Alleged Pederast Harry Reid Disregards Senate Rules, and Also Craves Boy Flesh

Posted on Comments

You’ve probably forgotten the Harry Reid pederasty scandal of 2012, because the lamestream media refused to cover the accusations. There was certainly as much evidence for that as for Harry Reid’s claim that Mitt Romney evaded paying income tax — an accusation that Reid insisted Romney must disprove — and I don’t remember Harry ever proving he is not sexually interested in young boys, so by his standards of logic, it’s fair to say Harry Reid is a pederast.

Now the alleged deviant Harry Reid has stricken down the Senate rules:

After years of threats and warnings, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and his Democratic majority on Thursday executed the “nuclear option” to eliminate the filibuster for executive branch and judicial nominees, except for the Supreme Court.

Drew M. at Ace of Spades explains:

This is going to result in all out partisan warfare in the Senate. Democrats complain fillibusters slow the Senate down but requiring a vote on everything and not agreeing to any unanimous consent requests will grind it to a halt. . . .
Reid is a lying hypocrite who is trying to change the subject from the damage that ObamaCare is causing across the country.

The Senate has adjourned, and Harry Reid will now return to his home state to meet with his constituents and fellate teenage boys.

Allegedly.

 

135 comments

  13. Play nice fine people. It appears my region may be in for a epic ice-storm. Pray for the high-plains.

    Stay safe.

  19. Has the quality of the gruel improved at all? It does take more work when you’re swinging often and it takes more energy.

  26. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), an outspoken proponent of rules reform, circulated a memo to the media Thursday morning defending the tactic.

    He noted that then-Senate Majority Leader Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) used it on March 5, 1980, when he eliminated filibusters on motions to proceed to nominations.

    He argued the Senate has changed its procedures by a simple majority vote at least 18 times since 1977.

    “The notion that changing Senate procedure with a simple majority vote is ‘changing the rules by breaking the rules’ is false,” he wrote

  36. It would take too long to explain the intricacies of the Gruel Apportionment System, and not be all that interesting, tbqh.

Comments are closed.