The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Every Blogger Keeps Asking, ‘Gee, How Can I Get Brett Kimberlin to Sue Me?’

Posted on | October 16, 2013 | 75 Comments

Ever since the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al lawsuit became public, my fellow defendants and I have been plagued by envious bloggers wondering what they’re doing wrong. “Gosh, I called him a ‘sociopathic creep’ and a ‘pipsqueak terrorist’ — why isn’t he suing me?”

The envy has only increased since launched Monday. It’s really kind of unfair for the five of us to monopolize the fun of being targets of lawfare and harassment by the World’s Worst Pro Se Litigant™ — a convicted perjurer and bomber, who can’t even get basic facts right on his lying court documents:

Last week, our defense team filed a motion with the Maryland court, alerting them to the fact that Brett Kimberlin’s original complaint was erred. In non-legal jargon: he didn’t even have the basic technicalities in his original complaint written correctly. This is nothing new for Litigious litigant and convicted bomber Kimberlin.
We demanded a correction be filed. We expect tomorrow that Kimberlin will make those advised modifications to his complaint. We also expect him to add new allegations because remember, what he most seeks is our silence.
Our defense team is growing thanks to the support so many of you have chipped in to give. We are humbled and plan to keep you updated. If you are on Twitter, you can follow details at @BomberSues.

Did I mention that he’s The World’s Worst Pro Se Litigant™?

It is an utterly frivolous lawsuit and Brett Kimberlin knows it and we are asking for your donations to help.
How frivolous is it? So much so that he is suing Robert Stacy McCain for defamation for calling him “evil.”
I mean first, Stacy has a lot of good reasons to call Kimberlin evil given his terrorist bombing campaign has cost one man his life, to name but one example of the downright evil things Brett Kimberlin has done over the years.
But even before you shout “truth is a defense!” even more fundamentally, it cannot be defamation to call someone evil.  I don’t care who you call “evil,” I don’t care how undeserving that person is, it is not defamation.  If Mother Teresa was still among us and a person called her evil, even putting aside that she is a public figure, that would not be defamation.

That’s Aaron Walker’s discussion of the case, and you can understand why, given the pathetically ill-argued and just plain wrong stuff in this lawsuit, lots of our fellow bloggers are wondering how they can get added as defendants and become First Amendment heroes without risk of ever paying that little felon one red cent of damages.

OK, so I’ll give you a few tips. First of all, be sure to blog frequently about a little Indiana girl whose grandmother got shot to death.

There’s no statute of limitation on murder, you know.

Secondly, it may help to mention the claims of harassment Kimberlin’s estranged wife made in her July petition for a protective order:

T. Kimberlin v. B. Kimberlin Petition for Protective Order 7.9.13 (OCR) by AaronWorthing


You can link that and maybe quote the part about “he will hurt me” or, if you’re feeling energetic, just transcribe the whole thing.

Improvise. I’m not a lawyer (and neither is Brett Kimberlin), so I can’t really be giving you legal advice on how to get sued. 

This is just what has worked so well for me. “Best practices,” as it were.

Something else: Brett Kimberlin really, really hates when people mention the sex charges his wife filed against him July 29. Sure, the charges got dropped, so there’s no chance he’s going to be arrested and put in jail for (allegedly) violating Maryland law.

But the simple fact that a 40-ish federal convict on parole would be having sex with a Ukrainian teenager . . . Well, see for yourself:

Charges State v Kimberlin (Redacted) by himself2462


Now, I’ve been told Brett Kimberlin will file a motion today to try and get that Scribd upload taken offline, because he hates the truth. But if you were to download that PDF to your computer, and then upload it to your own Scribd account or as a media file on some other site, maybe Brett Kimberlin will add you to the lawsuit. Quoting extensively from that document could help, too.

What if a dozen different bloggers posted that document? What if 30 or 40 bloggers quoted extensively from these documents? Could Brett Kimberlin sue the entire freaking Internet into silence?

Heck, he might just sue you if you go to and click the button to “like” it on your Facebook page.

It’s worth a try, isn’t it?



75 Responses to “Every Blogger Keeps Asking, ‘Gee, How Can I Get Brett Kimberlin to Sue Me?’”

  1. bet0001970
    October 16th, 2013 @ 10:26 am

    It won’t show up on PACER.

  2. screwtape1a12
    October 16th, 2013 @ 10:54 am

    RT @BomberSues: #BrettKimberlinSues everyone who laughed while reading this post by @rsmccain:

  3. Chris
    October 16th, 2013 @ 11:01 am

    But if Brettina imported Tatyana from a foreign country, wouldn’t that make it federal? Gotta be under the Mann Act, shouldn’t it?

  4. bet0001970
    October 16th, 2013 @ 11:16 am


  5. bet0001970
    October 16th, 2013 @ 11:17 am

    Ok, so I just found out that Kimberlin filed an additional FEDERAL case. So this one will show up on PACER. TWO cases.

  6. EarlScruggs
    October 16th, 2013 @ 11:35 am

    Well, again, if you believe Scmalfeldt – the filing was in US District Court. RICO is a Federal statute.

