The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Lawyer: Convicted Sex Teacher Has ‘Significant Psychological Issues’

Posted on | October 14, 2014 | 87 Comments

Lauren Harrington Cooper, 32, was Exhibit A earlier this year in my argument “that America’s public schools are staffed by sex-crazed perverts.” Every day brings new reports of teachers who cannot restrain their depraved craving for teenage flesh. Ms. Cooper was an English teacher in Pennsylvania whose modus operandi involved giving boys blow jobs in her car. Last month, she pleaded guilty and was sentenced to “9 to 23 months in the Luzerne County Correctional Facility, followed by five years of probation.” This quote from a Huffington Post story about her case caught my attention:

In court, Cooper’s lawyer told the judge his client, who is still married, has severe emotional problems.
“She has been diagnosed with some significant psychological issues of inadequacy,” Joe D’Andrea said. “You would think that she’s a pretty, young girl, that she would feel good about herself. But her self-esteem issues have really troubled her all of her life, and she found comfort and solace in some people giving her attention, as wrong as it was.”

In other words, his client — the English teacher who performed oral sex on teenage boys — is not really responsible for her crimes, because of her “issues of inadequacy.” She’s “troubled.” She suffers from a self-esteem deficit, and what she was seeking from these teenage boys was “comfort and solace.” Also, the taste of their semen.

Ms. Cooper was interviewed Friday on ABC’s 20/20:

“I’m glad I got caught,” she told ABC News’ “20/20” exclusively. “I went against what I know is right, and I did wrong. And there is no way to explain that away. I have no defense of myself. I was wrong, plain and simple.”
Her forbidden affairs began after she opened a dance studio in her town with her husband, Raphael Cooper. The new side-business was time-consuming and took a toll on their marriage.
“It turned into more of a business relationship than a marriage,” she said. “With us deteriorating in our marriage and having less and less of a relationship, I didn’t feel attractive. I didn’t feel wanted.”

And so she started sucking on teenage boys. Isn’t that the obvious thing to do, if you don’t “feel attractive,” don’t “feel wanted”? Because your feelings are all that matter, see, and if your marriage is less than fully satisfying in terms of your emotional needs, it is imperative that you do something to make you feel better about yourself, i.e., give a teenage boy a blowjob. Violating every ethical code of your profession? Betraying the trust of taxpayers and parents? That’s OK, because your marriage is unhappy and you don’t “feel wanted.”

But wait, the criminal has more self-serving rationalizations:

“It wasn’t so much that I even needed a physical connection. It was just being able to interact with someone who made me feel valued and worthwhile,” Mrs. Cooper said. “As crazy as this might sound to some people, he’s very intelligent. I could have real conversations with him about real life issues.”

And, as crazy as this might sound to some people, Ms. Cooper’s rationalizations are the same as every pedophile, ever. That is to say, her explanation of her crimes is not really unusual, it’s typical. There is a bright line — very hard to overlook — between your need to “feel valued and worthwhile” and the crimes that will send you to prison. People who cross that line always have an excuse, an explanation for why they did what they did, and this story the criminal tells invariably involves an element of self-pity. The criminal wants to be seen as a victim.

The criminal uses euphemisms (“a physical connection . . . interact with someone”) that have the effect of minimizing her crimes. The plain fact of what the criminal did must be obscured and her perverse motive must be hidden behind psychobabble about the criminal’s emotional needs. Why? Because Ms. Cooper doesn’t want you to see her as what she actually is, a sexual deviant with an appetite for teenage boys.

