The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Intolerant Diversity, ‘Rape Culture,’ and the Feminist-Industrial Complex

Posted on | April 26, 2015 | 75 Comments

Perhaps yesterday’s discussion of academic feminism — “The Feminist-Industrial Complex: Academia and the Means of Production” — was one of those “TL:DR” experiences for you. Certainly, when I stretch it out to 3,600 words, with lengthy quotations from Queer Theory scholars, I understand that many readers will skip out after a few paragraphs.

The reader’s irritated impatience (“What’s the point here?”) got an unexpectedly quick answer from the latest headlines:

A students’ union has been accused of racism and sexism after banning white people and men from an event to promote equality.
Those studying at Goldsmiths, University of London, were invited to the students’ union meeting to discuss ‘diversifying the curriculum’.
But they were shocked when an organiser told white people and men ‘not to come’ as it was only open to BME [black and minority ethnic] women.
The union eventually backed down after a backlash from students, one of whom described the exclusive policy as ‘patronising beyond belief’.
The event, held on Wednesday, was organised by welfare and diversity officer Bahar Mustafa, who said she hoped to persuade academics to broaden courses to include more material relating to minority groups.

(Hat-tip: Instapundit.) You see that his happened at the University of London’s Goldsmiths College, where Professor Sara Ahmed is director of the Centre for Feminist Research:

The Centre for Feminist Research (CFR) provides a coordinating hub for feminist work at Goldsmiths. In addition to organising seminars and conferences, the CFR offers a symbolic and intellectual home for the MA in Gender, Media and Culture, co-convened by the Departments of Media & Communications and Sociology. . . .
By ‘feminist research’ we include any work that is informed by an active engagement with feminist intellectual debates, and any research that investigates questions of power, inequality and difference including race, class, disability as well as gender and sexuality. . . .

Gosh, who would have thought this was so timely and relevant?

Ideas Have Consequences, as Richard Weaver warned, and Cultural Marxism is an idea whose influence pervades academia. When the primary object of intellectual endeavor is “research that investigates questions of power, inequality and difference,” you can be sure that no one will be permitted to express skepticism and dissent about this unmistakably political agenda. Once doubt and opposition have been excluded, so that only True Believers are permitted to participate in the discussion, the university is no longer engaged in education, but rather indoctrination. The employment of intellectual totalitarians like Sara Ahmed in positions of authority is a signifier — a sort of dye marker — advertising the University of London’s hostility to freedom of thought.

Is anyone therefore surprised to discover that “diversity officer” Bahar Mustafa is a crypto-fascist thug?

ZERO TOLERANCE on homophobia, queer-phobia,
trans*phobia, racism, Islamaphobia, misogyny,
ableism, cis-sexism, and classist behaviour.

Translation: “Disagreement is hate!”

The Feminist-Industrial Complex is based in academia where it is protected by “anti-discrimination” policies that have the effect of prohibiting dissent from feminist ideology. Inside the campus cocoon, particularly within Women’s Studies programs, students and faculty alike never have to encounter articulate disagreement with the fanatical certainty of their belief system:

Whether they are speaking of “male supremacy” or “sexism,” whether the immediate object of their indignation is “rape culture,” “harassment” or the “objectification” of women in media, always the fundamental premise of the feminist argument is this systemic, historical and universal oppression of women. What we might call the Patriarchal Thesis is really an extraordinary assertion, requiring us to believe that there are no natural differences between men and women. Rather, everything we consider to be “natural” in terms of human traits and behavior — the masculinity of males and the femininity of females — is socially constructed by the gender binary of the heterosexual matrix.

This is why, for example, “trigger warnings” and “safe spaces” are necessary when Christina Hoff Sommers sets foot on campus:

From her podium in Dye Lecture Hall, Christina Hoff Sommers, an author, former philosophy professor and self-proclaimed “freedom feminist,” attempted, amid protesters and dissenting audience members, to persuade Oberlin students that feminism has become too radicalized. She was invited to campus on Monday night by the Oberlin College Republicans and Libertarians . . .
Before Sommers arrived at Dye Lecture Hall, protesters covered the venue with signs criticizing her beliefs and the event. One sign read “Support Survivors,” referring to survivors of sexualized violence. Another sign read “Rape Culture Hall of Fame” with the names of past and present members of OCRL listed below. . . .
Protesters and other students who opposed the event could not be reached for comment, but they described their opposition in a letter published in the Review last week.
“By bringing her to a college campus laden with trauma and sexualized violence and full of victims/survivors, OCRL is choosing to reinforce this climate of denial/ blame/shame that ultimately has real life consequences on the wellbeing of people who have experienced sexualized violence,” they wrote. “We could spend all of our time and energy explaining all of the ways she’s harmful. But why should we?”

