Feminism is the belief that men are entirely useless, except when men are destructive and evil. If you think any man ever had any skill, knowledge or virtue that entitled him to be treated with courtesy and respect, you are not a feminist. According to feminism, all that is good and worthy in human history — all important accomplishments, every act of courage and kindness — has been done by women. Anyone who believes otherwise has been brainwashed by the patriarchal myth that males have imposed on society as “history” and so-called “science.”
Such are the esoteric doctrines of feminism, the c0re ideology that inspires their endless complaints about inequality and oppression. By proclaiming that they have a monopoly of wisdom and virtue, feminists thereby empower themselves to tell the rest of us what we are allowed to say and what we are permitted to think. If at any time you make any statement that is not consistent with feminist ideology, you will be vilified and insulted, shouted down by the feminist mob that exercises a heckler’s veto over public discourse. Totalitarian movements require totalitarian tactics, and the foremost goal of feminists is to silence those whom they aim to enslave or destroy. See for yourself:
RULES FOR MEN IN FEMINIST MOVEMENTS
- Shut up and listen
- Ask me, don’t tell me
- Prepare to be wrong
- Call fellow men out on problematic behaviour
- Never dismiss the lived experiences of women
- Do not attempt to take a leadership role
Feminists who say their movement is about “equality” are lying. Feminism is a movement about power — absolute and unlimited power — and therefore the first rule for men in feminist movements is, SHUT UP. (That list of rules has been “liked” or “reblogged” more than 20,000 times on Tumblr.com since it was posted in April 2013.)
The three principles of feminism are selfishness, dishonesty and hate. If feminism had a fourth principle, it would be more hate.
“I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding . . . time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness. . . . I don’t want a baby. . . . Nothing will make me want a baby. . . . This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.”
— Amanda Marcotte, March 2014
Feminism’s fanatical hatred empowers feminist dishonesty. They usually try to pretend that “choice” isn’t about hating babies, but the question remains: If feminists don’t hate babies, why do they want to kill them?
To which their answer is, SHUT UP.
We cannot be permitted to speak the truth about feminism. Facts and logic are tools of the patriarchy, and ordinary “common sense” — well, that’s just an obsolete male-supremacist myth!
A movement that systematically excludes honest, sane and intelligent people will tend to become a paranoid hive of fools. This brings us to “Ask a Radfem,” a Tumlbr blog that describe its purpose thus:
This blog exists to bridge a gap between people with honest questions about radical feminism, and radical feminists with something to say.
Let’s meet a few of the site’s contributors, shall we?
- Ash is a fat, creative writer, lesbian radical feminist from Australia who aspires to be a women’s health nurse. She is a gender abolitionist, is anti-kink culture and pro the destruction of the porn and prostitution industries – but supports porn actresses and prostitutes themselves.
- Cammy is a white-passing American woman from a Puerto Rican household. A bisexual radical feminist in the Southern U.S., she focuses on lesbians, childfreedom, gender and sex industry abolition, religious apostates and the poor. She is an atheist and a survivor of trauma from emotional abuse, molestation and rape dealing with C-PTSD, anxiety and depression. Past experiences include BDSM, polyamory, self-harming, abortion, an abusive marriage, Christianity and Islam.
- Blossom is an outreach worker from Canada. Her passion lies in harm reduction, outreach, & housing initiatives with people experiencing addiction & homelessness. She is a de-transitioned lesbian who lived “as male” from 2004-2011 and has experienced the process of transition and eventual de-transition with the help of mental health professionals and family. . . . She is also a former webcam girl and behind-the-scenes employee of various adult websites. She focuses on gender abolition, mental health, & lesbian activism.
- Lauren (Lo) is a 17-year-old white-passing Chicana from Southern California. Her career aspiration is to work against internet crimes against children for either local or federal law enforcement. She identifies as bisexual and is open about her struggle with anxiety disorder.
- R4df3m is a no-nonsense fat, disabled, bisexual radical feminist from Portland, Oregon who does not mince words. A former sex worker and abuse survivor, she speaks primarily about the harms of the sex industry and the realities of sex based oppression. As a bisexual radical woman in a heterosexual marriage she addresses the unique intersections of straight passing privilege and the abuse inherent to heterosexual relationships.
