The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Election Day Tea Party Wants To Abuse Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

Posted on | January 12, 2012 | 7 Comments

by Smitty

It really isn’t fair to debate Ms. Wasserman Schultz on a topic of which she has no knowledge:

“Today, we are challenging Ms. Wasserman Schultz to a debate on the Constitution,” said Michael Patrick Leahy, co-coordinator of Election Day Tea Party. “We think the country is ready for direct and civil discourse on what the Constitution says about the proper role of the federal government in our lives. That’s the real issue. Ms. Wasserman Schultz and the entire leadership of the Democratic Party believe that the federal government should keep taxing and spending more and more. We in the Tea Party movement think otherwise.”
The first national event of Election Day Tea Party 2012 will be a celebration of the Tea Party movement’s 3rd anniversary on February 25th, 26th, and 27th. On February 27, 2009, the Tea Party movement was launched with simultaneous tea parties in fifty cities which were attended by more than 30,000 tea partiers. This was immediately followed by Tax Day Tea Party on April 15, 2009, when over 1 million tea partiers participated in rallies held in more than 900 cities.
Michelle Moore, organizer of the St. Louis Tea Party Coalition in February 2009, said “The St, Louis Tea Party will be happy to host this debate on February 25, 2012, the 3rd Anniversary of the movement. We think CNN, MSNBC, and FoxNews will be very interested in covering such an event.”

This outfit looks like the genuine article. I hope that they schedule copious rallies this year: tax day; the ObamaCare testimony at SCOTUS; and 9/11 all come to mind. The troops must needs be rallied.

via Dr. Wolf


7 Responses to “Election Day Tea Party Wants To Abuse Debbie Wasserman-Schultz”

  1. Tea Party Leaders to Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz: Stop Lying About Us | marfdrat
    January 12th, 2012 @ 9:28 am

    […] Smitty agrees: Blabbermouth Schultz has precious little knowledge of the Constitution, so it wouldn’t be a fair debate […]

  2. richard mcenroe
    January 12th, 2012 @ 10:11 am

    Screw DWS.  She’s doing nothing she’s not already been doing.  This is just smoke and mirrors to distract us from the fact that the RNC is trying shove an unelectable, unfit candidate down our throats.  Don’t fall for the distraction.

  3. Pathfinder's wife
    January 12th, 2012 @ 10:56 am

    The best comeback for DWS is the one Allen West gave “Debbie is not bright”.  It should be used more.

  4. Anonymous
    January 12th, 2012 @ 11:33 am

    Hopefully the thrust of the argument isn’t simply about “taxing and spending,” since that’s actually in the Constitution.  Not that every exercise of the spending power is spent on an enumerated power, and not that we aren’t spending too much.

  5. Dave
    January 12th, 2012 @ 11:50 am

    DWS is just barely qualified to run  a glory hole at a truck stop in Gary, Indiana, and that only by virtue of the fact that there would be a wall between her and her customers, preventing them from seeing her.

  6. Thursday Roundup 1/12/12 Newt Revival? Edition | Katy Pundit
    January 12th, 2012 @ 3:22 pm

    […] EmployeesRepublicans to Act After Obama Refuses to Approve Keystone Jobs Project ELECTIONSElection Day Tea Party Wants To Abuse Debbie Wasserman-SchultzIn South Carolina, Rick Perry Uses Faith to ConnectGingrich Campaign Threatens to Sue South Carolina […]

  7. Adjoran
    January 12th, 2012 @ 4:06 pm

    I challenge DWS to a debate on ANY subject with the single rule that she cannot say a word while it is my turn to speak.

    Guaranteed, her head explodes in five minutes – Jeri curls everywhere, O! the humanity!