Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt and His ‘Progressive’ Homophobia

Posted on Comments

Bill Schmalfeldt ranting, 2011. (Image via Thomas Anderson at Vimeo)

“He’s banned on Daily Kos. He’s banned at the Examiner. He gets angry about being ignored, and erupts in frothing rage. So then people pay Bill the only kind of attention he deserves — pointing out that he’s a brain-damaged troll — at which point he claims victimhood. Then the cycle begins again, and Bill makes new threats . . .”
— Robert Stacy McCain, Oct. 6, 2013

Some things are more predictable than others, and no despicable expression of hate from Bill Schmalfeldt is ever really surprising, but this latest outburst was a complete non sequitur, apropos of nothing.

Signifying nothing except the rancid contents of his own reprobate mind, Schmalfeldt’s weird rant merits no rebuttal, however:

  1. If, by “constant woman-hating” he means my writing about feminism, perhaps Schmalfeldt is simply too dense to comprehend a point I have frequently made, namely that it is not misogyny to disagree with, e.g., Mary Daly;
  2. Schmalfeldt’s attribution of “anti-gay rhetoric” to me, which can be shown to apply more accurately to him, is nevertheless wide of the mark because disagreements over policy or criticism of media bias are not the same as hate;
    and
  3. None of my children have “turned out to be gay,” although it has been said that among Schmalfeldt’s adult children (all of whom are estranged from him) is a lesbian daughter.

Why would Bill Schmalfeldt think it was “progressive” to deride an antagonist as “a simpering, limp-wristed, glory-hole queen” and “a pillow-biting, studded leather collar-wearing bukkake boy“?

Hasn’t he already damaged himself enough with “the Butt Stuff”?

“Who is Bill Schmalfeldt?
“Schmalfelt’s a guy who describes himself as a progressive . . . He leaves no sense of what values he promotes, only of what groups and individuals he hates. There’s only one circumstance when you get a sense that he’s enjoying what he does, that he has a craft or a calling. That’s when he’s describing someone being raped, murdered, or otherwise abused, or when he’s pursuing the families of someone he hates.”
— Ken White, Aug. 6, 2013




 

 


 

46 comments

  1. So much hate. Such a little brain. My opinion of smegfelt really can’t get lower. But he keeps trying.

  5. In all my life I don’t think I have ever come across a more depraved individual. On occasion I say a pray for him, most days I just shudder and thank the Lord for the “block” button.

  7. Like other Leftard trolls (Anamika springs to mind), all Schmuckfeldt has is projection of his own failings. And hate.

  10. If he took all the energy he focuses as hate, and used to feed orphans, or help runaway teens, he might actually make the world a better place. But, he chooses to be an a**hole instead.

  11. I have found that when you reach the point a libtard can’t go any lower, you just haven’t given them enough of a chance.

  18. The saddest thing about it is that I actually knew what it was before I learned the name for it.

  21. The old “you dislike gays, you must be gay yourself” thing is the oldest playground taunt in the book.

  23. He wishes. Tragically for ol’ Fattycakes (this is all the dignity I will grant him, for it is all he has earned), he’ll have long since been declared expendable and liquidated (for the greater good of The Cause — mustn’t waste those precious healthcare resources on such an obvious and costly failure, after all) by the time the camps are up and running.

    But hey. A festering pustule can dream…

  24. The worst thing about this depraved miscreant is that he is virtually judgment-proof. Unlike TDPK, he didn’t even have to keep everything in either Mom’s name or some phony organization’s. He just doesn’t have any attachable property, his only apparent income is what he gets in government benefits like a parasite sucks the blood of its host.

    The unfortunate thing about being targeted by an impoverished loser is that he has nothing to attach that is worth attaching. You couldn’t even take his furniture without fumigation and delousing it.

    But one day, all those people like him and TDPK who attack others more or less indiscriminately pick out the wrong target. They decide to attack someone who won’t hire a lawyer, but will deal with them personally.

  25. I’m sure he fancies himself a combination of Bertrand Russel and the Left’s equivalent of Bill Buckley without the Boston Brahmin overtones. Alas, the truth is a pathetic loser and anger and bitterness at those cold hard facts make him what he is now. Those he believes to be his friends on the Left tolerate him only for the comic relief he provides and make fun of him behind his back. It’s the bed he’s made; too bad he finds it uncomfortable.

  26. Is there actually someone out there who worries about being accused of being gay? Anyone over the age of 13?

  27. One’s worse than the next and in this case they both aptly apply.

    Filed under: things I could have gone my whole life without knowing.

  29. Bill Schmalfeldt has about 130 twitter followers although he posted over 13K tweets, that’s a conversion rate of 1%. OOH RSM has over 80K followers and 90K tweets, a conversion factor of 90%.

    My question is why is RSM fixated on defending himself from a guy who literally swims in the gutters of internet. Everyone detests him and ignores him even in the liberal blogosphere. Why is RSM giving him the attention he craves?

    The only answer that makes any sense is that RSM is always on the lookout for easy meat.

  33. Alternately, everyone enjoys a good ol fashioned Cabin Boy thumpin’

    or

    Evil needs to be smacked down every so often, size be damned

    or

    Flushing is mandatory.

    or….

    So, its not the only answer, and once again your powers of deduction are found wanting.

  34. Tut tut, Anamika, tut tut!

    Rule 4 is indeed “Make some enemies”. But if you actually, y’know, read “How To Get A Million Hits On Your Blog In Less Than A Year”, you’ll find this gem under Rule 4:

    “At the same time, however, don’t confuse cyber-venom with real-world hate.”

    I find that most instructive. Not to mention, Bill Schmalfeldt can’t even begin to compete with Rule 5. Not even on a slow news day.

    Tut tut, Anamika! Clearly, you hate pretty girls. Tut tut!

  35. Standing up for a pathological liar and deranged nutjob, huh, Anamika?

    Well, at least it’s a change from apologizing for pedophilia. I’m sure that children everywhere appreciate that.

  36. I can’t find a saner reason for RSM’s prolific take downs of Bill Schmalfeldt whom everyone ignores for a good reason. RSM has written about Schmalfeldt in (at least) 63 blogposts in the past 16 months. An average of four per month. That’s some unhealthy obsession really.

  37. You don’t have to stand up and compose a lengthy blogpost every time a the same nutjob harasses you over and over on twitter unless you are compelled to feel defensive for some reason or you are reverse trolling him for easy blog meat.

  42. Well, Stacy is hardly “easy blog meat”, but I’m glad you agree that Bill needs to stop his reverse trolling.

  43. PS: Once again, it is indeed a refreshing change that you are not apologizing for pedophiles everywhere on this thread.

Comments are closed.