Feminist artist Eleanor Beth Haswell (@Elle_Haswell) has designed what the fashionable Women’s Studies major will be wearing:
Art student Eleanor Beth Haswell’s ‘Why are you so afraid of your own anatomy?’ collection is all about the vagina knickers.
Haswell’s undies . . . are a true celebration of the female anatomy and come complete with an annotated diagram of said lady parts, demonstrating exactly where everything — from the fallopian tube to the cervix — actually is.
The designer-turned-gynaecologist also created a bra to go with her knickers making the ultimate matching set.
See, ladies? If you’re not parading your vagina around in public, you’re “afraid of your own anatomy,” according to feminism.
Let’s read the “about” page at Eleanor Beth Haswell’s web site:
Eleanor Beth Haswell is an eighteen year old art student from North East England, who previously studied Fine Art and Graphic Design at Durham Sixth Form Centre and is going on to start Sunderland University and complete the Foundation Degree in Art and Design. Her work is mainly photography based, covering feminist issues such as body shaming in the media, as well as her previous project on domestic violence. Prior to this, Eleanor also created a project based around the cruelty to animals within the cosmetic and fur industry, to which she made a series of advertisements showing the unseen effects. She highlights mainly upon the negative views of body hair within her work, and the perception of beauty that the medias imprints within society today.
Out of education, she runs a North East England female identified arts collective named Clandestine Collective, of which she is also the logo/poster designer.
“Female-identified,” huh? From the collective’s Twitter account:
Photo: // Good Enough to Eat, 2014 // Robyn Nichol // http://t.co/CzyZubSgHS
— //CLANDESTINE// (@clandestinecoll) June 26, 2014
Feminists obsessed with female genitalia, which they are not afraid to proclaim “good enough to eat”? Yeah, there’s a word for that.
UPDATE: Twitchy’s having a blast with this:
"The fevered imaginings of @AmandaMarcotte" — LOL! http://t.co/KHFWKprRR1 @michelelfrost @TwitchyTeam
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) July 21, 2014
Do feminists need a roadmap to their vagina? Good grief. Grow up. You're more than a body part. RE http://t.co/twZSRnpeaj
— Melissa Clouthier (@MelissaTweets) July 21, 2014
Thankfully I ate breakfast BEFORE vagina pants became a thing.
— Daniel Gilfillan (@OneTonTurtle) July 21, 2014
Only one word DISGUSTING
I once told my wife, when our kids were small and we had a dog, that kids and dogs do gross things. Childish adults do as well, alas.
This is an example of why 18 year olds should not be allowed to vote.
Don’t eat it!
[…] The New Feminist Fashion Be careful what you eat! Or at least tell her you love her so much you are willing to face death. […]
Just sayin: That vagina seems big enough for a small calf the way it is depicted.
More macroaggression Stacy? Heh!
Shouldn’t that be a graphic of an execution chamber? They are feminists after all.
Oddly gross. Why are they trying to gross people out?
I know what’s in there academically, and don’t need a constant explination.
Kind of makes you wonder what’s on the back.
The only question is: who wears them in the White House, Michelle or Barack?
Actually, from the second picture, she’s telling you that she’s cherry. 🙂
Or could that be false advertising?
Why wear underwear at all?
If they had any authenticity, they’d go commando. Posers.
(and of course, no pants either)
Depends. If she is a true feminist she has probably never been with a man. So technically…
There was probably that one time, back when she was 14…and she swore she’d never be victimized by a man again.
Would Hillary wear them? Then again that broad’s so old – what difference would it make?
Who’s afraid of their own anatomy? The looks to me like a solution in search of a problem.
A true diagram would show a sand dune.
Barack’s face?
Who’s ready for the male version?
“The Illustrated Sausage”
Feminists seem to be born with a talent for making everything they touch as unattractive as possible.
Guys would be more inclined to go with the bigger sausage…sort of like fishing, the catch tends to get bigger and bigger over time.
And when they come off, the ladies discover they’re dealing with bait.
Aka, “catch and release.”
You want or expect authenticity from a loony leftist? C’mon now….
I would hate to see their brain hats.
Bleah! Now I’m considering a vow of celibacy.
As far as feminists go, I mean.
Those were invented long ago, me bucko!
Feminists, they are all about copying stuff. And not very effectively at that.
That requires a vacuum pump.
And a magnifying glass (maybe a microscope)
All it needs is the diagrams! http://www.hohowear.com/shop/product.php?productid=17571
You get promised the big kielbasi and end up with a Vienna sausage.
Both.
I am so marketing men’s tighty-whities with a big pecker on ’em. I bet they’ll sell like hotcakes.
But where’s the G-Spot?
Help me out here ladies.
Another gynocentric misandrist ?
I don’t know. I can kinda see how something similar to this might be useful. My wife is always telling me I don’t know my ass from a hole in the ground…
I asked my girlfriend the other day, ‘you know I’d like a little pussy’
and she said, ‘me to mine’s as big as a house!!’
…. Hawkins, Predator
[…] The New Feminist Fashion. […]
So why is it that men are not obsessed with their penises and talk about them incessantly, make giant sculptures of them, and put them on clothing?
I suppose we don’t need to because feminists are nearly as obsessed with them as they are with their own lady parts. When they are not yammering on and on about their hoo-hahs they’re talking constantly about penises.
The real question I have is why would any serious person, or even a seriously frivolous person, take these ridiculous specimens seriously? They are as tiresome as they are stupid, and eminently predictable. Anyway, would somebody tip them off that never shutting up about various sexual organs does not establish gravitas and credibility?
And you knew about that sock, how???
We must face facts—you’re simply nasty. NTTAWWT!
that’s not “vagina pants”. That’s ENTIRE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM PANTS. Geez. Why reduce the name of the feature to just ONE part?
Huma would
Ich.
(shudder).
Makes you wonder what the homosexual men will wear?
Just the opposite with women – you get promised a pup tent and end up with a McMansion.
A road map and I still can’t find the G spot.
Do you think that there’s a chastity belt under that thing (Kevlar no doubt)?
[…] The New Feminist Fashion […]
Who the heck claims to be “afraid” of their body?
We heard that crap back in the sixties.
It’s nothing more than an excuse people use when they plan on shoving some part of their anatomy in your face.
A lot of feminists are so charmingly over-reubenesque that they can’t even see what’s down there in order to be afraid of it.