The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Deadline Loometh, and the Raven Is Croaking Brett Kimberlin’s Name

Posted on | May 20, 2012 | 93 Comments


Three days of exposure — “The Army of Davids” effect that the Lonely Conservative cleverly invoked — looks like it was enough to push convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin right over the edge. After nearly two years of Kimberlin apparently stalking and harassing his adversaries, the sudden burst of online publicity occasioned by Aaron Walker (aka Worthing) writing up a 28,000-word account of his own legal dispute with Kimberlin seems to have done the trick.

Remember that the “Breitbart Unmasked” Web site has denied — in a Twitter colloquy with me Thursday night — being run by Brett Kimberlin, which Worthing, Patterico and others long suspected.

OK, asked and answered — the denial is duly noted. Why, then, does that site exhibit such an obsessive interest in attacking those who tell the truth about Kimberlin? And why would the recent flurry of attention to Kimberlin’s activities cause Not Brett Kimberlin (as I’ve begun to think of “Breitbart Unmasked”) to post an unhinged 467-word rant on Saturday afternoon? Quoting that rant in its entirety:

Yes, This is Aaron Justin Walker Attorney at Law who blogs as Aaron Worthing @AaronWorthing and is a major Islamophobe who hates Muslims with a passion. He runs a blog called which is now set to private while he battles it out with the non profit Velvet Revolution, who had called him out on his Islamophobia. This is the face of dark evil. This is the man who would assume the mantel of launching a major assault on the institutional left, and with it a solid non-profit organization whose work has helped tens of thousands of people gain a better understanding of the process of voting and how that system has become corrupted by the influence of corporate money into the system. This is the man who has taken upon himself to launch an all out attack on everything that the left stands for. His lies are legend. His claims against Velvet Revolution and its foundations are nothing short of an attack on everything the left holds dear. Over the course of the next few weeks we will document everyone involved in this plot against this small non-profit organization that has taken everyone from Karl Rove, to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to the out of control U.S. Chamber of Commerce to task. Yes, this small non-profit has called for massive investigations against these behemoths of the organized right to hold them accountable to the people. And because of that the right has responded with a full on outrageous assault on this non-profit in an effort to destroy everything they have accomplished. They call it #WAR. They call it #IAMANDREWBREITBART they call it a total commitment. OK, if its total commitment you want, it will be total commitment you will get.
Velvet Revolution has worked hard at dealing with this issue with the courts, and has contacted the FBI, the Attorney Generals Office, and everyone else that one can go to seek relief. The end result is that all of the parties that have been approached, contacted, or otherwise utilized, have all said that this is a battle they will not get involved in. So that is the way it will be. This will be a man to man knock down drag out fight for the hearts and minds, and a battle it will be. The message to the right wing extremists out there from BU is this: If you think we are going to be punked out and or bend over and let you stick it in then you are dead wrong. The rules you set up say that you and you only can attack people and get away with it, well, OK. Stand back and let loose the dogs of war then..
I hope you get that message loud and clear. Deal with it…

Oh, you are so frightened, aren’t you, Mr. Not Brett Kimberlin? Kind of externalizing and projecting your sociopathic habits on others, eh?

Horrified at the prospect of exposure, aren’t you? Trying to rally everybody around to protect your dishonest felonious self by conflating your own narrow interests with “the institutional left,” and exaggerating Aaron Walker into an all-powerful Right-Wing Ringleader, whom you accuse of orchestrating “all out attack on everything that the left stands for” and “everything the left holds dear” — like blowing up innocent people with bombs, for example?


Your liberal buddies might be stupid, but I don’t think they’re so stupid they can’t recognize you as the selfish gutless weasel you are.

Let’s just state a fact that should be blindingly obvious: Stalking, harassing and attempting to intimidate bloggers who tell the truth about Brett Kimberlin’s notorious criminal history is not the kind of philanthropic activity for which federal law grants tax-exempt status.

Yesterday I posted links to the two most recent IRS Form 990’s for Kimberlin’s 501(c)3 organization, the Justice Through Music Project (JTMP), for which Kimberlin has collected $1.8 million since 2005, reporting $223,739 in contributions for 2010. If you’ll go to Page 7 of JTMP’s 2010 IRS filing (link is to PDF document), you will see that Kimberlin reported a salary of $19,500 for his full-time 40-hour-a-week job as JTMP’s director.