It’s an all-star lineup of feminist kooks. You could not assemble such a crew of weirdos by accident. The pattern is not random. Crazy movements attract crazy people. Here is one of the more seemingly sane contributors to “Ask a Radfem”:
Alisha M. is a feminist blogger, writer, musician, and poet, from the Southern United States. She is focused on gender abolition, women’s media, health, spirituality and activism for women with mental illness.
Feminism = “activism for women with mental illness.” Thanks for the concise definition, Alisha! Now let’s get to the big question:
Can/how a male promote radical feminism?
Listening. Really listening and being involved. Listening. This is something I’m trying to explain to my male friends who by some stroke of “altruism” really want to help be better allies. Just listen. Listen with empathy and emotions, be human, be vulnerable . . . accept silence on your part and accept sometimes being wrong.
-Alisha
In other words, SHUT UP.
Or applaud the feminist’s courage for killing her baby:
I couldn’t bring another monster into the world. We already have enough enemies as it is.
That’s from an article with the empowering feminist headline, “I Aborted My Baby — Because it was a Boy.”
Feminism is organized insanity. Why be merely crazy, when you can turn your mental illness into a political movement?

Porn is what the internet is for! Musical theater (Avenue Q) and online role-playing games (World of Warcraft) made sweet love, and the result was this video:
You don’t have to read any more. The rest is all verbiage meant to disguise a hatred for men and whites. De Beauvoir/Crenshaw equal hatred of men/whites. That is modern “Third Wave.” There is nothing behind it but sheer hatred, the same as a neo-Nazi or the KKK. It is a con game hiding behind women’s rights and “The New Jim Crow.” Third Wave Intersectionalism needs to be talked about the same way we talk about white supremacy, because in principle that’s all modern feminism is.
That’s all well and good, but sometimes I wish that I could avoid Tumblr like the plaque: brushing it vigorously with firm bristles, flossing the cracks with sturdy thread, and then rinsing it all out with a potent antiseptic.
Well, maybe feminism is a tacit method of population control, so maybe it’s not so crazy. I tend to err on the side of believing that people do things out of more than craziness or stupidity.
But the problem with any movement or backlash is that it usually winds up most hurting the people who don’t deserve it. The ones who really deserve the backlash will see it coming and get out of the way, leaving ordinary schmucks to take the hit.
I thought of that possibility too, that is was about population control, but no. They used the African-American community as a test, liked what they saw, and doubled down. It’s about destroying the family unit, since having the bio dad in the home is a potent antibody to State control.
I did notice that all of the all-star lineup use pseudonyms.
Russian uses gender. In nouns, generally speaking, feminine nouns end in a, while masculine nouns lack an ending. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin’s (now ex-) wife is called Lyudmila Aleksandrovna Putina.
But, since we don’t know who invented the wheel — it could have been a female — maybe everything after that falls apart due to our dependence upon the wheel.
And therein is the problem: if women hadn’t invented pretty naked women’s bodies. we’d have no porn!
Thanks, I’m not very good at Russian.
In the Conan series for Lancer Books that L Sprague deCamp edited in the 1960s, he often added a line such as, “The Picts were a white race as well, though swarthy, but the Hyborians never referred to them as such.”
Robert E Howard wrote in the early 1930s, and could use words like Negro with no problem; though Negro was still acceptable in the 1960s, the reader can easily see where Mr deCamp had to work his way around some of Mr Howard’s prose.
After a certain point, stuff starts to get silly: it’s estimated that we are all at least 20th cousins (though I wonder how they account for isolated Amazon tribesmen), and supposedly all European-descended people are at least 12th cousins, so there’s some of everybody in all of us.
Of course, I guess that means I am related to Michelle Obama and Wombat-socho and Amanda Marcotte . . . .
I’ve lost a lot of it myself.
I can read it but I never got the hang of speaking it. I’m glad I didn’t have to learn Ukrainian or Polish
Mental cases used to line up to get on Jerry Springer. Now, thanks to youtube and the internet they all have their own independent kingdoms or retardation. Marcotte is nothing but a monkey in a cage with three arms. It gets blog hits.
It’s not a contradiction, they only want to abolish the male gender/sex.
