BREAKING: Kaitlyn Hunt Refuses Plea Offer, Will Face Trial on June 20
Posted on | May 24, 2013 | 123 Comments
Kaitlyn Hunt, the Florida 18-year-old who admitted a sexual affair with a 14-year-old girl, has rejected a plea-bargain offer from prosecutors in Indian River County and will face trial June 20 on charges of lewd and lascivious battery.
UPDATE: Hunt’s supporters had mounted an online campaign claiming that she was the victim of homophobic prejudice in an effort to pressure prosecutors to drop the felony charges against her.
While prosecutors had offered a plea bargain that would have kept Hunt out of prison on supervised release, Hunt and her supporters wanted the charges reduced to a misdemeanor. Hunt’s supporters say because her sexual involvement with a 14-year-old freshman girl — which began inside a toilet stall at Sebastian High School — was consensual, she should not be charged with a felony.
UPDATE II: Liberal organizations and major media have united behind the #FreeKate movement’s argument that Hunt is a victim, and have demonized the parents of the 14-year-old as “bigoted religious zealots.” However, in an interview with the local CBS affiliate yesterday, Jim and Laurie Smith, denied those accusations, saying they twice warned Hunt to stay away from their daughter. The Smiths say they only went to police after a Jan. 4 incident in which their daughter went missing overnight; a sheriff’s department arrest affidavit in the case says the 14-year-old ran away and spent that night at Hunt’s house, where the two teens “put their fingers inside of each other’s vaginas, put their mouths on each other’s vaginas, and both of them used a vibrator on each other to insert it in each other’s vaginas.”
Sebastian High School student Kaitlyn Hunt refuses plea deal for charges of improper relationship with 14-year-old girlfriend
— CBS12 (@CBS12) May 24, 2013
UPDATE III: It is doubtful that Hunt’s attorneys will attempt what Da Tech identifies as The Roman Polanski Defense:
“Judges want to f— young girls. Juries want to f— young girls. Everyone wants to f— young girls!”
But the cross-examination should certainly be interesting, eh?
And what about the forensic evidence? Will prosecutors include the vibrator as Exhibit A? If readers want to send me to Florida next month to cover The Teenage Lesbian Trial of the Century, this would be a good time to hit the tip jar.
UPDATE IV: Darleen Click at Protein Wisdom:
Merely three years ago Whoopi Goldberg was rightfully chastised for defending Roman Polaski’s sexual relationship with a 13 year old girl by questioning whether or not it was rape-rape. . . .
On one hand, we have the the Obama Administration demanding universities criminalize even “offensive” speech as sexual harassment, making all college students nascent sexual harassers; but we have a whole new social movement dedicated to decriminalizing sexual behavior with 14 year olds . . .
Minors must be emancipated from their parents and adults must be dependent on The State.
Dan Collins at The Conservatory:
Meanwhile, on Twitter, with the hashtag #FreeKate, and elsewhere online, the far left has tried to make this a cause celebre, painting the issue as one of two young girls being in love, but tormented by the younger’s Christofascist Godbag parents. . . . [T]hey go so far as to lie about the age of the younger girl, stating that she was just 17 (you know what I mean), when these incidents occurred, because that helps them shape the narrative of victimization.
You should read the whole thing. The automatic conflation of “gay = victim” is one of those emotional buttons that liberals love to push. And speaking of pushing buttons, hit the tip jar.
@datechguyblog Let’s face it, #FreeKate is the Mumia Abu-Jamal of Jailbait Lesbianism.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 24, 2013
Y’know, @instapundit, there’s only one reporter in America who can cover The Teenage Lesbian Trial of the Century … theothermccain.com/2013/05/24/bre…
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 24, 2013
You’d hate yourself if I missed this one, wouldn’t you?
PREVIOUSLY:
- May 23: Damn You, #FreeKate Liars! UPDATE: Parents of 14-Year-Old Girl Speak Out
- May 22: Liberals Now Arguing for a Lesbian’s Right to Have Sex With a 14-Year-Old Girl
Comments
123 Responses to “BREAKING: Kaitlyn Hunt Refuses Plea Offer, Will Face Trial on June 20”
May 24th, 2013 @ 12:51 pm
Nothing worse than an 18 year old idiot. She wants the case to go to trial….so be it. Thats exactly where it should be.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:08 pm
Politicians like Reagan, both Bushs and countless other criminals get away with lying and stealing and they waste tax payers money on prosecuting a 18 YO girl for messing around with a 14 YO girl….don’t they have some real criminals to catch?
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:17 pm
Said somebody who isn’t a parent. Responsible parent, anyway.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:22 pm
Things like this divide people into two camps: Parents vs. everybody else.