Forty hours a week. Full-time. Says so right there on the IRS Form 990 signed by Kimberlin “under penalty of law,” etc.

While thus serving as full-time director of a 501(c)3 non-profit, however, Kimberlin is also an “interested party” in the 501(c)4 non-profit Velvet Revolution, the director of which is Brad “Bradblog” Friedman. Now, if you will look at the IRS 2010 filing for Velvet Revolution (PDF), you’ll see that on line 38, they answer “yes” to this question:

“Did the organization borrow from, or make any loans to, any officer, director, trustee, or key employee or were any such loans made in a prior year and still outstanding at the end of the tax year covered by this return?”

Answering “yes” to question 38 required Velvet Revolution to attach Schedule L, “Transactions With Interested Persons,” wherein we discover that this 501(c)4 received a $4,500 loan from — OK, you guessed, didn’t you? — Brett Kimberlin. For the purpose of “paying bills.”

(CORRECTION: Dianna Deeley in the comments tells me I got this wrong, mistaking a loan from Kimberlin to Velvet Revolution for a loan from VR to Kimberlin. Fixed now. — RSM.)

So, riddle me this, Batman: How was it that Brett Kimberlin was serving as full-time director of the 501(c)3 Justice Through Music Project in 2010, while simultaneously serving as an “officer, director, trustee, or key employee” of the 501(c)4 Velvet Revolution. And why did he give them a $4,500 loan for “paying bills”?

Three words: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

Stipulate that there may be an entirely innocent explanation for this, and that we have no reason to believe that this apparent double-dipping by Kimberlin violated any actual law or regulation. But to cite noted legal scholar Ricky Ricardo, “You got some ‘splain’ to do, Lucy.”

Furthermore, the stated non-profit purpose of these organizations — the work which justifies their tax-exempt status — has no apparent relationship to the stuff they are accused of doing.

For example, why was Brett Kimberlin suing a blogger named Seth Allen? It was Kimberlin’s suit against Allen, remember, which led to the January courthouse encounter between Aaron Walker and Kimberlin that finally blew the lid off this mess. How is it that Kimberlin, while supposedly toiling 40 hours a week as director of JTMP and also being an “officer, director, trustee, or key employee” of Velvet Revolution, finds himself with enough spare time to go around suing measly bloggers nobody ever heard of before?

Who was Seth Allen until tort-happy Kimberlin decided to engage in an evident campaign of “lawfare” harassment against him?

Swear to God: I’ve been a full-time conservative blogger since March 2008 and never heard of Seth Allen until his name turned up in Aaron Worthing’s post Thursday. Exactly what did this hitherto unknown blogger do, that he became the object of this legal blitzkrieg by Kimberlin, who tells the IRS he’s working 40 hours a week as full-time director of a 501(c)3 tax-exempt non-profit, and who is also somehow simultaneously doing quite valuable work for 501(c)4 tax-exempt non-profit Velvet Revolution, yet finds time out of his busy day to go chasing after Seth Allen and declaring Aaron Worthing “The Face of Evil”?

Something is not adding up here, OK? Frankly, it reeks to high heaven, and I sure as hell ain’t the only one noticing the putrid stench emanating from the general direction of Brett Kimberlin. It smells a lot like the acrid odor of desperate crazed fear, don’t you think?

Aaron Worthing writes today about the “Streisand Effect,” by which Kimberlin’s attempt to suppress the truth has had the opposite effect.

More to come in a bit, but meanwhile, think about something a little birdie told me: When Democrat political operative Neal Rauhauser made an appearance in a New Jersey court Tuesday for a proceeding related to a criminal harassment complaint, guess who showed up at the courthouse with the defendant Rauhauser?

Yeah: Convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin — or at least that’s what the little birdie says, and we have not yet seen any denial of that claim from “Breitbart Unmasked” Not Brett Kimberlin.

UPDATE: This is a huge story, and the problem — the reason it’s been fought out almost unnoticed in the blogosphere and on Twitter — is that it has so many different aspects that any attempt to tell the whole story all at once is nearly impossible.

