The problem with trying to keep up with feminist insanity is, while you’re distracted by one deranged nutjob — say, Amanda Marcotte, or that fat chick with paranoid rape fears — another one is likely to go off her meds and completely melt down while you’re not looking.
Believe it or not, when she is not busy wishing violence upon people she’s never met, Laura Levites is a professional comedian.
Probably observational humor: “Did you ever notice those Republican women on TV? Wouldn’t you like to rip out their uterus?“
You’ll notice I’m screen-capping her tweets rather than just embedding them, because I figure Laura Levites will eventually go completely schizo like Amanda Bynes and get committed for psychiatric evaluation. Then her therapist will make her delete this crazy stuff, so I want to preserve the part where she death-wished a teenage girl.
See, this is what happens to women who take Amanda Marcotte seriously: They actually
believe that Hobby Lobby wants to take away their “reproductive choice” and, because they are soulless bloodthirsty baby-hating fanatics, this leads them to an existential crisis which can only be resolved by death-wishing innocent teenagers.
“Especially important is the warning to avoid conversations with the demon. . . . He is a liar. The demon is a liar. He will lie to confuse us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. So don’t listen to him. Remember that — do not listen.”
— The Exorcist (1973)
Some people — including Chris Loesch — are actually praying for Laura Levites’s salvation, but this is almost certainly a waste of prayer. Someone who openly delights in wickedness and curses Christians in such a foul manner is most likely possessed by demons.
Unless you’re prepared to conduct an exorcism, there is no hope at all for satanic monsters like Laura Levites.
So link to the push back on Levite’s supposed trolling? She’s got over three thousand followers and someone besides Bethany must have told her that hate isn’t pretty. Right?
So leftists can rant about maiming and murdering, but we have to worry about accidentally uttering “micro-aggressions” from a secret and continually-updating list of formerly innocent words.
Got it.
It makes perfect sense.
Hey!
1.) Single
2.) Sane
3.) Hot
You only need 2 out of the 3.
I have had the good fortune to be accepted in the world of the left (I work in the theatre) and the world of the right (attending a church), and I can tell you for a solid fact: Right wing people are the same behind closed doors, while left wing people are utterly vile when they think they’re among pals. They talk on and on about this sort of stuff – murdering and maiming, and ALWAYS with a sick, sexual angle to it. They want to “hate f*ck” Sarah Palin; they want to rape George Bush to death. It’s been very educational and very disturbing.
The crazy woman sending out those tweets DOES INDEED represent the left. Very much! She’s just outrageous enough to do it in the open.
And remember, if we aren’t treating these people with kid gloves we are aggressing against them or something. Any disagreement with the lockstep stupidity on the left is an attack on whatever victim group is popular today. But by God, they’ll let you know just what they think of you (usually something along the lines of how you should be thrown in a camp, lined up against a wall and shot, or be castrated/forcibly sterilized – depending on your gender) if you even think about applying even a basic smattering of logic to what they’re spouting. Because not a single bit of it is logical and they know it. You should just feel it and don’t go any deeper.
As I was reading scripture last night I was struck by just how close they called it with the good being called bad and the bad being called good. Talk about eerie.
Keep in mind that liberalism’s ideological precursor, Marxism, has always been a theory of revolution, a theory not merely lacking in creative and constructive ideas, but actively hostile to creative and constructive ideas.
Borrowed from HG Wells’ Russia in the Shadows:
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks06/0602371h.html
There is always hope that a person will repent and turn to God. Saul, the persecutor of Christians, became the Apostle Paul. If God saved him, he can and will save anyone.
No problemo! Glad to do it.
[…] This one wants to do some select cutting on Christian malesĀ as The Other McCain, an expert on Crazy Feminists tells us […]
Your best reply is tu quoque? You’re fucking pathetic.
“Oh, but that’s not REAL Leftism!”
You twits have been screeching that tired old line since Lenin was still alive and well, hasn’t it ever occurred to you that you might want to update your lies?
How can read that Biblical reference and not feel a sense of impending doom?
A true pleasure to meet the real you!
Paul, the people who don’t like you probably never will, but the people who know all about you and like you probably always will. The only reason for Dickie to be retired is if YOU are tired of doing the bit, not because people who don’t like you anyway want that. Just my humble opinion.
Thanks Zilla my beloved friend. Just tired. Going out as myself not a parody …
Thanks! You saw the real me but hidden behind a parody. This is the real me, warts, wrinkles and all.