I note at the site featuring the “Abortion Because of ‘Maleness'” entry, the following appears on the sidebar:
Hatred is not allowed here, this is a safe zone for everyone.
Right. Self-awareness is obviously not a prized trait among these types, it would appear.
Upon further reflection, I wonder whether “Abortion For Maleness” writer is engaging in an elaborate Juvenalian put-on. It’s so over-the-top and breathtakingly lacking in self-awareness, that it’s difficult to believe any rational human being could have written it. Combine that with the set-up of the “assault” occurring on a first class flight to San Francisco, where the be-suited male “attacker” uses language common to street thugs, and I begin to wonder whether someone is pulling our legs.
I know our host has admirably cataloged similar sentiments among feminists, and I’ve seen such things posted in other places. (David Thompson has noted a number of such things over the years.) Still, the lunacy contained in the original post and follow-up is almost too great to be believed.
““I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding . . . time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness. . . . I don’t want a baby. . . . Nothing will make me want a baby. . . . This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.”— Amanda Marcotte, March 2014”
Gee, kind of sounds like her.
What happens when they say ‘shut up’ and the response is ‘no’?
Uh, no they cut off communication with you because you’re a horrid person with the moral compass of a Nazi.
In other words, as a friend of mine likes to put it, English is German trying to sound French so it can get laid.
Thank you for reviving this.
I’m distressed st how many of them are from the South. Didn’t pay attention to their grandmothers’ examples, no doubt.
Because the overt violence that the patriarchal oppressors will use against thier real persons in the real world. So they hide behind a pen name because it is the only way they feel empowered (until the patriarchal oppressors are destroyed) and that is typically what they would really like to be called and not use those icky nasty bigoted western religious created names or share names with racist, homophobic, xenophobic, anti-diversity thinking historical people (this is also known as dumping your slave name in the other radical diversity groups)
Tokophobia? Well, if she’s 50, there’s little need for her to worry about that anymore — if any cisheteronormative male would actually do anything to her which could result in pregnancy — but even if she is still potentially fertile, modern science can fix that for her!
The lovely Miss Marcotte has been settled down with her POSSLQ Marc Faletti for several years now; if he and she — I assume that he doesn’t want children either, or he’d have found a more compliant wench — never want children, modern science has the techniques to provide permanent birth control. It’s more expensive and involved for women — curse that evil patriarchal God who designed women so! — but for men it’s a routine procedure in the urologist’s office, home that night, with a bag of ice on the bag overnight, and presto! no more worries!
Someone snarkier than myself might suggest that Mr Faletti’s balls have already been so thoroughly busted that the procedure was unnecessary, but I would certainly never say that!
Men aren’t allowed to say no.
Didn’t pay attention to their grandmothers’ examples, no doubt.
A thousand thumbs up for that comment. My mother’s people are from Alabama. There is a Yankee caricature of the demure, submissive “Southern Belle” which bears no relationship to reality. The strength of Southern women must be seen and experienced to be believed.
And it’s not a racial thing, BTW. It’s a cultural thing.
Italians and French are Hispanics? WHAT THE HELL DID YOU JUST SAY? W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W WHY DO YOU HAVE TO BE SO DAMNED STUPID!
Yea the thing is she claims that she is afraid of pregnancy and child birth on a whole. Not only affecting her but the mere fact that a pregnant woman is in the same room makes her ill. To the point that even normal fun sex makes her ill.
Yea, she is that crazy.
So again what I can pull from her when not fighting about various leftist thoughts; is she was going to work for the state providing counseling to women about thier options when pregnant (this was like the early 80s) as State Social Services. She couldn’t handle seeing all those young girls from schools who thought thier BFs loved them and hated the rule from the state to help get foster/adoption process going for some of these because woman’s choice or something. No thoughts or discussion about whether some of these girls were trafficked; nope they were all abused teens by men (either daddy or the BF) and the evil patriarchal government wanted to saddle these girls with children. Anyway, chronically underemployed since social philosophy grads to run in the great society programs are a dime a dozen since we have had almost 20 years of them getting into the government before she showed up at all levels and driving wages down. So her cushy 6 figure job prospect turned into making just a few dollars per hour more than a burger flipper. Oh and she is loud and opinions are freely expressed without neither serious thoughts nor tact. So she was let go before she really established her job security. That isn’t her fault, nope its all the patriarchal oppressors fault. I mean it was the men that forced themselves on those young teen girls, it was men that fired her from her state job, and it was men that suppressed the wages because they are afraid of a strong woman.