As I’ve said before in trying to explain complicated weird stuff like this, when crazy things start happening, any person who tries to tell the story may sound crazy, because it’s hard to believe stuff like this really happens: Barbra Streisand gives money to a convicted terrorist? Crazy. Aforesaid terrorist starts getting his fingers into all kinds of pies, including WeinerGate and sundry lurid accusations against James O’Keefe? Crazy. Terrorist joins forces with Democrat campaign operative, pushing bogus legal hassles against a Los Angeles County deputy district attorney? Crazy.

Here I have just touched a few points on the tip of a vast submerged iceberg of craziness in this story. Yesterday’s 2,800-word “Joe Friday”-style report attempting to summarize clearly the main thread of the saga took me 13 hours to write and edit. And I was so busy yesterday, I didn’t even have time to do linkbacks to most of our many blogger friends who’ve linked that story.

Meanwhile, several bloggers who’ve been pushing on this Kimberlin/Rauhauser angle for months are kind of peeved at me for not having linked the work they’ve done. My apologies:

  1. There’s a crapload of this stuff scattered all over the place;
  2. Sources inform me of all kinds of internecine rivalries and mistrust among these bloggers, some of whom have said nasty stuff about Breitbart or other of my friends; and
  3. Kimberlin/Rauhauser have thrown up a lot of smear stuff about some of these bloggers, which I don’t have time to vet.

Most of (3), I’m sure, is just the usual smear stuff, but especially on yesterday’s main “Joe Friday” article, I didn’t want to muck it up with links to people whom I haven’t had an opportunity to vet, which might have given Kimberlin & Co. a chance to say, “A-ha! You cited so-and-so, who has three DUIs, two bankruptcies and a divorce” — you see what I’m saying, eh?

So, I’m not trying to glory-hog or ignore work done by others. I was just trying to boil down the main Kimberlin story into a tight narrative, so that the average reader could understand it and perceive the newsworthy relevance. Meanwhile, just for a sample of some of the stuff that’s being going on for months, here’s Dave in Queens from Feb. 7:

Ron Brynaert recently became a frontpaged blogger at BradBlog. Brad Friedman is a co-founder of Velvet Revolution. Hmmm. . . .
According to a court document from my case, it appears, imho, that by no later than December 21st, Neal Rauhauser had already obtained Aaron’s real full name.

What does this mean? I don’t know. Somebody sent it to me and said it was significant. Brynaert is a journalist who spent several years as an editor at Raw Story, and who might be grateful nowadays for paid work as a front-pager at BradBlog. My own personal hunch — and this is nothing but a hunch, mind you — is the Brad Friedman might be ready to throw Brett Kimberlin under the BradBus, and nobody in the progressive blogosphere would blame him.

There was evidently some point in time where Kimberlin appeared to have been an asset to Friedman, helping publicize and raise money for his blog, but put yourself in Friedman’s shoes now: Aren’t Kimberlin’s increasingly deranged antics making him a liability? Wouldn’t you hate to have your name continually linked with Mr. Perjury McTerrorist?

I think you would.

My hunch, then, is that at some point Friedman will weigh his options and tell Kimberlin, “Sorry, pal. Been nice working with you, but there’s only so much of your sociopathic crap I can deal with and still be an effective voice for the progressive cause. Bye, now.”

And by the way: One of those little birdies tells me there may be a connection between the “Anonymous”/”LulzSec” international hacker conspiracy and Brett Kimberlin. I know: Crazy.

UPDATE II: One of the pro-Kimberlin Twitter-troll accounts is now mocking me for having linked the awful nasty “Dave From Queens” blog, saying that “Dave” is actually Seth Allen, who has allegedly made himself a nuisance online but who — so far as I can tell — has never gone on a weeklong bombing spree in Indiana.

Which kinda matters, I think.

My point is that I’m trying to get at the facts of the case, rather than trying to judge the moral character of the people who are providing the facts. If Charles Johnson were to come up with something truly useful (and I’m told that Neal Rauhauser has now drifted into the LGF orbit), I might even be forced to quote CJ.

Keep in mind that if Rauhauser realizes his connection to Brett Kimberlin is exposing him (Rauhauser) to jeopardy, then Brett might also go under the wheels of the NealBus as well as the BradBus.

If my hunch about how this story plays out is correct — and hey, it’s just a hunch — then the Kimberlin/Friedman/Rauhauser nexus could explode into a frenzy of backstabbing and finger-pointing, as each tries to make his colleagues the fall guys for whatever evil craziness gets exposed, with no one wanting to become the scapegoat for the whole busted enterprise.

