The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Guys: Never Talk to a College Girl

Posted on | February 19, 2016 | 78 Comments

The more I read about the current climate on America’s college and university campuses, the more convinced I am that no man smart enough to go to college would ever be stupid enough to date a college girl.

Feminists have ginned up a frightening hysteria of anti-male fear among female students. Any boy who kisses a girl on campus could be expelled for sexual assault, and even speaking to a college girl might result in accusations of harassment. Feminist “rape culture” rhetoric has incited such a virulent hatred of males among college girls that they go berserk at the idea of a man being invited to speak on campus, even if the man is homosexual. A frenzy of uncontrollable madness was unleashed when Milo Yiannopoulos spoke last week at Rutgers University:

Breitbart tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos made an appearance at Rutgers University, and his ideas and rhetoric so traumatized the delicate flowers who heard him that many of them attended a “group therapy” session afterward.
You are not going to believe what happened next:

According to the [Rutgers student newspaper The Daily Targum], students and faculty members held a wound-licking gathering at a cultural center on campus, where students described “feeling scared, hurt, and discriminated against.”
“A variety of different organizations and departments were present to listen, answer questions and show support” to the apparently weak and vulnerable students, who just a few days prior had disrupted Yiannopoulos’ event by smearing fake blood on their faces and chanting protest slogans.
One student at the event told the Targum that they “broke down crying” after the event, while another reported that he felt “scared to walk around campus the next day.” According to the report, “many others” said they felt “unsafe” at the event and on campus afterwards.
“It is upsetting that my mental health is not cared about by the University,” said one student at the event. “I do not know what else to do for us to be heard for us to be cared about. I deserve an apology, everyone in this room deserves an apology.”
A number of organizations were at the event to offer support to the poor, traumatised students. These included Psychiatric Services, the Office for Violence Prevention and Victim Assistance, and the Rutgers University Police.

Dear God, the education system is turning kids into spineless cowards. My paratrooper son spends his days jumping out of C-130s and marching for miles with 70 pounds of gear on his back, but Rutgers students “broke down crying” and were “scared to walk around campus” because Milo gave a speech? Are there any sane students at Rutgers? Are there no responsible adults in the administration or faculty? Like every other university in America, Rutgers has been descending into decadent chaos for years, as evidenced by this story from September 2014:

Jessica Valenti hopes to redefine
what rape really means
A Rutgers graduate with a master’s degree in women’s and gender studies, Jessica Valenti . . . addressed an almost-full Trayes Hall in the Douglass Campus Center yesterday during her presentation, called “Yes Means Yes: Battling Rape Culture and Moving Towards a Positive Sexuality.” . . .
“I am a feminist this month because a student and activist Emma Sulkowicz carries around a mattress to all of her classes in protest until her rapist is kicked out of her school,” Valenti said.
Valenti hopes to redefine rape, saying that the word has been so distorted that it makes it difficult for sexual assault survivors to admit and report rape. She added that society tends not to believe victims.
The new definition of rape, she said, must include the acknowledgement of inequalities and discriminations in society . . .

What does this mean? It means never talk to a college girl.

“The new definition of rape” means that everything is rape, if a feminist says it is rape, and guess what? Any guy who talks to a college girl is a rapist, because “inequalities and discriminations in society” or something. Whatever. Feminists like Jessica Valenti clearly won’t be happy until males are forbidden to attend college. Heterosexuality will be prohibited on campus and guys will be subject to arrest if they go anywhere within 500 feet of a college girl. And this would probably be a good idea, because college girls are so crazy now that no parent would want their son to associate with one of them.




 

Category: Education, Sex Trouble

Comments

78 Responses to “Guys: Never Talk to a College Girl”

  1. Robert What?
    February 19th, 2016 @ 5:47 pm

    I don’t envy the writers at The Onion. I mean, how are you going to write satire for a living when real life has become satire?

  2. K-Bob
    February 19th, 2016 @ 5:57 pm

    I think I was raped like, twice, from reading this article.

    It wasn’t incredibly rapey, though. Just rape-ish. Like when you eat a salad and find out the hard way there’s some grit in the spinach. You know, “rape.”

  3. DeadMessenger
    February 19th, 2016 @ 6:02 pm

    Well, of course, because “inequalities and discriminations in society” or something.

  4. DeadMessenger
    February 19th, 2016 @ 6:03 pm

    They may be forced by circumstances to become serious investigative journalists over there. I mean, it is a niche, given that there are so few of them.

  5. Finrod Felagund
    February 19th, 2016 @ 6:14 pm

    Rape is being defined downward the same way torture was: for political convenience so it can be used as a club to beat people with.

