In The Mailbox: 10.22.13

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
Dead Republican Party: Son Of “40 Acres And A Mule”?
Proof Positive: Radicals For Rules?
First Street Journal: The Logic Of The Left


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: “Corrupt Bastards Club”
American Thinker: I Ache For A President Who Loves America
Blackmailers Don’t Shoot: Time For Gloating Demagoguery On Obamacare
The Necropolitan Sentinel: Michael Skolnick Fails Deductive Reasoning, American History, And Math; also, Obamacare Watch – Public Retirees On The Exchanges You should have TNS bookmarked for Meep’s series on the trainwreck alone. Seriously.
Don Surber: Daily Scoreboard, October 21
Jammie Wearing Fools: Vaporcare – Obama Delivers An Informercial When An Accounting Is Due
Pat Dollard: Of The 13 Human Props Around President Loser At LoserCare Speech Today, Only Three Were Actually Able To Register
Protein Wisdom: WaPo’s Marc Thiessen – TEA Party Needs A General Washington
Shot In The Dark: Duckspeak, Part CXXVIII
The Jawa Report: Heartbreak! Japanese Teens Not F*cking
The Lonely Conservative: Nanny Bloomberg Spending A Fortune On Terry McAuliffe In Virginia Governor’s Race
Megan McArdle: Is Obamacare In A Death Spiral?


55% Off Rockport Mens’ Dress Shoes

BREAKING: Maryland Appeals Court Denies Certiorari for Schmalfeldt Appeal

In a long list of cases dismissed without comment we find this news:

“Schmalfeldt v. Hoge — Pet. Docket No. 320.”

Will update with commentary, and expected rage reaction from the deranged cyberstalker. Two words, Bill: “Res judicata.”

UPDATE: John Hoge briefly acknowledges his victory. He has previously noted how Bill Schmalfeldt refers to the bloggers sued by Brett Kimberlin as “RICO Racketeers” — i.e., in effect convicting us of a felony, on the basis of false allegations in a ridiculous civil suit filed by the perjuring bomber I call The World’s Worst Pro Se Litigant™.

UPDATE II: Further comment from John Hoge:

I never had any serious doubts about Schmalfedlt’s appeal of the peace order failing. I did consider the possibility that the Court of Appeals would take the case in order to settle some point of law, but I never had any doubt about the order being upheld.
I would once again like to publicly thank my lawyer Zoa Barnes for her help with the case.

The RICO Racketeers™ would like to buy Zoa a steak dinner.

 

BomberSuesBloggers.com

 

In The Mailbox: 10.21.13

— compiled by Wombat-socho


Live At Five is going to be on hiatus for a few days, since my daughter is visiting from the Left Coast and the Dad Taxi has been pressed into service, which makes the usual blogging choice between getting up at 0300 or staying up until midnight the previous night to get the daily news fix done completely out of the question. Still, people send me stuff, and there’s stuff in my Feedly you should be reading, so you get this instead. Regular installments of Live at Five will resume on Thursday.


Over The Transom
Dead Republican Party: Cultural Marxism Creating A Fear Culture?
First Street Journal: A Very Bad Idea Whose Time Has Come
Proof Positive: John Cox (of Cox & Forkum) Returns!
Blackmailers Don’t Shoot: Study – Anti-Bullying Programs Backfire In Schools
Michelle Malkin: How NOT To Argue With Parents About Common Core
Doug Powers: David Axelrod Spins The Train Wreck
Twitchy: “Utterly Incredible!” Obama Says Nothing To See Here, Obamacare Disaster Is “Working Just Fine”


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: Obama’s OMB Director Can’t Confirm That Health Exchanges Will Be Up And Running By December
American Thinker: Obamacare A Planned Disaster For Political Reasons
The Necropolitan Sentinel: Obamacare Watch – Start The Deathwatch, also Obamacare Watch – Hold Them To It
Don Surber: Mother Teresa Day Weekend Scoreboard
Jammie Wearing Fools: Only Three Of Obama’s Props At Rose Garden Comedy Routine Have Actually Registered To Attempt Getting Obamacare
JustOneMinute: And The Problem With The Problem With This Analysis
Pat Dollard: CBS News Director – “Obama’s A Dirty Liar In A Credibility Death Spiral”
Protein Wisdom: “Core Assumptions of ‘Win Elections, Then Repeal’ Require The Suspension Of Disbelief”
Shot In The Dark: What The Hell Do We Do About The MNGOP, 2013 Edition
The Jawa Report: University Complains Racist IDF Soldiers Won’t Rape Palestinian Women
The Lonely Conservative: Company Behind Failed Obamacare Site Rewarded With $8 Billion In Future Work
Megan McArdle: Four Things We Think We Know About Obamacare