What madness takes hold in the minds of overprivileged young people who expect to convince us that Oberlin College (annual tuition $48,682) is a “campus laden with trauma and sexualized violence”? Do they actually believe this or, as we might instead suspect, has the Feminist-Industrial Complex fostered a climate in which it is forbidden to contradict these deliberate lies? Banishing opposition allows feminism’s anti-male/anti-heterosexual paranoia (“Fear and Loathing of the Penis”) to rage unchecked like a viral pandemic. Nick Mascari at Third Base Politics reported Sommers’ April 20 Oberlin lecture:

At the end, Sommers took questions. All but one were obviously hostile to her presence, and she took questions from an equal number of male and female attendees. A female student behind me exclaimed “Oh look! She called on a boy!” every single time she took a question from a male student, even though every one of the male questions she received was equally as hostile to her as the female questions.
After taking questions from three women in a row, she took the final question from a man. The student behind me again remarked “Oh look another question from a boy!”.
I politely asked her, “But weren’t the last three girls?”
She glared at me and said, “This is an event about FEMINISM!”
After her discussion with the male student was finished, the same student said to me, “It’s offensive that you said to me ‘Should she only call on pretty girls?’”
“That’s not what I said. I asked weren’t the last three questions from girls? You misunderstood, miss.”
She continued to accuse me. I didn’t bother to inform her that I was recording the speech and had our words on tape. It wouldn’t have mattered.

In 2015, “feminism” is a subject about which only women are allowed to speak. Feminism can never permit women to speak favorably of males, and the only thing males can contribute to feminism is silence.

“SHUT UP, BECAUSE RAPE!”

Such is the totalitarian message of feminism, as it has been for more than four decades. “Women’s way of knowing” is rooted in what the 1969 Redstockings Manifesto called women’s “personal experience, and our feelings about that experience,” which feminists insist is the only possible basis for analysis. There are no objective facts beyond women’s subjective feelings about their experiences, and therefore no feminist should listen to anything any man has to say about anything.

Universities now teach feminism as Science with a capital “S” and Truth with a capital “T.” No one can be allowed to deny Scientific Truth, which is whatever women say it is. Women have a monopoly on intelligence, knowledge and virtue because, feminists believe, everything men do is wrong and everything men say is false. (See “‘There Is No Spoon’: Radical Feminism and the Paranoid Matrix of Patriarchy.”)

These are the totalitarian conclusions to which feminism’s hateful logic leads, and nowhere is this more evident than at elite university campuses. Emma Sulkowicz became the most feminist at Columbia University (annual tuition $51,008) by accusing her former friend Paul Nungesser of rape. Once the facts were made public in Nungesser’s federal lawsuit against Columbia, however, it seemed otherwise: Sulkowicz is simply a spiteful liar motivated by a selfish desire for revenge. Nungesser didn’t want to date Sulkowicz, so she evidently plotted to get him expelled from Columbia. When that failed — every investigation cleared Nungesser of wrongdoing — Sulkowicz decided to make herself famous by ruining his reputation.

Sulkowicz spoke at an April 16 “Sexual Assault Awareness Month” event at Brown University, and quotes from her speech reveal her to be a young woman with some very strange ideas about truth:

There does not exist a scientific way to prove non-consent. . . . When it comes to sexual violence, scientific proof is impossible. . . . If we use proof in rape cases, we fall into the patterns of rape deniers. . . . When a person claims that their theory is a science, they disqualify other types of knowledge. . . . Let’s change the question from ‘Did she consent that night?’ to ‘Did she have the power to consent that night?’ . . . This is not about physical strength. . . . This is about historical power. . . . Seeing is the origin of interpretation. Interpretation is the origin of knowing. . . . If truth is scientific, then art cannot access truth. But perhaps there is something beyond the truth. . . . When people assume I’m bringing the truth to light, they project their own idea of truth onto me. . . . When people engage in believing in me, they objectify me.”