  6. DeadMessenger
    February 19th, 2016 @ 6:15 pm

    I was considering taking an MBA at Ole Miss, but I’m sort of afraid to step foot on a college campus at this point. What if I’m forced to call a feminist a jackwagon after she says something stupid, and get expelled for it?

  7. NeoWayland
    February 19th, 2016 @ 6:18 pm

    As long as someone insists that “the personal is political,” I’m going to reveal a deep dark truth about myself.

    I prefer my sex partners don’t whine BEFORE they become sex partners.

  8. Quartermaster
    February 19th, 2016 @ 6:49 pm

    If you did that you’d be a rapey rapist and a H8tey H8er and it would be obvious you could not possibly be allowed to make Oxford such an unsafe space for leftards who bruise easily. If you were a boy instead of a girl, you would have to go to re-education camp to be helped over your white male privilege. Then you’d be expelled.

  9. DeadMessenger
    February 19th, 2016 @ 6:55 pm

    But…but…doesn’t Oxford need more H8tey H8ters like me? I might also accidentally on-purpose mention Jesus, and in a good way. Plus, I’m part Native American and wheelchair bound and maybe I could get a scholarship. Wouldn’t that frost the libs?

  10. RS
    February 19th, 2016 @ 7:36 pm

    There are about 40,000 students at the main campus of Rutgers. How many of these 40K showed up to ostentatiously display their mental “anguish” which they claim resulted from Milo’s speech?

  11. Fail Burton
    February 19th, 2016 @ 8:07 pm

    Anti-white lesbian liberation ideology has been remarkably effective in mainstreaming hate speech, delusion and even madness precisely because no one calls it by that name. Instead it all goes under the rubric of “feminism” and who could be against that?

    Intersectionality and lesbian theory work great as long as you assume the innate hostility of men, whites and heterosexuals towards women, non-whites and gays. In other words Third Wave Feminism operates much like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Take away the assumed hostility and immorality of straight white males and TWF pops like a soap bubble. Imagine if Ripley behaved exactly towards the Alien as she does in the movie but the Alien never actually does any harm towards anyone. That activism powered by paranoia, assumptions and delusion pretty much sums up TWF.

    The genius of TWF is it takes real-world historic events such as Jim Crow, arranged marriages and women’s suffrage and not only freezes them in time but spreads them about globally. By simply ignoring the progress of law and institution and putting in their place such vague terms as “structural inequality” TWF is the gift that never ends. Jim Crow never ended, women never voted and marriage was never a decent institution. The normal world is defined by the most corrupt versions of society cherry-picked from history as the “norm.” In the case of the “intersectional” element, the only global history shown is where oppression is white on non-white, never non-white on white, non-white on non-white or white on white. Therefore “colonialism” also becomes an exclusive symbol of white corruption.

    The Trojan Horse pull of this anti-white lesbian liberation ideology has been so successful that white heterosexual women like Jessica Valenti and even male “feminists” have been drawn in by their own ignorance, lack of sophistication and naivete into believing this is just “feminism.” Let’s just pretend these people don’t talk about straight white males the way anti-Semites talk about Jews and ignore their clever demonization theories which smear all white men like “rape culture” and “white privilege” as well.

    We shouldn’t be surprised an ideology which throws aside history, due process and equal protection and is so easily torn apart on that basis is also against free speech. “Inequalities and discriminations” can mean anything one wants them to mean. What is a “ball” or a “strike” without a strike zone, and yet Valenti and her idiots are calling balls and strikes with a strike zone only they determine and can see.

  12. JosephBleau
    February 19th, 2016 @ 8:26 pm

    They were bought out by a Hillary supporter and gave up writing real satire to become an arm of the Hillary Clinton campaign.

  13. Quartermaster
    February 19th, 2016 @ 9:32 pm

    Native American, disabled, scholarship and mentioning Jesus in a good way? Oh, yes!!! Good Bye safe spaces, hello catatonia and asploding heads!

    You may be onto something here!

  14. Quartermaster
    February 19th, 2016 @ 9:33 pm

    Serves you right for laying out all this time. While you were gone all the safe spaces here disappeared. We’re used to it. You’ll just have to adjust.

  15. Robert What?
    February 19th, 2016 @ 10:07 pm

    They rarely write anything truly courageous. Not for years.

  16. Abu Nudnik
    February 19th, 2016 @ 11:13 pm

    The Morlocks are coming!. The Morlocks are coming!

  17. DeadMessenger
    February 19th, 2016 @ 11:15 pm

    It would be wicked good fun, QM. And if any student took exception to Jesus mentioning, I could start to cry and say that the University of Mississippi is intolerant of my Native American spiritual beliefs, and my disability, and thet are ageist, and demand that those intolerant students be given diversity training.