Law enforcement officials in Pennsylvania are angry about Ms. Cooper’s 20/20 interview. They say she misrepresented her crimes:

In the eyes of Luzerne County investigators, former Wyoming Valley West teacher Lauren Harrington-Cooper lied to the world Friday night in a television interview. . . .
“The bottom line is she pled guilty to all the charges,” said Luzerne County Detective Charles Balogh, the lead detective in the teacher-student sex case that has made headlines around the globe. “She’s not accepting responsibility or guilt for what she did. She accepted the consequences, but doesn’t want to admit to the facts. It doesn’t make sense.” . . .
On the show, Harrington-Cooper said, “I did do wrong, but I’m not a monster,” a comment that drew ire from Balogh.
“I think she is a monster,” Balogh said. “She’s a true predator.” . . .
In addition to Victim No. 1, prosecutors accused Harrington-Cooper of performing oral sex on a 17-year-old boy and sending sexual messages to two other boys, aged 16 and 17. Luzerne County Assistant District Attorney Jenny Roberts, the lead prosecutor in the case, maintains Harrington-Cooper was trying to deny what she did. She said the denials fly in the face of the overwhelming evidence against the former teacher.
“Obviously, she does not want the public to know the extent of what she actually did. But she did admit her guilt in court with a factual basis that covers all four victims,” Roberts said. “I guess she doesn’t want the nation to know the full extent of her crimes.” . . .
While Harrington-Cooper admitted to having sexual encounters with the 18-year-old, she was very deceptive in the interview about how the relationship developed, Balogh and Roberts said.
She told “20/20” that the 18-year-old senior, Victim No. 1, sent her complimentary text messages after getting her cellphone number. His compliments bolstered her sagging self-esteem, she said.
Local investigators say Harrington-Cooper was the one who pursued the teen.
“She blamed Victim No. 1 for chasing her, when, in fact, she was the one who reached out to Victim No. 1 by reaching out to his sister. She provided her cellphone number and said she thinks he’s hot,” Balogh recalled.
The way Roberts interpreted it, Harrington-Cooper was insinuating she was playing “hard to get” when the teen started texting her.
“That’s not what happened at all. There was no playing hard to get,” Roberts said. “She was pursuing him.”

You see the profoundly immature aspect of Ms. Cooper’s personality. She’s already been convicted and sentenced to prison. Yet her narcissistic self-esteem — how she feels about herself — is still controlling how she talks about her crimes. She minimizes and rationalizes and uses esuphemistic language because it would make her feel bad if people thought she was a “monster” who gets her sick thrills by performing oral sex on teenage boys. Perverts like her are everywhere:

  • VIRGINIA — A Henrico County art teacher was arrested and charged with taking indecent liberties with someone less than 18 years old after an incident at Highland Springs High School.
    Police arrested Tessa Monique Hairston, 31, on Friday.
    “The charge stems from an inappropriate relationship involving a juvenile male that occurred at Highland Springs High School while Ms. Hairston was employed as a teacher by Henrico County Public Schools,” Henrico Police spokesman Lt. Chris Eley said in an email.
  • ARKANSAS — A Siloam Springs teacher that was accused of having sex with a student pleaded not guilty on Monday (Oct. 13), officials say.
    Mary F. McCormick, 32, was arraigned before Circuit Judge Brad Karren on Monday, accused of raping and exchanging explicit photographs with a 13-year-old boy.
  • LOUISIANA — Destrehan High School teachers Shelley Dufresne and Rachel Respess were drinking alcohol on the night they engaged in group sex with a 16-year-old student, according to records released Thursday by the Kenner Police Department. . . .
    The student, now 17, had told St. Charles Parish sheriff’s deputies that he had sex with the two English teachers at Respess’ apartment in Kenner on Sept. 12. That was a Friday, the night of the Destrehan Wildcats-Helen Cox Cougars football game.
  • CONNECTICUT — Stamford High School Donna Valentine and assistant principal Roth Nordin have been charged with not reporting an alleged sexual relationship between a teacher and student.
    Police say English teacher Danielle Watkins, 32, had sexual relationship with the 18-year-old student for about 10 months. Police also say Watkins assaulted the student when he tried to end the relationship. Watkins is also accused of selling marijuana to the 18-year-old and a second 15-year-old student.
  • VIRGINIA — Erica Lynne Mesa, 27, a geometry teacher and freshman volleyball coach at Colonial Forge High School, “admitted to police of having sexual relations with at least four students,” according to court documents.
    Mesa is charged with three counts of custodial indecent liberties and three counts of using a computer to solicit a minor. She was arrested Sept. 29. Detective Sgt. Chris Cameron wrote in affidavits for search warrants that the incidents started in 2012 and continued up until a week before her arrest. Court records list the students’ ages as ranging from 16 to 18.
  • TEXAS — During the 2013-2014 school year, five teachers at Permian High School were charged with sexually molesting students. In May, Alisha Carrasco Knighten, a 25-year-old assistant softball coach and a junior high physical education teacher, resigned amid rumors of an inappropriate relationship with a female student (she was subsequently indicted). A week after Knighten resigned, another teacher Mark Lampman, 47, committed suicide after resigning amid allegations that he had sex with a student.

