeared women in this fashion, he’d be called out as a sexist, but on feminist Tumblr, this hateful anti-male rhetoric gets 40,000 notes in a matter of days. However, it’s important to ask, “Is this true?” That is to say, is her complaint factually accurate?

No, I’d say. Many men genuinely are confused and perplexed by the vehemence of what I’ve called the Sexual Harassment Apocalypse, where trivial offenses by men — making a risque joke at work, or just behaving in ways described vaguely as “creepy” — are conflated with very serious misconduct, up to and including rape. We can all agree, for example, that Louis C.K.’s habit of inviting women to his dressing room to watch him masturbate was wrong, but then we repeatedly see feminist writers who employ various pejorative terms (“misogyny,” “harassment,” “rape culture”) to lump this kind of arguably criminal behavior into the same category as the well-meaning schlub who says the wrong thing after having one too many cocktails at the office Christmas party.

However, when men call attention to this problem, voicing concerns about the dangers men face in a climate of sexual paranoia, the Tumblrina condemns those concerns as “a particular brand of rape culture.” How dare any man protest his innocence by saying he doesn’t have “the basic social skills to know the difference between wanted and unwanted advances”? And she almost instantly got 40,000 notes on this!

A persistent problem of feminist discourse is that the movement attracts women who are basically anti-male, so that the feminist audience will always give the loudest applause to the writer who denounces men in the most categorical terms. This is why writers like Andrea Dworkin are endlessly quoted by young feminists, and it’s also why so many leaders of campus sexual assault “awareness” organizations are lesbians. The feminist movement incentivizes hatred of males. No careful student of the movement is surprised to learn that, for example, Women’s Studies Professor Breanne Fahs (who claims the “stigma” of obesity is “connected to patriarchy, sexism, and the oppression of women”) is a lesbian who wrote a hagiographic book about Valerie Solanas, the man-hating psychotic who attempted to murder Andy Warhol. Nor are we surprised that Professor Fahs writes journal articles that attack “heteronormativity and heterosexual privilege” in the field of “sexuality studies.” Anyone who says a word in favor of heterosexuality has transgressed against “feminist thought,” according to Professor Fahs, because having sex with women makes men happy, and anything that makes men happy is wrong.

OK, she doesn’t say that in so many words, but read her work — or the work of any Women’s Studies professor, really — and it’s difficult to overlook this recurrent theme in feminist rhetoric. Whenever we enter one of these cyclical periods of feminist rage, such as that unleashed by the #MeToo hashtag in the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal, men who notice these expressions of seething resentment quite naturally express concern about the potential effect on their own lives. Feminists then mock these concerns as evidence of men being “clueless,” because this is another recurrent theme of feminist discourse, i.e., that men are so intellectual inferior they are incapable of understanding anything.

What we learn, if we study what feminists say, is that their rhetoric about “equality” is a deliberate falsehood. Feminism is based on a belief in male inferiority. The feminist believes herself to be so vastly superior to men that they are expected to sit silently while she lectures them on what’s wrong with them, namely everything. She needs no evidence whatsoever to accuse a man of “sexism,” because all men are sexist (a word that is simply a feminist synonym for “male”). Nothing a man might say in his own defense is considered valid by feminists, who reject the possibility that any man could ever be right about anything.

Any student of feminist rhetoric perceives that what actually motivates them is a sadistic desire to humiliate men, to punish men for being men — an ideology of hatred, manifesting an appetite for revenge: Jessica Valenti has a big nose, and she’s never going to forgive men for that.

“Not guilty” — I plead innocent, your honor. I’m not responsible for Jessica Valenti’s childhood insecurities, because I was nowhere near New York City when she was growing up there, envious of snub-nosed blue-eyed blonde girls (and hating the boys who liked those girls better). I’ve never met Jessica Valenti, and so I can’t be blamed for her miserable self-pity, her substance abuse, the men who catcalled her, etc.

“Not guilty” — men are allowed to say that, right? We have the right to ask that we be judged as individuals, rather than lumped into a category and condemned collectively as part of the “patriarchy.”

A man need not have lived a life of sainthood to reject this collective guilt trip, which is based on a feminist ideology that blames “male power” for everything wrong in the world. Is some nerdy college boy to blame for the sins of Harvey Weinstein? Is the $12-an-hour day laborer at fault for the predations of Bill Cosby or Bill Clinton? You might think so, if you pay attention to feminist rhetoric condemning men quite generally as perpetrators of “rape culture.” But I digress . . .

“Intersectionality” is sometimes used as by feminists as an excuse for hypocrisy in the name of progressive solidarity. For example, when O.J. Simpson murdered his wife, the National Organization of Women (NOW) punished its L.A. chapter president, Tammy Bruce, for organizing a protest focusing on Simpson’s history of domestic violence. It was wrong to condemn O.J., according to NOW leaders, because violence against women is acceptable when a black guy does it.