    I’m starting to think that yes, maybe I do need at least one more degree. I would need a capstone project for my MBA, too, some I’m thinking perhaps a project at a Christian outreach mission specializing in charity work for the poor on reservations. The libtards would want desperately to object, but couldn’t without violating their PC notions of social justice. It would be a boffo brain-splodey good time! (For me.)

  18. Abu Nudnik
    February 19th, 2016 @ 11:16 pm

    Call me skeptical. Sexplain please how you intend to Queer this.

  19. DeadMessenger
    February 20th, 2016 @ 12:07 am

    Perhaps Wombat can explain. He has a way with words.

  20. Patrick Carroll
    February 20th, 2016 @ 12:26 am

    Back in the day, I volunteered for everything. That way, I got used to the hard tasks to come, before they became hard tasks.

    Should the world come to its well-deserved end, the SJWs, et al., will be pickings. They’ll never have manned up, so they’ll be chattels or camp-followers.

    Sad, that.

  21. K-Bob
    February 20th, 2016 @ 12:31 am

    It’s too late for that!

  22. Wombat_socho
    February 20th, 2016 @ 12:55 am

    Cishet disabled women are the new queer. How’s that?

  23. Wombat_socho
    February 20th, 2016 @ 12:55 am

    But afterward it’s justified? 😉

  24. Daniel Freeman
    February 20th, 2016 @ 1:26 am

    RSM, your Twitter account has been suspended. I suspected as much when everyone else’s embedded tweets showed properly except yours, which were just grey boxes with text, so I clicked the link on @DateOffCampus’s tweet, and sure enough…

    I bet their pretext was your use of the title of Milo’s tour. Oh noes, a breeder used the sacred word Faggot that only Queers may use!

  25. Daniel Freeman
    February 20th, 2016 @ 1:39 am

    DM could tutor the male MBA students in statistics, in a wickedly queer subversion of gender roles.

    (It never ceases to amaze me how feminism has reinforced stereotypes by railing against them, instead of just letting people be individuals like we used to do.)

  26. Daniel Freeman
    February 20th, 2016 @ 1:44 am

    I’m afraid if you cried, the modern treatment for a Strong Independent Woman on campus would be to show you a puppy video while waiting for someone else to run to the safe space for a teddy bear, a coloring book and some color-blind crayons. Or something like that.

  27. Fail Burton
    February 20th, 2016 @ 2:14 am

    Let this be a lesson to everyone bleating about Marxists, Leftist, cultural Marxism and liberals. Twitter is shadowbanning and suspending accts. which specifically are the most effective at countering Third Wave Feminism. This has nothing to do with abuse. TWF accts. themselves are centers of abuse, harassment, racial incitement and incitement to hate men. They cruise unscathed while their opponents are memory-holed. Unless Twitter sees itself as a charity devoted to electing a Democratic President. it seems Twitter is going to show itself to be the ultimate example of how TWF will destroy anything which embraces it.

  28. DeadMessenger
    February 20th, 2016 @ 3:29 am

    And I’d treat them to some good ol’ fashioned Southern girl crayon sketches of guns, hunting trips and zombie brain eating. It’s not like they’d give me a psych test to get in, or they’d lose 90% of the paying student body.

    I’d watch the puppy videos though, while I wondered aloud whether that dawg could be trained as my combination service dog – slash – hunting hound. I could share cool stories about my ol’ hounds Cletus and Goober. Bet them SJWs would dig those stories. I could take notes and send ’em to Vox Day. Hahahahaha!

    P.s. Color blind crayons – good one! BWAHAHAHAHA!

  29. DeadMessenger
    February 20th, 2016 @ 3:34 am

    ding*ding*ding

    We’ve got a winner!

  30. BunE22
    February 20th, 2016 @ 3:35 am

    I’m reading the article and get to this;

    According to the [Rutgers student newspaper The Daily Targum], students and faculty members..

    And I thought it said Rutgers Student newspaper The Daily Tantrum. They should consider changing the name to that.

  31. DeadMessenger
    February 20th, 2016 @ 3:39 am

    That would be an awesome idea, actually. I’ve been working on a certificate in Data Science through Johns Hopkins, and most of my fellow students – the vast majority, actually – are men, and I am able to assist them awesomely, because I myself am awesomely brilliant. As far as you know.

    My, you’re right! How wickedly queer of me! I’m feeling cool right now in a peculiarly Native American, disabled, ageist, queer way! I’m going to use this very language in my next job interview (next week) and I believe I’ll be hired in a thrice. Because they’ll be afraid not to hire me! Thanks Daniel!