There are no parents of 14-year-olds who think it should be legal for someone to do to their child what Kaitlyn Hunt did to the Smiths’ daughter.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:28 pm
Only Bill Clinton was actually caught lying.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:29 pm
Sorry, sir, but you are quite wrong. Liberal parents see nothing wrong with it. The rest of the world who isn’t insane sees things your way.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:32 pm
18 year old boys are prosecuted all the time for sleeping with 14 year old girls. Why should we make an exception for lesbians?
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:34 pm
Says someone with a f’n gun as an icon.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:36 pm
“did to”??? The girl willingly took part, Einstein. She didn’t go out and find someone to molest and tie her up in the basement. Grow a couple of functioning brain cells.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:38 pm
in prison Kaitlyn will be, what should I say, POPULAR?
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:49 pm
This is my gun. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:55 pm
Yes, and their names are put on federal predator registries so that the rest of their lives can be hell on earth. The same should happen to this girl, or the laws should be changed. 14 year olds either are too young to consent or they’re not. Personally, I think they are too young for consent.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:55 pm
statutory rape is not going to be
overturned because of an out of control bimbo.
Anyone notice the size of her pupils in this photo? She needs to be tested for drugs.
Rapid Diagnosis: Pinpoint Pupils.) Opiate use / abuse / overdose
Opiate class drugs such as Heroin, Fentanyl, Codeine, Methadone and Morphine stimulate the parasympathetic side of the autonomic nervous system and cause pupil constriction. While it varies depending on your response area, most of the constricted pupils that you encounter in the field will be opiate induced.
http://theemtspot.com/2009/04/23/rapid-diagnosis-pinpoint-pupils/
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:57 pm
Most liberals are phonies. They would probably see nothing wrong with it as long as it wasn’t their child.
May 24th, 2013 @ 1:59 pm
A minor can not consent – A 14 year old is a minor. Carnal knowledge of a minor? Pedophilia ? Statutory rape ? Stop me when you have heard of any of these.
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:01 pm
What in the world does Reagan and Bush have to do with this? You must be in the O adminstration.
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:01 pm
Someone doesn’t understand how molesters operate. Google “grooming”
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:01 pm
[…] Update: Stacy McCain reports that, advice from the Today Show not withstanding Kaitlyn Hunt has turned down the plea bargain […]
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:03 pm
I don’t think I’d want it to go to trial if I were the victim or her family.
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:04 pm
“Liberal parents” — that concept just boggles my mind. I was a Democrat all my life, and becoming a parent was certainly one of the key events that helped convince me that the Democrat Party was Satan’s Handmaiden.
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:11 pm
I wss just thinking “damn, the crazy is strong in this one.”
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:49 pm
What will sink her are the repeated warnings to stay away from the 14 year old. Of course it will depend on Kate’s credibility. If the 14 year old testifies against her it might go really bad.
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:50 pm
I think the penalty should be the same.
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:52 pm
So? By statute, the 14 y/o is incapable of giving consent regardless if its a football player with a bottle of beer or a pretty blonde girl with a dildo.
“Jailbait” — learn the term.
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:53 pm
^^^^ This!
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:53 pm
Consent (as the statute says) has nothing to do with it. Let’s not pretend that molesters in general don’t say “but he/she wanted me to!”.
Do we accept that?
The victim is 14; how do you argue that this is just fine?
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:55 pm
How does that have anything to do with the discussion?
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:00 pm
I think CommonSense was implying that responsible parents don’t have guns. Just another way to say “SQUIRREL!!”
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:11 pm
Of course not: The reason cases like this are nearly always plea-bargained is that prosecutors don’t want to have to put the “consenting victim” on the witness stand and subject her to cross-examination.
It is therefore selfish cruelty on the part of Kaitlyn Hunt to insist that, because prosecutors wouldn’t let her off with a misdemeanor charge, she will instead force this case to a trial that will inflict so much trauma on the young girl she claims to have loved. This whole situation is a horrible thing to contemplate — imagine your 14-year-old freshman daughter running away to be dildoed by a senior on the basketball team! — and for liberals to try to turn the perpetrator into a victimized hero-martyr should outrage all decent people.
BTW, you will probably not be surprised to know that Anonymous “doxed” the 14-year-old and her parents.
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:13 pm
Indeed.
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:20 pm
So you have no respect for your kid? You don’t want your kid to be capable of making their own decisions? You don’t want your kid to be happy? Let’s not pretend this is an elementary age kid being violated and tricked by an adult, not understanding what sex is, this 14 year old teenager knows EXACTLY what she is doing.
She knows what makes HER feel good, she knows what she wants, she isn’t being taken advantage of, for god sake, the other teenager is just a few years older then she is? Tell me, hate monger, where is the victim? By hate monger, I mean, you hate the thought that young people are able to make their own choices, make big decisions in their life.
Gay is irreverent here in my eyes, to me, this is yet another case where teenaged kids are the victim of control freak adults, where young people get ZERO respect. Makes me sick, and all of you who want to see this chick’s life get ruined over a consensual relationship should be ashamed, and I would tell that to the 14 year old’s parents, the prosecutor, and all the government bureaucrats who are in the business of ruining people’s lives.
