The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Question To #OccupyResoluteDesk Next Time His Piehole’s Open Near A Reporter

Posted on | March 21, 2015 | 18 Comments

by Smitty

The no-talent rodeo clown hath spoken: Netanyahu’s comments ‘erode the name of democracy’. OK, it’s not clear what that means. It’s still ‘democracy’, and not ’emocracy’ or ‘democrac’. Because if we’re going to hammer Bibi for saying something stupid, e.g.:

Following Netanyahu’s pre-election statement that there would be no Palestinian state if he were re-elected, Obama “indicated to him that given his statements prior to the election, it is going to be hard to find a path” forward on negotiations, Obama said.
Obama also said that he took issue with Netanyahu’s campaign trail warning that Israeli Arabs were headed to the polls “in droves.”

Shouldn’t the president at least be precise in the criticism? How do you erode the name of an abstract concept whose symbol is fairly constant, irrespective of who is throwing it in the urinal like an aromatic cake?

But that’s just a pedantic quibble. More practically, isn’t President Obama the same jackwagon who discussed voting as the ‘best revenge’?

So, if we can get Jake Tapper or Major Garrett a free moment, I’d like to have them inquire of ol’ Stompyfoot McPointyfinger:

How, exactly, does he think Netanyahu’s campaign trail remarks substantially differ from his 2012 entreaty?

I was pretty concerned about Obama when he made that remark, as it’s a challenge to reconcile tempting others to behave in a spirit of vengeance with Christian faith. But I’ll keep praying for BHO and the world. And I certainly should try use the respect level due the office, and not the respect his record has earned, in addressing BHO. Blogging is scant recompense for the ridiculous damage he’s inflicting, though.

via HotAir


18 Responses to “Question To #OccupyResoluteDesk Next Time His Piehole’s Open Near A Reporter”

  1. Adobe_Walls
    March 21st, 2015 @ 8:41 pm

    What exactly do you pray for, when praying for President Look at Me Looking at Me? Obviously you don’t have to answer.

  2. M. Thompson
    March 21st, 2015 @ 8:55 pm

    I’m too distgusted to be upset.

  3. Adobe_Walls
    March 21st, 2015 @ 9:11 pm

    He really is a despicable creature.

  4. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    March 21st, 2015 @ 9:17 pm

    Partners in Peace! Or Pieces…as the case may be.

  5. smitty
    March 21st, 2015 @ 9:26 pm

    I pray that wisdom find him.

  6. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    March 21st, 2015 @ 10:58 pm

    His fragile ego is more important than millions of lives. What a sad and pathetic leader we have elected.

  7. Adobe_Walls
    March 21st, 2015 @ 11:03 pm

    Well good luck with that.

  8. Zohydro
    March 21st, 2015 @ 11:17 pm

    You being too charitble here, hombre!

  9. Adobe_Walls
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 12:14 am

    A vice I work on overcoming everyday.

  10. DeadMessenger
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 1:03 am

    You’re a good man, Smitty.

    As you obviously know, we’re told to pray for our leaders. We know that we get the leaders we deserve, and looking at what this country has become (Babylon the Once Great), we can see why we are afflicated with this particular batch. Nevertheless, Jesus said that those who obey His commands are the ones who love Him, and those who love Him belong to Him.

    At the end of the day, all I can say is maranatha.

  11. Tyrconnell
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 1:37 am

    Hmm, misquote Bibi to justify their dislike of Israel, mistranslate Kaddafi to justify destroying Lybia, misidentifying the Hondurans removing their president in accordance with their constitution a coup in order to satisfy Chavez and Ortega. I seem to sense a pattern here.

  12. DeadMessenger
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 1:46 am

    Interesting that you should use the word “despicable”. In referring to the Antichrist, the prophet Daniel wrote:

    “…a despicable person will arise, on whom the honor of kingship has not been conferred, but he will come in a time of tranquility and seize the kingdom by intrigue.” (Dan 11:21).

    Not that I’m saying that the Occupant is THE Antichrist, because it’s also written that the Antichrist will seem wise, which clearly doesn’t apply here (and I think that people in all 57 states will agree with me).

    AN antichrist, though, certainly, and a despicable human being who fancies himself a king over a kingdom seized by intrigue.

  13. Adobe_Walls
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 2:03 am

    Well assuming the Antichrist is the planning sort, there’s got to be at least one Beta version.

  14. smitty
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 6:43 am

    I believe in a deterministic universe. This “luck” concept mystifies.

  15. Quartermaster
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 7:33 am

    I can understand that. But while the Universe is deterministic to the extent that it “obeys” the laws of Physics, man is given a free will and while hemmed in to an extent by Physics, he can determine his own path by either accepting or rejecting the Gospel.

    The concept of “luck” had its origin in “pleasing the gods.” As such, a Christian does not accept or live by the concept.

  16. Quartermaster
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 7:35 am

    His assistance of the Religion of Pieces® does him no credit.

  17. riverlifecallie
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 12:27 pm

    Which brought this to mind:

    For he who despises wisdom and instruction is doomed. Vain is their hope, fruitless are their labors, and worthless are their works.

    Their wives are foolish and their children
    wicked; accursed is their brood.

    Wisdom 3; 11-12

  18. Squid Hunt
    March 22nd, 2015 @ 2:46 pm

    My understanding is that what Netanyahu said basically boiled down to there not being two states as long as Palestine was run by nut-jobs. It was a fairly rational conditional. Not that Obama would twist the truth.