The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Fort Sumter 1861: ‘Strike a Blow!’

Posted on | April 12, 2011 | 27 Comments

Today, a most momentous anniversary is the subject of my column at The American Spectator:

Visitors to Princeton, New Jersey, may find there the grave of a former New York state judge who died in 1919 at the advanced age of 90. Judge Roger Pryor was not from New Jersey, however, nor was he a native of New York. A Virginian by birth, as a young man Pryor had been one of the Old Dominion’s foremost secessionist “fire-eaters.” Impatient with Virginia’s reluctance to secede from the Union, Pryor traveled to South Carolina in April 1861 and gave a speech urging the newborn Confederacy to resist Abraham Lincoln’s attempt to reinforce the U.S. Army contingent holding the fort that commanded Charleston harbor.
“Strike a blow!” Pryor cried, assuring his “immense and enthusiastic audience” that if the crisis led to war, Virginia would secede immediately — “within an hour by Shrewsbury clock,” he said. . . .

Please read the whole thing. And by all means, sing along!

And here, by the way, is that grave in Princeton, N.J.:

Bookmark and Share

Comments

  • Datechguy

    And with all due respect Stacy, that advice was even worse than the advise given by some smart fellow to a certain first term president saying: “Hey Gaddafi is about to fall, you might want to put out a statement”

  • Pingback: Datechguy's Blog » Blog Archive » Fort Sumter and bad advice

  • http://twitter.com/marriedrambler Andrew Patrick

    All the same, I believe I shall remind my students of it today.

  • http://thecampofthesaints.org Bob Belvedere

    Jesus Christ and General Jackson, Stacy, you missed a more important anniversary – at least according to the Useful Idiots at Google.

  • Anonymous

    In point of fact, Pete, Pryor’s counsel was exactly right, if the problem to be solved was how to force the upper South to choose sides in the crisis. As of April 1861, there were seven Confederate states, all in the Deep South, while the upper south stood aloof.

    Virginia was then the most populous of the Southern states and it must be remembered that Virginia’s border then ran all the way to the Ohio River. Perhaps more importantly, if Virginia joined the Confederacy, the new nation’s border on the Potomac River would immediately put Washington, D.C., in jeopardy.

    While Virginia did not secede “within an hour by Shrewsbury clock” from the opening of the Sumter bombardment, she did vote to secede five days later, on April 17. Virginia’s accession to the Confederacy influenced Arkansas and Tennessee to secede (May 6 and May 7). It is remarkable that North Carolina resisted the secessionist tide until May 20.

    The great loss to the Confederates, however, was the hesitancy of Kentucky. If the Bluegrass State seceded, that would put the Confederate frontier just across the river from Cincinnati. And it was Anderson’s shrewd leadership that played a crucial role in that affair. But entire books have been written about that subject, so I’ll leave it to you whether you wish to investigate the subject further.

    As to the general unwisdom of the South firing the first shot of the war, however, you are in agreement with no less an authority than that arch-secessionist Robert Toombs of Georgia, who counseled Jefferson David thus: “The firing on that fort will inaugurate a civil war greater than any the world has yet seen, and I do not feel competent to advise you. … Mr. President, at this time it is suicide, murder, and you will lose us every friend we have in the North. You will wantonly strike a hornets’ nest which extends from mountains to ocean, Legions now quiet will stream out and sting us to death. It is unnecessary. It puts us in the wrong. It is fatal.”

    So you agree with Toombs, and are therefore eligible to be denounced as a neo-Confederate in 3, 2, 1 …

  • Pingback: Fort Sumter

  • http://twitter.com/marriedrambler Andrew Patrick

    How Tombs figured that secession was going to happen absent a display of arms remains a mystery eternal. But then those fire-eaters were masters of ignoring reality…

  • Pingback: Sputnik or Fort Sumter? : The Other McCain

  • Anonymous

    No more so than those thinking we’ll restrain the government absent one.

  • http://twitter.com/marriedrambler Andrew Patrick

    Be careful what you wish for.

  • http://twitter.com/marriedrambler Andrew Patrick

    Be careful what you wish for.

  • http://thecampofthesaints.org Bob Belvedere

    Damn eloquent essay at TAS, Stace.

    Linked to at:
    A Long Twilight Struggle

  • Anonymous

    The War for Southern Independence was the first modern war in many respects, such as deeming private property and the civilian economy as part of the national war effort and therefore a legitimate target. This conflict is sometimes characterized as the first “Total War”. At the same time much stock was put in the notion of chivalry by the protagonists of both sides. This dichotomy worked very much to the South’s disadvantage. After embracing the role of the aggressor at Charleston the South then performed a policy about face by trying to be perceived as and acting solely on defense for well over a year. The refusal to follow the panicked retreat of the Union forces from 1St Manassas right into Washington was a missed opportunity to end the war successfully. Waiting till September 1862 to take the war to the North allowed the North’s long term advantages to prevail over the South.
    Kudos to Stacy for using the correct names of the battles here and in your AS article.

  • Anonymous

    Not wishing for it; just not finding any examples from history that avoid it.

  • Anonymous

    Not wishing for it; just not finding any examples from history that avoid it.

  • Pingback: This Day in History: Civil War Begins at Fort Sumter, 1861 | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED

  • Anonymous

    Your point about the failure of the Confederates to push their advantage after First Manassas is, of course, an argument made by many then and since. Just last night I skimmed through Taylor’s Destruction and Reconstruction (which I highly recommend, BTW) and he made the same point. An aggressive pursuit toward Washington would probably, at the very least, led the Yankees to flee their advanced fortifications on the Virginia side of the Potomac. And Jackson was in favor of mounting an immediate drive across the Potomac from the Shenandoah Valley, as Lee did immediately after both Second Manassas (1862) and Chancellorsville (1863).

