Men Cannot Be Feminists

Posted on Comments

The oxymoronic phenomenon of the “male feminist” is an endless source of amusement. If groveling self-abasement were an Olympic sport, “male feminists” would win the gold medal every four years.

Modern feminism is basically about three things:

  1. Killing babies;
  2. Hating men;
    and
  3. Lying.

A common feminist lie is to deny that they hate men. This is exactly the kind of shameless dishonesty we must expect from fanatics who assert that killing babies is women’s most basic “right.”

Hateful bloodthirsty liars are not the kind of women that normal men find attractive, yet there are always enough abnormal men in the world that some of them actually want to have sex with feminists. Inspired by twisted masochistic neuroses or other perverse impulses, these pathetic males declare themselves feminists and, while not all “male feminists” end up in the lunatic ward like Professor Hugo Schwyzer, they always meet a sorry end, groveling for the approval of sadistic women whose raison d’etre is their contempt for men.

Meghan Murphy is the proprietor of Feminist Current, “Canada’s leading feminist website.” She has a Masters degree in Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies, but still insists on describing herself as “a heterosexual woman who has been in a number of heterosexual relationships,” despite never having met a man she actually likes or respects enough to consider them her equal. Like every other feminist, Meghan Murphy only ever speaks of men as her moral and intellectual inferiors. No man could ever deserve her trust or admiration, and certainly she could never be expected to praise a “male feminist” like Noah Berlatsky:

Noah Berlatsky . . . perfectly exemplifies the trouble with male “allies.” He not only presumes to know more about what’s good for women than women themselves, but has taken it upon himself to dictate what the future of the feminist movement should look like, using Playboy as a platform, at that. . . .
Propping up a man whose “feminist cred” consists of attacking feminists and smearing the feminist movement is as ignorant as it is dangerous. . . .
Men like Berlatsky are big supporters of “feminism” so long as it benefits them. Playboy Feminism™ works to elevate male power and privilege and supports a notion of liberation that says: “Beautiful naked women, splayed across pages for the male gaze is what freedom for women is really about.” . . .
Playboy and the male gaze have absolutely nothing to do with female sexuality. To imply as much is to reinforce the notion that women exist only in relation to men and, therefore, that women’s sexuality depends on the male gaze.
Despite challenges such as a fundamental lack of understanding around what feminism is, Berlatsky has persisted in his quest to reinvent our century-old women’s movement, painting feminists as needing, simply, a little male leadership. . . .

FEMINISM IS NOT ABOUT MAKING MEN HAPPY.

How much more clearly can Meghan Murphy explain this to Noah Berlatsky? A basic goal of the feminist movement is to abolish male happiness. If you are a male and you are happy, you are the problem that feminism is intended to solve.

Does it make men happy to look at beautiful naked women? Then feminists must condemn beautiful women and also condemn the “male gaze”that enjoys seeing beautiful women naked. No man can ever be permitted to see a woman naked, because that has “absolutely nothing to do with female sexuality,” according to Meghan Murphy. Under no condition should “female sexuality”ever make men happy.

Meghan Murphy knows this, because she “has been in a number of heterosexual relationships” and no man has ever accused Meghan Murphy of making him happy. Nor is it likely any man would admit to having tried to make her happy. Even in Canada, most men have enough self-respect that they’d never admit something as shameful as that.




 

127 comments

  1. Peter Singer.
    Correct… I did recently read a transcript of a speech where he expanded that to age five— and euthanasia after seventy. Trying to remember where so I can post link…

    It’s not a big surprise… it fits the “whole life” model, after all.

  2. I think that these people live in such insulated bubbles, never having to interact with anyone who will contradict them …

    Liberal arts majors.

  8. Such people would prefer to be mere animals, because they continue to rebel against the free will and the moral backpack which God requires us to lug through life.

  9. I have had my share of conversations with people when the moment arrived that reality became unmoored and slowly drifted away.

    The most memorable was when working as the night clerk at a 7-11 while in college. Some woman was out front yelling, and I briefly considered going out to ask her to shut up or move on, but got distracted by cleaning or restocking or something.