  32. DeadMessenger
    February 20th, 2016 @ 3:44 am

    If truth in advertising were a thing, they would be legally forced to.

  33. DeadMessenger
    February 20th, 2016 @ 4:16 am

    Um…they DO see themselves as a charity devoted to electing a Democratic President. Cripes, dude, hulloooo!

  34. DeadMessenger
    February 20th, 2016 @ 4:16 am

    No, not sad! Opportunity for moi!

  35. Fail Burton
    February 20th, 2016 @ 5:28 am

    I suspect their shareholders see things quite differently.

  36. Daniel Freeman
    February 20th, 2016 @ 5:35 am

    Indeed. Here’s Vox Day on how to tell when you’ve been shadowbanned, and the new Orwellian Twitter Trust & Safety Council — because when you think “trust” you think Anita Sarkeesian! (not)

  37. NeoWayland
    February 20th, 2016 @ 7:43 am

    If I’ve done my bit right…

  38. Abu Nudnik
    February 20th, 2016 @ 9:08 am

    We were never individuals.Individualism is a social construction whose intent is to oppress minorities. But your answer is sadly lacking, sir. Statistics themselves need to be queered before they can be taken up in discussion. You need to get into a queer studies faculty, obviously.

  39. Guys: Never Talk to a College Girl | Living in Anglo-America
    February 20th, 2016 @ 9:13 am

    […] Guys: Never Talk to a College Girl […]

  40. Milwaukee
    February 20th, 2016 @ 10:16 am

    This will only get worse. First, if a guy talks to a gal he is. months later, going to be charged with assault because in the course of the conversation he thought about having sex with her. Remember Scarlet O’Hare? Her comment about Rhett Butler was that he “…looked at me like I didn’t have any clothes on…”

    But, wait, remember you heard it here first. Fat girls are going to complain that the boys aren’t talking to them because they are prejudiced against fat girls for being fat. “Sir! In the first 3 months of campus all of your verbal interactions with girls have been girls with long blonde hair, which are a size 6 or less. Why all the hate?”

    Stacy: The twitter account I don’t have, is now, will never, and has never, ever, ever followed you. Ever.

  41. Milwaukee
    February 20th, 2016 @ 10:19 am

    Look to Britain. Somebody noticed, and did a survey, on how men weren’t as polite as they used to be. Before, when a pregnant woman got on the bus or tube, a man would offer his seat. Now they don’t. Follow up survey of the men explained. If they offered a seat to a fat woman, thinking she was pregnant, she would go off on him. Better to be rude to a pregnant woman than mistake a fat woman for being pregnant. Gotta love women, but dang they sure are batshit crazy.

  42. GayPatriot » Social Just Us Wankers Are Such… Pathetic Wimps
    February 20th, 2016 @ 10:39 am

    […] Imagine having such delicate sensibilities that the mere presence of someone with a contradictory opinion sent you rushing to the fainting couch. Literally. […]

  43. Joan Of Argghh!
    February 20th, 2016 @ 10:46 am

    Pretty sure the Mexican Gangs and the Islamic refugees with sex emergencies have an apology ready.

  44. dustbury.com » Minions of the Ninny State
    February 20th, 2016 @ 12:24 pm

    […] Robert Stacy McCain, in the same patented style that got him suspended from Twitter yesterday: […]

  45. Ilion
    February 20th, 2016 @ 12:25 pm

    This whole thing brings to mind that famous old country/western song: ‘Mommas, Don’t Let Your Babies Grow Up to Be Pussies‘

  46. Quartermaster
    February 20th, 2016 @ 3:03 pm

    It’s not voluntary. You could have eased into it like the rest of irregular regulars, but you’ll simply have to go cold turkey for laying out so long.

  47. Guest
    February 20th, 2016 @ 3:05 pm

    The reason that “society tends not to believe victims” is precisely because of people like Jessica Valenti, who have watered down the accusation of rape to near meaningnlessness.

  48. K-Bob
    February 20th, 2016 @ 4:02 pm

    Don’t make me play the Butthurt card. I’ll let you off easy with the TerriblySad card. Let’s see…

    Damn you, Quartermaster! Can’t you see how terribly sad this makes me feel?

  49. Ayatollah Obama
    February 20th, 2016 @ 5:24 pm

    The problem is that college has monopolized females. Seriously, are there attractive girls who don’t go to college?

  50. Joe Joe
    February 20th, 2016 @ 5:40 pm

    ““It is upsetting that my mental health is not cared about by the University,” said one student at the event.”

    So the university should pay a shrink to hold you back and prevent you from going to a speech that you might not like?

    Or do you just want free Xanax?