Save 50% On Closeout Carhartt Outerwear

Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt Clearly Knows He Is Doomed to Hell

Bill Schmalfeldt ranting, 2011. (Image via Thomas Anderson at Vimeo)

“Bill Schmalfeldt doesn’t have principles. Bill Schmalfeldt doesn’t have values. Bill Schmalfeldt doesn’t have beliefs. Bill Schmalfeldt has enemies, and then nothing, a black and dank and empty void of sullenness.”
— Ken White, Popehat, Aug. 6

In 2011, Bill Schmalfeldt self-published a book entitled, Can You BE a Tea Party Member and STILL Call Yourself CHRISTIAN?: YES! Thanks to This NEWLY-REVEALED WORD of GOD! To say that this was one of the most wretched, ill-argued, unreadable and un-Christian things ever published would be to praise it with faint damns.

Put it this way: Bill’s book could more accurately be called, A Cry For Help: Please Put Me in a Lunatic Asylum Before I Hurt Myself.

The most important thing revealed by the book, however, is that Bill Schmalfeldt is not a Christian. He is a certain familiar type of dishonest atheist who mocks Christians and attacks the authority of the Bible except when he is (with unintended irony) using the authority of the Bible (in which he does not actually believe) to mock Christians (whom he deeply hates) as fools and hypocrites.

People often ask why I even bother to notice such an obscure failure, but any student of deviant psychology would find Schmalfeldt a fascinating case study and, while I am certainly not qualified to make a professional diagnosis, I know crazy when I see it. What we nowadays call mental illness or personality disorder, the Bible often describes as demonic possession, and if psychiatric treatment can’t fix what’s wrong with Bill Schmalfeldt, perhaps an exorcism could.

On the other hand, perhaps Bill Schmalfeldt is not crazy, but merely evil and, having decided to make war on God, has abandoned all hope of redemption. Keep that in mind when, for example, you read John Hoge’s account of Schmalfeldt’s most recent embarassment: Having boldly predicted Wednesday that the Maryland Court of Appeals would by Friday overturn Hoge’s peace order against him, Schmalfeldt finds his prediction to be mistaken. But did Bill learn anything from his mistake? No, he’s incapable of learning any lesson, or even acknowledging his errors, because he refuses to take responsibility for his own actions, always choosing instead to attribute his failures to wrongs or unfairness he blames on others. Bill Schmalfeldt knows he is doomed to Hell.

Of course @Vermontaigne is actually our good friend Dan Collins, who changed his screen name and photo to Carl DeLong (Kimberlin’s 1978 bombing victim) after Kimberlin sued us. But you see that Schmalfeldt refuses to acknowledge the fact that his “excellent friend” Brett Kimberlin has spent the past 20 years cheating DeLong’s widow out of the wrongful death settlement she won in court.

Meanwhile, Dan makes mocking reference to two of Brett Kimberlin’s most wicked lies: First, Kimberlin has falsely claimed he was secretly exonerated of his crimes. As investigative journalist Matthew Vadum has said, “A record of this surreptitious pardon is bound to surface any day now, delivered by a leprechaun in a unicorn-pulled stage coach.” Second, Kimberlin has falsely claimed that he won a lawsuit against Mark Singer, author of Citizen K: The Deeply Weird American Journey of Brett Kimberlin. That never happened, either.

Honest and intelligent people know what Brett Kimberlin did and why Brett Kimberlin did it, but if Bill Schmalfeldt is intelligent — we stipulate the hypothetical — he is provably dishonest. Everybody knew that when Schmalfeldt harassed Aaron Walker and harassed Lee Stranahan, he was doing it to help Brett Kimberlin. For a long time, Schmalfeldt denied this. Then he accidentally admitted it:

Oops. So, what was his motive in harassing my wife in November? I believed at the time that Schmalfeldt was doing this at the behest of Neal Rauhauser, who had expressed interest in learning where I had moved when I left Maryland. If, by his hateful harassment — he sent me more than 200 hostile tweets in 48 hours — Schmalfeldt could provoke me into calling the cops, the police report would list my address and phone number, so that I would have in effect doxed myself.

Instead, I asked for intercessory prayer. Then, Schmalfeldt and his fellow Team Kimberlin members began publicly claiming I had not actually moved, as the basis of accusing me of “fraud.”

Oh. Oh, my goodness, Bill. Oh, my, my.

Then Brett Kimberlin sued and Schmalfeldt claimed I had been “served” in Maryland — a deliberate lie. When challenged to provide what’s called “proof of service” (which his “excellent friend” Brett Kimberlin would have, if it were true), Schmalfeldt was trapped.

