The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Being an Atheist Is Bad. Being an Obnoxious Atheist Is Worse.

Posted on | July 29, 2014 | 76 Comments

Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) is inarguably obnoxious:

Prominent atheist and professional provocateur Richard Dawkins has sparked a fierce debate on Twitter after he classified certain types of rape and paedophilia as “worse” and milder than others.
“Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse. If you think that’s an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think,” Dawkins tweeted on Tuesday morning.
He had earlier tweeted: “X is bad. Y is worse. If you think that’s an endorsement of X, go away and don’t come back until you’ve learned how to think logically.”
He followed it up with: “Mild pedophilia is bad. Violent pedophilia is worse. If you think that’s an endorsement of mild pedophilia, go away and learn how to think.”

Am I the only one who notices that Dawkins was not merely demonstrating a logical principle, but that both of his examples were attempts to diminish the wrongness of sexual crimes? That is to say, if he had merely wished to demonstrate the principle, he could have said, “Armed robbery is bad. Murder is worse,” etc. But he didn’t do that, did he? No, it is specifically in the area of sex offenses that The Great Darwinian insists that we must learn to see gradations of moral relativity.

He insists that we mere mortals have misunderstood his genius.



76 Responses to “Being an Atheist Is Bad. Being an Obnoxious Atheist Is Worse.”

  1. NeoWayland
    July 30th, 2014 @ 8:17 am

    I think you’re showing signs of an ideologue.

  2. TroubleAtTheMine
    July 30th, 2014 @ 9:08 am

    Although I despise Dawkins’ lack of imagination and his despotism – he wants to ban not only the Bible but also fairy tales – I admire his willingness to stand up to the mad feminists, which is what this is about. He’s not trying to relativise sexual perversions. He’s just explaining that saying one this is worse than another isn’t saying or implying that the less bad thing is good. He’s trying to pound some logic into their little brains. He probably chose sexual examples because that is the main feminist battleground for rabidly demonising everythng everyone else says, no matter how reasonable.

  3. TroubleAtTheMine
    July 30th, 2014 @ 9:10 am

    I think it’s terribly unfair to call Angry Harry a pederast just because you disagree with him, it’s unworthy of you. Dawkins and Angry Harry are taking on the feminists all the time, it’s not easy work.

  4. DeadMessenger
    July 30th, 2014 @ 9:55 am

    How about you actually read the Bible before offering “contradictory” evidence?

    Although…I guess that wouldn’t help. 2 Corintians 4:4: “The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.”

    Maybe it’s wiser not to comment on things you do not and cannot understand.

  5. PeterP
    July 30th, 2014 @ 10:25 am

    One wonders why Mr. Dawkins finds the need to justify “mild pedophilia.” Perhaps a vice squad investigation is in order?

  6. Quartermaster
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:00 pm

    If we ban fairy tales, we’d be banning most of what he calls his work. The man is simply a preening fool educated beyond his abilities.

  7. Quartermaster
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:03 pm

    He has a moral code. But, you wouldn’t understand the difference.

  8. Quartermaster
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:06 pm

    You are one of the few that is trying to categorize theists in one lump. There is “variety” among atheists because they have nothing on which to base a moral code.

  9. Quartermaster
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:11 pm

    You would first have to have a point to make. He really isn’t making one, unless showing more than a trace of stupidity is his point.

  10. Geoff Boulton
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:35 pm

    How about you read the thread. The original assertion, and the one which was being addressed, was that atheists cannot attain justice because of their relativism. This assertion is contradicted by the fact that this is exactly the system which is used throughout the majority of the world. In the majority of justice systems, each case is judged on the particulars of that case and judgement made based upon those particulars. Nobody has addressed that fact yet, instead all I get is a bunch of ad hominems. If you’re going to argue then at least present an argument instead of simply calling names.

  11. Zohydro
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:41 pm
  12. Zohydro
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:46 pm

    Dawkins is a victim himself… That’s no excuse, mind you!

  13. Geoff Boulton
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:47 pm

    Maybe he’s addressing remarks by the like of Aldridge and other GOP members who clearly do think there are different types of rape and different consequences.

  14. TroubleAtTheMine
    July 30th, 2014 @ 12:51 pm

    I agree, I loathe the man. But that’s not the point. He’s willing to take on feminists, and that’s what he’s trying to do with these twitters. In my opinion.

  15. PeterP
    July 30th, 2014 @ 1:06 pm

    If one of my male teachers played with my pee pee when I was 6, I’d probably hate God, too.

  16. NeoWayland
    July 30th, 2014 @ 2:02 pm

    I’m curious what he has to say for himself. It is, after all, an accusation that he uses himself fairly often.

  17. NeoWayland
    July 30th, 2014 @ 2:06 pm

    Thinking about it just now, that raises a fascinating question.

    Which is worth more, a moral code handed to you or one earned through personal experience?

  18. RichFader
    July 30th, 2014 @ 5:28 pm

    “Mild atheism is bad. Violent atheism is worse. If you think that’s an endorsement of mild atheism, go away and learn how to think.”

    “But you *do* endorse mild atheism, Doctor.”

    “…Oh, my. Look at the time.”

  19. Quartermaster
    July 30th, 2014 @ 8:34 pm

    I don’t think you care about the answer to that anyway.

  20. NeoWayland
    July 30th, 2014 @ 9:49 pm

    I do, or I wouldn’t have asked the question.

    I think I know how people here would answer. And yes, it’s a big part of the point I would like to make.

  21. Dennis Mahon
    July 30th, 2014 @ 9:52 pm

    Moral codes are not earned, they are observed.

  22. NeoWayland
    July 30th, 2014 @ 10:17 pm

    Well, I didn’t expect that.

    I disagree, but let’s go on as if.

    Who made the first code and how did they do it?

    What happens when your morality doesn’t match your moral code? Can you make a new code, or are you stuck with the old one?

  23. Da Tech Guy On DaRadio Blog » Blog Archive » Richard Dawkins Busts a key Myth of Atheism
    August 1st, 2014 @ 8:20 am

    […] Now lets stip­u­late that one does not have to be a fan of either rad­i­cal Islam or rad­i­cal fem­i­nism to think his argu­ments on reli­gion are tripe & Dawkins is an ass. […]

  24. Atheist Creep @RichardDawkins Destroying His Own Reputation : The Other McCain
    August 1st, 2014 @ 10:25 am

    […] days ago, I took notice of how notorious atheist Richard Dawkins had grossly offended many liberals with his Twitter rants about rape and pedophilia. One is reminded of last year’s atheist sex scandals which involved, among other things, […]

  25. Richard Dawkins managing to annoy people (again) | Batshit Crazy News
    August 1st, 2014 @ 10:40 am

    […] TOM: Richard Dawkins has a real gift for alienating people… […]

  26. Jaclyn Glenn Rule 5 | Batshit Crazy News
    August 1st, 2014 @ 7:11 pm

    […] and Richard!  TOM did a couple of Dawkin posts this […]