UPDATE III: One guy who did a lot to expose Neal Rauhauser’s “Beandogs” gang in the so-called 2010 “TwitterGate” episode is Patrick Read at Swift Read, who last month put up a post detailing the background on Rauhauser’s modus operandi, for anyone who might want to understand what a left-wing “hacktivist” can do.


93 Responses to “Deadline Loometh, and the Raven Is Croaking Brett Kimberlin’s Name”

  1. Mike G.
    May 20th, 2012 @ 2:34 pm

     All I would say to that little weasel is bring it on Mo’Fo’. I got something for yo’ ass.

  2. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 2:35 pm

    Yes, it is a good question where Kimberlin finds the time to go around suing everybody and his brother and his uncles and his cousins.

    I work a 40 hour week (at a nonprofit), and have a fairly substantial commute. This tends to mean that when I get home, I’m not exactly dying to stir up a court case!

  3. PaulLemmen
    May 20th, 2012 @ 2:44 pm

    Hehehe … I am almost hoping he notices me. I might even be able to use my “specialized knowledge” for good!

  4. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

    “Perspectives” indeed. It’s like Rashomon. Oh well . . .

  5. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 2:54 pm

     Not in the least.

    Stop being silly and playing equivalency games.

  6. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 2:59 pm

    Oh, a question: does anyone see where JTMP got the gift of approximately $55,000 (market valuation) in stocks? Who donated it?

    The income would be insignificant, probably, but I’d love to know who gave that gift. I’d also like to see a listing of what stocks are in that gift.

  7. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:03 pm

     I am so glad to meet someone like you who I know can help me, unlike those evil bozos who have tried and failed and have f***ed me over and who I am now suing for everything they have.

  8. Sarah Wells
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:06 pm

    I’m a little confused on the point of the loan.  I read the form and thought the loan was a liability of VR,  and that it was a loan to the organization (VR) from Brett Kimberlin? 

  9. Sarah Wells
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:14 pm

    Or anyway a loan taken by VR.    BR is listed as “interested person” and the purpose to “pay Bills”,  but the next column over asks if it is a loan “to or from” the institution  and “to” is checked.

    Am I reading that all wrong?  

  10. Adobe_Walls
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:14 pm

    “This is the face of dark evil. ”
    The Left asserts that the Right is pure evil as the Right believes the Left is the root of all evil. Surely one side or the other is correct. It gives one hope.

  11. Sarah Wells
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:18 pm

    Or perhaps the money was distributed to BK,  but  a “loan” to VR nonetheless?    I confess I don’t know how to read the form.

  12. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:18 pm

    There is no equivalency. Try to force it and I will prove it.

    There doesn’t seem to be much insight for

    you here, either.

    A failure of perspective perhaps?  ‘False equivalency’ though, is not necessarily accomplished on purpose. It is often made spontaneously in ‘reaction’. This situation occurs when one is under some sort of duress; even that of an unexpected memory.

  13. Ladd Ehlinger Jr.
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:24 pm

    What the hell are you babbling about? Spell out your threats plainly, don’t be a schizophrenic OCD waste of carbon and water. 

  14. Quoth the Raven, `Nevermore’ « An Ex-Con's View
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:26 pm

    […] Deadline Loometh, and the Raven Is Croaking Brett Kimberlin’s Name […]

  15. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:31 pm

     The help you need is at the end of your arm. Have a nice day.

  16. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:33 pm

     I’m looking at the PDF. Hang on a minute or two. I have to walk dogs, then I’ll answer.

  17. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:34 pm

    For me, “evil” is a social-moral construct, most often used to label those the speaker dislikes intensely, and to bully and belittle them into some sort of re-alignment. It almost never succeeds in this (success rate < 0.0001%) but sets up a permanent us-vs-them relationship dealie which is at least as implacable as any individual belief or feeling.

    Which is why i, and perhaps others, do not resort much to this terminology.

    And "evil" does not describe, it assigns moral value, a largely subjective thingie which pretends to be universal but really only represents a highly personalized disgust, and that deviously. And worst, it usually assigns this extreme negative moral value to people, not their actions.

  18. Adjoran
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:36 pm

     Anamika’s drunk again.  Her pimp’s back in jail, so she can buy all the Valu-Rite Vodka she wants.

