Feminists and Their Vaginas; Also, Guess Who’s Talking About ‘Forced Procreation’?

Last night I teased this at the end of a post about two “empowered” feminists and their podcast about the men they’ve had sex with.

At Huffington Post, author Jenny Block wrote a column with the headline, “My Vagina Doesn’t Smell Like Shame“:

So, I’m going to just put this out there loud and proud. I love my pussy. I love her. And my lovers love her.
She looks like a pussy and smells like a pussy and she’s perfect in every way.

Do you want to read the whole thing? It’s 31 flavors of crazy, and was written in reaction to an even crazier column at Jezebel:

I know that every woman smells unique. I know that good and bad is simply a judgement. No. My fear is that he might be indoctrinated by the same system I am struggling to escape. And if I see my own insecurity mirrored in his eyes, I will feel once again the humiliation that I felt growing up. The humiliation of having a vagina and knowing that others know I have a vagina. Blood is evidence I have a vagina. Discharge is evidence I have a vagina. Camel Toe is evidence I have a vagina. And perhaps most insidious of all; smell is evidence … that I have a vagina.
My vagina smells like shame. Rancid and sickly. SHAME.
Since educating myself through my own personal project The Vagina Times, I’ve discovered so much about our systemic culture of shame which has prompted women to mutilate, bleach and douche their genitals to eliminate their natural shape, colour and smell. It’s truly heartbreaking. Because shame stems from someone else’s emotional repression. And their beliefs become internalized until we perpetuate them and shame our daughters.

Sure, you want to read that whole thing, too, because you haven’t yet been convinced that feminism is a psychiatric disorder.

Guys, try to resist any urge you may have to write a column, “My Scrotum Is Made of 100% Pure Awesomeness.” The Huffington Post isn’t interested, and you’ll only embarrass yourself.

Speaking of embarrassment, remember Radical Wind of “PIV is always rape, OK?” fame? Well, she’s been busy lately, cranking out more of her uniquely crazy feminist gibberish:

All forms of domination stem from and serve this purpose of maintaining men’s sexual access to women, globally: it is the first and final cause. There is no system separate from patriarchy because men are the sole rulers everywhere on the planet, and their tyranny is always and inherently sex-based, based on their sexual domination over women. Power-over is phallic and male, and men treat subordination as female and receptacle-shaped. . . . Being male, holding the rape-weapon between their legs, is what grants status in patriarchy, power to oppress and the privilege of being considered a subject. That is because at the very basic level, their oppressive power is both achieved and maintained with the use of their penis-weapon, through the raping, impregnation, capture and domestication of women globally.

Did I mention her feminist gibberish is uniquely crazy?

Women’s situation is more complex since we are oppressed by all the different classes of men who are the originators and subjects of patriarchal snooldom. They are the rapists. The multiple violations men put some women into serve a completely different purpose than men’s own class divides — or put in another way, both serve only one class interest: male supremacy. Racism, classism and division of labour between men strengthens men’s global rapist apparatus against women, while from women’s perspective it is a male divide-and-conquer tactic to reinforce our sexual subordination to men. . . .

(The “global rapist apparatus”? Please, tell us more!)

From men’s perspective, racism and classism is what provides male corporations with a continued flow of desperate, pliable male workers to exploit, who seek to escape the misery of their colonised country or impoverished region. It serves a capitalist and patriarchal interest because it supports the accumulation of wealth of a minority of men, which overall strengthens the patriarchal system. When we look at women, racism is what will provide all men with a continued flow of desperate, pliable women to be prostituted, raped and exploited in female subservient tasks. In this sense racism and classism benefits all men as it increases their ability to rape more women. Not to mention that all male economies are largely driven by trafficking in women, pimping, pornography and theft of women’s domestic work. . . .

(Isn’t the patriarchy amazing? It supplies us “with a continued flow of desperate, pliable women.” Just don’t tell my wife, OK?)