They all had some “self-esteem issues,” I’m sure.




  • DeadMessenger

    Holy schnikes, I don’t even want to think about that one…

  • DeadMessenger

    And so Mssr. Polaroid gets a pass? Why, he might well be the king of pron!

  • Pingback: Watcher of Weasels » Watcher’s Council Nominations – #Hashtag Edition!()

  • Zohydro

    I guess you’re right… Edwin Land of the Polaroid company was in on plot all the way too!

    I now realise “Kodak” was the company—George Eastman, the founder, is the actual culprit—I don’t know what I was thinking!

  • Bandit Keena

    Just remember that this goes on everyday across America and other teachers and administrators are as complicit as Cardinal Law and Joe Paterno

  • Zohydro

    Buddhism is even cooler now that the Dalai Lama is down with gay marriage …

  • RS

    Original Sin? Or is that not the answer you’re looking for?

  • Art Deco

    Mr. McQueary and Mr. Paterno informed the higher authorities at Penn State, who then dropped the ball. You can say these two should have been more vigorous, but they were hardly ‘complicit’.

  • Bob Belvedere

    Same here, in having older parents.

  • Bob Belvedere

    Justice [ironic term, eh?] Kennedy is salivating as he waits to rule on this.

  • Bob Belvedere

    I have ranting about Entrapment for decades – LE creating a crime where not existed.

    It’s just another symptom of LE gone Fascist.

    Look, I want pedophiles to receive capital punishment [or street justice], but Entrapment can and has been used against non-perverts.

  • Bob Belvedere

    One wonders what he is also ‘down with’ – low, perhaps?

  • Bob Belvedere


    The Transvaluation Of All Values brought to the masses.

    IOW: The Age Of Leftist Hegemony.

  • Bob Belvedere

    They were, perhaps, not legally complicit, but they certainly were Morally. They had obligations as members of the community and a Men to take action, even if it meant they would unjustly suffer because of it.

  • RS

    Paterno is, in many respects, a classically tragic character. His type would have been recognized instantly by Sophocles a long time ago. Alas, Sophocles is a dead white dude, so he’s got nothing to teach us today.

  • Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – #Hashtag Edition! |

  • Pingback: Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » Watcher’s Council Nominations – #Hashtag Edition!()

  • Bandit Keena

    Abject nonsense – Joe Pa knew the guy was a child molester and worked with him everyday

  • Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations — #Hashtag Edition! |

  • Pingback: Ebola Infected Nurse Flew Frontier | Regular Right Guy()

  • theoldsargesays

    No. I’m sorry but the answer was Patriarchy….but you were close because Original Sin was obviously a construct of the Patriarchy. (Yes, Adam’s first conscious thought upon seeing Eve for the first time must have been “Oh good, God hath given me a sammich maker)

    For liberals in denial about the lies and failures of President Obama it’s Bush’s fault.

    For the sandwich artists at your local fast food joint who think their skills are worth $15 per hour it’s Corporate Americas fault.