There is no truth, there is only power — this is what feminism teaches. This is how feminism empowers liars. Unless we recover our concern for truth, unless we reject the hateful totalitarian ideology that can justify any lie if the lie serves the cause of “progress,” our society is utterly and irretrievably doomed. Deprived of our freedom to speak truth, we shall be enslaved by liars whose unscrupulous appetite for power is exceeded only by their cruelty and dishonesty.

“Truth is great and will prevail if left to herself . . . she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.”
Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, 1786

Be afraid, America. Be very afraid.





 

Comments

75 Responses to “Intolerant Diversity, ‘Rape Culture,’ and the Feminist-Industrial Complex”

  1. Adobe_Walls
    April 26th, 2015 @ 10:25 pm

    ”By ‘feminist research’ we include any work that is informed by an active engagement with feminist intellectual debates,”
    Does this mean you would be welcome?

  2. RS
    April 26th, 2015 @ 10:43 pm

    We can trace this all back to that part of The Enlightenment was concerned that science and rationality would some how destroy Faith. Thus, “Truth” ceased to be singular and became multifaceted, which facets could conflict with each other. Then, of course, instead being facets of a whole, there arose individual, separate and distinct “Truths,” many of which appeared to be mutually inconsistent, but were all considered equally valid.

    And so we arrive at the lunacy which is Ms. Sulkowicz (Motto: “You Can’t Spell ‘Sulkowicz’ Without ‘Sulk.'”) Those of us who pay attention know well the opprobrium leveled at us because we believe in a single Truth ordained by God. We are called “Science Deniers” and our opponents proclaim themselves the “Reality Based Community.” Yet here, we have Ms. Sulkowicz wishing to dismiss “science”–whatever that means in this context–in favor of her own “truth” which she wishes us to accept on faith.

    Yes, it is about power. But it is also indistinguishable from religion. The difference between Ms. Sulkowicz’s religion and mine, is mine has the injunction, “Thou shalt not bear false witness.”

  3. Julie Pascal
    April 26th, 2015 @ 10:45 pm

    I think it means… We welcome any work that agrees with our fundamental doctrine.

    One of my English teachers (a PhD student) described the concept of “theory” in class one day. I, being an old lady, was utterly shocked to hear someone explain what was essentially a deliberate effort to view history, literature, and current events in a pre-determined biased manner… as if that was a good thing in a university setting.

  4. OrangeEnt
    April 26th, 2015 @ 10:56 pm

    Funny, these first two women seem to have muslim names, wait til their father gets home….

  5. Scottie M.
    April 26th, 2015 @ 11:20 pm

    Hoards of women are beginning to cash in on the manufactured rape hysteria being promoted by radical feminists. They have been expanding the definition of rape so much, so that every man is a rapist and every woman is a victim by their definition. Women now realize that claiming to be a rape victim a good way to get some fame and sympathy, at the expense of running an innocent man’s life. Being a rape victim is trendy and popular, and many young women sure aren’t going to miss out on this latest trend.

  6. Warmongerel
    April 26th, 2015 @ 11:59 pm

    I honestly thought that the picture of Bahar Mustafa was a satirical joke before I read the article. It was just too stereotypical of the college radical feminist.

  7. Adobe_Walls
    April 27th, 2015 @ 12:51 am

    Quite.

  8. DeadMessenger
    April 27th, 2015 @ 1:32 am

    The direction society is taking is unspeakably loathesome, and this is only one of many examples. Judgment fast approaches, but as we see, truth is now hate speech. For crying out loud, everyone knows in their heart that this day was going to come, but I’m sad that so many have silenced their consciences.

    I hate to keep harping on this*, but Isaiah 5:20 warned, “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”

    *No I don’t.

  9. DeadMessenger
    April 27th, 2015 @ 1:36 am

    When I was young, back in the beginning of time, people were expected to mature out of being drama queens and attention whores. Of course, this was back in the days when self-induced idiocy was considered shameful and humiliating.

  10. Young men off to college really need to put this movie on their Netflix queue… | Batshit Crazy News
    April 27th, 2015 @ 1:42 am

    […] The Feminism Industrial Complex and Intolerant Diversity Smitty: Her Majesty’s Example Instapundit: Campus Sex Culture and the Parody of Bill […]

  11. RichFader
    April 27th, 2015 @ 2:52 am

    I’d say “you look white enough to me, love,” and sit down.

  12. Prime Director
    April 27th, 2015 @ 3:08 am

    instead being facets of a whole, there arose individual, separate and distinct “Truths,” many of which appeared to be mutually inconsistent, but were all considered equally valid.

    This is the case not only with Truth but with all values.

    Even if we all agree on the essential nature of values Liberty and Equality, Justice and Mercy, etc., the relative importance of these values in a given set of circumstances will be a matter of contention.

    I have for many years thought the problem of the incommensurability, and still more the incompatibility, of some values to be central to all ethical, social, political and aesthetic issues

    Isaiah Berlin

  13. concern00
    April 27th, 2015 @ 3:13 am

    It’s funny that when you roll out your more intellectual pieces that the trolls tend to stay away.

  14. The original Mr. X
    April 27th, 2015 @ 3:29 am

    When people engage in believing in me, they objectify me.
    OK, I won’t believe you.

  15. Daniel Freeman
    April 27th, 2015 @ 5:01 am

    We can trace this all back to that part of The Enlightenment was concerned that science and rationality would some how destroy Faith. Thus, “Truth” ceased to be singular and became multifaceted, which facets could conflict with each other.

    I recently went through an extended period of questioning my faith, even going so far as to self-identify as an agnostic left-libertarian. The fundamental problem was that I perceived the act of faith as training for self-credulity — building a habit of unquestioning — that crossed over the separate domains.

    The resolution of my quest was not to reject faith, but to double down on skepticism in every other sphere. In the end, it really was that simple.

  16. Adjoran
    April 27th, 2015 @ 6:09 am

    Yeah, if you were casting a movie spoofing campus feminism, you’d be screaming, “Bring me a Bahar Mustafa type!”

    Other than for the comedy flick, no one would ever send out for one of her.

  17. Dana
    April 27th, 2015 @ 7:10 am

    Our esteemed host quoted:

    By bringing her to a college campus laden with trauma and sexualized violence and full of victims/survivors, OCRL is choosing to reinforce this climate of denial/ blame/shame that ultimately has real life consequences on the wellbeing of people who have experienced sexualized violence,

    Was the Oberlin Review describing a college, or a hospital? I would imagine that every college has some students who have been victims of some sort of violence, but “laden” and “full of” describes an institution in which the majority of the population have been beaten, raped and abused. How on God’s earth — sorry about the Christofascist godbag desciption! — can Oberlin College do anything other than treat victims and hand out meds?

  18. Jeanette Victoria
    April 27th, 2015 @ 7:14 am

    When I was a young mother I gave my daughter a time out when she was acting like a whiny drama queen.

  19. Dana
    April 27th, 2015 @ 7:15 am

    ‘Twas also back in the days where being drama queens and attention whores wasn’t a lucrative career field for a hopeful few of the practitioners . . . unless they made it in Hollywood.

    It would seem as though the academy is now a series of Little Hollywoods scattered across the fruited plain: only a lucky few of the Gender and Womyns’ Studies majors will ever make a professional career out of such, but the colleges seem to be as full of students majoring in those “academic” fields as Hollywood is filled with waitresses waiting for their big break in (non-porn) films.

  20. Dana
    April 27th, 2015 @ 7:16 am

    You stifled her development! I’m calling Children and Youth!

  21. texlovera
    April 27th, 2015 @ 7:26 am

    Emma Sulkowicz was never raped.

    But somebody sure as hell brain-f*cked her really, really bad.

  22. PeterP
    April 27th, 2015 @ 7:35 am

    When Excluding White Men No Longer Applies:

    “I am a lesbian feminist who graduated with a degree in Gender, Media & Culture and can’t find a job. I invite white men with degrees in engineering and accounting who have found jobs to pay more taxes so the government can forgive my student loans.”

  23. Dana
    April 27th, 2015 @ 7:40 am

  24. RS
    April 27th, 2015 @ 7:49 am

    The resolution of my quest was not to reject faith . . .

    The problem is that faith is viewed as irrational, a view which is patently false. The so-called “reality based community” engages in “faith based” activities all the time. It just refuses to acknowledge it, preferring to slap a patina of “science” on its various assertions in a semantic sleight-of-hand that most people don’t perceive.

  25. Steve Skubinna
    April 27th, 2015 @ 8:05 am

    Thinking hurts, for trolls.

  26. Intolerant Diversity, ‘Rape Culture,’ and the Feminist-Industrial Complex | Living in Anglo-America
    April 27th, 2015 @ 8:06 am
  27. Jeanette Victoria
    April 27th, 2015 @ 8:14 am

    It all about feeling with progressives facts are hateful

  28. RS
    April 27th, 2015 @ 8:14 am

    I alternate between sorrow for what has been lost and anticipation for where I see the world is fast heading. The best we can hope for, I think, is a King Josiah to hold back the tide for a few years. Ultimately, however, I’ve come to believe it is a lost cause, and I weep for those who cannot see what’s clearly on the horizon.

  29. RS
    April 27th, 2015 @ 8:17 am

    Contemplating that quotation give me a headache. WTF does that even mean? It’s like these people have boxes of various parts of speech on little slips of paper and pull them out at random to construct sentences.

    “Donnie and Marie Osmond”

    “Are”

    “Hittites.”

    Makes about as much sense.

  30. marcus tullius cicero
    April 27th, 2015 @ 8:53 am

    …my question is, WHERE do these womyn find jobs after they “graduate” from these so called Universities? They come to “work” with a chip on their shoulder already, who in their right mind would dare hire them…
    H->prison

  31. Finrod Felagund
    April 27th, 2015 @ 9:14 am

    Which is why I call them the Community-Based Reality, a term I heard years ago that is just so apt.

  32. ChandlersGhost
    April 27th, 2015 @ 10:14 am

    Kind of OT:

    So I’ve had a thought over the last couple of days, Stacy. Feminism actually forces people to work harder than they would have in the past. If there is only one student loan to pay off (or preferably zero,) there is less debt. If the wife stays at home with the kids, there is no cost of daycare. [Edit] Which is freaking expensive. [/Edit] My brother and his Berkeley educated feminist wife are both attorneys, and while they make plenty of money there must be 300k in debt between them.

    Feminism really is for neurotic white women, and while I am antifeminist intellectually, guys of my generation were practically born with this shit in our heads. I’m just going to take a blow-off job, learn programming in the off hours and stop stressing so much. Thank God I have a non-feminist girlfriend.

  33. Adobe_Walls
    April 27th, 2015 @ 10:21 am

    There’s no way I’d consider hiring anyone with one of these degrees. I assume that at some point they’d sue, probably over something frivolous.

  34. ChandlersGhost
    April 27th, 2015 @ 10:39 am

    I’ll reply to myself to avoid having to edit that post again. I just did the math and discovered that my rent costs about seven bucks an hour of full time work in one of the most expensive cities in the country (granted, it is a low-rent place.) I drive a used car. Food isn’t really that expensive, and honestly who needs cable?

    I think my Mexican neighbors have been doing it right all along.

  35. Fail Burton
    April 27th, 2015 @ 10:52 am

    None of these bizarre hateful women and their sucker “allies” are capable of upholding a thing like our Constitution let alone creating it. Since intersectional gender feminism is indistinguishable in principle from the KKK, it should be shunned wherever it is found.

  36. RKae
    April 27th, 2015 @ 11:12 am

    And the more they get degrees in nonsense, the quicker they will bring back the gender wage gap.

    …Which gives them power.

  37. Dana
    April 27th, 2015 @ 11:25 am

    Actually, I can see her as the hapless first victim in another Friday the 13th movie.

  38. Finrod Felagund
    April 27th, 2015 @ 11:44 am

    This is why ‘gender studies’ degrees have negative value.

  39. JayDee
    April 27th, 2015 @ 11:57 am

    Hate to split hairs here, but she’s the exact opposite of a fascist since fascism includes homophobia, racism, misogyny, classism, ableism, etc. Words have meaning and the word fascism shouldn’t be thrown around to describe someone’s agenda you simply don’t like. She’s a New Left Socialist, or Post Left Anarchist, or Neo Marxist, but definitely not a crypto fascist. Ted Cruz is a crypto fascist with an uncanny physical resemblance to Joe McCarthy.