    I suspect it is modeled after the MIller-Jenkins case.

  7. rsmccain
    October 16th, 2013 @ 11:37 am

    ICYMI: How You, Too, Can Get Sued by Convicted Bomber Brett Kimberlin

  8. DocWashburn
    October 16th, 2013 @ 11:37 am

    RT @BomberSues: #BrettKimberlinSues everyone who laughed while reading this post by @rsmccain:

  9. That Guy
    October 16th, 2013 @ 12:05 pm

    I suspect the Federal RICO case, similar to the original case, was filed not only to silence critics, but as an attempt to compel the identity of anyone anonymous who dares mention Brett Kimberlin’s name. I have neither the time nor space here to explain fully why that case will fail miserably but suffice it to say the courts do not enjoy being used as a mechanism to go on a baseless fishing expedition.
    Oh and while I’m at it, in my OPINION which is protected under the 1st amendment, I wish to state that I BELIEVE Brett Kimberlin is a first rate douche cannon. There. Sue me Mr. Kimberlin.

  10. Captien_Obvious
    October 16th, 2013 @ 12:09 pm

    Feeling left out? Well never fear. Here are detailed instructions on what you need to do to get sued by Kimberlin

  11. Ugh. You First. | Daily Pundit
    October 16th, 2013 @ 12:19 pm

    […] Every Blogger Keeps Asking, ‘Gee, How Can I Get Brett Kimberlin to Sue Me?’ : The Other McCain […]

  12. tmitsss
    October 16th, 2013 @ 12:32 pm

    Sorry, I was referencing the newly filed RICO suit in USDC for Maryland

  13. Kelsonus
    October 16th, 2013 @ 1:00 pm

    Every Blogger Keeps Asking, ‘Gee, How Can I Get Brett Kimberlin to Sue Me?’

  14. bet0001970
    October 16th, 2013 @ 1:01 pm

    No explanation needed. I know exactly why. And I think others here do to.

  15. bet0001970
    October 16th, 2013 @ 1:01 pm

    No. See the below comment.

  16. StacyMcCainSays
    October 16th, 2013 @ 1:09 pm

    RT @rsmccain: ICYMI: How You, Too, Can Get Sued by Convicted Bomber Brett Kimberlin

  17. Thinking Americanist
    October 16th, 2013 @ 2:38 pm

    Every Blogger Keeps Asking, ‘Gee, How Can I Get Brett Kimberlin to Sue Me?’

    Not me! I can’t afford a lawyer. Besides, I don’t have any money for the guy to collect. So, I’m screwed coming and going.

  18. Chris
    October 16th, 2013 @ 3:20 pm

    This should clear it up:

    The exploitation of children in prostitution is not legal anywhere in the United States.

    Under U.S. federal law, the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, prohibits transporting a person

    across foreign or state borders for the purpose of prostitution. In addition to this general

    prohibition, federal law specifically prohibits transportation across foreign or state borders

    of any individual under age 18 with the intent that the ?individual engage in prostitution or

    in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.? 18

    U.S.C. § 2423(a). Federal law further prohibits enticing, persuading, inducing, etc., any

    person to travel across a state boundary for prostitution or for any sexual activity for which

    any person may be charged with a crime, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), and travel with intent to

    engage in any sexual act with anyone under age 18, 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b).

  19. bet0001970
    October 17th, 2013 @ 2:00 am

    No, I know what the Mann Act is. I didn’t understand what his point was in reference to the filing being on PACER. I spoke to someone afterwards and found out that Kimberlin had filed TWO suits.

  20. rsmccain
    October 18th, 2013 @ 3:34 pm

    Enhance Your Blog Reputation: How to Get Sued by Progressive Bomber Brett Kimberlin @instapundit @BomberSues

  21. RhymesWithRight
    October 18th, 2013 @ 3:43 pm

    RT @rsmccain: Enhance Your Blog Reputation: How to Get Sued by Progressive Bomber Brett Kimberlin @instapundit @Bomb…

  22. FMJRA 2.0: Day Late & A Dollar Short : The Other McCain
    October 20th, 2013 @ 3:21 pm

    […] Every Blogger Keeps Asking, ‘Gee, How Can I Get Brett Kimberlin to Sue Me?’ […]

  23. TC_LeatherPenguin
    October 21st, 2013 @ 12:13 pm

    OH, FARK THIS ALL” Tell Ali what he needs and I’ll turn over LPP…

  24. TC_LeatherPenguin
    October 21st, 2013 @ 12:24 pm

    Why is setting up an account here such an Obama?

  25. The World’s Worst Pro Se Litigant™ Gets the Complete @Popehat Treatment : The Other McCain
    October 21st, 2013 @ 1:46 pm

    […] Bloggers keep asking me how to get sued by Brett Kimberlin, and I urge everyone to hurry now: If you don’t immediately join the “conspiracy” to “defame” the convicted perjuring bomber, the dishonest creep may actually wise up and reconsider his epic legal folly. […]