This is how people go to Hell, see?

Bill Schmalfeldt hates God and loves evil. He despises truth and embraces lies. And no matter how often such a person is caught, their hatred of God is so deep and their commitment to wickedness is so profound, they will never confess  their sins, nor will they repent. You cannot hope for their deliverance, for they scorn the prayers of the faithful. Their satanic dishonesty delivers them to destruction.

Bon voyage, Bill.

 




 

Bill Schmalfeldt Lies Again

After I replied to his “offer” of an “interview,” the sadistic sociopath who has cyberstalked, harassed and threatened me for months — and well do regular readers know this — had the unspeakable effrontery to e-mail me again, from which I quote two sentences:

“You make untrue statements that you sprinkle with your hate spittle and anoint as ‘true.’ I have not lied, and you have never once proven a lie other than to call me a liar.”

How many time in the past year has Bill Schmalfeldt accused me of lying when I said I no longer live in Maryland? How many times in the past five weeks has Bill Schmalfeldt falsely claimed I was “served” at a Maryland address in the Kimberlin v. Walker et al. lawsuit?

How many times have I named witnesses who can confirm for a fact that I do not live in Maryland, that I have not lived in Maryland since mid-2012? How many times have I stated that I have not been “served” in Maryland, because the Maryland address listed for me in Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., is not my address and, in point of fact, that particular address has never been my address?

I have not been served. I do not live in Maryland. Yet Schmalfeldt has never once acknowledged his dishonesty in accusing me falsely.

What authority, after all, did Bill Schmalfeldt ever have to make this false accusation against me? If Bill Schmalfeldt can prove that I am in Maryland — as he knows damned well that I am not — where is his proof? Where is the signed receipt for legal service that Bill Schmalfeldt says his perjuring friend Brett Kimberlin should have?

Bill Schmalfeldt has repeatedly claimed to be “ethical,” even as he has endlessly repeated this lie, demanding that I tell a convicted bomber where I and my family live, in order to disprove his lie.

You are a sick and pathetic freak, Bill Schmalfeldt. And your deliberate dishonesty is nearly as disgusting as your shameless cruelty.

 Bon voyage!

 





 


Reply to Bill Schmalfeldt

From: Bill Schmalfeldt <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:31 PM
Subject: Interview offer

Despite your opinion of me, I want to write a balanced story about Kimberlin’s RICO suit. If you are interested in telling your side of the story, i could submit a list of questions and will print your answers verbatim. This is a one time, take-it-or-leave-it offer. If you want your side told in my writing, let me know. If you do not want your side of the story, feel free to ignore me. Don’t bother writing back telling me not to contact you. That doesn’t work. Either agree or disagree to be interviewed, and leave it at that.
Thank you.

– – – –
From: Robert Stacy McCain
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Interview offer

Damn your “offer,” and damn your “interview.”
My opinion of you is of no consequence. What finally matters is the self-evident fact of your hateful dishonesty and cowardice, which is apparent to every intelligent person who has ever bothered to examine your words and actions.
Your assistance in “telling [my] side of the story” is neither welcome nor necessary. Of course, your offer is not made in good faith, as you have never acted on good faith in the entirety of the months that I have been forced to observe your constant lying and harassment. Further research has determined that this sort of disgraceful conduct has been your habit ever since you began your inept online attempts at impersonating a “progressive pundit” or whatever else you may choose to call that pathetic charade of yours.
What is astounding is that, after days of threatening the Impending Doom of myself and others — because of your advance notice of Kimberlin’s RICO suit — you have the unmitigated gall now to insult me by suggesting that you “want to write a balanced story” about the baseless and legally defective federal lawsuit your patron has filed against innocent people who have committed no wrong. You well know that the only “sin” of which the defendants are guilty is their failure to join you in your reverent worship at the Holy Shrine of Saint Brett of the Blessed Pipe Bomb.
Despite your knowledge of this truth, you pretend that Kimberlin’s litigation has some purpose beyond harassment. This pretense of yours fools no one. Your actions are entirely for the selfish and sadistic purpose of inflicting harm on people who are successful and happy, and your hate toward them is motivated by your envy, the ultimate cause of which is your inability to take responsibility for your incompetence and self-inflicted misfortunes.
Failure has attended your every step so far, and you have forfeited any claim you might ever have had on the courtesy of decent, honest and respectable people. Every person who knows you must regard you with thorough contempt, even such of your colleagues as may find you temporarily useful. Bad causes attract bad people, and the very fact that you are acceptable to Brett Kimberlin as an accomplice is conclusive proof of how desperate he has become.
You obviously have no shame, but you cannot be unconscious of the wrongs you have done, and I pity anyone so unfortunate as to have any reason to care what a laughingstock you have made of yourself. Cast your eye backward, look at the road you have traveled to reach your present humiliated position, and consider what destination you shall reach if you continue your current self-destructive trajectory.
I don’t have to tell you to go to Hell, because you are already in a frantic hurry to get there. All I can say now is, “Bon voyage.”
— RSM

 

– | – | – | –

ADDENDUM: A reader suggests the addition of this link:

BomberSuesBloggers.com

What is it worth to you, to read the truth about these jackals?