Probably because it sold as well as those books that tell the real answer as to why the Philadelphia Experiment appeared in the air over Dallas in 1963 and why the lizard people have been able to be elected multiple times to office even when the Greys have been fighting them. Or that chemtrails are all part of a plot by the old ones to bring back the squid people.
Aside from my own mother, grandmothers, &c., I think of Mrs. Dubose from “To Kill a Mockingbird”. THAT, not whining about “oppression”, is strength.
With regard to your point (2), those people exist and are called “union organizers”.
In my very-heavily-male dominated line of work, I have told more than a few women to get their commercial driver’s licenses and drive a dump truck for a living; it pays more than working at a laundromat or convenience store.
If this no-longer-young lady cannot stand to be around pregnant women, the obvious recourse was not to become a professional feminist, but to move into a male-dominated field where there are very few women, period, around, much less knocked-up ones.
Bet that never occurred to her!
“Shut up!”
“No.”
“…What?”
“I said no.”
“…Why?”
“I don’t want to.”
“But… but I have feminism!”
“I don’t care.”
“This doesn’t make any sense!”
“Too bad.”
It may be trite and old hat, but it’s worth remembering Rush Limbaugh’s Undeniable truth of Life #24: “Feminism was established so that unattractive women could have easier access to the mainstream of society.”
Doesn’t that really still cover it all? Women who are physically and mentally unable to even pique even a modicum of male interest in them, never got asked to dance, never got a prom date, end up blaming the world and men specifically for their own deficiencies. Rather than change themselves, they want to change themselves.
And the concept of being “unattractive” encompasses being bat shit psycho.
They’re angry and bitter at not winning the game of life, so their mission is to change all the rules until they *do* win.
In Russian, words ending in consonants are generally masculine, words ending in ? or ? are typically feminine, and words ending in ? are neuter.
[…] http://theothermccain.com/2015/01/29/the-first-rule-of-feminism/ […]
A young woman (30ish) that I am acquainted with lives in San Diego. She is not all that attractive physically, but she has a nice spirit about her that makes being around her a pleasure. A woman that does not have such a spirit, regardless of her looks, is an ugly woman. A woman with such a spirit is a very attractive woman. Regardless of what the Feminazis say.
The San Dog acquaintance got married two years ago and I was invited to the wedding. Regretted that, but I was recovering from major surgery at the time and simply didn’t have the strength to go. The guy that she married is a lucky guy to get her too.
Such people can’t abide the “judgmentalism” of normal people.
I could not possibly care less what they think. I will say no.
You’ve made the rebuttable presumption that he has any to begin with. That’s a UK grad for ya.
It used to just be the CIA out to get us. The good ol’ days are gone forever.
This is horrific! That would mean we are related to a UK grad! Oh, the shame, the shame….
I don’t care for porn, but I can’t seem to bring myself to hate women for those pretty naked bodies.
A friend went to Kremenchuk and spoke a little Russian. His instructors at the University which ran the Mi-17 transition course told him, “We speak Ukranian here.” He chuckled over that and I laughed when he told me about it.
I think you won here.
I particularly like this one:
“Never dismiss the lived experiences of women”
So no matter how peculiar, unlikely, or contradictory the subjective, anecdotal claims of feminists are, you’re a patriarchal shitlord if you question them.
It’s a heads-I-win, tails-you’re-a-rapist proposition.
“Shut up!”, she explained.
A bio:
How can one be both someone “who aspires to be a women’s health nurse” and “is a gender abolitionist”? If she wishes to become a women’s health nurse, then she is aspiring to a position which is limiting itself to the gender of the patients.
More, “women’s health” normally refers to gynecology and obstetrics, along with breast care; most other women’s health issues are also men’s health issues, and there’s no particular need to separate out care by sex. This means that this lesbian radical feminist wants to be a nurse taking care of other women’s sexual parts. Am I the only one who sees a problem here?