The Fact of Evil: @Popehat Describes Brett Kimberlin’s Lawsuit Against Truth

Brett Kimberlin could have been sentenced to 230 years in federal prison

“Kimberlin seemed to be the only one with a possible motive — to distract police attention from the Scyphers murder and delay or halt their quiet investigation of him.”
– R. Joseph Gelarden, Indianapolis Star, “Kimberlin case a maze of murder, deceit,” Oct. 18, 1981

Liars hate truth, and the wicked fear justice. Every honest man must oppose harassment and intimidation intended to silence those who call evil by its right name, because if truth is silenced, the righteous and innocent shall become prey for the wicked and dishonest.

God bless Ken White at Popehat, who hates evil liars:

One of the problems with Kimberlin’s complaint about being called a pedophile is that his detractors disclosed the factual basis for using that epithet against him. Among other things, they pointed out that (1) Kimberlin has said sexually creepy things about teenaged girls; (2) Mark Singer’s book about Kimberlin describes a relationship with an underaged girl that some find inappropriate and suggestive of pedophilia; (3) Kimberlin’s wife accused him of having sex with her before she was 16, and in 2013 filed charges against him on that basis, although prosecutors declined to prosecute the case and she apparently later retracted and disavowed the charges after the defendants wrote about them; and (4) even accepting Kimberlin’s position that he did not have sex with his wife before she was 16, by his own version of events it appears that he met her in Russia before she was 16 when he was in his 40s, she traveled to the United States, and they married when she was 16 and he in his 40s. . . .

Please read the whole righteous truth.

UPDATE: Let me slightly disagree with Ken White:

People follow and support Brett Kimberlin for several reasons. First, like many sociopaths, he is superficially charming and socially adept. People support him for the same reason that people got into Ted Bundy’s Volkswagen Bug.

Clever, but somewhat inaccurate. People who support Brett Kimberlin are either spectacularly stupid or active agents of evil.

Which is to say, they’re Democrats.

That statement of fact probably won’t endear me to any Democrat lawyers who may be considering taking on the battle against Brett Kimberlin, but it is important that anybody who gets into this thing know exactly what they’re getting into, eh? Whereas a sociopath like Brett Kimberlin will tell any lie to achieve his evil purposes — and falsely accuse others of doing the wrongs he is himself actually doing — an honest man will speak truth even at his own peril.

Even at this very minute, Brett Kimberlin’s vicious allies are lying about me, and why? Because I keep telling the truth about them.

Go read the rest of Ken’s post, and thank him in the comments for help.

 

68 comments

  1. I wonder how BK will explain hiring an unregistered sex offender and allowing him to be around BK’s daughters.

    Also, is BS an obstetrician? Did he attend the same school as Andrew Sullivan? I ask because I thought that he only graduated from high school, yet he is giving medical opinions on Lee Stranahan’s wife. This despite her tweets to him a couple months ago confirming a visit to her doctor the day before she gave birth, during which he told her that everything appeared to be OK.

    I have read that cocaine abuse can has been linked to the development of Parkinson’s, by the way. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051214084800.htm

  2. Mr. McCain, let me give you a reminder of how this whole thing started (I doubt you need it but I’m not sure you made the connection): Seth Allen was hit with a lawsuit because he pointed out that Brett Kimberlin’s non-profits did not seem to be doing much to advance Liberal or Democrat causes. He thought they were a scam. Does anyone think George Soros and Barbara Streisand got their money’s worth out of Velvet Revolution or Justice through Music? It has since gone very much beyond that but one of the side effects is that Conservatives have been fighting to keep Democrats from getting scammed by this guy. Brett Kimberlin is a bipartisan issue.

  3. I’ll buy that when I see Democrats stop turning to their Kimberlins and Rauhausers and Flynns for low-class, low-rent goon work.

  4. Well, I just read the Kimberlin complaint. My first comment is that he should have proof read it better so that he didn’t refer to himself as “her.” My second comment is that I agree with Popehat’s analysis. My third comment is that he doesn’t know what he doesn’t know. Finally, no more analysis because it may assist the convicted bomber with delicate sensibilities.

  5. “People who support Brett Kimberlin are either spectacularly stupid or active agents of evil.

    Which is to say, they’re Democrats.”

    Yeah yeah–but even if all evil/stupid people were Democrats, it wouldn’t necessarily follow that all Democrats were evil/stupid.

    If one were in an impertinent mood, of course, one might ask which one RSM was when he was young–stupid, or evil . . .

    Good on you, Stacy, for standing up to Brett Kimberlin. I’ve volunteered to do any scutwork/proofreading/errand-running needed here in L.A.

Comments are closed.