 

Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt Humiliates Himself in Maryland Court

Bill Schmalfeldt: ‘Brain-Damaged Troll’ (Image via YouTube.com)

From today’s Viral Read report on the latest Brett Kimberlin news:

Kimberlin personally handed a copy of the 48-page complaint to blogger John Hoge this morning at a Maryland court hearing where Kimberlin’s associate Bill Schmalfeldt failed in his appeal of a court order forbidding Schmalfeldt to continue his online harassment of Hoge. Kimberlin filed his federal suit in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland.

For the past couple of weeks, Bill Schmalfeldt — who has described himself as a “Brain Damaged Troll” — has been boasting on Twitter that he was going to devastate Hoge in today’s hearing. For some strange reason, reality refused to conform to Schmalfeldt’s delusions:

Bill Schmalfeldt called me as his witness. I was on the stand for about 25 minutes and answered fewer than 10 questions. Most of the time was spent either by my lawyer objecting (and the judge sustaining her objection) on matters of relevance or Judge Stansfield correcting Schmalfeldt’s misunderstandings of legal concepts. . . .
The judge also explained to Schmalfeldt that there is no exception to Maryland’s harassment statute for “journalism.”
None of Schmalfeldt’s exhibits were received into evidence.
When Schmalfeldt rested his case, the judge dismissed the petition on his own motion. My lawyer did not have to present my side of the case. . . .

Read the whole thing at Hogewash.com and be sure to hit his tip jar to repay John for providing us such delightful entertainment.

 

Anonymous and the Super-Hero Fantasy

Esquire magazine profiles a loser:

Known as Deric Lostutter to the government, DJ to his mom, and Shadow to his oldest friends, he was twenty-five years old and working as a waiter in a pizza-and-beer joint for eight bucks an hour, getting home at two or three in the morning stinking of kitchen grease. One day he pulled up a documentary on YouTube called We Are Legion. . . .
The thing is, these are all kids just like Deric Lostutter. Most of them are in their twenties, and some are teenagers. One of the geniuses behind the HBGary hack was an eighteen-year-old from the Shetland Islands who called himself Topiary. Another was a twenty-four-year-old soldier who posed online as a sixteen-year-old girl named Kayla. Multiply that by hundreds, thousands, maybe someday even millions. Because you don’t have to sit at home complaining about your crappy job, your crappy town, your crappy country. Anyone can join. All you have to do is find your way to the private Internet Relay Chat channel for newbies and start listening to the conversation.
And Lostutter thought, Fuck yeah, America. Finally someone’s getting off their ass. I want to roll with these people!

You can and should read the whole thing, even though it is a predictable liberal Valentine to these digital anarchist thugs.

What happens is that this sort of online vigilante act permits people to think they have a license to break the law because (a) it’s for a “cause,” and (b) they’re surrounded by a like-minded mob.

People who’ve played too many video games or watched too many science fiction movies buy into the fantasy of themselves as mighty heroes when, in fact, they’re 25-year-old pizza-joint waiters.

Or heroin-addicted douchebags.

Digital trespassing, digital theft and digital vandalism are justly regarded as criminal acts, yet the WikiLeaks/Anonymous/Occupy mentality has no regard for the concept of private property online, nor does it have any respect for national security. Their crusades are never really about any “principle” or “ideal.” They’re selfish nihilists and disgruntled ego-trippers, a thug mob with no respect for anything, who claim to be acting on behalf of some noble cause simply to justify their fundamentally anti-social activities.

Such arrogant punks are, unfortunately, a very familiar type:

This tendency toward self-pity, blaming others for problems that he himself caused, appears to be a deeply engrained personality trait with Rauhauser. Incapable of accepting responsibility for his own failures, Rauhauser psychologically projects responsibility onto scapegoats, whom he demonizes and accuses of malicious motives and actions, as a means of justifying his attacks on them, attacks that he encourages others to join.

And it’s all fun and games until somebody gets busted by the feds.

Me? I’m just a dude with a blog. Is it my fault crazy people hate me?

BomberSuesBloggers.com