    Taylor also pointed out that the Southern governments, including his own state of Louisiana, contemplated a short war, and thus failed to take measures that — if undertaken at the outset — would have spared them much woe later. Taylor cites as example (a) the failure to purchase arms overseas before the Federal naveal blockade became effective, and (b) failure of the Confederacy to immediately levy a war tax, instead relying entirely on loans (bonds) to pay for the war.

    All of this, of course, is the sort of “what-if” stuff that leads through the looking-glass into hypothetical Wonderland. In studying history, it is more important (a) to examine the past mistakes of others, so that we may ourselves avoid repeating such mistakes, and (b) to note that there were people who, even then, saw these mistakes as mistakes, but whose counsel was ignored.

  • Pingback: The WyBlog

  • Anonymous

    One of the lessons to be leaned is that a cold blooded and unsentimental appraisal of the relative strengths and deficiencies cannot be sacrificed to other considerations such as attempting to preserve the Moral High ground. To relate this to here and now much has been made about not putting time limits on military operations. However the length of time Americans will tolerate a war no matter the justification isn’t infinite. One of the considerations in the decision to nuke Japan was a growing fear of war weariness. For the South time was perhaps it’s most formidable enemy and relying on being in the right couldn’t change that. Attempting to keep the American People from experiencing any sense of being at war as we had in WW2 only marginally extends the length of time we have to achieve our goals in a military conflict.
    A coldblooded and unsentimental appraisal before deciding to intervene in Libya would have revealed that the extensive list of things we are not willing to do will surely prevent us from achieving the very vague goals we have set. No matter how strong our “humanitarian” impulses the self imposed limits we’ve imposed on the use of might, assures that being in the right won’t make might.

  • http://2011.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

    One of the lessons to be learned is that a cold blooded and unsentimental appraisal of the relative strengths and deficiencies cannot be sacrificed to other considerations such as attempting to preserve the Moral High ground.

    And this is why Unconditional Surrender Grant and War Is Hell Sherman are now credited with having brought the war into its closing phases.

    Or as Malcolm Reynolds put it, “It’s my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of sumbitch or another.”

  • Anonymous

    Aren’t we all?

  • http://twitter.com/marriedrambler Andrew Patrick

    The problem with any First Bull Run “What-If’s” is that the Confederate Army was just as green as the Federal one, and were almost as disorganized by victory as the other was by defeat. An attempt to make that 25-mile march and besiege a city might well have been disastrous. Keep in mind that the Southrons had a joint-commanded army that day.

  • http://twitter.com/1389 1389

    Ooookaaayyyy. The score at half time is Union 1, Confederacy 0. But the war is by no means over. It’s the end game that decides it all, and might does not make right. Sometimes it is worth fighting for what is right even if you do not win, because later generations may remember your struggle, renew it, and eventually prevail.

    For the record, yes, I am a secessionist, and I certainly don’t mind being called a neo-Confederate, but no, I am not a racist.

  • Anonymous

    My point is that war is the means to a political/social/economic/religious end. However that end can often be allowed to distort or subvert the means to the point of failure for the end and that this still happens all too often today.

  • http://2011.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

    Shhh.

  • http://2011.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

    That’s fine, as long as it doesn’t end up with your great great great great great grandson strapping a bomb to himself and self-detonating in a pizza parlor on a Friday night.

  • Dave

    I’ve always liked the Bonnie Blue flag as a song. When the whole Tea Party started, I thought it would be a good anthem, except for the implied support of slavery and the endorsement of secession. When I saw this post and watched the you tube video, having a few minutes on my hands I re-wrote it as a Tea Party anthem. What do you think?

    “We are a band of brothers
    And native to the soil,
    Fighting for the property
    We gained by honest toil;
    And when our rights were threatened,
    The cry rose near and far–
    “Hurrah for the Gadson Flag
    Fly proudly from our spar!”

    CHORUS: Hurrah! Hurrah!
    Individual rights hurrah!
    Hurrah for the Gadson Flag
    Fly proudly from our spar.

    While the D.C elite,
    Were faithful to their trust,
    Like friends and like brothers
    Both kind were we and just;
    But now, when Federal treachery
    Attempts our rights to mar,
    We hoist on high the Gadson Flag
    Fly proudly from our spar.–CHORUS

    First gallant Rick Santelli
    cried out from the exchange,
    The people followed quickly,
    rejecting this new “change”.
    Alsaka’s native daughter,
    inspired many more
    All raised on high the Gadson Flag
    Fly proudly from our spar.–CHORUS

    Ye men of valor, gather round
    The banner of our fight;
    From home to halls of Congress
    The statist foe we smite.
    We shall oppose the president,
    his cronies and his tzars;
    Now rally round the Gadson Flag
    Fly proudly from our spar.–CHORUS

    And then in old Virginia–
    progressives met their fate–
    Along with blue New Jersey
    showed reforms can not wait;
    Impelled by their example,
    Now other states prepare
    To hoist on high the Gadson Flag
    Fly proudly from our spar.–CHORUS

    Then cheer, boys, cheer;
    Raise the joyous shout,
    The two-ten midterms proved our case
    There is no remaining doubt;
    And let another rousing cheer
    For freedom’s light be given,
    “Don’t tread on me” from the Gadson Flag
    Flys proudly from our spar.–CHORUS

    Then here’s to our Republic,
    Strong are we and brave;
    Like patriots of old we’ll fight
    Our rule of law to save.
    And rather than submit to shame,
    To die we would prefer;
    So cheer for the Gadson Flag
    Fly proudly from our spar.–CHORUS

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE