The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Feminism: Death Cult Chaos

Posted on | December 30, 2015 | 150 Comments

 

“Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It” — this is a truth that cannot be repeated often enough as we watch the Democrat-Media Complex mobilize all its resources to elect Hillary Clinton president. Monday night I found myself assailed on Twitter by Clintonistas who resented my characterization of feminism as a totalitarian ideology as rigid and intolerant as the neo-Stalinism of the North Korean regime. The one thing Democrats cannot tolerate is the truth, and suppressing the truth about feminism — a movement that is not about “equality,” but instead is about power — is therefore necessary to Democrat success in the 2016 election campaign. If the truth is known, Democrats lose. Meanwhile, in England . . .

A student has spoken out about the challenges of identifying as neither male or female and also being attracted to both genders.
Speaking with the Liverpool Echo, Amy Toon – who studies modern history and politics at the University of Liverpool – described a feeling of relief at being able to self-identify as being non-binary and pansexual after years of being in the unknown.
However, despite being generally treated with respect, Amy told the site being referred to as “a girl” is upsetting and that many people think gay marriage is enough, but insisted the opposite. Amy also added how the option of hormone replacement would mean having to wait for up to five years, and said: “You have to live for quite a while being very unhappy with who you are.” . . .
Amy, originally from Leeds, described having to sign on as being female, however, services like the NHS provide the option of ‘Mx’ instead of the usual ‘Miss/Mr/Mrs’, and also told the news site “they/them” is a preferable way of being addressed, whereas others may opt for “ze, hir, hirs, and xe, xem, or xyr.”
Even though Amy has received support since self-identifying with both groups, the undergraduate highlighted feelings of anxiety and depression when being called a “girl” and added how students at the university “can be really transphobic.” Amy added: “They make stupid statements and our LGBT posters were torn down.” . . .

Amy Toon is a victim of society, oppressed by pronouns. How dare you call a girl a “girl,” you heteronormative transphobic bigot?

As easy as it is to laugh at such products of feminist ideology, we must not overlook the tragic dimension — what if it were your daughter who had been brainwashed by the transgender cult? — and the disastrous social consequences. A couple of weeks ago, I interviewed a parent whose child had been captured by this movement. It was a story familiar to anyone who has paid attention to this trend: A tomboyish daughter, a good student, generally well-behaved but somewhat socially awkward, quite suddenly becomes hostile and defiant, announces that she is “he,” denounces her parents as bigots for questioning the decision to “transition,” and pursues a new persona based on an extreme alienation from her female identity. Only after this dramatic and heartbreaking departure — their daughter not merely renouncing her identity, but rejecting her family — did the parents discover the precipitating cause. Their daughter, trying to cope with an adolescent identity crisis, had gone exploring the corners of the Internet where advocates of transgenderism celebrate “transition” as a miraculous cure for every confused teenager’s problem. These FtM (female-to-male) transgender blogs feature photos and videos showing the effects of testosterone injections and weightlifting in developing a masculinized physique, and the results of “top” surgery (i.e., mastectomy) by which tomboys turn themselves into simulations of men. Inside the transgender cult’s online echo chamber, the teenager encounters a very one-sided message.

“Propaganda” is not too strong a word to describe the transgender cult’s carefully calculated campaign to convert the confusion of an adolescent crisis into the certainty of “transition” into a new identity. Much like a porngraphy addict, the vulnerable teenager who is at first merely curious about transgenderism may quickly become obsessed, and parents whose children fall prey to the transgender cult often report that their teenager went from normal to weirdo to fanatic in a matter of months.

Laughter is not the appropriate response to these tragedies, and it is not just Christian conservatives who are raising concerns about the transgender cult’s recruitment campaign. Radical feminists have been warning about this trend for years. The blog 4th Wave Now was started by a feminist who watched in horror as her daughter was captured by the transgender cult. Understand that the feminist mom responsible for 4th Wave Now enthusiastically approved of her daughter’s lesbianism; it was when the teenage lesbian rejected female identity that her mother became alarmed. Feminist gender theory — the social construction of the gender binary within the heterosexual matrix — denies that there is any such thing as “human nature,” and feminists condemn heterosexuality as “the ideology of male supremacy.” Teaching girls to hate and fear men is what feminist motherhood is all about, so when their daughters want to become men — identifying with the hated male oppressor — we understand why feminists panic. Instead of smashing patriarchy, their daughters want to be the patriarchy.

 

The feminist crusade to destroy civilization in the name of “equality” has produced many ironic results, and we may be tempted to laugh when the debris of this destructive project lands on the doorsteps of man-hating fanatics who have fomented this War Against Human Nature. Yes, we can ridicule freaks like Tobias “Tobi” Hill-Meyer, whose career as a transgender pornographer brought shame on his/”her” lesbian feminist mother(s). However, the expanding cultural influence of radical feminism — promoted for decades in university Women’s Studies classrooms, and now increasingly extended to the public school curriculum — is aimed at all children, and every parent concerned for the future must pay attention. “The Queering of Feminism” means that “equality” requires the destruction of morality. All critical dissent must be suppressed while government schools indoctrinate children in the movement’s anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology. Wellesley College Professor Julie Matthaei credits feminism with exposing “the oppressiveness of traditional heterosexuality” in a movement that “advocated lesbianism as an option for women.” By demonizing males and stigmatizing heterosexuality in this way, feminism seeks to create equality, but what it actually creates is decadence and chaos.

Meanwhile, in England . . .

The number of primary school-aged children, some as young as four, beginning to “transition” their gender is rising rapidly in the UK. The popularity of the fad appears to be clustered, with children copying others in the same schools.
Up to 80 primary school-aged children a year are now seeking help towards potentially changing their gender, the chair of Mermaids, a charity which lobbies for families who believe their children and teenagers are transgendered, has revealed.
Speaking to the Telegraph, Susie Green said that, in some cases, British children as young as four are already in the process of “transitioning” to another sex.
She also described how her organisation has observed a cluster effect across the country, with children following one and another in the same school; a school where there might be a teacher who promotes transgender ideology.
Her anecdotal evidence correlates with the results of a study by Mark Zucker at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Canada, which found that transgenderism was more prominent and persistent among children when promoted by adults.
Researchers observed that children who saw therapists and others in authority who assume that they belong to the opposite sex can actually become more distressed, exacerbating their “gender dysphoric identity.”

Ask yourself, why is this trend so noticeable in England? One reason may be the 2010 Equality Act which effectively criminalizes criticism of the LGBT agenda. By making “sexual orientation” a protected category, this law not only requires schools to hire gay teachers, but makes it hazardous for anyone to express disapproval of homosexuality. LGBT advocacy in British schools is now ubiquitous and exempt from criticism, as is the case in many American school systems, where such advocacy often takes the form of “anti-bullying” programs. Is it any wonder, really, that many young people are so deeply confused about their sexuality?

Many parents are clueless about what is being taught in their children’s schools, but when we see transgender children in elementary school and LGBT clubs in high schools, it becomes obvious that the education system itself is dedicated to promoting this ideology. However, at the same time, the feminist fanatics who created the phony “rape epidemic” hysteria on college campuses are now promoting “consent education” in K-12 schools — to make sure that all students are warned that males are dangerous and heterosexuality is “rape culture.”

Feminism is a Death Cult, whose only goal is destruction — destroying religion, family, liberty, morality and, ultimately, human life itself.




 

Category: Sex Trouble

Comments

150 Responses to “Feminism: Death Cult Chaos”

  1. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:13 am

    You’re naivete is hilarious. I’ve simply stated an observation. There is nothing to call anyone on. You simply don’t pay as much attention to what is going on as you like to let on.

  2. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:14 am

    Whatever those voices in your head tell you.

  3. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:18 am

    There are a large number of people that call themselves Christians who are not. Barna has done good work on showing this. The “Evangelical” left is such only in their own conceit.

    Even the GOP has admitted that Evangelical voters have been a very large plus for the GOP. Without them, they would hold neither house of congress, and Reagan and both Bushes would never have made it to the white house. The left likes to think otherwise and you are welcome to buy whatever delusion they are peddling.

    But, you are entitled to your own opinion.

  4. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:18 am

    None of that has been the least bit effective.

  5. Fail Burton
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:35 am

    Ridiculous. WBC was nothing more than a single family and a few friends. It was no more significant than a conversation which may take place in any backyard party in America.

    And you have it backwards. We are not saying all feminists are anything. We are identifying a specific ideology that uses the word “feminism.” We have made it clear what one needs to qualify as the kind of “feminist” we go after.

  6. Fail Burton
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:39 am

    It’s not a question of being “worth it,” but of potential damage and the mainstreaming of hate speech. I am not concerned about the nutty neighbor who doesn’t like so-and-so. I am concerned with an ideology gaining traction to the point the Dept. of Education is writing letters extorting colleges into setting up extra-legal kangaroo courts. Stop making dumb comparisons. There is anecdote and there is institution. One person not liking Jews is not the same as a university having anti-Jewish quotas.

  7. Fail Burton
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:40 am

    False, they have changed the landscape of gov’t, initiatives, media and art.

  8. Fail Burton
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:42 am

    We are not attacking any labels. What in the world is there about analyzing rhetoric and tracing it back to foundational texts taught at universities do you not understand?

  9. Fail Burton
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:43 am

    Let’s hide in Innsmouth until Tor makes the gender binary go away.

  10. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 11:56 am

    When I start reading about how ALL feminists do terrible things, yeah, somebody is attacking the label. Especially when there’s no contrasting view.

    Since I’ve posted comments here, I’ve offered at least a dozen examples of self-proclaimed feminists who don’t do those things and indeed speak out against the anti-male and anti-human bias. That’s usually when someone here tells me that they aren’t True Feminists®.

    Going after the label is wrong. Going after individuals who cross the line, that is defending yourself.

  11. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 11:58 am

    In other words, you didn’t read what I said before criticizing.

  12. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 12:05 pm

    No, the GOP has admitted that the “Evangelical wing” has brought some press. Since 2000, the positive impact has been dropping. The “unchurched” demographic is having a bigger and bigger impact.

  13. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 12:08 pm

    And that is QM code for “I can’t talk sense against your point so I’m going to try to make this personal, just like the SJWs.”

    I acknowledge your concession.

  14. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 12:10 pm

    Did you really pay attention to GamerGate?

  15. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 12:12 pm

    Yes they do.

    Feminism is supposed to be about choice. But apparently some choices are better than others.

  16. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 12:16 pm

    No, they changed the rules.

    The landscape is still the same.

    The libertarian in me will say that the only way to get government (and government money) out of the equation is to drastically reduce the size of government.

    Will you agree to give up conservative government interference if it means no liberal government interference?

    Neither help nor hinder. Let the ideas prove themselves.

  17. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 12:20 pm

    Let me point something out. And it’s certainly something that has hurt conservatives during the Imperious Leader’s reign.

    There was a devil’s deal done with tax exemption. Yes, “worthy” organizations were free from the income tax, but it was the FedGov that decided which organizations were “worthy.”

    That’s the trap. More government to fix the mistakes of government and because people can’t be trusted to make the “right” choice.

  18. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 12:26 pm

    Given the attitudes held by Bush the Elder and Bush the Younger (and some of Clinton’s comments), we didn’t know. There were elements in government that worked against non-Christians (the Air Force Academy and the Faith Based Initiative come to mind).

    Now with the benefit of hindsight it’s obvious. It wasn’t at the time.

    You shouldn’t go after them because they’re feminists. You should go after them because of their individual behavior. And you should find ways to build bridges to the feminists who are just as repelled as you are.

  19. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 12:32 pm

    The problem isn’t because of feminist or liberal ideology. It’s because left to itself, government expands and draws more and more power to itself.

    Without government interference in everything from the internet to Title IX to mandated ethanol, the so-called liberal agenda would collapse because it could not support itself.

  20. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 1:40 pm

    I did and the comment stands.

  21. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 1:42 pm

    Once more, you reveal your ignorance. I was active in GOP politics for much of my adult life. I know exactly what they admitted to. The only thing you’ve said that is partially accurate is the impact since 2000. Evangelicals still out weigh “nones” by a lot.

  22. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 1:46 pm

    Hold any delusion you like, but there was no concession. I am well aware of gamergate. But it has had little impact so far outside of gamers. The “Puppies” have some effect with the Woldlcon, but so far hasn’t gotten much traction beyond that.

    You grasp at straws far too often. It would be better if you stuck to the little you know.

  23. Prime Director
    January 1st, 2016 @ 1:58 pm

    Going after the label is wrong.

    Nah, the label is bogus.

    If feminism is just about equality, then what distinguishes feminism from liberalism?

    Sufferage was about equality. Feminism is just palette-swap utopian marxism, with women as the proletariat and men as the running dog capitalists.

    E’rybody knows that.

    Goddam, boy

  24. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 4:17 pm

    All group labels are bogus.

    That’s the point. The vice or virtue is in what an individual says and does, not the group label.

    The WBC weren’t really what Christianity is supposed to be about.

    Likewise, these young feminist bloggers aren’t what feminism or suffrage or human rights are about.

    They get the headlines and the attention yes. They get that because it sells page clicks to have a Weirdo of the Week.

    I say let these ideas compete without government backing. See which ideas can work and which will fail.

    Feminism shouldn’t be the target, not in the least because it makes you the Monster of the Week.

  25. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 4:22 pm

    I can’t believe you’re using a thirty-five year old election as an example of current politics. A generation and a half has come of age since then.

    Shift happens, no matter what your personal preferences.

  26. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 4:26 pm

    More like teetering.

    You need a better foundation.

  27. Prime Director
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:17 pm

    If feminism is just about equal civil rights regardless of sex, then we clearly don’t need “feminism”.

    Liberalism is already about equality.

    Sufferage brought consistency to liberalism.

    So what distinguishes liberalism from feminism?

  28. Prime Director
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:17 pm

    If feminism is just about equal civil rights regardless of sex, then we clearly don’t need “feminism”.

    Liberalism is already about equality.

    Sufferage brought consistency to liberalism.

    So what distinguishes liberalism from feminism?

  29. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:21 pm

    Pardon, but I refuse to participate in a discussion about the ideas we do and do not need.

    That inevitably sets up one group above all others to decide what is “right” and “wrong.”

    Much better to let ideas work or not. People should make their choice and live with the consequences.

    Notice that means I am under no obligation to bail someone out if their idea blows up or doesn’t work out.

  30. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:21 pm

    Pardon, but I refuse to participate in a discussion about the ideas we do and do not need.

    That inevitably sets up one group above all others to decide what is “right” and “wrong.”

    Much better to let ideas work or not. People should make their choice and live with the consequences.

    Notice that means I am under no obligation to bail someone out if their idea blows up or doesn’t work out.

  31. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:31 pm

    LOL! Coming from you that’s sufficient confirmation of what I said.

  32. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:31 pm

    LOL! Coming from you that’s sufficient confirmation of what I said.

  33. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:33 pm

    You refuse to deal with ideas on any basis that you yourself do not define. You’re simply unserious.

  34. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:33 pm

    You refuse to deal with ideas on any basis that you yourself do not define. You’re simply unserious.

  35. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:35 pm

    But I like the gender binary, particularly the feminine part.

  36. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:35 pm

    But I like the gender binary, particularly the feminine part.

  37. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:35 pm

    You rang?

  38. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:39 pm

    Quit arguing like an idiot. I did not use a 35 year old election as an “example.” It was used as a point in time. Frankly, you refuse to argue like an adult so why not try someplace where they argue on your level. Huffington Post would be good place for you.

  39. Quartermaster
    January 1st, 2016 @ 5:39 pm

    Quit arguing like an idiot. I did not use a 35 year old election as an “example.” It was used as a point in time. Frankly, you refuse to argue like an adult so why not try someplace where they argue on your level. Huffington Post would be good place for you.

  40. Daniel Freeman
    January 1st, 2016 @ 6:18 pm

    Men have hierarchies which work best when enforced positively. (Both excessive hazing and bans on hazing are bad for society.)

    Women have more in-group preference — which results in lopsided laws, enforcement and courts — because women prefer women, and so do men.

    But you’re right, loyalty is a masculine trait.

  41. Daniel Freeman
    January 1st, 2016 @ 6:24 pm

    Really? Not all Nazis are like that?

  42. mole
    January 1st, 2016 @ 7:24 pm

    Any court which seeks to keep its deliberations “secret” probably isnt administering justice.

  43. KrakenFartz
    January 1st, 2016 @ 7:57 pm

    But, but, what about all the moderate, peaceful Nazis? It is racist to tar all Nazis with the same brush because of some embarrassing incidents in the past carried out by unrepresentative extremists. People who engage in hate-speech against Nazis are literally Hitler. Why can’t we all just get along?

  44. Prime Director
    January 1st, 2016 @ 8:38 pm

    Pardon, but I refuse to participate in a discussion about the ideas we do and do not need.

    IF feminism is concerned primarily with equality
    AND liberalism is concerned primarily with equality
    THEN feminism and liberalism are primarily concerned with the same thing
    AND THEREFORE feminism is redundant and unnecessary.

    Liberalism incorporated the suffragist platform and the civil rights platform to attain a higher degree of moral and ideological consistency.

    Classical Liberalism is the original All Lives Matter movement. I see the femininists simply as Female Lives Matter chauvinists.

  45. Prime Director
    January 1st, 2016 @ 8:51 pm

    BTW, what distinguishes liberalism from feminism?

    Don’t be so stingy with your obvious plethora of wisdom.

    If you won’t share with me the definition of feminism with which you truck, however am I to progress and approach a similar degree of enlightenment?

    Pick up some verbal fencing and draw a boundary around this idea, if you would be so kind; so I, too can see it with true sight and begin a proper examination of its limits.

  46. Nan
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:13 pm

    I believe our host has previously posted on the injustice of the trannies inability to get dates with the cisgendered heteronormative pterodactyl types. Those with their original equipment are found to be disinterested in the confused.

    Oh, and I haven’t been here much lately but there was an article a few months ago, written by a black woman, complaining how tired she is of discrimination in dating. She’s a college professor and wants to date white men. White men on dating sites aren’t interested in her. She feels entitled to dates with the men she thinks are interesting. Next thing we know, there will be enforced dating.

  47. Nan
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:31 pm

    I went to Topeka for Christmas several years ago and they had a sufficient presence to have protesters at two churches that I saw. I drove past one church and went to the service at the other. There were children protesting.

  48. Nan
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:32 pm

    Crazy woman with well-groomed eyebrows.

    Too much of this stuff can’t be healthy for you to read though.

  49. Dana
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:37 pm

    If she “wants to date white men,” as opposed to “there’s a white man in whom she is interested,” how would that be any less racially discriminatory than some white men not wanting to date black women?

  50. Daniel Freeman
    January 1st, 2016 @ 10:57 pm

    Secret justice is injustice
    Family court is jailing