Groomed exclusively for breeding, married women are held captive in the man’s home and are either abducted, sold by the father or, more recently, manipulated or “seduced” into marriage and hetero-imprisonment. Her basic function will be to breed children until she dies from it, and if she doesn’t die after she has accomplished this horrific function, she may be killed, left to starve, or she will be used for domestic chores or to surveil other women’s children, or re-marry. If she’s lucky enough, she might be able to reduce the number of birthed children, survive her husband and enjoy slight freedom as a widow or spinster in the remaining years of her life.
Married women are evenly spread out across all male classes, nations and ethnic groups. All men of all groups conscript a majority of their daughters to marriage and forced procreation. All married women will be raped, forcibly impregnated and tortured to varying degrees according to the whim of their owner and more generally, according to the misogynistic customs of his male group. . . .

OK, that’s enough “hetero-imprisonment”/”forced procreation” paranoia, although she rants on for many more turgid paragraphs, ending with the promise that her next post “will focus on what it does when men inflict different degrees of violence between women.”

We can’t wait.

 

90 comments

  1. Notice how this oppression BS is never thrown at Muslims? Of course there might be actual consequences for doing so. Even in their insanity, most of these these fools aren’t that crazy. Much safer to dump on people you know won’t fight back.

  2. I repeat myself, in a sane world these women would be in a
    mental institution and heavily medicated. Our world is so disordered we no longer recognize crazy and instead give the loons a professorship and a soapbox

  3. Mr. Nixon, I had no idea of your life and pray that the saints look after you and your wife, er, sex slave.

  4. Sanity is a by-product of competition. If one is never challenged, one is free to wander into fantasy.
    This is what the academy has wrought.

  5. True, but I would call it a different kind of insanity. This is Orwellian doublethink: the ability to hold mutually exclusive thoughts simultaneously. This phenomenon is facilitated by the premature truncation of the chain of cause-and-effect.

    Liberals know the “oppression” narrative doesn’t square with the “Muslim” narrative, so they make sure to never take these narratives to their logical conclusions.

  6. In fact, that may be the whole point (whether planned or not) to the number of tactics the left uses to cut off debate. They don’t want the audience to see that “2 + 2 = 4,” so they end it at “2 + 2 …RACIST!”

  7. It’s only very recently that I’ve noticed this whole “having a vagina is shameful in our culture” meme. Did I just miss it before? Maybe it’s just the Internet that’s letting the craziness leak out of the Women’s Studies departments?

    It reminds me of males being worried that their penis is too small. Are chicks just feeling left out of being ashamed of something that no one else can publicly see? I guess with breast implants (or even good old fashioned bra stuffing), they can take care of that if it bothers them, so they’ve moved on to this bizarre vagina phobia schtick?

  8. After listening to this Feminist Hysteria for decades, I have reach the conclusion that medication and institutionalization would be wasted on these demented womyn. The only solution: for mercy’s sake, put them down.

  9. I tend to be surrounded by guys who aren’t married or are divorced. That may explain the junk talk. But I still think they talk way less about it than feminists do, which makes me wonder how a feminist can get through a day what with their constant contemplating of their ladyparts.

  10. I used to think the character “Catwoman” was always made out to be a little too crazy. Now I know whoever came up with her must have know womenfemales like these.

    I just decided they aren’t women. Similar to the fact that wife beaters aren’t men.

  11. I just want to say these are the best comments from the best commenters, ever. The other people in the room are looking at me askance and wondering why I’m laughing so loudly.

  12. I just want to say these are the best comments from the best commenters, ever. The other people in the room are looking at me askance and wondering why I’m laughing so loudly.

  13. I will never in my life understand the attraction some women have to meteosexual men. Ugh. Give me a guy with broad shoulders who could easily break me in two (but won’t because he’s a man, not an ape) and keep the sniveling nancy boys. If I wanted to end up with a woman, I’d be a raging feminist lesbian.

  14. I will never in my life understand the attraction some women have to meteosexual men. Ugh. Give me a guy with broad shoulders who could easily break me in two (but won’t because he’s a man, not an ape) and keep the sniveling nancy boys. If I wanted to end up with a woman, I’d be a raging feminist lesbian.

  15. I had a rapist apparatus once but one of the pieces got lost in a move and you just can’t get spares anymore. Now it just sits rather forlornly in its box. When it was working, though, it increased my raping efficiency by over 200%.

Comments are closed.