Like our esteemed host, I also spent many years of my life in the world of rock music. Many decades, actually.
I can say you are 100% correct.
So, I go away, come back late in the afternoon, and discover you have still not addressed the issue: Why the vitriolic murder fantasies instead of a logical, rational explanation for why Person A should be legally compelled to pay for a good or service for person B when the good or service violates Person A’s right to freely exercise his Religion? You have not answered that question, because you cannot. Thus, you attempt to divert the discussion with lengthy Tu Quoque fallacies. Is a new flash: when you avoid the topic, or address it by wishing death on your opponent, you’ve lost. It’s prima facie evidence of a mind bereft of ideas or philosophy besides what is expedient at any given moment.
There’s also nothing separating mainstream Socons and Westboro.
You are an idiot. You generalize from a particular which consists of one now-deceased Democrat–look it up– loon and a few dozen of his family members to make an assertion which is contrary to all the evidence.
The Dems have a big tent for color or gender or other superficial elements, but do they have a big tent for ideological differences? It’s not a big tent if all the diverse people toe a strict policy-line.
The Dems used to have pro-gun or pro-life people. Is this still true? They used to have a few sorta-fiscal conservatives too.
The Republicans are quite diverse, but what I hear most from the “concern trolls” is that what Republicans need to do is shut up the Tea Party and be more moderate… like Democrats. But “big tent” means ideological diversity… that there is room for Ted Cruz and there is room for Rand Paul and there is room for moderates like Paul Ryan, too. (Yes, my examples are all white-ish men… but I wouldn’t want to support the error of viewing pigment or girl parts as equaling political diversity by saying Ben Carson or Alan West or Jindal or Governor Martinez or Niki Haley.)
She’s crazy as a sh!thouse rat.
Westboro is a creation of the left, to form as the example of Christian hate they never could find in reality.
The entire “cult” is made up of lawyers — the Democrats’ second most loyal constituents. The late Fred Phelps was a delegate to the DNC in 2000.
That you fall for the stalking horse says quite a bit about you.
C’mon, they still BELIEVE the things Marx crapped out.
Nope. Sooner or later the one you left out will come back to bite you in the ass.
Are you a bot?
Not really. 1 & 2 are fine. #3 fades with time anyway.
Not really. 1 & 2 are fine. #3 fades with time anyway.
Not really. 1 & 2 are fine. #3 fades with time anyway.
Add a “V”and you ca n make the word Vile. Which is exactly what you would call a woman who would tweet a photo of her turd. Leftist feminists are mentally ill. She probably rubbed the feces all over herself while cackling the word c*nt over and over.
[…] Maniac Feminist @LauraLevites Unleashes Anti-Christian Hatred […]
that was officially the worst thing I’ve ever seen on twitter
Saturday morning links
Thanks to our pal at Never Yet Melted for mailing me that book. That was my Mom’s life, or an aspect of it. What one needs to know about female orgasm. The New York Sun is back. The moving moment a deaf woman is overcome by emotion as she HEARS fo
Aren’t we all?
RT @smitty_one_each: TOM Maniac Feminist @LauraLevites Unleashes Anti-Christian Hatred http://t.co/9PQQe7Psey #TCOT
The Dems have a big tent….right! And everybody in it thinks exactly the same in mind numbing politically correct Orwellian speech.
aren’t comedians supposed to be…like funny?
The Dems have a big tent for color or gender or other superficial
elements, but do they have a big tent for ideological differences?…
The thing is: we conservatives are the opposite of Ideologues and, therefore, the Left can’t relate to us in a civil way because we don’t view Life as they do.
Same here.
But you have to want to be Saved, to be willing to take the frightening step of opening your Soul to God. So, yes, there is hope for this pitiful woman, but don’t bet that she will ever overcome the Demons she let into her Soul.
Sadly, there is a damn good possibility that you’re spot-on.
No, not the Lefty ones – just ‘transgressive’.
Let’s see…
Bob summarizes the above in one word: Ideologues.
[…] who has been reporting on Modern Feminists for years [see the results of his latest investigations here, here, and here], did not express any surprise at this revelation, describing them as […]
[…] In his Epistle To The Romans, Saint Paul wrote this description [tip of the fedora to Stacy McCain]: […]
No, actually…
[…] Maniac Feminist @LauraLevites Unleashes Anti-Christian Hatred […]
[…] Maniac Feminist @LauraLevites Unleashes Anti-Christian Hatred […]