    Then she came in, obviously distraught, and within seconds I realized that she was either talking herself into or out of suicide. So I assumed my most reasonable and sympathetic persona, spoke with her at some length, offered her the store phone to make a call gratis. She called a friend and we spoke for some time… no idea how long until the friend arrived and away she went.

    And I have no idea how she ended up. Hope she was, and still is all right. And glad that I did not try chasing her away, who knows how that would have ended up.

  10. I keep the original Wonka picture on my laptop because it is just about perfect whenever you hear or read something amazingly stupid.

  12. Golly, some faces are just made for punching. But, since she’s a girrrrrrl, she gets a pass.

    Still, she looks like Obamacare Pajamaboy’s sister. Mom still thinks it’s cute to dress them alike.

  13. Feminists hate everything that makes a man a man — not the men themselves.

    Feminists would love to create a world in which men are unnecessary — but they don’t hate men.

    Feminists believe Original Sin resulted in creation of the Y chromosome — but they don’t hate men.

    Hate the sin, not the sinner — it’s just that being a man is sinful.

  14. Too late! We’re coming for you. My interstellar special reaction team is on its way from 3 Beta Reticuli to deal with your betrayal.

  17. They also want women to squash their femininity and become as much like men as possible. Make of that what you will.

  18. Recently in a conversation with some SJWs, I was told — apparently in all seriousness — that expecting people to give actual reasons for why I should do what they say was hateful against crazy people.
    I mean… what does one do when confronted with that level of wilful insanity?

  19. Damn. I just can’t get the hang of hashtags. Kids today, with their sex parties and internet pills and hoverpants.

    Kids. My lawn. Some disassembly required.

  21. I would NOT tap that! Even if she were married to me, which, fortunately, she is not.

  23. Hey, we’re losing all our damn money, and Christmas is around the corner, and I ain’t gonna have no money to buy my son the G.I. Joe with the kung-fu grip! And my wife ain’t gonna f… my wife ain’t gonna make love to me if I got no money!” So they’re panicking right now, they’re screaming “SELL! SELL!” to get out before the price keeps dropping. They’re panicking out there right now, I can feel it.

  25. They want a world without men but know that somebody’s still going to have to kill spiders and fix the flats.

  29. “… but either way, I’m smokin’ hot, buddy.”

    No man *ever* describes any woman he loves or respects as “hot”, much less “smokin’ hot”.

  30. A woman’s long hair shouts *WOMAN* to us men. And, on some level, women do understand something of the effect their long hair has on us, how much we enjoy it. This is why when a relatively normal woman decides to start pushing her man away, one of the first things she’ll do is chop off her hair.

  31. The hottest woman in the world is the one who accepts your love and returns it with the same intensity.

  34. Male tears are kinda rare. They’d better reserve their ablutions to a regular shower. There’s far more water on tap there.

  39. “Don’t objectify me, you misogynistic, patriarchal swine !!!!!11!!!! Now, where are the arm holes in the giant foam vagina I’m wearing to the “Safe Space” rally?”

  40. Depends on your definition of “chop off”. if you’re talking “mannish”, then maybe so.

  45. As I remarked before, an eminently punchable face. But it’s attached to a girl, of sort, so no punches from me.

    Oh, such a burden is this exaggerated sense of chivalry of mine!

  48. Imagine saying “I Do” then lifting the veil for that first kiss and discovering Ms. Murphy behind the veil. It might be like that Boy Scout skit about the worlds ugliest man that one can see and live.

  49. Your husband telling *you* that you’re “smokin’ hot” is a very different thing from him telling “the guys” that you’re “smokin’ hot”.

  50. Do you really go around telling other men that your S.O. is “smokin’ hot”? Assuming you have any, do you describe daughter or sister that way? If some guy were to say to you, concerning your daughter or sister (whom he did not know is your daughter or sister), “Man! Will you look at that “smokin’ hot” babe!”, are you *really* going to react as though he had not expressed great disrespect toward her?

Comments are closed.