OK, they didn’t say that in so many words, but that’s how “intersectionality” actually operates. Feminists jumped on the #BlackLivesMatter bandwagon, smearing police as racist monsters, unconcerned that demonizing cops might jeopardize women’s safety. Feminists expect us to believe that the epidemic of criminal violence in Chicago, for example, is good for women. Because “intersectionality.”

Guess what the same Tumblrina has to say about black men?

Black boys need to be taught to value and respect themselves more often

I also wish you guys would stop saying things like “black men are trash”, “black men ain’t shit”, or worse, “black men are worthless” etc. cause it’s ugly and counter-productive

 

Yep, the Tumblrina is black, so while she’s willing to engage in feminist man-hating generally, she wants to exempt black men. But wait! She’s got more “intersectionality”:

We rarely use this word when it comes to men, but it’s true, a lot of straight men are easy. like they have very low standards for who they sleep with, how they do it, they don’t care whether she’s clean, whether she’s std-free, whether she’s on the pill, whether she’s nice and treats them with a basic level of respect, nothing, they only really care about how she looks, if that. literally anyone who gives them attention, they’ll take it, and it’s really sad, and that’s what we mean when we say they don’t really value their lives. and i honestly think their reckless behavior stems from something deep within themselves. idk what it could be, but i have theories, maybe not being raised the right way, maybe peer pressure, maybe deep rooted self-esteem issues, idk

To which a gay Hispanic man replied:

Gender roles + that’s how male depression manifests
Male depression is markedly different than most people’s conception of depression, with self-medication through drugs, and sex, and reckless behavior and it frankly needs more attention.

 

So, “straight men . . . have very low standards” and engage in “reckless behavior” because of “deep rooted self-esteem issues,” according to our intersectional Tumblrina, a claim that inspired the gay man to blame “depression” and “gender roles.” These theoretical speculations, however, lack any basis in fact. Go check CDC data on the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases, and you’ll discover that it’s not “straight men” who have the highest rates. For example, 48% of black females are infected with herpes, compared to less than 9% of white males. And as for gay men, they “are disproportionately impacted by syphilis, HIV, and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs),” according to the CDC. In other words, the facts are 180 degrees opposite of what is claimed on Tumblr.

Need I remind you that Tumblr is “effectively worthless”?



 

Category: Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 12.13.17

Posted on | December 13, 2017 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 12.13.17

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Irish People Try Hanukkah Food
Twitchy: Trey Gowdy Goes Off During Hearing On FBI Agents’ Anti-Trump Texts
Louder With Crowder: Pediatrician Nails It – Transgenderism Is A Danger To Children
Reuters: Feds Not Granting Loan Relief To Defrauded Students (h/t NeoWayland)


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Podcast #67 – The Sit Down Money Episode
American Power: Volokh Conspiracy Leaves WaPo, Moves to Reason.com, also, Jews Targeted In Sweden
American Thinker: Does Mueller Need Blood?
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Hump Day News
BattleSwarm: Quick Impressions – TX-02 Congressional Race
BLACKFIVE: Robert “Concrete Bob” Miller – Someone You Should Have Known
Bring The HEAT: The Battle Of The River Plate
Da Tech Guy: And Now For The Roy Moore Post-Mortems, also, A Golden Opportunity To Sink The MSM Once and For All Thrown Away
Don Surber: USA Today Freaks Over A Tweet
Dustbury: In Swiftness And In Health
The Geller Report: EU Begins Court Action Against Czech Republic, Hungary, And Poland For Not Taking Enough Muslim Migrants
Hogewash: Strange Bedfellows, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Joe For America: Lawyer Caught Offering Woman $200K To Accuse Trump Of Sexual Assault
JustOneMinute: Lest You Are Wavering…
Legal Insurrection: Gowdy Grills Deputy AG Over Conflicts Of Interest In Mueller Investigation, also, Tweetin’ Texan Don Willett Confirmed To 5th Circuit Despite Democrat “War On Women” Nonsense
Michelle Malkin: Still Dawdling Over Deadly Diversity Visas
Power Line: Trump Was Right About The Intelligence Agencies, also, Ms. Smith Goes To Washington
Shark Tank: Sexual Assault Allegations Made Against US Florida Attorney Thomas Mulvihill
Shot In The Dark: So What You Have Here This Morning…
The Political Hat: Twelve Posts Of Christmas, Day 1
This Ain’t Hell: Foxhole Sean Carrigan, also, Navy Apologizes For Sky Penis
Weasel Zippers: Sheila Jackson Lee Congratulates “Doug Moore” On Alabama Senate Victory, also, University Of Iowa Kicks Christian Group Off Campus For Its Religious Beliefs
Megan McArdle: Right-Sizing The Power Of Republican Insurgents
Mark Steyn: O Tempora, O Moores


