It Seems As Though @KurtSchlichter Doesn’t Hold Her Majesty In High Regard

Posted on Comments

by Smitty

Great outing from the Colonel at Townhall:

. . .let the liberals solve this problem for us with their bizarre determination to nominate that glass-jawed, email-deleting cuckoldette. Yeah, non-coastal America is dying to elect someone who reminds everybody of their first wife, including women and the never-married.

The main thrust of Schlichter’s piece, though, is a cavalry charge up the Lefty middle.  Tap that glass jaw. Call the Lefty’s bluff via the legal system. It’s not a bad plan, given lots of time and resources.  A few questions for the Colonel, though:

  • Can you offer a breadcrumb or two? Your next couple of books could be How To Go To The Legal Mat With The Lefties, and What To Do About The Gastropodic Slime After You’ve Gone To The Legal Mat With The Lefties.
  • Can we part out the work? Quite a few conservatives view legal interactions like being covered with gastropods. Is supporting the ACLJ a possible option?
  • What about the problem of legalism, itself, as the issue? Many fear that, in wrestling the Lefty gastropods, we risk becoming them. What are your recommendations for skeletal conservation?

via Instapundit

14 comments

  4. If Brett Kimberlin can file lawsuits like a friggin fish flopping on a deck (and while not being effective does cause some turmoil), what could a competent person do if they tried law fare?

  6. For men who’ve been through the wringer, you’re first wife is commonly the one who served papers on you a propos of nothing terribly compelling (under the impression she could trade up). That doesn’t describe Hildebeast. (The ‘reminds every woman of her first husband’ was a stupid joke about George Bush the Elder offered by Ellen Goodman; I tend to doubt that Goodman’s first husband was a preternaturally good natured combat veteran who built his own business and raised five children).

  7. Is insufferable prick a shtick for him, or is he really like that? He always come off like your best friends asshole older brother. Kinda like Chet in the movie Weird Science. Bad article, too. Liberals defend slavery, and Jim Crow? Does he actually expect people to believe that shit? That’s just dumb on every level. I was beginning to wonder how many times he was going to use the word “fascistic” as a descriptor, too? If that’s the kind of D-Level punditry, simple minded worldview, nonsense hyperbole, and retarded fantasy that the right is passing off as insightful then you’ve got some serious messaging problems.

Comments are closed.