  19. Adjoran
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:38 pm

    Somebody needs to check into the circumstances of his personal life, too.  These guys who have a taste for prepubescent girls don’t usually change.

  20. Ladd Ehlinger Jr.
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:39 pm

    What an evil definition of evil.  Get on with your evil solipsistic patronizing “i”.

  21. PaulLemmen
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:42 pm

    Excepted, linked, H/T’d with additional commentary.

  22. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:42 pm

    Sarah Wells, your question is quite correct. The loan is *to* the organization (Velvet Revolution) from Brett Kimberlin of JTMP.  Stacy needs to correct that statement.

    The two organizations share an address and an executive  director; the tax preparer in 2010 is the same person.

  23. Sarah Wells
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:45 pm

    Here is the pdf link for the instructions.  for the instructions:

    It explains very fully what an “interested person” is.  But simply says check the appropriate box for loan to/from —-
    On the form the heading  seems like it would be “to or from” the interested person,  but the column  heading says “to or from” the “Organizaton”
    Can someone who is familiar with these forms clear it up for me?

  24. PaulLemmen
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:46 pm


  25. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:47 pm

     Honesty means exactly telling everyone “my truth”. I have only one truth.

    Usually those who have more than one truth are called either hypocrites or schizophrenics.

    And you might consider that honesty can mean much more than telling everyone you disagree with “your truth” (= that they are a**holes).

  26. PaulLemmen
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:48 pm

    From the tone of her babbling, it may well be Sterno …

  27. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:55 pm

     Read the question on page 5, under Part II. It reads, in Column b, “Loan to or from the organization”, and “to” is checked. In other words, Brett Kimberlin, who is an “interested person” because his JTMP shares an address and an executive director with VR, lent $4,500 to VR “to pay bills”.

    Out of what copious resources, one does wonder.

  28. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 3:56 pm

     Well, then let’s drop this dishonest word. “Evil” is not about categorizing actions but beings. I submit that even Jack The Ripper is not evil, even though we can easily agree that his actions should be prevented.

  29. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:09 pm

    Adjoran, seriously, I hope that what you said came from a Free and Clear consciousness and not one that’s been muddied and muddled by a combination of beer, wine, and vodka.

    That would be very sad indeed. I sincerely hope that that’s not the case.

    If your sober I am happy for you and you can say anything you want about me or to me, even your asinine “whore” allusion but if you’re coming from a sloppy, semi-drunk, angry, and vindictive place, then what can I say, except you REALLY do have my genuine love and compassion.

  30. Sarah Wells
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:12 pm

    Thanks Dianna.    So Brett K. is an interested person in VR.  I actually didn’t know that.

  31. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:16 pm

     They say he is.

    I blinked a little, I confess, when I saw that Mr. Cohen is the executive director of both JTMP and VR. 

    It’s all looking a little dicey to me.

  32. R.S. McCain on the great unmasking of convicted terrorist and Leftie hacktivist Brett Kimberlin. « The Rhetorican
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:18 pm

    […] R.S. McCain on the great unmasking of convicted terrorist and Leftie hacktivist Brett Kimberlin.R.S. McCain on the great unmasking of convicted terrorist and Leftie hacktivist Brett Kimberlin. […]

  33. robertstacymccain
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:20 pm

    Hey, thanks — corrected the error.

  34. Sarah Wells
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:20 pm

    Brett Kimberlin has no “side”
    but his own.  I think even his marks are on to him by now.  If I had any cause I valued I’d get it as far away from that guy as possible. 

  35. Sarah Wells
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:23 pm

    Brett Kimberlin has no cause but himself.  I think even his marks must be on to him by now. Any cause I sincerely wanted to advance, I’d get as far away from BK as  I could.

  36. Calling All Conservative Bloggers – The Army of Davids Needs You | The Lonely Conservative
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:25 pm

    […] Linked by Legal Insurrection – thanks!Update: Linked by An Ex-Con’s View and again by The Other McCain in another post questioning how Kimberlin can claim tax-exempt status for his “non […]

  37. Adobe_Walls
    May 20th, 2012 @ 4:55 pm

    Or sinister perhaps?

  38. Dianna Deeley
    May 20th, 2012 @ 5:06 pm

     Exasperating, anyway. Seriously, I’ve read a lot of opaque nonsense in my life, but it’s not usually in the 990!

  39. Dustin
    May 20th, 2012 @ 5:29 pm

    For me, “evil” is doing things like setting bombs and framing people for crimes.