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:20 pm
So you have no respect for your
kid? You don’t want your kid to be capable of making their own
decisions? You don’t want your kid to be happy? Let’s not pretend this
is an elementary age kid being violated and tricked by an adult, not
understanding what sex is, this 14 year old teenager knows EXACTLY what
she is doing.
She knows what makes HER feel good, she knows what she wants, she
isn’t being taken advantage of, for god sake, the other teenager is just
a few years older then she is? Tell me, hate monger, where is the
victim? By hate monger, I mean, you hate the thought that young people
are able to make their own choices, make big decisions in their life.
Gay is irreverent here in my eyes, to me, this is yet another case
where teenaged kids are the victim of control freak adults, where young
people get ZERO respect. Makes me sick, and all of you who want to see
this chick’s life get ruined over a consensual relationship should be
ashamed, and I would tell that to the 14 year old’s parents, the
prosecutor, and all the government bureaucrats who are in the business
of ruining people’s lives….
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:30 pm
The crazy is indeed strong on this post. And RPGPrince, I mean you as BSC.
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:32 pm
Loud is not logic.
Ad hominem is not fact.
This is a haiku.
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:34 pm
The dividing line between child and adult is a fine one that moves as you change era and culture.
But any healthy culture protects their children because children, by any definition, are not mature enough to deal with the problems this nasty world produces. This is a major role of a good parent.
Like it or not “Rocket Propelled Grenade” Prince, in this era and culture, a 14 year old is a child. Thus, your hate filled rant is not relevant.
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:46 pm
If she “feels” she can drive a car without a license, is that ok? If she “feels” she can drop out of school, kick a dog, get a tattoo, perform in a porn film, drink alcohol, do meth and it MAKES HER HAPPY, who are her parents to say “no”?
Geez, with so few brain cells, how did you ever find the log-in screen on your ‘puter?
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:50 pm
It’s easier at some libraries than others.
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:55 pm
I doubt they will put the victim on the stand, they’ve got the taped phone call.
May 24th, 2013 @ 3:58 pm
Ah! I see!
Perhaps I ought to revert to using a dapper squirrel as my avatar, and save everyone some time? Ha!
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:03 pm
You, sir, are an ignorant bigot. I am a parent and I consider this kind of sexual activity among consenting teenagers to be both healthy and normal. In a perfect world kids would wait longer to have sex, but the world is not perfect, and most of us started experimenting at around 14, yet we turned out fine. Monsters who want to lock up young women for having normal sexual urges and interactions are the twisted ones who we need to keep our kids safe from.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:04 pm
When one catches an 18 year old boy diddling one’s lovely 14 year old daughter, does one pretend that the girl is not being taken advantage of?
This is why there are age of consent laws.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:06 pm
Er…what’s not “twisted” about being a senior and taking advantage of a freshman?
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:09 pm
Most statutory rape laws differentiate with regard to the age differences of the parties involved. What Polanski did to a 13 year old would involve a considerable jail sentence and is reprehensible. An 18 year old with a 14 year old is a much more minor offense. 14yos and 18yos go to the same schools, attend the same parties, most people over 21 consider them to be peers. I’d prefer 14yos not to be sexually active, but the world is what it is, and I’d hardly object if I found out my 14yo daughter was dating a girl who just turned 18.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:10 pm
I would prefer that Ms. Hunt’s life not be ruined, but she has chosen otherwise by taking advantage of a girl four years younger than herself, who is not mature enough to consent to sexual activity.
I’m curious about something: when you were 18, did you seek out a 14-year-old to have sex with? I know I didn’t; I’d have thought that rather silly, if not perverse.
Actions have consequences. When you choose an action, you choose the consequences of that action. If you don’t want the consequences, don’t choose the action. It’s painfully simple.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:10 pm
You misleading yourself is no cause to ruin another young person’s life.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:14 pm
I don’t consider two kids who could go to the same school messing around to be twisted. 40yo Roman Polanski raping a 13yo is twisted. Two adolescents less than 4 years apart in age is much, much grayer.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:15 pm
That was your mistake. Democrats are no more liberal that Republicans are.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:16 pm
It’s sad this girl is getting such bad advice. Everything that her “supporters” are doing is going to make this harder for her. Such needless damage. And after the parents had tried to solve the problem privately! Really FreeKate people, just shut up.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:18 pm
18 yr old having sexual relations with a 14 yr old. Rape. Gender irrelevant.
so says this 54 yr white lesbian.
May 24th, 2013 @ 4:19 pm
I don’t see this. The difference between an 18 year old and a 14 year old is pretty extreme, and the social distance between a senior and a freshman is pretty large.
Perhaps what I’m seeing is different from what you’re seeing; I will still maintain that Ms. Hunt is in the wrong, here, morally as well as legally. Further, I’d say the same if her victim were a boy of 14, simply to obviate that particular gambit.