  40. Dana
    April 27th, 2015 @ 12:18 pm

    I denounce myself for the feeling of schadenfreude!

    http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltalohGjbP1r25y9yo1_500.jpg

  41. robertstacymccain
    April 27th, 2015 @ 12:27 pm

    Fascism distinguishes itself as a political philosophy of power for the sake of power. It originated with Mussolini’s rogue socialism in Italy, the paramilitary “March on Rome” to depose what was seen as an ineffective parliamentary government, which Hitler attempted to emulate in the Munich “Beer Hall Putsch.” Fascism has been deliberately associated with “racism” and “nationalism” because such an analysis suited the propaganda interests of the Soviet Union and the worldwide communist revolutionary movement. Yet as anyone who has read Jonah Goldberg (or Freidrich Hayek, among others) understands, the differences between fascism, Nazism and Bolshevism were not really that great. All totalitarian doctrines are ultimately alike in basic ways, and are to be contrasted with the classic liberal ideas of the free society.

    With Ms. Mustafa, my choice of “fascist thug” was an alternative to calling her a “brownshirt,” although now I realize I could have more accurately called her a commissar. Nevertheless, what I had in mind was the bullying brutality by which Ernst Rohm’s brownshirts (the SA) used to break up meetings of opponents (particularly Communists) or to enforce order in Nazi meetings. Ms. Mustafa and her ideological comrades are bullies of a similar spirit, as feminists have repeatedly demonstrated their willingness to use terroristic intimidation tactics to suppress opposition.

  42. JayDee
    April 27th, 2015 @ 1:00 pm

    Hayek(I’ve never read Goldberg)bases his reading on nothing more than the economic dimension of fascism(which he sees as Statist, and therefore leftist), and gets that wrong too, since industrialists supported fascists, especially Hitler, as a bulwark against labor unions, socialism, and communism. The nationalist, and racist leanings of fascists are not Soviet propaganda, and are actually intrinsic to fascism, especially in Germany(along with anti feminism, militarism, anti liberalism, homophobia, and family values)and based on ideas that had been kicked around since before the turn of the 20th Century. What makes fascism, fascism is its socio cultural leanings and that places it very much on the right wing of the political spectrum. Tactics are not idology and idelogically Mustafa is an anti fascist, and very much a leftist, but probably not even a bona fide Marxist. who really advocates total central planning of the economy? Not even so called communist leaders. If I was going to read about the fascist movement Id read Richard J Evans, or Ian Kershaw.

  43. DeadMessenger
    April 27th, 2015 @ 1:16 pm

    Be cheaper still if your brother and his eife moved in snd shared the rent. Then they could start chipping away at that debt. =)

  44. ChandlersGhost
    April 27th, 2015 @ 1:21 pm

    Then I’d have a real L.A. apartment. Five people in two bedrooms.

  45. DeadMessenger
    April 27th, 2015 @ 1:31 pm

    That stupid woman confused “want to major in” with “have to major in, in order to get a job”. I don’t feel a bit sorry for her, either.

    Not only that, but I’d put money down that at least one person in her life warned her. And also, why isn’t her husband supporting the family? Because she made another stupid choice in that area, too?

    When people suffer the natural consequences of their self-imposed stupidity, that’s supposed to teach important life lessons, that, you know, she ought to be learning by now. Derp.

    I don’t denounce you, I denounce her.

  46. Daniel Freeman
    April 27th, 2015 @ 1:48 pm

    Speaking of TL;DR, that’s a good channel on YouTube. He gives sarcasm to people that deserve it.

  47. Dana
    April 27th, 2015 @ 2:01 pm

    How would they know?

  48. Dana
    April 27th, 2015 @ 2:05 pm

    Alas! I feel sorry for myself on this one, ’cause if she is relying on WIC and food stamps, it’s coming out of my pocket!

    And I denounce the guy who was stupid enough — or blind enough — to copulate with her.

  49. Prime Director
    April 27th, 2015 @ 2:06 pm

    The only thing “right wing” about fascism is the hegelianism.

  50. RKae
    April 27th, 2015 @ 2:12 pm

    Um… what job does she THINK that degree should get her?

    She never says.

    It’s like a dulcimer player complaining that no heavy metal bands ever call for session work.