    Robert Stacy Mccain’s blogging on this is awesome.  And I can tell he is pouring a great deal of effort into this.

    Keep up the good work, sir.

  40. Ladd Ehlinger Jr.
    May 20th, 2012 @ 5:30 pm

    No. Go make your own dictionary in your own world if you want.  Go be sympathetic to Jack the Ripper all on your own. 

    You are neither a superior intellect nor are you a superior human being, much as you desperately need to be both.I now think you are a psychopath after watching a couple of episodes of this:

    Watch the whole thing. See if you don’t recognize yourself.

  41. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 5:55 pm

     Words come and go, depending on their utility or other appeal. Let it have its chance in the meme bazaar.

    We can both agree that Jack The Ripper is someone who should be prevented from doing what he does. But the idea that it is not enough to just prevent his crimes but that he must be judged in his being as evil, perhaps consigned to fry forever, etc is what drives most use of the E-word. Someone or some group is categorized as evil, then the slippery slope: “Axis of Evil,” other political party members are evil, all to manipulate either the descriptee or others to join in the condemnation (and invade or ostracize), etc.

    It is the USE to which this terminology is put which bothers me. It is NOT NEEDED for preventative action. It is simply and solely a vehicle of condemnation, moral rectitude run amok, high on its own certainty and self-righteousness.

    Rather send JTR to a Buddhist boot camp, to meditate and examine his life, under the guidance of people who understand the ways of the human psyche. He could, like Anguli Mal(a), become enlightened.

  42. Anamika
    May 20th, 2012 @ 5:58 pm

     Cool. Take care of yourself.

  43. Pathfinder's wife
    May 20th, 2012 @ 6:23 pm

    Buddhist boot camp — hey sounds like a great idea:

    He would still be cutting people up, slicing their throats and desecrating their corpses,  but his steamed rice prep would be superb, right?
    And goodness knows properly cooked rice makes everything better!

    Oh, and it would all be done in a zen way — that’s important; that always makes it better too!

    Seriously….for reals

  44. Bob Belvedere
    May 20th, 2012 @ 6:26 pm

    Thank you, Dianna.


  45. Pathfinder's wife
    May 20th, 2012 @ 6:30 pm

    it’s not about the cause; the cause is never the cause, dig?…it’s the process, the representation of transcendental things and the awakening to the harmony of the now baby

    you need to dig to that zen, then you’ll reach the enlightenment…and trow some cash money our man’s way

  46. Pathfinder's wife
    May 20th, 2012 @ 6:32 pm

    throw, that is — this is what I get for trying to type and eat a popsicle at the same time, waiting for these NATO protests to kick off (very much a let down so far too, I might add)

  47. The Camp Of The Saints
    May 20th, 2012 @ 6:46 pm

    The Attempt To Silence The Right: Convicted Terrorist Brett Kimberlin And His Friends On The Attack [Updated Below]…

    [NOTE: I’m making this post a sticky one until further notice, so please look below for newer postings.] If you are not familiar with the name ‘Brett Kimberlin’ please see my previous posting, Connections: Soros, A Terrorist, Democrats and…

  48. Pathfinder's wife
    May 20th, 2012 @ 6:49 pm

    Dang, and I didn’t even get a chance to go on about some people obviously living in a bubble…the sort of bubble that rationalizes the relevancy of JRT and BK…and therefore feels no qualms about throwing folks like that cash money!

  49. Mike G.
    May 20th, 2012 @ 6:56 pm

     A little excitement in Chicago;
    So Much For Peaceful Demonstration, Eh?…Thugs Raid And Beat Patrons At Chicago Eatery via @thatMrGguy

  50. robertstacymccain
    May 20th, 2012 @ 7:33 pm

    Just to point out in the Not Brett Kimberlin rant, he talks about “behemoths of the organized right,” when he’s attacked Seth Allen and Aaron Worthing, a couple of guys you never heard of, who run free Blogspot sites. Meanwhile, Kimberlin’s JTMP has raked in $1.8 million in six years, while the most recent year of Velvet Revolution’s revenue was nearly $80,000 — not big money, but a helluva lot more than anybody’s ever made off a low-traffic Blogspot site.

    The word for what Not Brett Kimberlin is doing is “projection” — accusing others of his own wrongdoing and bad motives.