Moira Greyland, The Last Closet – The Dark Side Of Avalon
Twelve Days Of Deals
Kindle Unlimited – 30% Off

Category: Linkagery

In The Mailbox: 12.12.17

Posted on | December 12, 2017 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 12.12.17

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Senator Gillibrand Getting Blowback From Fellow Democrats
Twitchy: Senator Duckworth Proves Herself A Nasty Troll In Just Two Trump Tweets
Louder With Crowder: Family of Port Authority Bomber Angry…At Law Enforcement?
Stars & Stripes: 44,000 “Unknown” Military Personnel Reportedly Stationed Around The World (h/t NeoWayland)


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Communism Attempts To Reinvent Itself As Universal Basic Income
American Thinker: Gay Wedding Cakes Not A Constitutional Right
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily Not-So-Smart Bomb News
BattleSwarm: Filing Deadline Passes – Quick Impressions On Texas Statewide Races
BLACKFIVE: Christmas Stories
Bring The HEAT: How Low Can You Go?
CDR Salamander: Not That There Isn’t Time, It Just Isn’t A Priority
Da Tech Guy: Fake News & The Pentagon Papers, also, Man Trap
Don Surber: Today’s American Hero
Dustbury: Lustful Little Creep
The Geller Report: Wife Of Demoted DOJ Official Actually Worked For Anti-Trump Dossier Firm In 2016, also, UK Woman Whose Head Was Smashed By Muslim Attackers Stunned By Wall Of Silence
Hogewash: The Great Red Sport Plunge, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Jammie Wearing Fools: Trump Attorney Calls For New Special Prosecutor To Investigate Team Mueller’s Collusion
Joe For America: Pentagon Begins First Ever Financial Audit – Congress Is Terrified
JustOneMinute: Holding On For A Hero
Legal Insurrection: CNN’s Jim Acosta Whines About Press Secretary Being Mean, also, Malmo – The Canary In The Coal Mine Warning Of Euro-Islamist Anti-Semitism
Power Line: Glenn Reynolds Asks A Good Question – Mueller Won’t Answer, also, Port Authority Bombing Puts Spotlight On Chain Migration
Shark Tank: New Anti-Sugar Policy Bill Will Kill Florida Jobs
Shot In The Dark: There Is No Justice In Saint Paul
The Jawa Report: Soon! also, Caption Contest – Krispy Crotch Episode II Edition
The Political Hat: The Woke Obsolescence Of Parenthood
This Ain’t Hell: Cpl. Dungan, Sgt. Erler, And L/Cpl. Rosario Saving The World, also, Clarence Beavers RIP, also also, Judd Legum Is Obviously Not A Veteran
Weasel Zippers: Fauxcahontas Botches Attack On Trump, Calls Sen. Gillibrand A Slut, also, Federal Judge Recuses Herself From Second Fusion GPS Case
Megan McArdle: Stop Squeezing Prisoners’ Families For Cash
Mark Steyn: Don’t Send Your Emoji Out Without Her Hijab, also, The Biggest Story Of Our Time


Twelve Days Of Deals
Shop Amazon Devices – Deals Starting at $29.99
Shop Amazon – Holiday Deals $20 off Kindle Paperwhite

Category: Linkagery

In The Mailbox: 12.11.17

Posted on | December 11, 2017 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 12.11.17

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
Ninety Miles From Tyranny: The 90 Miles Mystery Box Episode #102
EBL: #FakeNews CNN – Walking Back Another Bombshell
Twitchy: Dana Loesch OWNS Chelsea Handler For Her Very Personal Attack On Sarah Sanders
Louder With Crowder: Smug Fan Talks Crap On Hunting, Gets Owned By Chris Pratt