    But for kooky womyn who chose the easy path of constant dissent rather than a vigorous work ethic in college and now find that they
    have no prospects of legitimate long term employment nor any hope of finding a good man with whom to have a family and live the American dream it’s the Patriarchy.

  • A_Nonny_Mouse

    As a Monday-morning quarterback and all-around armchair psychologist, I’m surmising that a lot of parents of the 40’s and early 50’s (who were children during the Great Depression) decided they didn’t want THEIR children to feel so deprived — so they were never going to say “NO” when they had kids of their own.

    And children who aren’t used to hearing “No” just don’t “grok” the notion that THERE ARE BOUNDARIES.

    Really, really, really simple. Hug your kids, tell them you love them, then tell them “No”. Give them limits– children NEED limits.
    “No, you can’t stay up on a school night.”
    “No, that Barbie doll isn’t in our budget right now.”
    “No, I don’t want you going over to Kenny’s house right before dinner time.”

    Agree? Disagree?

  • Pingback: Lawyer: Convicted Sex Teacher Has ‘Significant Psychological Issues’ - Walker Ministries | Virginia Beach, VA()

  • Pingback: Watcher’s Council nominations for October 15, 2014()

  • Servo1969

    Pedophiles always bring up the idea that the victim bears some or all of the responsibility for what happened. They actually do think this and believe this idea will be convincing to others.

    I remember a pedophile who was being sentenced in court and tried to say it was all because the victim had watched lots of adult videos. The judge became visibly angry and said, “No! I don’t even want to hear it! I don’t care if *****’s parents sat ***** down and made ***** watch sex tapes from the time ***** was a toddler until the day you were arrested! YOU’RE the adult! YOU had a choice! YOU were in charge of the situation! Don’t you stand in front of me and make like you had no control!”

  • RS

    Well, my parents were born in 1917 and 1930 and their marriage was the first for each and didn’t occur until the very late 1950’s.

    I have a son in high school. Whether may parents are part of the “Greatest Generation,” I cannot say. But trust me on this: “No” was a word I heard often.

    Growing up in the ’70s I got so tired of dealing with the Depression Era mindset; the World War II view of the world.

    Fortunately, I grew out of it.

  • Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – #Hashtag Edition! |

  • richard40

    Good luck to any male peadophile trying to get any sympathy from the media with a pathetic line like this.

  • richard40

    I hope you arent trying to imply that it is all the fault of these teen boys with raging hormones. Teen girls have raging hormones as well, but I dont see anybody claiming an older male teacher is doing them a favor when he has sex with them.

  • richard40

    The crowning injustice to this is if one of these female sexual predators gets pregnant, their teenage rape victim is then required to give their female rapist child support.

  • IanC

    And THAT is the utterly absurd, obnoxious part about it! I find that UTTERLY offensive and totally unacceptable. I would NEVER pay anything for child support in a case like that. NO WAY! I don’t give a DAMN what the law might say, it’s morally repugnant. SURELY a judge who KNOWS a guy has been raped (never mind the fact that the rad fems want to pass laws that mean it’s impossible to rape men – again totally absurd) and got the rapist pregnant ISN’T going to make him pay child support?! That is at least as bad, if not worse than forcing a woman to have a child that was the result of rape? But women DEMAND the right to abort if they see fit; so what’s good for them is good for us!

  • Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – #Hashtag Edition! | Virginia Right!()

  • richard40

    Actually there were documented cases where the judge did make them pay support. In one case, a guy did not even know his woman rapist had a kid, then 10 yrs after the rape he got billed for back support, going back to age 14. And the judge had no real choice, because that was what the law said, and child services insisted he pay, and garnished his wages till he did.

  • Pingback: The #GamerGate White Knight Syndrome : The Other McCain()

  • Pingback: FMJRA 2.0: We’re An American Band : The Other McCain()

  • Pingback: The Razor » Blog Archive » Council Submissions: October 15, 2014()

  • Pingback: » Apparently it’s just this simple()