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Tar Baby
American Power: The Rise Of N.W.A. And The Dawn Of Gangsta Rap, also, Rupert Darwall, Green Tyranny
American Thinker: No One Ever Drowned In Roy Moore’s Car
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye, Blue Monday
BattleSwarm: Have Democrats Found Their 2018 Joe Sadler?
BLACKFIVE: James Rollins, The Demon Crown
Bring The HEAT: The Landing Ship Dock
CDR Salamander: SECNAV Spencer – Stow The Optimism, There Will Be No Naval Renaissance
Da Tech Guy: Here They Come To Save The Day! Introducing The White (SJW) Nonsense Roundup, also, A Pro-Life, Pro-2A Republican Flips Senate Seat In MA Special Election
Don Surber: Skier Feuds With Trump, Promptly Injures Herself
Dustbury: Strange Search Engine Queries, also, I’m 70 And I Know Just What I Want
The Geller Report: Devout Muslim Identified As Port Authority Bomber, also, Intifada Announced From Sweden – “We’re Going To Shoot The Jews”
Hogewash: Programming Announcement, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Joe For America: Huge Pedophile Ring Uncovered At Disney World
JustOneMinute: Moral Clarity Or Political Expediency?
Legal Insurrection: Federal Judge Rules Military Must Accept Transgender Recruits, also, Mario Batali Leaves Cooking Empire After Sexual Harassment Allegations
Power Line: Garrison Keillor Flushed Down The Memory Hole, also, Why Doesn’t Daniel Shaver’s Life Matter?
Shark Tank: Poll – Florida’s Least Liked Congresscritter Is…
Shot In The Dark: Hypothetical Exercise
The Jawa Report: Explosion Near NYC Port Authority (Update: Splodeydope Expired), also, Fitna Strikes Amaq
The Political Hat: European Christianity As Cultural Cosplay
This Ain’t Hell: A Sailor’s Staged Racial Vandalism, also, Army Wins!
Weasel Zippers: Group Organizing Trump Accusers Backed By…George Soros, also, Fun Fact Of The Day – 35,000 Jihadis In Uk, Equal To Two WW2 Divisions
Mark Steyn: Polytechnique, also, White Christmas


Twelve Days Of Deals
Dash Daily Delights – A new Dash Button on sale each day
Shop Amazon Devices – Save $5 on Fire TV Stick

Category: Linkagery

Socialist Tumblrina Witches

Posted on | December 11, 2017 | 3 Comments

 

Sara is a 19-year-old bisexual socialist witch who likes cats and attends college somewhere in New England. She posts a lot of selfies, including pictures of herself dressed as Hecate, pagan goddess of death. Like every other pouty teenage Goth girl with a Tumblr blog, Sara fancies herself a writer and self-published a science fiction novel in 2014. So . . .

An atheist guy named Damien whose Tumblr blog has an obscene anti-police title got a question: “what does MRA mean? I haven’t heard of it before,” to which he supplied a deliberately insulting answer:

Men’s rights activist
Generally, they’re men that spend their time complaining that they’re being oppressed by women and feminism because feminism isn’t doing the work 100% for men.

Is this a fair description of MRAs? Never mind. As I’ve said, I’m not an MRA because I reject the identity-politics concept of group “rights,” which is fundamentally what’s wrong with feminism. While agreeing with many MRAs in their critique of feminism, I consider it foolish to create a mirror-obverse of feminism’s totalitarian ideology. Meanwhile, an asexual feminist Tumblrina amplified Damien’s anti-MRA message:

While simultaneously not doing any Actual advocacy that needs doing. Male rape goes under reported, gender roles are harmful and stifling, prostrate and testicular cancer (not to be a biological essentialist but) kill people, trans men have low life expectancy and difficulty accessing resources, gay men have to deal with fucking mike fucking pence as their VP
Men could do with so much advocacy but MRAs just wanna know why pretty women aren’t objects anymore. Unfair!!

Who says “gender roles are harmful and stifling”? Who wastes time worrying about testicular cancer or the life expectancy of “trans men,” etc.? You see how, in the mind of the asexual feminist, what MRAs should be doing is “advocacy” on these issues, instead of complaining that “pretty women aren’t objects anymore.” Rather than to bother critiquing the asexual feminist’s concept of what MRAs are about, however, I’ll just move on to quote Sara the bisexual socialist witch’s reaction:

THIS IS WHY I FUCKING HATE MRAs. THIS. Because men DO need advocacy for SO MANY THINGS and these fucking washed up fedora-toting shitwipes are pissed that they (understandably) can’t get a date omfg

 

So, according to the 19-year-old bisexual socialist witch, MRAs are “washed up fedora-toting” obscenities whose chief motivation is that they “can’t get a date.” This is further confirmation of Vox Day’s Third Law: “SJWs always project.” Which is to say that, by portraying her chosen enemies as primarily motivated by sexual dissatisfaction, Sara tells us about her own motivation. Sara is pro-abortion because she is a feminist who hates children and never wants to have babies (which may explain her fascination with the pagan Goddess of Death).

Why did Sara, who was raised Catholic, turn into a pro-abortion bisexual socialist witch who hates children? Does she have some sort of psychiatric problem? Is she possessed by demonic spirits? Well, as I’ve said, Feminism Is Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It, and Sara is one of its victims, along with the many millions of human lives destroyed in the name of “women’s rights.”



 

 

Category: Abortion, Sex Trouble
« go back — keep looking »